UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934

(Amendment No.    )

Filed by the Registrantx                            Filed by a Party other than the Registrant¨

Check the appropriate box:

 

¨ Preliminary Proxy Statement

 

¨ Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))

 

x Definitive Proxy Statement

 

¨ Definitive Additional Materials

 

¨ Soliciting Material Pursuant to §240.14a-12

Unum Group

 

(Name of Registrant as Specified In Its Charter)

 

  

 

(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)

Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):

 

x No fee required.

 

¨ Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11.

 

 (1) Title of each class of securities to which the transaction applies:

 

 

  

 

 (2) Aggregate number of securities to which the transaction applies:

 

 

  

 

 (3) Per unit price or other underlying value of the transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

 

 

  

 

 (4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of the transaction:

 

 

  

 

 (5) Total fee paid:

 

 

  

 

 

¨ Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.

 

¨ Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.

 

 (1) Amount Previously Paid:

 

 

  

 

 (2) Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

 

 

  

 

 (3) Filing Party:

 

 

  

 

 (4) Date Filed:

 

 

  

 

 


 

LOGO

NOTICEOF ANNUAL MEETING

AND

PROXY STATEMENT

ANNUAL MEETINGOF SHAREHOLDERS

THURSDAY, MAY 24, 2012

2211 CONGRESS STREET, PORTLAND, MAINELOGO


LOGO

April 12, 2012

Dear Fellow Shareholder:

On behalf of the Board of Directors and all of the employees of Unum, it is my pleasure to invite you to our 2012 Annual Meeting of Shareholders on Thursday, May 24, 2012. This year’s meeting will be held at 10:00 a.m. Eastern Time at our corporate offices located at 2211 Congress Street in Portland, Maine.

At this year’s meeting, you will be asked to elect four directors for terms expiring in 2015, cast an advisory vote to approve executive compensation, approve our Stock Incentive Plan of 2012, and ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2012. Shareholders will also consider any other business that may properly come before the meeting.

Each of the scheduled voting items is described in the accompanying proxy statement. The Board of Directors recommends that you vote in favor of each voting item.

For more information on attending the meeting, voting eligibility and how to cast a vote on these items, please review the sections of the accompanying proxy statement entitled “About this Proxy Statement” and “About the Annual Meeting” that begin on pages 11 and 133, respectively.

Your vote is important. Whether or not you plan to attend the meeting, I hope you will vote as soon as possible.

Thank you for your support of Unum. We look forward to seeing you at the meeting.

Sincerely,

LOGO

Thomas R. Watjen

President and Chief Executive Officer
LOGO

 

Unum Group3


4Unum Group


LOGO

April 12, 2012

Notice of 2012 Annual Meeting of Shareholders

Time and Date

10:00 a.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, May 24, 2012

Place

Unum Group

2211 Congress Street

Portland, Maine 04122

Webcast

An audio webcast of the Annual Meeting will be available on our website at www.unum.com in the Investors area beginning at 10:00 a.m. Eastern Time on May 24, 2012. The webcast will be archived on the website through June 7, 2012. Information on the website, other than the Proxy Statement and form of proxy, is not a part of our proxy soliciting material.

Items of Business

•      To elect four members of the Board of Directors, each for a three-year term expiring in 2015;

•      To conduct an advisory vote to approve executive compensation;

•      To vote on approval of our Stock Incentive Plan of 2012;

•      To ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2012; and

•      To transact other business that may properly come before the meeting.

Record Date

You may vote at the Annual Meeting, and at any adjournment or postponement thereof, if you were a shareholder of record at the close of business on March 26, 2012.

Proxy Voting

Your vote is important. Please vote as soon as possible. You may vote by proxy over the Internet or by phone, or if you received paper copies of the proxy materials, you may also vote by following the instructions on the proxy card or voting instruction card.

Annual Report to Shareholders

Our 2011 Annual Report to Shareholders, which includes audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011, and the accompanying Proxy Statement, are first being mailed and made available electronically to shareholders on or about April 12, 2012.

LOGO

Susan N. Roth

Vice President, Transactions, SEC and Corporate Secretary

Unum Group5


6Unum Group


Table of Contents

Proxy Summary Information

7

Performance Highlights

7

Capital Generation for Shareholders

8

Total Shareholder Return

8

2013 Compensation and Benefits Highlights

   9  

About this Proxy Statement2013 Say-on-Pay Vote

10

Key Corporate Governance Practices

10

Voting Items

   11  

Items to be Acted On at the Meeting

13

Information About the Board of Directors

   2712  

Nominees for Election as Directors with Terms Expiring in 2015

   2712  

ContinuingAdditional Directors with Terms Expiring in 2013 and 2014

   2914

Director Compensation

18

Corporate Governance

22

Corporate Governance Guidelines

22

Board Leadership Structure

22

Director Independence

22

Process for Nominating Directors

23

Limits on Board and Audit Committee Service

23

Board Meetings and Attendance

24  

Committees of the Board

   3324  

Board Leadership StructureThe Board’s Role in Risk Oversight

   37

Compensation of Directors

3826  

Director Selection ProcessRetirement Policy

   41

Independence of Directors

4527  

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

   4627  

Our Related Party TransactionTransactions and Policy

   4728  

Codes of Conduct and Ethics

   4728  

Interested Parties’ Communications withReport of the BoardAudit Committee

   4829  

Corporate Governance GuidelinesCompensation Discussion and Analysis

   4831  

About the Independent AuditorsBusiness and Performance Review

   4931  

Audit Committee Report2013 Compensation and Benefits Actions

   5134

2013 Say-on-Pay Vote

35

Compensation Program Structure and Committee Decisions

36

Individual Performance Assessments

40

Company Performance Targets

44

Compensation Decisions

50

Compensation Contracts and Agreements

57

Compensation Policies and Practices

59  

Report of the Human Capital Committee

   53

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

55

Executive Summary

56

2011 Business Overview

58

Compensation Philosophy and Processes

62

Benchmarking and Peer Group Design

65

Individual Performance Assessment

68

Elements of Pay

69

Executive Compensation Summaries

86

Compensation Contracts and Agreements

94

Compensation Policies and Practices

9661  

Compensation Tables

   10062

2013 Summary Compensation Table

62

2013 Grants of Plan-Based Awards

64

2013 Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End

66

Vesting Schedule for Unvested Restricted Stock Units

67

2013 Option Exercises and Stock Vested

68  

Post-Employment Compensation

   108

General Releases, Waivers and Post Employment Covenants

120

Equity Compensation Plan Information

12169  

Ownership of Company Securities

   12580  

Security Ownership of Directors and Officers

   12580  

Unum Group7


Security Ownership of Certain Shareholders

   12781  

Section 16(a) — Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

   12982  

Risk AnalysisItems to Be Voted On

   13183  

Risk ManagementElection of Directors

   13183  

Advisory Vote to Approve Executive Compensation Risk

   13184

Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

84  

About the Annual Meeting and Voting

   13386

Additional Information

90  

Appendix A: Unum Group Stock Incentive PlanReconciliation of 2012Non-GAAP Financial Measures

   A-1  

Appendix B: Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measures

B-1

Appendix C: Directions to the Annual Meeting

   C-1B-1  

8Unum Group


2012 Proxy StatementProxy Summary

 

 

Proxy Summary

This summary highlights information contained in this Proxy Statement. The summary does not contain all of the information that you should consider, and you should read the entire Proxy Statement carefully before voting.

Voting Items and Recommendations

Item  
No.
  Voting Item  Board Vote
Recommendation
  

  Page Reference  

(for more detail)

1  Election of four directors for terms expiring in 2015  FOR EACH NOMINEE  13
2  Advisory vote to approve executive compensation  FOR  13
3  Vote on approval of the Stock Incentive Plan of 2012  FOR  14
4  Ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as independent registered public accounting firm for 2012  FOR  25

Director Nominees for Terms Expiring in 2015

Name    Age      Director  
Since
  Occupation     Independent     Committee
  Memberships  

 

Pamela H. Godwin

  

 

63

  

 

2004

  

 

President,

Change Partners, Inc.

 

 

Yes

 

 

FC – Member

GC – Member

Thomas Kinser  68  2004  Former President and CEO, BlueCross BlueShield of Tennessee Yes 

AC – Member

HCC – Member  

A.S. (Pat) MacMillan, Jr.  68  1995  

CEO,

Triaxia Partners, Inc.

 Yes 

HCC – Chair

RCC – Member

Edward J. Muhl  67  2005  Former National Leader of the Insurance Regulatory Advisory Practice, PriceWaterhouseCoopers Yes 

HCC – Member

RCC – Member

AC    Audit Committee

FC    Finance Committee

GC      Governance Committee

HCC    Human Capital Committee

RCC    Regulatory Compliance  

            Committee

Unum Group9


Proxy Summary2012 Proxy Statement

Advisory Vote to Approve Executive Compensation

Our Board of Directors unanimously recommends that shareholders vote to approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the company’s named executive officers, as disclosed in this Proxy Statement. We believe our compensation programs and practices carry out our philosophy of aligning pay with performance and attracting and retaining top talent. A substantial percentage of the total compensation of our named executive officers is “at risk” as it is contingent on the achievement of individual performance objectives and corporate performance targets that the Human Capital Committee and Board of Directors believe promote the creation of shareholder value and position the company for long-term success. Our discussion of executive compensation begins on page 55.

Stock Incentive Plan of 2012

We are seeking shareholder approval of our Stock Incentive Plan of 2012. Though substantially similar to our current Stock Incentive Plan of 2007, as amended, which was approved by shareholders at our 2007 Annual Meeting, the 2012 plan has been updated to include certain terms (such as “double-trigger” vesting in respect of change in control events) we believe are more representative of current compensation practices in our industry. If the 2012 plan is approved by shareholders:

We may continue to elect to deduct all performance-based compensation paid to certain senior executives, in accordance with Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code, which requires that shareholders approve the material terms of the performance goals under which performance-based compensation is to be paid at least every five years;

New awards pursuant to our existing long-term incentive program will be made under the 2012 plan, and will no longer be made under the 2007 plan; and

We will continue to use our long-term incentive plan to attract, retain and motivate officers, employees, directors and/or consultants, which provides incentives directly linked to shareholder value.

A description of the 2012 plan,furnishing proxy materials, including a summary of material differences from the 2007 plan, begins on page 14.

Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

We ask that our shareholders ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2012. A summary of Ernst & Young’s fees for services provided in 2011 and 2010 is below. Additional information concerning our independent registered public accounting firm begins on page 49.

   Year Ended December 31, 
  Types of Fees    2011   2010 

 

  Audit Fees

  $7,608,443    $7,151,455  

 

  Audit-Related Fees

   618,579     405,450  

 

  Tax Fees

   96,662     32,695  

 

  All Other Fees

        119,006  

 

Total

  $8,323,684    $7,708,606  

10Unum Group


2012 Proxy StatementAbout this Proxy Statement

About this Proxy Statement

You are receiving these materialsproxy statement, in connection with the solicitation of proxies on behalf of the Board of Directors of Unum Group (referred to as “we”, “Unum” or “the company”) to be voted at the Annual Meeting2014 annual meeting of Shareholders on Thursday, May 24, 2012,shareholders of Unum Group (Annual Meeting) and at any adjournment or postponement of the Annual Meeting. The materials are being furnished by Internet or e-mail, or by mail if you have requested this method or it is required. This Proxy Statement and the accompanyingthereof. Our proxy materials are first being mailed and made available electronically to shareholders on or about April 12, 2012.9, 2014.

The

Notice of Annual Meeting will take place at 10:00 a.m. Eastern Time on May 24, 2012, at our corporate offices at 2211 Congress Street, Portland, Maine 04122.

What is included in the company’s proxy materials?

Our proxy materials include thisof Shareholders and 2014 Proxy Statement and our 2011 Annual Report to Shareholders, which includes audited consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011. If you received a printed version of these materials by mail you also received a proxy card or voting instruction card for the meeting.| 3 

Why did I receive a notice in the mail regarding the Internet availability of proxy materials instead of a full printed set?

As a convenience to our shareholders and to help save both costs and the environment, this year we are pleased to again be furnishing proxy materials over the Internet. As a result, we are mailing to many of our shareholders a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials instead of a printed set of materials. All shareholders receiving the notice will have the ability to access the proxy materials over the Internet and may also request to receive a printed set of these materials by mail. The notice will also serve as an admission ticket for the Annual Meeting.


How can I get electronic access to the proxy materials?LOGO

Instructions on how to access electronic materials are included in the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials and in the proxy card or voting instruction card. These provide information on how to:

View our proxy materials for the Annual Meeting over the Internet; and

Request that future proxy materials be sent to you by e-mail.

Our proxy materials are available on our website at www.unum.com in the Investors area under Proxy Materials. If you choose to access future proxy materials electronically, you will receive an e-mail with instructions detailing where those materials are available and how to vote by proxy. Your decision to receive proxy materials by e-mail will remain in effect until you change it.

How can I communicate with the company or obtain copies of corporate documents and SEC filings?

Shareholders may communicate with us or obtain copies of corporate documents, committee charters and SEC filings by contacting the Office of the Corporate Secretary as described below. In addition, SEC

 

Unum Group 11

April 9, 2014

Dear Fellow Shareholder:

As members of your Board of Directors, our primary focus is on creating long-term value for our shareholders. We accomplish that in a number of ways, from setting a clear strategic course for the company, to helping management develop sound operating and financial plans, to assuring that management executes those plans in a responsible manner.

Our vision as a company is to be the leading provider of employee benefits products and services that help employers manage their businesses and employees protect their livelihoods. In 2013, we continued to make steady progress toward this vision through solid financial results and consistent operating performance across all of our business units. This, in turn, drove significant value for our shareholders.

In particular, we would note these 2013 highlights:(1)

•     We reported pre-tax operating income of $1.24 billion and after tax operating income of $882.5 million, both record highs, on operating revenues of $10.35 billion. Our operating earnings per share were a record $3.32, a 5.4% increase.

•     We delivered on our commitments to our customers by paying more than $6 billion in benefits and achieving consistently high customer satisfaction metrics.

•     We drove value for our shareholders by increasing our book value per share 9.4% from the prior year. We also returned capital by paying $146.5 million in dividends and repurchasing more than $318 million of shares. Since 2007, we have repurchased $2.5 billion of shares, or 30% of shares outstanding.

•     We achieved a one-year total shareholder return (TSR) of 71.8%, a significant improvement over the prior year.

Transparency, accountability, integrity, and sound risk management form the foundation of our culture at Unum. We are pleased that our corporate citizenship efforts have been recognized by several independent organizations, including being named one ofForbes Most Reputable Companies and 100 Most Trustworthy Companies, a member of the Dow Jones Sustainability North American Index and one of the Best Places to Work in Insurance byBusiness Insurance.You can learn about these and other awards on our website atwww.unumgroup.com/about/awards.

(1)Operating results referenced in this letter exclude certain specified items. For 2013, these include net realized investment gains and losses, non-operating retirement-related gains or losses, the unclaimed death benefits reserve increase and the group life waiver of premium benefit reserve reduction. For reconciliations of the non-GAAP financial measures, including operating income, operating revenue, operating earnings per share, return on equity and book value per share (excluding accumulated other comprehensive income, or AOCI), to the most directly comparable GAAP measures, refer toAppendix A.

 4 | Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and 2014 Proxy Statement


About this Proxy Statement 2012 Proxy Statement

Listening carefully to our shareholders is also an important part of our culture. Your continued feedback is invaluable to us as we work to fulfill our role as directors. Participation in our Annual Meeting is one of the important ways you can provide feedback to us. We also regularly solicit feedback from shareholders on key issues. While shareholders generally have approved of our overall executive compensation program, we continued our outreach program to institutional investors and proxy advisory firms to solicit input regarding our executive compensation programs and other governance matters.

We remain pleased with our 2013 operating and financial performance, and we are confident that we are continuing to do all the things necessary to create value for our shareholders.

On behalf of our employees and the entire leadership team, we would like to thank you for your continued support of Unum.

LOGOLOGOLOGO
Theodore H. Bunting, Jr.E. Michael CaulfieldPamela H. Godwin
LOGOLOGOLOGO
Ronald E. GoldsberryKevin T. KabatTimothy F. Keaney
LOGOLOGOLOGO
Thomas KinserGloria LarsonA.S. MacMillan, Jr.
LOGOLOGOLOGO
Edward J. MuhiMichael J. PassarellaWilliam J. Ryan
LOGO

Thomas R. Watjen

 

filings, corporate governance information

Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and other documents are available on our website at www.unum.com in the Investors area.2014 Proxy Statement | 5 

How can I contact the Office


LOGO

The 2014 annual meeting of the Corporate Secretary?

Shareholders may contact the Officeshareholders of the Corporate Secretary by calling toll-free 800-718-8824 or by writing to the following address:

Office of the Corporate Secretary

Unum Group

1 Fountain Square

Chattanooga, Tennessee 37402

Where are the company’s principal offices?

Our principal executive offices are at 1 Fountain Square, Chattanooga, Tennessee 37402. Our main telephone number is 423-294-1011.

will be held:

 

12Date:    Unum GroupTuesday, May 20, 2014


2012 Proxy StatementTime:    Items to be Acted On at10:00 a.m. Eastern Time
Place:Colonial Life
1200 Colonial Life Boulevard
Columbia, South Carolina 29210

The items of business are:

To elect four directors named in the Meetingproxy statement, each for a one-year term expiring in 2015;

 

To conduct an advisory vote to approve executive compensation;

To ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the company’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2014; and

To transact other business that may properly come before the meeting.

Management will also review the company’s 2013 performance and its outlook for the future.

Shareholders of record of the company’s common stock (NYSE: UNM) at the close of business on March 27, 2014 are entitled to vote at the meeting and any adjournments or postponements of the meeting.

 

Items to be Acted On at the MeetingLOGO

Susan N. Roth

Election of DirectorsVice President, Transactions, SEC and Corporate Secretary

April 9, 2014

(Item 1 on theImportant Notice Regarding Availability of Proxy Card)

Our Board of Directors currently has 11 members and is divided into three classes, each comprised of an approximately equal number of directors. Each year, shareholders elect a class of directors to serveMaterials for three-year terms. At this Annual Meeting, we have nominated four persons to serve as directors until the Annual Meeting to be held in 2015.

The Board of Directors recommends the election of Pamela H. Godwin, Thomas Kinser, A.S. (Pat) MacMillan, Jr. and Edward J. Muhl, each to hold office for a term of three years expiring at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held in 2015,Held on May 20, 2014: The proxy statement and until his or her successor is duly elected and qualified or until his or her earlier resignation, retirement or removal. Each nominee is currently serving as a memberannual report to shareholders are available atwww.envisionreports.com/unm.

 6 | Notice of our Board of Directors. Information concerning these candidates is provided under the section titled “Nominees for Election as Directors with Terms Expiring in 2015” beginning on page 27.

We have no reason to believe that any nominee would be unable to serve if elected. However, if for any reason a nominee were to become unable to serve at or before the Annual Meeting of Shareholders and 2014 Proxy Statement


LOGO

This summary is intended to highlight certain key information contained in this proxy statement that, we believe, will assist your review of the Boarditems of Directors could either reduce the number of directors or nominate someone else to stand for election. The persons we have designated as proxy holders could use their discretion to vote for any such substitute nominee.

For any nomineebusiness to be elected, he or she must receive a majority of the votes castvoted on at the Annual Meeting. As it is only a summary, we encourage you to review the full proxy statement and our annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013 (2013 10-K) for more complete information about these topics.

THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE “FOR” THE ELECTION OF EACH OF THE NOMINEES FOR DIRECTOR: PAMELA H. GODWIN, THOMAS KINSER, A.S. (PAT) MACMILLAN, JR. AND EDWARD J. MUHL.Performance Highlights

At next year’sLast year was a successful one for Unum as we delivered strong financial and operating performance across the company. Although we continued to face some economic headwinds – particularly in the form of low interest rates and modest job and salary growth – our businesses have adapted well and delivered consistent, predictable results.

Our key financial highlights for 2013 include:(1)

Pre-tax operating income of $1.24 billion and after tax operating income of $882.5 million, both record highs, and operating revenues of $10.35 billion;

Record operating earnings per share of $3.32, a 5.4% increase from the prior year and the eighth consecutive year of operating earnings per share (EPS) growth;

Consolidated return on equity of 11.4% (14.2% in our three primary operating businesses);

Book value per share growth of 9.4% from 2012 (excluding AOCI), the fifth year of growth; and

Strong investment results and, through our emphasis on sound risk management, a credit quality that remains among the best in the industry.

Our key operating highlights for 2013 include:

Meeting our commitments to customers by paying more than $6 billion in benefits to people facing illness, injury or loss of life;

High customer satisfaction metrics that generally exceeded our plan benchmarks; and

A strong company brand, image and reputation.

LOGO

(1)Operating results referenced throughout this document exclude certain specified items. For 2013, these include net realized investment gains and losses, non-operating retirement-related gains or losses, the unclaimed death benefits reserve increase and the group life waiver of premium benefit reserve reduction. For reconciliations of the non-GAAP financial measures, including operating income, operating revenue, operating earnings per share, return on equity and book value per share (excluding accumulated other comprehensive income, or AOCI), to the most directly comparable GAAP measures, refer toAppendix A.

Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and 2014 Proxy Statement | 7 


 Proxy Summary Information

Capital Generation for Shareholders

Because of these and other accomplishments in 2013, our capital generation remained strong and we were able to deploy that capital to invest in and strengthen our businesses, as well as return it to shareholders through share repurchases totaling more than $318 million and a dividend payout of $146.5 million, an 11.5% increase from the prior year.

Total Shareholder Return

Total shareholder return (TSR) comparisons vary significantly based upon the indices and time periods considered. On a one-year basis, our TSR was 71.8%, outperforming our proxy peers, the S&P Life and Health Index, and the broader S&P 500. On a three- and five-year basis, we were consistent with the S&P Life and Health Index – the group that most closely aligns with our industry – and were generally in line with the S&P 500. Our performance trailed our proxy peers during that time, illustrating the significant volatility seen as a result of the financial crisis and the impact it had on the smaller Proxy Peer Group when compared with broader indices.

We are pleased that our track record of solid operating performance and returning value to shareholders was recognized in 2013 with our share price reaching levels nearer the historical valuation of our company.

LOGO

 8 | Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and 2014 Proxy Statement


Proxy Summary Information  

2013 Compensation and Benefits Highlights

The financial and operational performance of the company, expects to seek shareholder approval of amendments to its certificate of incorporation to provide for the annual election of all directors, beginning at the 2016 Annual Meeting. If the amendments are approved, the declassification of the Board would be phased in so that all directors elected by shareholders at or after the 2014 Annual Meeting would be elected for terms that would end at the following year’s Annual Meeting.

Advisory Vote to Approve Executive Compensation

(Item 2as outlined on the Proxy Card)

Our Boardpreceding pages and in our 2013 10-K, resulted in above plan achievement for all of Directors has decided to hold a shareholder advisory vote with respect toour business units (see accompanying table). This high performance is also recognized in the compensationindividual performance assessments and achievement levels of our named executive officers, every year. Thewhich are described beginning on page 42.

During 2013, the Committee took the following resolution asks that you approveactions with respect to compensation and benefits:

      PLAN ACHIEVEMENT LEVELS
    Plan  2013  2012    

    Unum Group

  111%  95%    

    Unum US

  103%  105%    

    Unum UK

  110%  65%    

    Colonial Life

  105%  95%    

    Investments

  109%  105%    

We amended the terms of our defined benefit pension plans to freeze further accrual of retirement benefits provided to U.S. employees on December 31, 2013. Effective January 1, 2014, we transitioned to a defined contribution plan for all employees in which Unum provides a 4.5% company contribution for those employees who have completed one year of service.

By freezing further accrual of retirement benefits provided to employees under the defined benefit pension plans, we effectively eliminated a change in control benefit otherwise available to executives who are parties to change in control severance agreements with the company. The benefit eliminated is a lump sum payment equal to the increased actuarial present value of the executive’s retirement benefit under the defined benefit pension plan assuming two additional years of age and service credit following termination of employment in connection with a change in control.

oIn the future, executives currently covered by change in control severance agreements will receive two additional years of contributions under the company’s non-qualified defined contribution plan in the event of a termination of employment in connection with a change in control.

At Mr. Watjen’s request to be consistent with all other employees, we amended his employment agreement to freeze further accrual of his retirement benefit under the Unum Group Senior Executive Retirement Plan (SERP) (which is described in his employment agreement) as of December 31, 2013. As part of the revisions to Mr. Watjen’s employment agreement, we also:

oEliminated the Section 280G excise tax gross-up;

oReduced severance payable in the event of termination by the company without “cause” or by Mr. Watjen for “good reason” outside of certain “change in control” periods (each as defined in his employment agreement) by:

¡

Decreasing the severance multiple from three times the sum of base salary and average bonus to two times the sum of base salary and average bonus; and

¡

Reducing health and welfare benefits continuation from three years of continuation to two years of continuation; and

oEliminated a lump sum severance payment that was equal to the increased actuarial present value of Mr. Watjen’s retirement benefit under the SERP assuming three additional years of age and service credit following termination of employment.

Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and 2014 Proxy Statement | 9 


 Proxy Summary Information

2013 Say-on-Pay Vote

Last year’s advisory vote on executive compensation (or “say-on-pay” vote) passed with 76% approval. This was higher than the compensationprevious year’s vote and included support from 12 of our 13 largest shareholders. We continue to strive to improve the level of shareholder support for our named executive officersofficer compensation.

Over the last several years, the company has had an extensive outreach program to shareholders and proxy advisory firms, with a particular focus on soliciting input on our executive compensation program.

The Human Capital Committee provided feedback and guidance with respect to the proposed agenda to be used during our shareholder outreach program. Throughout the process, the Committee was updated on our conversations with both institutional investors as describedwell as proxy advisory firms, including their feedback on our executive compensation programs. The Committee values shareholder feedback and takes the results of the say-on-pay vote and the shareholder feedback into consideration as it makes compensation decisions.

In 2012, we received specific feedback, including:

A preference for a three-year performance cycle for the long-term incentive plan;

Requests for a reduction in the amount of overlap between annual and long-term incentive plan goals; and

Requests for enhanced disclosure of the goals for the annual and long-term incentive plans.

The Committee responded to the feedback and made changes in this2013, which included:

Introducing performance share units (PSUs) based on three-year, prospective average return on equity and average earnings per share goals, with a modifier tied to relative total shareholder return;

Establishing new performance goals for our long-term incentive plan to reduce the overlap with the performance goals for our annual incentive plan;

Enhancing proxy disclosure to provide a more detailed explanation of the rationale behind compensation decisions and a more comprehensive discussion of goals, individual performance and the linkage to compensation; and

Supplementing disclosure of our annual and long-term incentive performance metrics by including threshold, maximum and actual performance levels for each metric.

In 2013, the company again solicited feedback from institutional shareholders and proxy advisory firms. The feedback from our outreach in 2013 indicated that shareholders agreed with the changes we made to the long-term incentive program, particularly the use of PSUs with three-year corporate performance goals and a payout modifier tied to relative TSR. No additional concerns were identified by shareholders with respect to our executive compensation programs in the course of our 2013 shareholder outreach.

Key Corporate Governance Practices

We are committed to good corporate governance, as evidenced by the following practices:

Pay for performance;

Annual say-on-pay votes;

 10 | Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and 2014 Proxy Statement:Statement


Proxy Summary Information  

 

Robust stock ownership and retention requirements for senior officers and directors;

Anti-pledging and anti-hedging policies applicable to executives and directors;

No poison pill;

Non-executive chairman;

Majority voting for directors;

Board declassification in progress;

Substantially independent Board (CEO only non-independent director);

Restriction on other board and audit committee service;

Executive sessions of independent directors at each regularly scheduled Board meeting;

High meeting attendance by directors (average attendance of 95% in 2013);

Double-trigger required for accelerated vesting of equity;

Independent compensation consultant;

Minimum perquisites; and

No excise tax gross-ups after 2010.

Voting Items

The following items will be voted on at the Annual Meeting:

 

Unum Group13


Items to be Acted On at the Meeting      VOTING ITEMS
  2012 Proxy Statement For More Information  Board Recommends 
 Item 1. Election of directorsPage 83FOR

Four directors are seeking re-election for terms expiring in 2015:

each nominee
            Timothy F. KeaneyWilliam J. Ryan
            Gloria C. LarsonThomas R. Watjen
 Item 2. Advisory vote to approve executive compensationPage 84FOR

An advisory vote to approve the compensation of our named executive officers.

 Item 3. Ratification of appointment of independent registered  public accounting firmPage 84FOR

A vote to ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP.

 

 

RESOLVED, that the shareholders approve, on an advisory basis, the compensationNotice of the company’s named executive officers, as disclosed pursuant to Item 402 of Regulation S-K in the company’s proxy statement for the 2012 Annual Meeting of Shareholders including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, compensation tables and related narrative discussion.

Advisory approval of the compensation of our named executive officers as described in this2014 Proxy Statement requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes entitled to be cast by shareholders represented and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting.| 11 

Although this vote will not be binding, the Human Capital Committee will carefully consider the outcome in connection with its ongoing evaluation of the company’s compensation program


LOGO

Below are brief biographies for named executive officers and when considering future executive compensation arrangements.

THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE “FOR” APPROVAL OF NAMED EXECUTIVE OFFICER COMPENSATION, AS PROVIDED IN THE RESOLUTION ABOVE.

Vote on Approval of the Unum Group Stock Incentive Plan of 2012

(Item 3 on the Proxy Card)

We ask that our shareholders vote to approve the Unum Group Stock Incentive Plan of 2012 (the “2012 Plan”). The 2012 Plan was adopted by the Human Capital Committee of the Board of Directors on February 21, 2012, subject to such approval. If approved by shareholders at the Annual Meeting, the 2012 Plan will become effective on that date (the “Effective Date”).

Our existing Stock Incentive Plan of 2007, as amended (the “2007 Plan”), was approved by shareholders at our 2007 Annual Meeting. Though substantially similar to the 2007 Plan, the 2012 Plan has been updated to include certain terms (such as “double-trigger” vesting in respect of change in control events) we believe are more representative of current compensation practices in our industry. If the 2012 Plan is approved by shareholders:

We may continue to elect to deduct all performance-based compensation paid to certain senior executives, in accordance with Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code (the “Code”), which requires that shareholders approve the material terms of the performance goals under which performance-based compensation is to be paid at least every five years;

New awards pursuant to our existing long-term incentive program will be made under the 2012 Plan, and will no longer be made under the 2007 Plan; and

We will continue to use our long-term incentive plan to attract, retain and motivate officers, employees, directors and/or consultants, which provides incentives directly linked to shareholder value.

Section 162(m) of the Code generally places a $1 million annual limit on a company’s tax deduction for compensation paid to certain senior executives, other than compensation that satisfies the applicable

14Unum Group


2012 Proxy StatementItems to be Acted On at the Meeting

requirements for a performance-based compensation exception. To qualify as performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) of the Code, the compensation must (among other requirements) be subject to attainment of performance goals that have been disclosed to shareholders and approved by a majority shareholder vote. We are asking shareholders at the 2012 Annual Meeting to approve the material terms of the performance goals under the 2012 Plan so that the company may make awards that qualify as performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) of the Code, and thus, would be tax-deductible. For purposes of Section 162(m) of the Code, the material terms of the performance goals requiring shareholder approval include the following:

the employees eligible to receive awards under the 2012 Plan;

the business criteria used as the basis for the performance goals; and

the limits on the maximum amount of compensation payable to any employee in a given time period.

By approving the 2012 Plan, shareholders will be approving, among other things, the eligibility requirements, performance goals and limits on various stock awards contained therein for purposes of Section 162(m) of the Code.

If the 2012 Plan is approved by our shareholders, no new awards may be granted under the 2007 Plan. However, awards previously granted and outstanding under the 2007 Plan will remain in full force and effect under the 2007 Plan according to their terms, and to the extent that any such award is forfeited, terminates, expires or lapses without being exercised (to the extent applicable), or is settled for cash, shares of our common stock subject to such award that are not delivered as a result will not be available for awards under the 2012 Plan. Dividend equivalents, however, may continue to be issued under the 2007 Plan in respect of awards granted under the 2007 Plan which are outstanding as of the Effective Date.

As of March 15, 2012, the shares to be issued upon the exercise or the settlement of outstanding awards under our existing equity compensation plans were as follows:

1,738,844 shares underlying outstanding options, with a weighted average exercise price of $20.71 and a weighted average remaining contractual term of 5.4 years; and

1,762,647 outstanding full-value awards (consisting of 1,619,994 restricted stock units and 142,653 deferred share rights).

Similar to the 2007 Plan, the purpose of the 2012 Plan is to allow us to attract, retain and motivate officers, employees, directors and/or consultants and to provide us and our subsidiaries and affiliates with a long-term incentive plan providing incentives directly linked to shareholder value.

A summary of the 2012 Plan, and a summary of the material differences between the terms and conditions of the 2012 Plan and the terms and conditions of the 2007 Plan, are set forth below. The summary of the 2012 Plan is qualified in its entirety by the full text of the 2012 Plan, which is included in this Proxy Statement asAppendix A.

Unum Group15


Items to be Acted On at the Meeting2012 Proxy Statement

Summary of Material Differences Between the 2012 Plan and the 2007 Plan

Consequences of Change in Control. The 2007 Plan provides that all awards granted and outstanding thereunder vest in full and are no longer subject to forfeiture upon a change in control of the company. Awards granted and outstanding under the 2012 Plan, however, vest upon a change in control only if equivalent replacement awards are not substituted for such awards at the time of the change in control. If equivalent replacement awards are substituted for the awards granted and outstanding under the 2012 Plan at the time of a change in control of the company, such awards vest upon a termination of employment by reason of death, disability or retirement or without cause or a resignation for “good reason” in each case within two years after such change in control (i.e., the awards “double-trigger” vest).

Individual Limitations On Awards. The 2007 Plan provides that, during any calendar year, the total number of shares that may be granted pursuant to awards to any one participant cannot exceed 1,000,000 and the maximum number of shares that may be granted pursuant to incentive stock options is 1,000,000. In response to recent guidance issued by the Internal Revenue Service under Section 162(m) of the Code, the 2012 Plan provides that no participant may be granted, in each case during any calendar year, performance-based awards intended to qualify under Section 162(m) of the Code (other than stock options and stock appreciation rights) covering in excess of 1,200,000 shares or stock options and stock appreciation rights covering in excess of 800,000 shares.

Types of Awards.The 2007 Plan permitted the grant of dividend equivalent awards with respect to all awards, including nonqualified stock options and stock appreciation rights, and did not prohibit payment of dividend equivalents in respect of unvested performance-based awards. The 2012 Plan eliminates the authorization for dividend equivalents in respect of nonqualified stock options and stock appreciation rights, and payment of dividend equivalents in respect of unvested performance-based awards is prohibited under the 2012 Plan.

Summary of the 2012 Plan

General. Awards granted under the 2012 Plan may be in the form of stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance units, other stock-based awards or any combination of those awards. The 2012 Plan provides that awards may be made under the 2012 Plan for ten years.

Administration. Under the terms of the 2012 Plan, the 2012 Plan will be administered by the Human Capital Committee of our Board, or by such other committee or subcommittee as may be appointed by our Board, and which consists entirely of two or more “outside directors” within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Code and who are “non-employee directors” as defined in Rule 16b-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and which will be referred to in this summary as the “committee.” Unless and until the Board appoints any other committee or subcommittee, the 2012 Plan will be administered by the Human Capital Committee. Under the terms of the 2012 Plan, the committee can make rules and regulations and establish such procedures for the administration of the 2012 Plan as it deems appropriate. Any determination made by the committee under the 2012 Plan will be made in the sole discretion of the committee and such determinations will be final and binding on all persons.

Shares Available. The 2012 Plan provides that the aggregate number of shares of our common stock that may be subject to awards under the 2012 Plan cannot exceed 20,000,000 subject to adjustment in certain circumstances to prevent dilution or enlargement. No participant may be granted, during any

16Unum Group


2012 Proxy StatementItems to be Acted On at the Meeting

calendar year, performance-based awards intended to qualify under Section 162(m) of the Code (other than stock options and stock appreciation rights) covering in excess of 1,200,000 shares or stock options and stock appreciation rights covering in excess of 800,000 shares. The maximum number of shares that may be granted pursuant to incentive stock options is 1,000,000. For purposes of the limits set forth above, each full-value award (i.e., each award other than a stock option or stock appreciation right) shall be counted as 1.76 shares.

As described above, if the 2012 Plan is approved by our shareholders, no new awards may be granted under the 2007 Plan. However, awards previously granted and outstanding under the 2007 Plan will remain in full force and effect under the 2007 Plan according to their respective terms, and to the extent that any such award is forfeited, terminates, expires or lapses without being exercised (to the extent applicable), or is settled for cash, shares of our common stock subject to such award that are not delivered as a result will not be available for awards under the 2012 Plan. Dividend equivalents, however, may continue to be issued under the 2007 Plan in respect of awards granted under the 2007 Plan which are outstanding as of the Effective Date.

Shares underlying awards that expire or are forfeited or terminated without being exercised or settled for cash will again be available for the grant of additional awards within the limits provided by the 2012 Plan. Shares withheld by or delivered to us to satisfy the exercise price of options or tax withholding obligations with respect to any award granted under the 2012 Plan will nonetheless be deemed to have been issued under the 2012 Plan.

Eligibility. The 2012 Plan provides for awards to the directors, officers, employees and consultants of the company and its subsidiaries and affiliates and prospective employees and consultants who have accepted offers of employment or consultancy from the company or its subsidiaries or affiliates, except that incentive stock options may be granted only to employees of the company and its subsidiaries. As of the date of this Proxy Statement, there were approximately 550 directors, officers and employees eligible to participate in the 2012 Plan. Our current executive officers named in the Summary Compensation Table under the caption “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” herein and each of our directors are amongand descriptions of the individuals eligible to receive awards under the 2012 Plan.

Stock Options. Subjectdirectors’ key qualifications, skills and experiences that contribute to the terms and provisions of the 2012 Plan, options to purchase shares of our common stock may be granted to eligible individuals at any time and from time to time as determined by the committee. Options may be granted as incentive stock options, which are intended to qualify for favorable treatment to the recipient under Federal tax law, or as non-qualified stock options, which do not qualify for this favorable tax treatment. Subject to the limits provided in the 2012 Plan, the committee determines the number of options granted to each recipient. Each option grant will be evidenced by a stock option agreement that specifies the option exercise price, whether the options are intended to be incentive stock options or non-qualified stock options, the duration of the options, the number of shares to which the options pertain and such additional limitations, terms and conditions as the committee may determine, but the 2012 Plan provides that, except as otherwise determined by the committee, in no event will the normal vesting schedule of an option provide that the option will vest before the first anniversary of the date of grant.

The committee determines the exercise price for each option granted, except that the option exercise price may not be less than 100 percent of the fair market value of a share of our common stock on the date of grant. As of March 15, 2012, the fair market value (as that term is defined under the 2012 Plan) of a share of our common stock was $24.64. All options granted under the 2012 Plan will expire no later

Unum Group17


Items to be Acted On at the Meeting2012 Proxy Statement

than ten years from the date of grant. The method of exercising an option granted under the 2012 Plan is set forth in the 2012 Plan as are the general provisions regarding the exercisability of incentive stock options and nonqualified stock options following certain terminations of employment. Stock options are nontransferable except by will or by the laws of descent and distribution or, in the case of non-qualified stock options, as otherwise expressly permitted by the committee. The granting of an option does not accord the recipient the rights of a shareholder, and such rights accrue only after the exercise of an option and the registration of shares of our common stock in the recipient’s name.

Stock Appreciation Rights. The committee in its discretion may grant stock appreciation rights under the 2012 Plan. Stock appreciation rights may be “tandem SARs,” which are granted in conjunction with an option, or “free-standing SARs,” which are not granted in conjunction with an option. A stock appreciation right entitles the holder to receive from us upon exercise an amount equal to the excess, if any, of the aggregate fair market value of a specified number of shares of our common stock to which such stock appreciation right pertains over the aggregate exercise price for the underlying shares. The exercise price of a Free-Standing SAR shall not be less than 100% of the fair market value of a share of our common stock on the date of grant.

A tandem SAR may be granted at the grant date of the related option. A tandem SAR will be exercisable only at such time or times and to the extent that the related option is exercisable and will have the same exercise price as the related option. A tandem SAR will terminate or be forfeited upon the exercise or forfeiture of the related option, and the related option will terminate or be forfeited upon the exercise or forfeiture of the tandem SAR.

Each SAR will be evidenced by an award agreement that specifies the base price, the number of shares to which the stock appreciation right pertains and such additional limitations, terms and conditions as the committee may determine, but the 2012 Plan provides that, except as otherwise determined by the committee, in no event will the normal vesting schedule of a SAR provide that the right will vest before the first anniversary of the date of grant. We may make payment of the amount to which the participant exercising stock appreciation rights is entitled by delivering shares of our common stock, cash or a combination of stock and cash as set forth in the award agreement relating to the stock appreciation rights. The method of exercising a stock appreciation right granted under the 2012 Plan is set forth in the 2012 Plan as are the general provisions regarding the exercisability of SARs following terminations of employment. Stock appreciation rights are not transferable except by will or the laws of descent and distribution or, with respect to stock appreciation rights that are not granted in “tandem” with an option, as expressly permitted by the committee. Each stock appreciation right will be evidenced by an award agreement that specifies the date and terms of the award and such additional limitations, terms and conditions as the committee may determine.

Restricted Stock. The 2012 Plan provides for the award of shares of our common stock that are subject to forfeiture and restrictions on transferability as set forth in the 2012 Plan and as may be otherwise determined by the committee. Except for these restrictions and any others imposed by the committee, upon the grant of restricted stock, the recipient will have rights of a stockholder with respect to the restricted stock, including the right to vote the restricted stock and to receive all dividends and other distributions paid or made with respect to the restricted stock. During the restriction period set by the committee, the recipient may not sell, transfer, pledge, exchange or otherwise encumber the restricted stock. Subject to the terms of the 2012 Plan and award agreements covering the shares, any award of restricted stock will be subject to vesting during a restriction period of at least three years following the date of grant, except that a restriction period of at least one year is permissible if vesting is conditioned

18Unum Group


2012 Proxy StatementItems to be Acted On at the Meeting

upon the achievement of performance goals established by the committee. Subject to the terms of the 2012 Plan and award agreements covering the shares, an award of restricted stock may vest in part on a pro rata basis prior to the expiration of any restriction period, and up to five percent of shares available for grant as restricted stock (together with all other shares available for grant as full-value awards under the 2012 Plan) may be granted without regard to the restriction period, and the committee may accelerate the vesting and lapse of any restrictions with respect to any such restricted stock award.

Restricted Stock Units. The 2012 Plan authorizes the committee to grant restricted stock units and deferred share rights. Restricted stock units and deferred share rights are not shares of our common stock and do not entitle the recipients to the rights of a shareholder. Restricted stock units granted under the 2012 Plan may or may not be subject to performance conditions. The recipient may not sell, transfer, pledge or otherwise encumber restricted stock units granted under the 2012 Plan prior to their vesting. Restricted stock units will be settled in cash or shares of our common stock, in an amount based on the fair market value of our common stock on the settlement date.

Subject to the terms of the 2012 Plan and the applicable award agreement, any award of restricted stock units will be subject to vesting during a restriction period of at least three years following the date of grant, except that a restriction period of at least one year is permissible if vesting is conditioned upon the achievement of certain performance goals established by the committee. In addition, subject to the terms of the 2012 Plan and the applicable award agreement, an award of restricted stock units may vest in part on a pro rata basis prior to the expiration of any restriction period, and up to five percent of shares available for grant subject to restricted stock units under the 2012 Plan (together with all other shares available for grant as full-value awards) may be granted without regard to the restriction period, and the Committee may accelerate the vesting and lapse of any restrictions with respect to any such restricted stock units.

Performance Units. The 2012 Plan provides for the award of performance units that are valued by reference to a designated amount of cash or other property other than shares of our common stock. The payment of the value of a performance unit is conditioned upon the achievement of performance goals set by the committee in granting the performance unit and may be paid in cash, shares of our common stock, other property or a combination thereof. The performance period for a performance unit must be at least one year. The maximum value of the property that may be paid to a participant pursuant to a performance unit in any year is $5,000,000.

Other Stock-Based Awards. The 2012 Plan also provides for the award of shares of our common stock and other awards that are valued by reference to our common stock, including unrestricted stock, dividend equivalents and convertible debentures. Awards of unrestricted stock may be granted only in lieu of compensation that would otherwise be payable to the participant. Subject to the terms of the 2012 Plan and award agreements covering the shares, any other stock-based award that is a full-value award will be subject to vesting during a restriction period of at least three years following the date of grant, except that a restriction period of at least one year is permissible if vesting is conditioned upon the achievement of certain performance goals established by the committee. In addition, subject to the terms of the 2012 Plan and award agreements covering the shares, another stock-based award that is a full-value award may vest in part on a pro rata basis prior to the expiration of any restriction period, and up to five percent of shares available for grant as other stock-based awards that are full-value awards under the 2012 Plan (together with all other shares available for grant as full-value awards) may be granted without regard to the restriction period, and the committee may accelerate the vesting and lapse of any restrictions with respect to any such other stock-based award.

Unum Group19


Items to be Acted On at the Meeting2012 Proxy Statement

Performance Goals. The 2012 Plan provides that performance goals may be established by the committee in connection with the grant of restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance units or other stock-based awards. In the case of an award intended to qualify for the performance-based compensation exception of Section 162(m) of the Code: (i) such goals will be based on the attainment of specified levels of one or more of the following measures: overall or selected premium or sales growth, expense efficiency ratios (ratio of expenses to premium income), market share, customer service measures or indices, underwriting efficiency and/or quality, persistency factors, return on net assets, economic value added, shareholder value added, embedded value added, combined ratio, expense ratio, loss ratio, premiums, risk based capital, revenues, revenue growth, earnings (including earnings before taxes, earnings before interest and taxes or earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization), earnings per share, operating income (including non-pension operating income), pre- or after-tax income, net income, cash flow (before or after dividends), cash flow per share (before or after dividends), gross margin, return on equity, return on capital (including return on total capital or return on invested capital), cash flow return on investment, return on assets or operating assets, economic value added (or an equivalent metric), stock price appreciation, total stockholder return (measured in terms of stock price appreciation and dividend growth), cost control, gross profit, operating profit, cash generation, unit volume, stock price, market share, sales, asset quality, cost saving levels, marketing-spending efficiency, core non-interest income, or change in working capital with respect to the company or any one or more subsidiaries, divisions, business units or business segments of the company either in absolute terms or relative to the performance of one or more other companies or an index covering multiple companies; and (ii) such performance goals will be set by the committee within the time period and other requirements prescribed by Section 162(m) of the Code and the regulations promulgated thereunder.

Change in Control. Unless provided otherwise in the applicable award agreement:

in the event of a “change in control” of the company (as defined in the 2012 Plan), unless equivalent replacement awards are not substituted for awards granted and outstanding under the 2012 Plan at the time of such change in control, such awards vest upon a termination of employment by reason of death, disability or retirement or without cause or a resignation for “good reason” in each case within two years after such change in control (i.e., the awards “double-trigger” vest); and

notwithstanding any other provision of the 2012 Plan to the contrary, upon the termination of employment of a participant during the two-year period following a change in control for any reason other than for cause, any option or stock appreciation right held by the participant as of the date of the change in control that remains outstanding as of the date of such termination of employment may thereafter be exercised until (i) in the case of incentive stock options, the last date on which such options would otherwise be exercisable, and (ii) in the case of nonqualified options and stock appreciation rights, the later of (A) the last date on which such option or stock appreciation right would otherwise be exercisable and (B) the earlier of (1) the third anniversary of the change in control and (2) the expiration of the option’s or stock appreciation right’s term.

An award qualifiesBoard’s effectiveness as a “replacement award” under the 2012 Plan if the following conditions are met in the sole discretion of the committee: (i) it is of the same type as the award being replaced; (ii) it has a value equal to the value of the award being replaced as of the date of the change in control; (iii) if the underlying award being replaced was an equity-based award, it relates to publicly traded equity securities of the company or the entity surviving the company following the change in control; (iv) it contains terms relating to vesting (including with respect to a termination of employment) that are substantially identical

20Unum Group


2012 Proxy StatementItems to Be Acted On at the Meeting

to those of the award being replaced; and (v) its other terms and conditions are not less favorable to the participant than the terms and conditions of the award being replaced (including the provisions that would apply in the event of a subsequent change in control) as of the date of the change in control.whole.

Termination of Employment. Unless otherwise determined by the committee:

upon a participant’s termination of employment for any reason other than death, disability, retirement or cause, any option or SAR held by the applicable participant that was exercisable immediately before the termination of employment may be exercised at any time until the earlier of (A) the 90th day following such termination of employment and (B) expiration of the term of the option or SAR;

upon a participant’s termination of employment by reason of the participant’s death, any option or SAR held by the participant will vest and be exercisable at any time until the earlier of (A) the third anniversary of the date of death and (B) the expiration of the term of the option or SAR;

upon a participant’s termination of employment by reason of disability, any option or SAR held by the participant will vest and be exercisable at any time until (A) in the case of nonqualified options and SARs, the expiration of the term of the option or SAR, and (B) in the case of incentive options, the earlier of (x) the first anniversary of the date of such termination of employment and (y) the expiration of the term of the option or SAR;

upon a participant’s termination of employment for retirement, any option or SAR held by the participant will vest and be exercisable at any time until the earlier of (A) in the case of nonqualified options and SARs, (x) the fifth anniversary of the termination of employment and (y) the expiration of the term of the option or SAR, and (B) in the case of incentive options, (1) the 90th day following such termination of employment and (2) the expiration of the term of the option; and

upon a participant’s termination for cause, all options or SARs will be forfeited.

Amendment. Our Board of Directors or the committee may amend, alter or discontinue the 2012 Plan, but no amendment, alteration or discontinuation shall be made which would materially impair the rights of the participant with respect to a previously granted award without such participant’s consent, except such an amendment made to comply with applicable law, including without limitation Section 409A of the Code, stock exchange rules or accounting rules. In addition, no such amendment shall be made without the approval of our shareholders (a) to the extent such approval is required (1) by applicable law or the listing standards of the applicable stock exchange as in effect as of the date hereof or (2) under applicable law or the listing standards of the applicable stock exchange as may be required after the date hereof, (b) to the extent such amendment would materially increase the benefits accruing to participants under the 2012 Plan, (c) to the extent such amendment would materially increase the number of securities which may be issued under the 2012 Plan or (d) to the extent such amendment would materially modify the requirements for participation in the 2012 Plan.

Federal Income Tax Consequences

The following is a summary of certain federal income tax consequences of awards made under the 2012 Plan based upon the laws in effect on the date hereof. The discussion is general in nature and does

Unum Group21


Items to Be Acted On at the Meeting2012 Proxy Statement

not take into account a number of considerations which may apply in light of the circumstances of a particular participant under the 2012 Plan. The income tax consequences under applicable state and local tax laws may not be the same as under federal income tax laws.

Non-Qualified Stock Options. A participant will not recognize taxable income at the time of grant of a non-qualified stock option, and we will not be entitled to a tax deduction at such time. A participant will recognize compensation taxable as ordinary income (and subject to income tax withholding in respect of an employee) upon exercise of a non-qualified stock option equal to the excess of the fair market value of the shares purchased over their exercise price, and we generally will be entitled to a corresponding deduction.

Incentive Stock Options. A participant will not recognize taxable income at the time of grant of an incentive stock option. A participant will not recognize taxable income (except for purposes of the alternative minimum tax) upon exercise of an incentive stock option. If the shares acquired by exercise of an incentive stock option are held for the longer of two years from the date the option was granted and one year from the date the shares were transferred, any gain or loss arising from a subsequent disposition of such shares will be taxed as long-term capital gain or loss, and we will not be entitled to any deduction. If, however, such shares are disposed of within such two- or one-year periods, then in the year of such disposition the participant will recognize compensation taxable as ordinary income equal to the excess of the lesser of the amount realized upon such disposition and the fair market value of such shares on the date of exercise over the exercise price, and we generally will be entitled to a corresponding deduction. The excess of the amount realized through the disposition date over the fair market value of the stock on the exercise date will be treated as capital gain.

Stock Appreciation Rights. A participant will not recognize taxable income at the time of grant of a stock appreciation right, and we will not be entitled to a tax deduction at such time. Upon exercise, a participant will recognize compensation taxable as ordinary income (and subject to income tax withholding in respect of an employee) equal to the fair market value of any shares delivered and the amount of cash paid by us, and we generally will be entitled to a corresponding deduction.

Restricted Stock. A participant will not recognize taxable income at the time of grant of shares of restricted stock, and we will not be entitled to a tax deduction at such time, unless the participant makes an election under Section 83(b) of the Code to be taxed at such time. If such election is made, the participant will recognize compensation taxable as ordinary income (and subject to income tax withholding in respect of an employee) at the time of the grant equal to the excess of the fair market value of the shares at such time over the amount, if any, paid for such shares. If such election is not made, the participant will recognize compensation taxable as ordinary income (and subject to income tax withholding in respect of an employee) at the time the restrictions lapse in an amount equal to the excess of the fair market value of the shares at such time over the amount, if any, paid for such shares. We are entitled to a corresponding deduction at the time the ordinary income is recognized by the participant, except to the extent the deduction limits of Section 162(m) of the Code apply. In addition, a participant receiving dividends with respect to restricted stock for which the above-described election has not been made and prior to the time the restrictions lapse will recognize compensation taxable as ordinary income (and subject to income tax withholding in respect of an employee), rather than dividend income. We will be entitled to a corresponding deduction, except to the extent the deduction limits of Section 162(m) of the Code apply.

22Unum Group


2012 Proxy StatementItems to Be Acted On at the Meeting

Restricted Stock Units. A participant will not recognize taxable income at the time of grant of a restricted stock unit, and we will not be entitled to a tax deduction at such time. A participant will recognize compensation taxable as ordinary income (and subject to income tax withholding in respect of an employee) at the time of settlement of the award equal to the fair market value of any shares delivered and the amount of cash paid by us, and we will be entitled to a corresponding deduction, except to the extent the deduction limits of Section 162(m) of the Code apply.

Performance Units. A participant will not recognize taxable income at the time of grant of performance units, and we will not be entitled to a tax deduction at such time. A participant will recognize compensation taxable as ordinary income (and subject to income tax withholding in respect of an employee) at the time of settlement of the award equal to the fair market value of any shares or property delivered and the amount of cash paid by us, and we will be entitled to a corresponding deduction, except to the extent the deduction limits of Section 162(m) of the Code apply.

Section 162(m) Limitations.As explained above, Section 162(m) of the Code generally places a $1 million annual limit on a company’s tax deduction for compensation paid to certain senior executives, other than compensation that satisfies the applicable requirements for a performance-based compensation exception. The 2012 Plan is designed so that options and SARs qualify for this exemption, and it also permits the committee to grant other awards designed to qualify for this exception. However, the committee reserves the right to grant awards that do not qualify for this exception, and, in some cases, the exception may cease to be available for some or all awards that otherwise so qualify. Thus, it is possible that Section 162(m) of the Code may disallow compensation deductions that would otherwise be available to the company.

The foregoing general tax discussion is intended for the information of shareholders considering how to vote with respect to this proposal and not as tax guidance to participants in the 2012 Plan. Participants are strongly urged to consult their own tax advisors regarding the federal, state, local, foreign and other tax consequences to them of participating in the 2012 Plan.

New Plan Benefits

Any awards that an individual may receive under the 2012 Plan will be at the discretion of the committee and therefore cannot be determined in advance, with the exception of a grant of restricted stock units with a value of $120,000 which will be paid as an annual retainer to each individual who will serve as a non-employee director after the Annual Meeting. The grant under the 2012 Plan will be contingent on and effective with the approval of the 2012 Plan by shareholders upon the Effective Date. If the 2012 Plan is not approved, the grant to the non-employee directors will be made under the 2007 Plan. The following table shows the awards that we believe would have been received under the 2012 Plan in 2011 had the 2012 Plan been in effect at that time, which are the same as the awards received in 2011 under the 2007 Plan.

Unum Group23


Items to Be Acted On at the Meeting2012 Proxy Statement

2011 EQUITY AWARDS 
Name and Position  Options
Granted
   Exercise
Price of
Options per
Share
   Number of
Restricted
Stock Units
Granted
   Dollar Value
of Restricted
Stock Units
Granted
   Number of
Deferred
Share Rights
Granted
   Dollar Value
of Deferred
Share Rights
Granted
 

Mr. Watjen,

President and Chief Executive Officer

   123,682    $26.29     165,552    $4,352,362     -     -  

Mr. McKenney,

EVP and Chief Financial Officer

   26,048     26.29     34,866     916,627     -     -  

Mr. McCarthy,

EVP and Chief Operating Officer; President and CEO, Unum US

            
   24,610     26.29     32,942     866,045     -     -  
            

Mr. Best,

former EVP, Global Services(1)

   16,450     26.29     22,019     578,880     -     -  

Mr. Horn,

EVP, President and CEO, Colonial Life

   11,035     26.29     14,770     388,303     -     -  

All executive officers, as a group

   -     -     507,406    $10,195,999     -     -  

All directors, excluding

executive officers, as a group

   -     -     50,963    $1,319,942     10,784    $277,229  

All employees, excluding

executive officers, as a group

   -     -     416,643    $10,934,551     -     -  

(1)Mr. Best retired on December 31, 2011.

Approval

Approval of the 2012 Plan requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes entitled to be cast by shareholders represented and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting.

THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE “FOR” THE APPROVAL OF THE UNUM GROUP STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN OF 2012.

24Unum Group


2012 Proxy StatementItems to Be Acted On at the Meeting

Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

(Item 4 on the Proxy Card)

The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors has appointed Ernst & Young LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm (“independent auditors”) to audit our financial statements for the company’s fiscal year ending December 31, 2012 and is recommending that their appointment be ratified by the shareholders.

Ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes entitled to be cast by shareholders represented and entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting.

Although ratification is not legally required, the Board wants to bring the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP before our shareholders. In the event this appointment is not ratified, the Audit Committee will reconsider the decision of appointing Ernst & Young LLP.

THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS THAT YOU VOTE “FOR” THE RATIFICATION OF THE APPOINTMENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP AS OUR INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM FOR 2012.

Unum Group25


26Unum Group


2012 Proxy StatementAbout the Board of Directors

About the Board of Directors

Nominees for Election as Directors with Terms Expiring in 2015

 

 

LOGOLOGO

Timothy F. Keaney

Director since 2012

Age 52

Independent Director   

Current term expires in 2014   

Member of the Audit Committee   

Member of the Finance Committee   

Mr. Keaney is Vice Chairman of BNY Mellon, where he has held this position since October 2010. He also serves as Chief Executive Officer of Investment Services at BNY Mellon and a member of BNY Mellon’s executive committee, which oversees day-to-day operations for that organization. Prior to the merger of The Bank of New York Company, Inc. and Mellon Financial Corporation in 2007, Mr. Keaney was head of The Bank of New York’s asset servicing business and head of that company’s presence in Europe, with management responsibilities for all business activities in the region. He joined the Bank of New York in 2000 as a Managing Director responsible for depositary receipts. Prior to that, Mr. Keaney was a Senior Vice President of Deutsche Bank.

Mr. Keaney possesses significant operational, investment and finance experience, both domestically and internationally. His work has included lengthy periods of executive leadership service in the United Kingdom, which has given him a deep understanding of many of the challenges and opportunities that we face in that region. He also qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” as defined in SEC regulations.

LOGO

Gloria C. Larson

Director since 2004

Age 63

Independent Director   

Current term expires in 2014   

Chair of the Regulatory Compliance Committee   

Member of the Governance Committee   

Ms. Larson has been the President of Bentley University since July 2007. She previously served as co-chairperson of the Government Practices Group of the law firm Foley Hoag LLP and coordinator for its Administrative Practices Group after joining the firm in 1996. Prior to joining Foley Hoag, she served as Secretary of Economic Affairs and as Secretary of Consumer Affairs and Business Regulation for the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, and prior to that was Deputy Director of Consumer Protection for the Federal Trade Commission.

Ms. Larson has executive management experience as president of a major university. In addition, she brings regulatory insight from her service as a regulator and her experience advising clients in the course of her practice of law. She also has previous service on both public and private companies’ boards of directors.

 12 | Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and 2014 Proxy Statement


Information About the Board of Directors  

LOGO

William J. Ryan

Director since 2004

Age 70

Independent Director   

Current term expires in 2014   

Chairman of the Board of Directors   

Mr. Ryan has served as the Chairman of the Board of Directors of our company since October 2011. He was Chairman, President and Chief Executive officer of TD Banknorth Inc., a banking and financial services company, from March 2005 until March 2007, and continued as its Chairman until November 2009. He was Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Banknorth Group Inc. from 2000 until its merger with TD Banknorth Inc. in March 2005, and prior to that served as President and Chief Executive Officer of People’s Heritage Savings Bank. He is also a director of WellPoint, Inc.

Mr. Ryan has experience as a board chairman and chief executive officer of companies in the banking and financial services industry. He currently serves as a director and the chair of the governance committee of another publicly traded company.

LOGO

Thomas R. Watjen

Director since 2002

Age 59

Current term expires in 2014   

President and Chief Executive Officer   

Mr. Watjen has been President and Chief Executive Officer of Unum since March 2003. He served as Vice Chairman and Chief Operating Officer from May 2002 until March 2003. He became Executive Vice President, Finance in June 1999. Prior to that, Mr. Watjen served in various roles with Provident. Before joining Provident in 1994, Mr. Watjen served as a Managing Director of the insurance practice of the investment banking firm Morgan Stanley & Co. He is also a director of SunTrust Banks, Inc.

Mr. Watjen has executive management and financial experience as chief executive officer of our company as well as his prior positions within the financial services industry. He also serves as a director and the chair of the audit committee of another publicly traded company in the financial services industry.

Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and 2014 Proxy Statement | 13 


 Information About the Board of Directors

Additional Directors

LOGO

Theodore H. Bunting, Jr.

Director since 2013

Age 55

Independent Director

Current term expires in 2016

Member of the Audit Committee

Member of the Regulatory Compliance Committee

Mr. Bunting is the Group President, Utility Operations of Entergy Corporation, an integrated energy company engaged primarily in electric power production and retail distribution operations, a position he has held since June 2012. From August 2007 to May 2012, he served as Senior Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer for Entergy and its subsidiaries. Prior to that, he held numerous executive positions within the Entergy organization, which he joined in 1983. He began his professional career in public accounting with Arthur Andersen & Co. in 1981 and is a certified public accountant. Mr. Bunting is also a director of Imation Corp.

Mr. Bunting possesses extensive financial, accounting and operational experience with a public company in a regulated industry. His leadership responsibilities have included strategic and financial planning, customer service, operations support and risk management. He also has experience as a director of another publicly traded company and qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” under SEC regulations.

LOGO

E. Michael Caulfield

Director since 2007

Age 67

Independent Director   

Current term expires in 2016   

Chair of the Finance Committee   

Member of the Audit Committee   

Mr. Caulfield served as President of Mercer Human Resource Consulting from September 2005 until September 2006, prior to which he served as Chief Operating Officer from July 2005. He retired from Prudential Insurance Company as Executive Vice President in 2000, after having held a number of executive positions, including Executive Vice President of Financial Management, Chief Executive Officer of Prudential Investments, and President of both Prudential Preferred Financial Services and Prudential Property and Casualty Company. He previously served as a director of our company from August 2004 to July 2005.

Mr. Caulfield has experience in finance, investments, and executive management in both the insurance and broader financial services industry. He also qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” under SEC regulations.

 14 | Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and 2014 Proxy Statement


Information About the Board of Directors  

LOGO

 

 

Pamela H. Godwin

 

Director since 2004

Age 63

65

 

 

Independent Director   

Current term expires in 20122015   

 

Member of the Finance Committee

Member of the Governance Committee

 

 

Ms. Godwin has been President of Change Partners, Inc., a consulting firm specializing in organizational change and growth initiatives, since 2001. From 1999 to 2001, she was President and Chief Operating Officer of the personal lines agency division of GMAC Insurance. Prior to that time, she held a number of executive positions within the financial services industry, including Senior Vice President of customer management for the credit card division of Advanta Corporation, President and Chief Operating Officer of Academy Insurance Group, a unit of Providian Corporation, and Senior Vice President of property/casualty claims at Colonial Penn Group, Inc. Ms. Godwin is also a director of Federal Home Loan Bank of Pittsburgh.

 

Ms. Godwin brings executive management experience from the insurance industry. Additionally, she has risk-assessment skills from her work as a chartered property/casualty underwriter and experience managing high-risk lines of insurance.

 

 

LOGO

Thomas Kinser

Director since 2004

Age 68

Current term expires in 2012

Member of the Audit Committee

Member of the Human Capital Committee

Mr. Kinser was President, Chief Executive Officer and a director of BlueCross BlueShield of Tennessee from 1994 to 2003. From 1991 to 1994, he was Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of BlueCross BlueShield Association in Chicago. Prior to that time, he held a number of executive positions with BlueCross BlueShield of Georgia, including President and Chief Executive Officer.

Mr. Kinser brings extensive executive management and board experience from the health insurance business. Additionally, he has a keen understanding of the complex regulatory environment in which we operate.

Unum Group27


About the Board of Directors2012 Proxy Statement

LOGO

A.S. (Pat) MacMillan, Jr.

Director since 1995

Age 68

Current term expires in 2012

Chair of the Human Capital Committee

Member of the Regulatory Compliance Committee

Mr. MacMillan has served as the Chief Executive Officer of Triaxia Partners, Inc. (formerly known as Team Resources, Inc.) since 1980. Triaxia’s practice areas include organizational strategy and design, as well as team and leadership development. Specific services include management consulting, management training and organizational audits. He is also a trustee of The Maclellan Foundation, Inc., and a director of MetoKote Corporation. Mr. MacMillan was a director of Guitar Center, Inc. from 2005 to 2007.

Mr. MacMillan brings management and organizational insight from his consulting practice. He has also served on the boards of public and private companies.

LOGO

Edward J. Muhl

Director since 2005

Age 67

Current term expires in 2012

Member of the Human Capital Committee

Member of the Regulatory Compliance Committee

Mr. Muhl served as the National Leader of the Insurance Regulatory Advisory Practice of PricewaterhouseCoopers from 2001 until his retirement in June 2005. He was Senior Managing Director of Navigant Consulting, Inc. from 1998 to 2000, which he joined as Executive Vice President in 1997. Prior to that time, Mr. Muhl held important regulatory positions within the insurance industry, including Superintendent of Insurance of the State of New York, Insurance Commissioner of the State of Maryland, and President of the National Association of Insurance Commissioners. He is also a director of Farm Family Insurance Company, and previously served as a director of Syncora Holdings, Ltd. from 2008 to 2009.

Mr. Muhl has 44 years of experience in the insurance industry, including service as a regulator. He has previously served as a director of a publicly traded company and currently serves as a director of a non-publicly traded insurance company.

28Unum Group


2012 Proxy StatementAbout the Board of Directors

Continuing Directors with Terms Expiring in 2013 and 2014

LOGO

E. Michael Caulfield

Director since 2007

Age 65

Current term expires in 2013

Chair of the Finance Committee

Member of the Audit Committee

Mr. Caulfield served as President of Mercer Human Resource Consulting from September 2005 until September 2006, prior to which he had served as Chief Operating Officer from July 2005. Prior to retiring in 2000 from Prudential Insurance Company as Executive Vice President, Mr. Caulfield held a number of executive positions with Prudential, including Executive Vice President of Financial Management, Chief Executive Officer of Prudential Investments, and President of both Prudential Preferred Financial Services and Prudential Property and Casualty Company. He previously served as a director of our company from August 2004 to July 2005.

Mr. Caulfield has experience in finance, investments, and executive management in both the insurance and broader financial services industry. He also qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” as defined in SEC regulations.

LOGOLOGO

 

 

Ronald E. Goldsberry

 

Director since 1999

Age 69

71

 

Independent Director   

Current term expires in 20132016   

 

Chair of the Governance Committee

Member of the Finance Committee

 

 

Dr. Goldsberry is an independent contractora consultant to clients in the automotive industry. He served as Chairman of OnStation Corporation (formerly known as Carstation.com) from November 1999 until August 2006, and as Chief Executive Officer of OnStation from January to May 2002 and from November 1999 to March 2001. Prior to that time, Dr. Goldsberry served in various capacities with Ford Motor Company, including Global Vice President and General Manager of Global Ford Customer Service Operations, General Manager of the Customer Service Division and General Sales and Marketing Manager for the Parts and Service Division. He was a director of our predecessor company, UNUM Corporation from 1993 until its merger with Provident Companies, Inc.our company in 1999.

 

Dr. Goldsberry has broad business experience which includes marketing, sales, customer service and international operations. He also brings experience from his prior service on the board and audit committee of another publicly traded company.

 

 

Unum Group29

Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and 2014 Proxy Statement | 15 


About the Board of Directors2012 Proxy Statement

 Information About the Board of Directors

 

 

 

LOGOLOGO

 

 

Kevin T. Kabat

 

Director since 2008

Age 55

57

 

 

Independent Director   

Current term expires in 20132016   

 

Member of the Audit Committee

MemberChair of the Human Capital Committee

Member of the Governance Committee   

 

Mr. Kabat is the PresidentVice Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Fifth Third Bancorp, where he has held those offices since June 2006September 2012 and April 2007, respectively. He is also a director of Fifth Third Bancorp and served as its Chairman from June 2008 to May 2010. Previously, Mr. Kabat was2010, President from June 2006 to September 2012, and Executive Vice President of Fifth Third Bancorp from December 2003 and2003. Prior to that, he was President and Chief Executive Officer of Fifth Third Bank (Michigan) from April 2001. Prior to joining the Fifth Third Bancorp organization, Mr. Kabat served in a number of management and executive positions with Old Kent Financial Corporation, including as its Vice Chairman and President.

 

Mr. Kabat brings extensive financial and operating experience as a chief executive officer of a major regional bank, and in other executive positions in the financial services industry. He also qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” as defined inunder SEC regulations.

 

 

LOGOLOGO

 

 

Gloria C. LarsonThomas Kinser

 

Director since 2004

Age 61

70

 

 

Independent Director   

Current term expires in 20142015   

 

Chair of the Regulatory Compliance Committee

Member of the GovernanceAudit Committee

Member of the Human Capital Committee   

 

Ms. Larson has been theMr. Kinser was President, of Bentley University since July 2007. She previously served as co-chairperson of the Government Practices Group of the law firm Foley Hoag LLPChief Executive Officer and coordinator for its Administrative Practices Group after joining the firm in 1996. Prior to joining Foley Hoag, she served as Secretary of Economic Affairs and as Secretary of Consumer Affairs and Business Regulation for the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, and prior to that as Deputy Director of Consumer Protection for the Federal Trade Commission. Ms. Larson was a director of RSA Security, Inc.BlueCross BlueShield of Tennessee from 20011994 to 20062003. From 1991 to 1994, he was Executive Vice President and KeySpan Corporation from 2003Chief Operating Officer of BlueCross BlueShield Association in Chicago. Prior to 2007.that time, he held a number of executive positions with BlueCross BlueShield of Georgia, including President and Chief Executive Officer.

 

Ms. Larson hasMr. Kinser brings extensive executive management and board experience as presidentfrom the health insurance business. Additionally, he has a keen understanding of a major university. In addition, she bringsthe complex regulatory insight from both service as a regulator and experience advising clientsenvironment in the course of her practice of law. She also has previous service on both public and private companies’ boards of directors.which we operate.

 

 

30Unum Group

 16 | Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and 2014 Proxy Statement


2012 Proxy StatementAbout the Board of Directors

Information About the Board of Directors 

 

 

 

LOGOLOGO

A.S. (Pat) MacMillan, Jr.

Director since 1995

Age 70

Independent Director   

Current term expires in 2015   

Member of the Human Capital Committee   
Member of the Regulatory Compliance  Committee   

Mr. MacMillan has served as the Chief Executive Officer of Triaxia Partners, Inc. since 1980. Triaxia’s practice areas include organizational strategy and design, as well as team and leadership development. Specific services include management consulting, management training and organizational audits. He is also a trustee of The Maclellan Foundation, Inc.

Mr. MacMillan brings management and organizational insight from his consulting practice. He has also served on the boards of public and private companies.

LOGO

Edward J. Muhl

Director since 2005

Age 69

Independent Director   

Current term expires in 2015   

Member of the Human Capital Committee   
Member of the Regulatory Compliance Committee   

Mr. Muhl served as the National Leader of the Insurance Regulatory Advisory Practice of PricewaterhouseCoopers from 2001 until his retirement in June 2005. He was Senior Managing Director of Navigant Consulting, Inc. from 1998 to 2000, which he joined as Executive Vice President in 1997. Prior to that time, Mr. Muhl held important regulatory positions within the insurance industry, including Superintendent of Insurance of the State of New York, Insurance Commissioner of the State of Maryland, and President of the National Association of Insurance Commissioners. He is also a director of Farm Family Insurance Company, and previously served as a director of Syncora Holdings, Ltd. from 2008 to 2009.

Mr. Muhl has over 45 years of experience in the insurance industry, including service as a regulator. He has previously served as a director of a publicly traded company and currently serves as a director of a non-publicly traded insurance company.

Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and 2014 Proxy Statement | 17 


 Information About the Board of Directors

LOGO

 

 

Michael J. Passarella

 

Director since 2006

Age 70

72

 

 

Current term expiresIndependent Director    

Retiring in 20132014    

 

Chair of the Audit Committee

Member of the Regulatory Compliance Committee

Mr. Passarella was an audit partner of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP from 1975 until his retirement in 2002. During that time, he served in a number of leadership positions at the firm, including as managing partner of the firm’s securities industry practice and as its capital markets industry global audit leader. Mr. Passarella served as a director and Chairman of the Audit Committee of Archipelago Holdings, Inc. from August 2004 until its merger in March 2006 with the New York Stock Exchange, Inc. He also served as a director with NYFIX, Inc. from October 2007, including as Chairman of its Audit Committee from April 2008, until its merger with a subsidiary of NYSE Technologies, Inc. in November 2009.

Mr. Passarella brings significant experience as an audit partner of a national accounting firm. He has also served on the boards and chaired the audit committees of two other publicly traded companies. He also qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” as defined in SEC regulations.

 

Mr. Passarella was an audit partner of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP from 1975 until his retirement in 2002. During that time, he served in a number of leadership positions at the firm, including as managing partner of its securities industry practice and as its capital markets industry global audit leader. Mr. Passarella served as a director and Chairman of the Audit Committee of Archipelago Holdings, Inc. from August 2004 until its merger in March 2006 with the New York Stock Exchange, Inc. He also served as a director with NYFIX, Inc. from October 2007, including as Chairman of its Audit Committee from April 2008, until its merger with a subsidiary of NYSE Technologies, Inc. in November 2009.

Mr. Passarella brings significant experience as an audit partner of a national accounting firm. He has also served on the boards and chaired the audit committees of two other publicly traded companies. He also qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” as defined in SEC regulations.

Director Compensation

The Human Capital Committee reviews director compensation annually and makes recommendations to the Board as appropriate.

Benchmarking

With the assistance of its third-party compensation consultant, Pay Governance LLC, the Committee reviews peer group data to understand market practices for director compensation. Our non-employee director compensation is compared to that of companies in two peer groups: (1) the Proxy Peer Group described on page 39 of the Compensation Discussion and Analysis; and (2) a general industry peer group with market capitalizations ranging from $2 billion to $12 billion, which consisted of 201 companies for the review in December 2012 and 162 companies for the review in August 2013. The Committee uses the approximate median of these peer groups as a reference point for setting director compensation. The use of two peer groups provides an indication of director pay levels both within the insurance industry as well as the broader market.

In December 2012, the Committee’s consultant provided its annual analysis of non-employee director compensation. While the analysis showed that total non-employee director compensation was approximately 5-14% below market median of the two comparator groups, the Committee decided not to make any change to non-employee director compensation at the time. In August 2013, Pay Governance provided an updated analysis based on the latest market data which showed that total remuneration had increased across the peer groups, and total non-employee director compensation was at that point approximately 8-16% below market median of the two comparator groups. The Committee agreed to consider this information and make a decision at its December meeting. In December 2013, given the comparison to market norms, the continued increased demands on directors, and the need to ensure that we attract and retain qualified directors, the Committee approved the compensation changes outlined in

 18 | Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and 2014 Proxy Statement


Information About the Board of Directors  

the table, to be effective in May 2014. In particular, the Committee noted that the company will be actively recruiting a number of new directors as a result of Board retirements over the next few years and the need to offer competitive compensation. During the process, Mr. Kabat (who succeeded Mr. MacMillan as chair of the Committee in May 2013) recused himself of the decision to increase the Committee chair retainer.

For information about fees paid to Pay Governance LLC for director and executive officer compensation consulting services, see page 38 of the Compensation Discussion and Analysis.

Elements of Non-Employee Director Compensation

Non-employee directors receive cash retainers and equity awards as outlined in the following table:

      CASH AND EQUITY COMPENSATION TO NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTORS    2013    2014  

All Directors:

    Value    Value  

Annual cash retainer

    $80,000    $95,000  

Annual restricted stock unit award

    120,000    140,000  

Committee Chairs:

            

Additional annual cash retainer - Audit Committee

    15,000    22,500  

Additional annual cash retainer - Human Capital Committee

    10,000    17,500  

Additional annual cash retainer - all other Board committees

    10,000    10,000  

Board Chairman:

            

Additional annual cash retainer (paid quarterly)

    160,000    160,000  

These amounts are prorated for partial-year service and may be deferred at the election of each director for payment in common stock at a future date. Directors deferring cash compensation receive a number of deferred share rights (each representing the right to one share of common stock) equal to the number of whole shares of common stock that could be purchased for the deferred amount based on the closing price of a share of common stock on the date the cash compensation is payable.

Directors’ expenses associated with attending Board and committee meetings, or other meetings relating to company business, are paid by the company. Directors are eligible to participate in our employee matching gifts program. Under this program, we match up to $7,500 each year for eligible gifts to nonprofit organizations.

We do not have a retirement plan for directors. However, Dr. Goldsberry, who served as a director of UNUM Corporation prior to its merger into our company in 1999, is entitled to receive an annual payment of $27,500 for four years under the UNUM Corporation plan upon his ceasing to be a director.

We pay no additional compensation to Mr. Watjen for his Board service.

Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and 2014 Proxy Statement | 19 


 Information About the Board of Directors

2013 Compensation

The following table provides details of the compensation of each person who served as a non-employee director during 2013.

 

      NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

 

 

Name

  Fees Earned or
Paid in Cash
(1)
   Stock
Awards
(2)
   

 

Change in Pension
Value and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings
(3)

   All Other
Compensation
(4)
   Total 

Theodore H. Bunting, Jr.

   $40,000       $59,995     $  -               $  -             $99,995    

E. Michael Caulfield

   90,000       119,996     7,230               7,500             224,726    

Pamela H. Godwin

   80,000       119,996     7,961               1,890             209,847    

Ronald E. Goldsberry

   90,000       119,996     8,398               -             218,394    

Kevin T. Kabat

   89,983       119,996     4,568               -             214,547    

Timothy F. Keaney

   80,000       119,996     -               7,500             207,496    

Thomas Kinser

   80,000       119,996     12,968               1,700             214,664    

Gloria C. Larson

   90,000       119,996     20,340               7,500             237,836    

A.S. (Pat) MacMillan, Jr.

   80,000       119,996     -               -             199,996    

Edward J. Muhl

   80,000       119,996     -               -             199,996    

Michael J. Passarella

   95,000       119,996     859               7,500             223,355    

William J. Ryan

   240,000       119,996     5,275               -             365,271    

 

LOGO

(1)These amounts include annual and committee retainers which were paid in cash or deferred. All directors elected to receive cash with the exception of Mr. Kabat, who chose to defer 100% of his fee in the form of deferred share rights.

 

William J. Ryan

Director since 2004

Age 68

(2)

Current term expires in 2014

ChairmanOn May 23, 2013, each non-employee director (other than Mr. Bunting) was granted 4,354 restricted stock units under the Unum Group Stock Incentive Plan of 2012. Upon his election to the Board on November 1, 2013, Mr. Bunting received a prorated grant of 1,904 restricted stock units. The amounts shown are the grant date value of these units. We account for stock-based payments under the requirements of Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718Compensation - Stock Compensation(ASC 718). A complete discussion of the Boardassumptions made as well as the financial impact of Directors

Mr. Ryan became Chairmanthis type of compensation can be found in Notes 1 and 11 of the Board of DirectorsConsolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 of our company effective October 1, 2011. He was Chairman, President and Chief Executive officer of TD Banknorth Inc., a banking and financial services company,Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013.

(3)The amounts shown represent dividend reinvestment earnings on deferred share rights in each director’s account.

(4)The amounts shown represent matching gifts to charitable organizations from March 2005 until March 2007, and continued as its Chairman until November 2009. He was Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Banknorth Group Inc. from 2000 until its merger with TD Banknorth Inc. in March 2005, and prior to that served as President and Chief Executive Officer of People’s Heritage Savings Bank. He is currently a director of WellPoint, Inc.

Mr. Ryan has experience as a board chairman and chief executive officer of companies in the banking and financial services industry. He currently serves as a director and the chair of the compensation committee of another publicly traded company.

 

 

Unum Group31

 20 | Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and 2014 Proxy Statement


About the Board of Directors2012 Proxy Statement

Information About the Board of Directors  

 

 

Director Stock Ownership and Retention Requirements

Each non-employee director is required to own Unum equity securities with an aggregate value in excess of five times the director’s annual cash retainer ($400,000 at the end of 2013; and $475,000 beginning May 2014). New directors have five years from the date of their election to meet the ownership requirement.

Currently, each non-employee director is required to retain Unum equity securities received as a result of director compensation for at least three years from the time the equity securities vest, and to retain at least the number of equity securities necessary to meet his or her ownership requirement until retirement from the Board. In December 2013, following a review of ownership and retention requirements, the Human Capital Committee determined that it was appropriate to align the director retention requirements with those currently in effect for Unum’s executive vice presidents. Effective May 2014, each director will be required to retain 60% of Unum equity securities received as a result of director compensation for one year from the time the equity securities vest and to retain at least the number of equity securities necessary to meet his or her ownership requirement until retirement from the Board.

The Committee annually reviews each director’s stock ownership level. If a director does not reach his or her ownership requirement in a timely manner, the Committee will determine whether action is appropriate. As of December 31, 2013, 10 of our non-employee directors had met the ownership requirement. The other two non-employee directors recently joined the Board and are expected to meet the increased ownership requirement within the time period provided for reaching the requirement.

Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and 2014 Proxy Statement | 21 


LOGO

Corporate Governance Guidelines

The Board of Directors has adopted corporate governance guidelines on a number of significant matters, including director selection and independence, director responsibilities, Board leadership and management succession. The corporate governance guidelines are available on our investor relations website under the “Corporate Governance” heading atwww.investors.unum.com. The Governance Committee regularly reviews developments in corporate governance and recommends updates to the corporate governance guidelines and other documents as necessary or appropriate in response to regulatory requirements and evolving practices.

Board Leadership Structure

William J. Ryan, an independent director, serves as Chairman of the Board, and Thomas R. Watjen serves as Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of the company. The Board has determined that separation of the Chairman and CEO positions is appropriate at this time because it enables the CEO to devote the significant time and focus necessary to manage our business in the current environment. Our corporate governance guidelines allow the Board to combine the offices of Chairman and CEO when appropriate.

As an independent Chairman, Mr. Ryan is deemed the lead independent director. As such, he presides over executive sessions of the independent directors, facilitates information flow between directors and senior management, consults with the CEO and senior management about schedules, agendas and participants for Board meetings, and performs other duties specified in our corporate governance guidelines. If a non-independent director becomes Chairman, the Board will elect an independent director annually to serve as the lead independent director.

Our independent directors generally meet in executive session at each regularly scheduled Board meeting. Executive sessions enable the independent directors to discuss matters without management present, including management performance, succession planning and Board effectiveness. The independent directors met five times in executive session during 2013.

Director Independence

Our corporate governance guidelines provide that a substantial majority of the Board will be independent. For a director to be considered independent, the Board must determine that the director has no material relationship with our company, and the director must meet the requirements for independence under the listing standards of the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE). The Board has also determined that certain categories of relationships are not considered to be material relationships that would impair a director’s independence. These independence standards are listed in our corporate governance guidelines. In making independence determinations, the Board considers all relevant facts and circumstances.

The Governance Committee reviews information about the directors’ relationships and affiliations that might affect their independence and makes recommendations to the Board as to the independence of the directors.

 22 | Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and 2014 Proxy Statement


Corporate Governance 

Based on a review of the findings and recommendations of the Governance Committee and applying the standards described above, the Board has determined that each of our directors is independent, with the exception of Thomas R. Watjen, our President and CEO.

Process for Nominating Directors

The Governance Committee is responsible for identifying and evaluating director candidates and recommending to the Board a slate of nominees for election at each annual meeting of shareholders. The Committee has engaged a third party search firm to assist with recruitment efforts in preparation for upcoming retirements. This firm identifies candidates who meet the criteria of our search, provides requested background and other relevant information regarding candidates, and coordinates arrangements for interviews as necessary. Nominees may also be suggested by directors, management or shareholders.

Shareholders who wish to nominate director candidates must submit written notice of their nominations to the Corporate Secretary at Unum Group, 1 Fountain Square, Chattanooga, Tennessee 37402 in accordance with the process described on page 90 in the section titled “Shareholder proposals and nominations for our 2015 annual meeting.” Our policy is to consider candidates recommended by shareholders in the same manner as other candidates.

Our corporate governance guidelines specify the following criteria to be used in evaluating the candidacy of a prospective nominee:

 

LOGO

 

Reputation for high ethical conduct, integrity, sound judgment and accountability;

Thomas R. Watjen

 

Director since 2002

Age 57

 

Current term expiresknowledge and experience in 2014one or more core competencies;

 

President and Chief Executive Officer

 

Mr. Watjen has been our PresidentAbility to commit sufficient time to the Board and Chief Executive Officer since March 2003. He served as Vice Chairman and Chief Operating Officer from May 2002 until March 2003. He became Executive Vice President, Finance in June 1999. Before joining Unum, Mr. Watjen served as a Managing Director of the insurance practice of the investment banking firm Morgan Stanley & Co. Mr. Watjen is currently a director of SunTrust Banks, Inc.

Mr. Watjen has executive management experience as chief executive officer of our company as well as his prior positions within the financial services industry. He also serves as a director of another publicly traded company in the financial services industry.

its committees;

How often does

Collegial effectiveness; and

Diversity, whether in viewpoints, gender, ethnic background, age, professional experience or other demographics (though no specific diversity policy is applied).

The core competencies sought in any particular candidate depend on the current and future needs of the Board meet?based on an assessment of the composition of the Board and the mix of attributes and qualifications represented. Core competencies include knowledge and experience in finance, investments and accounting, executive management, the insurance or financial services industry, risk oversight, technology, marketing, strategic planning, regulatory compliance and public policy.

In addition to the criteria described above, the Governance Committee considers other specific qualifications that may be desired or required of nominees, including their independence and ability to satisfy Audit Committee or Human Capital Committee requirements. In determining whether to recommend a director for re-election, the Governance Committee also considers the director’s interest in continuing to serve, past attendance at meetings, contributions to the Board and committees on which the director serves, and the results of the most recent Board, committee and individual director evaluations.

Limits on Board and Audit Committee Service

During 2011, theNo director may serve on more than three public company boards in addition to our Board, or on more than two audit committees of public companies in addition to our Audit Committee.

Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and 2014 Proxy Statement | 23 


 Corporate Governance

Board Meetings and Attendance

The Board of Directors met 15 times.seven times during 2013. Each incumbent director attended at least 75% of the total number of meetings of the Board and the committees on which he or she served during the periods of the director’s service in 2011. The independent directors met seven times2013. Depending upon committee assignments, a director generally would have had anywhere from 19 to 30 meetings to attend in executive session during 2011. William J. Ryan, the Chairman of the2013. Average director attendance at Board and lead independent director, presides over the executive sessions of the independent directors.committee meetings was 95%.

Directors are expected to attend annual meetings of shareholders. All of the directors attended the Annual Meeting in 2011.

What are the qualifications of the company’s directors?

To provide effective oversight of management and act in the long-term best interests of shareholders, we believe our directors must possess characteristics, attributes and qualities evidencing sound judgment, high ethical conduct, integrity and knowledge or experience in one or more core competencies. We consider knowledge in the following areas to be among the core competencies neededserving on the Board: finance and accounting, executive management,Board at the insurance industry or financial services industry, risk oversight, marketing, technology, strategic planning, regulatory compliance and public policy. Accountability, independence, commitment and diversity are also important. As indicated in our Corporate Governance Guidelines, we consider diversity to include diversity of viewpoints, gender, ethnicity, age, professional experience and other demographics. In evaluating candidates for directors, the Governance Committee and the Board of Directors consider the entirety of each candidate’s credentials in the context of these standards. With respect to continuing directors, the individuals’ contributions to the Board of Directors are also important.

Certain individual qualifications and skillstime of our directorsannual meeting in 2013 attended that contribute to the Board’s effectiveness as a whole are also discussed in the paragraphs above describing our directors.

32Unum Group


2012 Proxy StatementAbout the Board of Directors

meeting.

Committees of the Board

What are the standing Board committees?

The Board of Directors has five standing committees: Audit, Finance, Governance, Human Capital and Regulatory Compliance. Each committee has a charter that is available on our investor relations website under the “Corporate Governance” heading atwww.investors.unum.com. In addition to the duties contained in their respective charters, each committee may be assigned additional tasks by the Board, from time to time, and each is charged with reporting its activities to the Board. Each standing committee has a charter that may be accessed on our website at www.unum.com in the Investors area under Corporate Governance. Copies also are available free of charge by submitting a request to the Office of the Corporate Secretary as described on page 12.

Some matters may be discussed by more than one committee. The charters of each committee allow for this to occur, and any overlap of responsibilities is managed through communication among the committee chairs.

Who serves on the committees?

The table below lists the current members of the Board of Directors and the committees on which they serve (with “X” denoting membership and “C” denoting committee chair).

 

      BOARD MEMBERS AND COMMITTEES

 

Name  Term
Expires
 Audit  Finance  Governance  Human
Capital
  Regulatory
  Compliance  

Theodore H. Bunting, Jr.

  2016    X           X

E. Michael Caulfield

  2016    X  Chair         

Pamela H. Godwin

  2015       X  X      

Ronald E. Goldsberry

  2016       X  Chair      

Kevin T. Kabat

  2016          X  Chair   

Timothy F. Keaney

  2014    X  X         

Thomas Kinser

  2015    X        X   

Gloria C. Larson

  2014          X     Chair

A.S. (Pat) MacMillan, Jr.

  2015             X  X

Edward J. Muhl

  2015             X  X

Michael J. Passarella

  2016  (1) Chair           X

William J. Ryan

  2014                 

Thomas R. Watjen

  2014                 

2013 Committee Meetings

    12  7  7  11  5

 

(1)
BOARD MEMBERSAND COMMITTEES
NameTerm
Expires
AuditFinanceGovernanceHuman
Capital
Regulatory
Compliance

E. Michael Caulfield

2013XC

Pamela H. Godwin

2012XX

Ronald E. Goldsberry

2013XC

Kevin T. Kabat

2013XX

Thomas Kinser

2012XX

Gloria C. Larson

2014XC

A.S. (Pat) MacMillan, Jr.

2012CX

Edward J. Muhl

2012XX

Michael J.As described on page 27, Mr. Passarella

2013CX

William J. Ryan

2014

Thomas R. Watjen

2014 will retire from the Board at the Annual Meeting in May 2014.

 

 

Unum Group33

 24 | Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and 2014 Proxy Statement


About the Board of Directors2012 Proxy Statement

Corporate Governance 

 

 

Audit Committee

The Audit Committee assists the Board in its oversight of financial statement and disclosure matters, the company’s relationship with itsour independent auditors,auditor, the internal audit function, risk management responsibilities, and compliance with legal and regulatory requirements. Under its charter, the Committee’s responsibilities, among others, are to:

appoint and, as necessary, replace, and provide appropriate funding for payment of compensation to, our independent auditors;

review and discuss matters relating to our financial and accounting reporting processes, including oversightA more complete description of the integrityresponsibilities of our financial statements and the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting;

review and discuss with management and the independent auditors the company’s annual and quarterly financial statements and related disclosuresAudit Committee is included in the company’s annual and quarterly reports filed with the SEC;

pre-approve all audit services and permitted non-audit services to be performed by our independent auditors;

review and evaluate the qualifications, performance and independence of our independent auditors;

review and, as appropriate, discuss with management and the independent auditors matters relating to internal audit responsibilities, budgeting and staffing, including the scopeReport of the internal audit plan each year and a summary of significant findings and responses;

review and discuss with management the company’s policies and major exposures with respect to financial risk, operational risk and any other risk not allocated to another Board committee, as well as the company’s risk assessment and risk management framework; and

obtain reports and advise the Board concerning matters relating to compliance with applicable laws, regulations and the Code of Conduct.

Members as of December 31, 2011 were: Michael J. Passarella (Chair), E. Michael Caulfield, Kevin T. Kabat and Thomas Kinser.

The Audit Committee met 10 times during 2011. beginning on page 29.

All members of the Audit Committee are independent according to the requirements of the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE), and as required by SEC rules and regulations, and otherwise satisfymeet the independence requirements of the SEC, the NYSE and our Corporate Governance Guidelines.corporate governance guidelines. The Board has determined that threefour members of the Audit Committee, Michael J. Passarella,Theodore H. Bunting, Jr., E. Michael Caulfield, Timothy F. Keaney and Kevin T. Kabat,Michael J. Passarella, are “audit committee financial experts” as defined by SEC regulations. Each of Messrs. Passarella, Caulfieldrules and Kabat also hashave accounting or related financial management expertise within the meaning of the listing standards of the NYSE. All members of the Audit Committee have been determined by the Board to be “financially literate” as required by the NYSE.

34Unum Group


2012 Proxy StatementAbout the Board of Directors

Finance Committee

The Finance Committee assists the Board in overseeing risk associated with the company’soversight of our investments, and related financial matters. Under its charter, the Committee’s primary responsibilities are to:

monitor, evaluate and recommend present and future capital and financing plans and capital requirementsactivities and opportunities relative to our business;related financial matters and the associated risks. Among other responsibilities, the Finance Committee:

 

evaluates and recommends to the Board capital and financing plans, activities, requirements and opportunities;

develop, adopt, revise, and oversee

oversees implementation of and compliance with investment strategies, guidelines and policies;

reviews, assesses and reports on the impact of various finance activities on our debt ratings; and

monitors, evaluates and makes recommendations to the Board regarding matters pertaining to our Closed Block segment, including the long-term care business, that could have a meaningful impact upon any of the matters for which the Committee has oversight responsibility.

All members of and compliance with investment strategies, guidelines and policies;

review, advise and provide reports to the Board of Directors with respect to our financial resources and investments;

authorize borrowings by the company;

review material proposed mergers, acquisitions, divestitures, restructurings, and joint ventures, and report to the Board on implications to our financial and capital plans; and

review, assess and report on the impact of various finance activities on our debt ratings.

Members as of December 31, 2011 were: E. Michael Caulfield (Chair), Pamela H. Godwin and Ronald E. Goldsberry.

The Finance Committee met six times during 2011. All Committee members satisfymeet the independence requirements of our Corporate Governance Guidelines.corporate governance guidelines.

Governance Committee

The Governance Committee assists the Board in developing, implementingimplementation and overseeing the company’soversight of our corporate governance policies. Under its charter,Among other responsibilities, the Committee’s primary responsibilities are to:Governance Committee:

 

oversee compliance with our Corporate Governance Guidelines;

oversees compliance with our corporate governance guidelines;

 

establish the criteria for selecting director candidates;

sets director selection criteria and identifies qualified candidates for the Board;

 

identify qualified candidates for the Board in its role as the nominating committee;

oversees the process for Board and committee evaluations; and

 

periodically makes recommendations to the Board regarding committee membership.

develop and implement a process for evaluating the Board and its members;

develop standards for independence of directors; and

periodically review and make recommendations to the Board regarding membership on Board Committees.

Members as of December 31, 2011 were: Ronald E. Goldsberry (Chair), Pamela H. Godwin, and Gloria C. Larson. The Governance Committee met 14 times during 2011. All members of the Governance

Unum Group35


About the Board of Directors2012 Proxy Statement

Committee are independent according to the NYSE requirements and otherwise satisfymeet the independence requirements of the NYSE and our corporate governance guidelines.

Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and 2014 Proxy Statement | 25 


 Corporate Governance Guidelines.

Human Capital Committee

The Human Capital Committee assists the Board in overseeing the company’soversight of our compensation and benefit programs and related risks. Under its charter,risks to support business plans, attract and retain key executives and tie compensation to performance. Among other responsibilities, the Committee’s primary responsibilities are to:Human Capital Committee:

 

approve the compensation for the CEO and other senior executives;

establishes our general compensation philosophy, principles and practices;

 

evaluate employee compensation programs;

evaluates and approves compensation and benefit plans;

 

oversee compensation regulatory compliance;

reviews and approves compensation of the CEO and other senior executives; and

 

advises the Board on the Compensation Discussion and Analysis in our proxy statements, including consideration of the most recent say-on-pay vote.

recommend the compensation of directors to the Board;

recommend any equity-based compensation plan to the Board;

advise the Board on the Compensation Discussion and Analysis in our Proxy Statement;

oversee compliance with the NYSE requirement that shareholders approve equity compensation plans; and

prepare an Annual Report of the Committee for inclusion in our Proxy Statement as required by regulations of the SEC.

Members as of December 31, 2011 were: A.S. (Pat) MacMillan, Jr. (Chair), Kevin T. Kabat, Thomas Kinser and Edward J. Muhl.

The Human Capital Committee met seven times during 2011. All members of the Human Capital Committee are independent according to NYSE requirements and otherwise satisfymeet the independence requirements of the NYSE and our Corporate Governance Guidelines to serve as members of the Committeecorporate governance guidelines and are “non-employee directors” for purposes of Rule 16b-3 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and “outside directors” for purposes of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code.

The Committee has engaged Pay Governance LLC as its independent compensation consulting firm since 2010. Committee meetings are generally attended by Pay Governance consultants, who also participate in executive sessions without members of management in attendance and communicate with Committee members outside of meetings. Pay Governance consultants report directly to the Committee, although they may meet with members of management from time to time on proposals management may make to the Committee. The Committee annually evaluates the independence of its compensation consultants in accordance with the policy it adopted in February 2009.

36Unum Group


2012 Proxy StatementAbout the Board of Directors

Regulatory Compliance Committee

The Regulatory Compliance Committee assists the Board in its oversight of regulatory, compliance, policy and legal matters and related risks to ensure that we maintain compliance with laws and regulations and the highest levels of integrity. Among other responsibilities, the Regulatory Compliance Committee:

monitors the effectiveness of our compliance efforts concerning applicable regulatory and legal requirements and internal policy;

reviews and discusses with management any communication to or from regulators or governmental agencies and any information regarding our compliance with applicable laws or regulations; and

monitors the investigation and resolution of any significant instances of noncompliance or potential compliance violations.

All members of the Regulatory Compliance Committee meet the independence requirements of our corporate governance guidelines.

The Board’s Role in Risk Oversight

The Board has an active role, as a whole and also at the committee level, in overseeing management of the company’s risks. The Board is responsible for managing strategic risk and regularly reviews information regarding our capital, liquidity and operations, as well as the risks associated with each. The Audit Committee is responsible for oversight of the company’s risk management process, financial risks, operational risks, which includes cybersecurity risk, and any other risk not specifically assigned to another committee. An enterprise risk management report is provided to the Audit Committee at least quarterly. The Finance Committee is responsible for oversight of risks associated with investments and related financial matters, including those pertaining to our Closed Block segment. The Human Capital Committee is responsible for overseeing the management of risks relating to our compensation plans and programs; in connection with this oversight, it receives an analysis from enterprise risk management with respect to these risks. The Regulatory Compliance Committee oversees management of risks related to regulatory, compliance, policy and legal matters, both current and emerging and whether of a local, state, federal or international nature, that may affect the business of the company. Under its charter, the Committee’s primary responsibilities are to:

monitor and advise the Board on current and emerging regulatory, compliance, policy and legal matters and related risks that may significantly affect the company and for which oversight responsibility is not allocated solely to another standing committee of the Board;

monitor the effectiveness of the company’s enterprise-wide compliance efforts concerning applicable regulatory and legal requirements and internal policy;

obtain from and discuss with management, the Chief Compliance Officer, the Chief Risk Officer and/or other advisors, as appropriate, internal and external reports concerning significant compliance issues or exposure to which the company may be subject;

monitor compliance by the company and its insurance subsidiaries with applicable market conduct laws and regulations, Title I of ERISA and ongoing obligations under regulatory compliance agreements;

review and discuss with management any reports, orders, inquiries, responses or other correspondence by, to or from regulators or governmental agencies and any complaints or published reports and any litigation or legal matters which raise significant issues regarding the company’s compliance with applicable laws or regulations; and

monitor the investigation and resolution of any significant instances of noncompliance or potential compliance violations that are reported to the Committee.

Members as of December 31, 2011 were: Gloria C. Larson (Chair), A.S. (Pat) MacMillan, Jr., Edward J. Muhl and Michael J. Passarella.

The Regulatory Compliance Committee met five times during 2011. All members of the Regulatory Compliance Committee are independent and satisfy the requirements of our Corporate Governance Guidelines.

Board Leadership Structure

What is the Board’s leadership structure?

Currently, the positions of Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer are separate. Our Chairman is an independent director, and the Board believes that the separation of the Chairman and CEO positions allows the CEO to devote the significant time and focus necessary to manage our business given the difficult economic and regulatory environment. Under our Corporate Governance Guidelines, the Board reserves the right to combine the offices of Chairman of the Board and CEO when appropriate.

 

 

Unum Group37

 26 | Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and 2014 Proxy Statement


About the Board of Directors2012 Proxy Statement

Corporate Governance

 

 

Compensation of Directors

Whointernational nature. While each committee is responsible for determiningevaluating certain risks and overseeing the compensationmanagement of non-employee directors?such risks, the entire Board of Directors is regularly informed through committee reports about such risks in addition to the risk information it receives directly.

Compensation Risk

TheOur chief risk officer, in consultation with the Human Capital Committee, is responsible for determininghas undertaken a risk assessment of our compensation programs and practices. The process included the compensation of non-employee directors. The Committee seeks advice from Pay Governance LLC, its independent compensation consultant.

How often does the company review director compensation?

The Committee, with the assistance of its consultant, reviews director compensation annually. The first changes to director compensation since 2007 were made in 2011, although annual reviews in the years following 2007 consistently indicated that overall compensation for our directors was below market levels.

What benchmarking or research is done with regard to director pay?

Our non-employee director compensation is compared to that of companies in two peer groups:

The Proxy Peer Group described in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis; and

A general industry peer group with market capitalizations ranging from $2 billion to $12 billion which consisted of 170 companies for reviews in December 2010 and early 2011; and 216 companies for the review in December 2011.

As with executive pay, peer group data helps us understand the director compensation practices of other companies. The Committee uses the approximate median of this peer group as a reference point for setting director compensation to ensure that we can attract and retain directors with the appropriate leadership experience and skills.

How are non-employee directors compensated for their services?

The Committee’s consultant provided an analysis of non-employee director compensation in February 2011, which indicated that overall compensation was more than 15% below market levels. Given the comparison to market norms, the continued increased demands on directors, and the need to ensure that we attract and retain qualified directors, the Committee approved several changes to directors’ compensation. Further, in order to ensure alignment of director’s interests with those of shareholders, the Committee also increased the percentage of total compensation paid in restricted stock units. The following changes were made effective in May 2011:

Meeting fees were discontinued;

The grant date value of the annual grant of restricted stock units made to non-employee directors was increased; and

The additional annual retainer payable to the chair of each standing committee (other than the Audit Committee) was increased.

steps:

 

38 Unum Group


2012 Proxy StatementAbout

Review the Boardoverall design and philosophy of Directorsthe incentive compensation programs.

 

Each non-employee director receives fees as outlined in the following table:

Review and assess the 2013 annual incentive program and long-term incentive program performance measures for alignment between actual results and achievement payout levels.

 

 

DIRECTOR RETAINERSIdentify fundamental principles to test, including the SEC’s non-exclusive list of situations where compensation programs may have the potential to raise material risks to the company.

Component Value

Annual Cash Retainer

$80,000

Annual Restricted Stock Unit Award

120,000

Additional Cash Retainers to Committee Chairs

Audit Committee

$15,000

All Other Committees

10,000

Directors’ expenses associated with attending meetings of the Board and committees, or other meetings relating to company business, are paid by the company.

Retainers are prorated for partial years during which a director serves on the Board or as the chair of a committee. Non-employee directors can elect to receive all or a portion of their cash compensation in deferred share rights.

Mr. Watjen, because he is an employee of the company, does not receive any additional compensation for his services as a director of the company or as a director of any of its subsidiaries.

In December 2011, the Committee’s consultant provided its annual analysis of non-employee director compensation. The Committee decided not make any changes to directors’ compensation at that time.

What payments are made to the Chairman of the Board?

The Chairman of the Board receives an additional retainer of $40,000 per quarter. Mr. Ryan assumed the role of Chairman of the Board on October 1, 2011 following the retirement of Mr. Fossel on September 30, 2011. Mr. Fossel has agreed to serve as a consultant to the company for a three-year period following his retirement and will receive an average of $200,000 per year.

Do directors receive any other benefits?

Directors are eligible to participate in our employee matching gifts program, which provides us with an important way to directly support non-profit organizations and educational institutions. Under this program, eligible gifts from a minimum of $50 to an aggregate maximum gift of $7,500 per year are matched on a dollar for dollar basis per year. Gifts to accredited colleges, universities, graduate schools, and secondary and elementary schools within the United States are matched on a two-to-one basis, subject to the $7,500 matching gift limit.

Are directors eligible for retirement pay?

We do not have a retirement plan for directors. Dr. Goldsberry, who served as a director of UNUM Corporation prior to its merger into our company in 1999, is entitled to receive an annual payment of $27,500 for four years under the UNUM Corporation plan. These payments will not begin until he ceases

Unum Group39


AboutAssess the Boardincentive programs in light of Directors2012 Proxy Statement

to be a director and therefore are not included in the Non-Employee Director Compensation table as compensation in 2011.

What amounts were paid to the non-employee directors during 2011?

The following table provides details of the compensation of each person who served as a non-employee director during 2011.

NON-EMPLOYEE DIRECTOR COMPENSATION  
Name  Fees
Earned
or Paid in
Cash(1)
   Stock
Awards(2)
   Option
Awards
  Change in
Pension Value
and  Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings(3)
   All Other
Compensation(4)
   Total 
    ($)   ($)   ($)  ($)   ($)   ($) 

E. Michael Caulfield

   $111,000     $119,995    $ -      $4,981     $ -     $235,976  

Pamela H. Godwin

   99,000     119,995    -   6,821     -     225,816  

Ronald E. Goldsberry

   104,833     119,995    -   9,828     -     234,656  

Kevin T. Kabat

   99,500     119,995    -   2,818     -     222,313  

Thomas Kinser

   99,500     119,995    -   8,934     -     228,429  

Gloria C. Larson

   108,500     119,995    -   15,875     -     244,370  

A.S. (Pat) MacMillan, Jr.

   109,000     119,995    -   -     -     228,995  

Edward J. Muhl

   98,500     119,995    -   -     -     218,495  

Michael J. Passarella

   114,500     119,995    -   592     -     235,087  

William J. Ryan(5)

   144,667     119,995    -   3,634     -     268,296  

Jon S. Fossel(6)

   212,000     119,995    -   5,784     125,000     462,779  

(1)These amounts include annual and committee retainers which were paid in cash or deferred. The amount of annual compensation deferred was: Dr. Goldsberry - $104,833; Mr. Kabat - $40,000; and Ms. Larson - $108,500. Compensation is deferredthe company’s primary risks (as disclosed in the form of deferred share rights.

As of December 31, 2011, the aggregate number of deferred share rights held by each of our non-employee directors was as follows:

Mr. Caulfield

  12,745    Mr. Kinser  22,862    Mr. Muhl         -

Ms. Godwin

  16,466    Ms. Larson  42,480    Mr. Passarella  1,514

Dr. Goldsberry

  24,553(a)    Mr. MacMillan           -    Mr. Ryan  9,299

Mr. Kabat

    5,977            

(a)Includes 8,692 shares of common stock credited in respect of deferred share rights under the UNUM Corporation Director Deferred Compensation Plan, which will be settled in cash.

40Unum Group


2012 Proxy StatementAbout the Board of Directors

(2)On May 25, 2011, each non-employee director was granted 4,633 restricted stock units under the Unum Group Stock Incentive Plan of 2007 with an approximate grant date value of $120,000. The amounts shown are the grant date value of these units. We account for stock-based payments under the requirements of ASC Topic 718. A complete discussion of the assumptions made as well as the financial impact of this type of compensation can be found in Notes 1 and 10 of the Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 of ourcompany’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011.2013) and the company’s annual financial and capital plans.

 

(3)

Assess the effect of any proposed design changes to the 2014 incentive plans.

Based on this assessment, the following conclusions were reached:

The amounts shown represent dividend reinvestment earnings on deferred share rights in each director’s account.company’s incentive program targets, thresholds, caps, weights and payout curves are effective control mechanisms.

 

(4)Payments for matching gifts

The incentive plans are balanced and expenses related to expected spousal event attendance may be made byalign the company on behalflong-term interests of non-employee directors, but the aggregate amount for each director did not exceed $10,000 during 2011. Mr. Fossel received $125,000 for consulting services in 2011.stakeholders and management.

 

(5)Mr. Ryan assumed

The program’s goals are effectively balanced and consistent with the role of Chairman ofrisk levels embedded in the Board of Directors effective October 1, 2011.company’s financial and capital plans.

 

(6)Mr. Fossel retired from the Board of Directors effective September 30, 2011.

Are there stock ownership and retention guidelines for directors?

In 2008, we adopted a guideline that each non-employee director is expected to hold Unum securities with a value equal to three times the director’s annual cash retainer of $80,000, or $240,000. In December 2011, after a review of current market practice, the Committee decided to increase the guideline for all current directors to five times the director’s annual cash retainer of $80,000, or $400,000, in order to be aligned with market practice. The effective date will be the 2012 Annual Meeting date, and directors will have two years to meet the guideline. New directors have five years from the date they are first elected to their current continuous service on the Board to reach the guideline.

Under our guidelines for director ownership, each director is expected to retain securities received as a result of director compensation for at least three years from the time the securities vest and retain at least the number of securities necessary to meet the above ownership goal until retirement from the Board.

Our management provides the Committee with an ownership summary for each director on an annual basis. The Committee will make a subjective assessment of the appropriate action to take for any director who does not reach the ownership goal in a timely manner. As of December  31, 2011, each of the non-employee directors met the current ownership guideline.

Director Selection Process

What is the nomination process for the Board?

The Governance Committee, serving in its capacity as the nominating committee, considers candidates for Board membership suggested by Board members, management and shareholders. In addition, the Committee typically uses the services of a national executive search firm to help identify candidates for the Board, obtain information about prospective candidates’ backgrounds and experience, determine the candidates’ levels of interest in becoming a director of our company, and make arrangements for meetings with prospective candidates.

A shareholder who wishes to recommend a prospective nominee for the Board must notify the Office of the Corporate Secretary in writing. Our policy is to consider candidates recommended by shareholders

Unum Group 41

All potential awards are subject to Human Capital Committee discretion and the company has a recoupment policy in place in the event of a material earnings restatement.


AboutOur chief risk officer and the Board of Directors2012 Proxy Statement

in the same manner as other candidates. The nominee recommendation should include information required by our bylaws regarding shareholder nominations. Those requirements can be found in this document under “Submitting Nominations” below or on our website at www.unum.com in the Investors area under Corporate Governance.

Once the Committee has identified a prospective nominee, a decision is made whether to conduct a full evaluation of the candidate. This decision is based on information provided to the Committee as well as its own knowledge of the prospective candidate. This may be supplemented by information from the search firm assisting the Committee, or by inquiries to the person making the recommendation, or others. The Committee evaluates the prospective nominee against criteria in our Corporate Governance Guidelines, which include:

Evidence of reputation for high ethical conduct, integrity, sound judgment and accountability for one’s decisions and actions;

Current knowledge and experience that fulfill skills needed on the Board;

A willingness to commit time to the Board in order to fulfill its responsibilities;

Providing skills that help us build a Board that is effective and responsive to the needs of the company;

Contributing to the diversity of the Board, in viewpoints, gender, ethnic background, age, professional experience and other demographics; and

Fulfillment of the requirements of independence if the person is being considered for a position as an independent director.

The Committee also considers the number of other public company boards and audit committees on which a prospective nominee serves. The Corporate Governance Guidelines limit the number of public company boards on which a director of the company may serve to no more than three in addition to our Board. The Corporate Governance Guidelines further limit members of the Audit Committee of the Board to serving on no more than two other audit committees of public companies.

The Committee also considers other experience or qualifications from time to time, including:

The current composition of the Board;

Whether a director with specific experience is needed on the Board; and

The need for additional members to satisfy Audit Committee and Human Capital Committee requirements.

The Committee then compares prospective nominees and determines whetherdo not believe the company’s compensation programs create risks that are reasonably likely to interviewhave a nominee, either inmaterial adverse effect on the company.

Director Retirement Policy

Our bylaws state that no person or by telephone. After completingmay serve as a director beyond the evaluation and interview, the Committee makes a recommendation to the full Board as to whom, if anyone, should be nominated. The Board determines whether to accept the nominee after considering the recommendationdate of the Committee. In accordance with regulatory requirements, the Board may counsel with, or obtain approval of, certain state insurance regulators in connection with the qualifications of individuals asked to become directors.

42Unum Group


2012 Proxy StatementAbout the Board of Directors

As outlined in its charter and the Corporate Governance Guidelines, the Committee reviewed those directors whose terms expire at this Annual Meeting. This review took into account each director’s interest in continuing to serve, his or her contributions to the Board, and whether each director possessed special areas of experience or other traits or skills needed by the Board. Following this review, the Committee (with Ms. Godwin recusing herself from the decision with respect to her nomination) recommended the re-election of the four nominees identified in this Proxy Statement — Pamela H. Godwin, Thomas Kinser, A.S. (Pat) MacMillan, Jr. and Edward J. Muhl.

How may a shareholder submit a nomination?

Under our bylaws, a shareholder may nominate one or more persons for election to the Board of Directors at a meeting of shareholders. For the nominee to become eligible for election to the Board at the meeting, the shareholder nomination must be timely submitted to the company and must contain certain information concerning the nominee and the submitting shareholder, all as specified in our bylaws and summarized below.

What is the deadline for submitting a shareholder nomination?

To nominate a person for election to the Board at an annual meeting of shareholders a shareholder must give timely notice to our Corporate Secretary. To be timelyimmediately following his or her 72nd birthday. In accordance with this policy, Mr. Passarella will retire from the notice must be received between the 75th day and 120th day (by the close of business on such dates) prior to the first anniversary of the preceding year’s annual meeting. Thus, for notice of a shareholder nomination to be timely for our annual meeting in 2013, the notice must be received between the close of business on January 24, 2013 and the close of business on March 11, 2013.

If, however, the annual meeting date is moved by more than 30 days before or 70 days after the anniversary of the preceding year’s annual meeting or the nomination relates to a special meeting of shareholders called for the purpose of electing one or more directors, the notice will be timely if it is received no earlier than the close of business on the 120th day prior to the meeting and not later than the close of business on the later of (i) the 75th day prior to the meeting, and (ii) the 10th day following the day on which we first make public announcement of the date of the meeting.

What information must the shareholder nomination include?

Each notice of a shareholder nomination must set forth the following information:

As to each person whom the shareholder proposes to nominate for election or re-election as a director:

The name, age, business address and residence address of the person;

The principal occupation or employment of the person;

The class and number of shares of the company that are beneficially owned by the person;

A description of all arrangements, understandings or relationships between the shareholder and each nominee, and any other relevant person or persons;

All information required by the National Association of Insurance Commissioners’ Biographical Affidavit and attachments, as amended or replaced;

Unum Group43


About the Board of Directors2012 Proxy Statement

Such person’s written consent to being named in the Proxy Statement as a nominee and to serving as a director if elected; and

Any other information relating to the person that is required to be disclosed in solicitations of proxies for election of directors pursuant to Rule 14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Act”), and any other applicable laws, rules or regulations of any governmental authority, or of any national securities exchange or similar body overseeing any trading market on which our shares are traded.

As to the shareholder giving the notice:

The name and address of record of the shareholder and its principals (as hereinafter defined) and any shareholder associated person as defined in our bylaws on whose behalf the nomination is made, and the name and address of record of any person that owns or controls, directly or indirectly, 10% or more of any class of securities or interests in such shareholder or shareholder associated person;

The class and number of shares of the company which are owned beneficially or of record by the shareholder and any shareholder associated person;

A list of all shareholder proposals and director nominations made by the shareholder during the prior 10 years;

A list of all litigation filed against principals of the shareholder during the prior 10 years asserting a breach of fiduciary duty or a breach of loyalty;

A representation that the shareholder is a holder of record of shares of the company entitled to vote at such meeting and intends to appear in person or by proxyBoard effective at the meeting to nominate the person or persons specified in the notice. A principal of a shareholder shall be the chief executive officer (or the equivalent) of the shareholder and any individual who owns 10% or more, directly or indirectly, of any class of securities or interests in the shareholder and is employed by the shareholder;

A description of any agreement, arrangement or understanding with respect to the proposal between or among the shareholder and/or any shareholder associated person, any of their respective affiliates or associates, and any others acting in concert with any of the foregoing;

A description of any agreement, arrangement or understanding (including any derivative or short positions, profit interests, options, warrants, convertible securities, stock appreciation or similar rights, hedging transactions, and borrowed or loaned shares) that has been entered into as of the date of the shareholder’s notice by, or on behalf of, such shareholder and any shareholder associated person, whether or not such instrument or right shall be subject to settlement in underlying shares of capital stock of the company, the effect or intent of which is to mitigate loss to, manage risk or benefit of share price changes for, or decrease the voting power of, such stockholder or such beneficial owner, with respect to securities of the company; and

A representation of whether the shareholder or any shareholder-associated person intends, or is a part of a group which intends: (a) to deliver a proxy statement or form of proxy to holders of at least the percentage of our outstanding capital stock required to approve or adopt the proposal or

44Unum Group


2012 Proxy StatementAbout the Board of Directors

elect the nominee or otherwise; and (b) to solicit proxies from shareholders in support of such proposal or nomination.

No potential director nominated by a shareholder is eligible for election as a director unless nominated in accordance with these procedures.

Independence of DirectorsAnnual Meeting.

What guidelines have been established to determine the independence of the company’s directors?

In February 2004, the Board adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines, which were amended most recently in May 2011. Under these guidelines, to be considered “independent,” a director must have no material relationship with our company and must otherwise meet or exceed the criteria for independence set forth in the listing standards of the NYSE.

Under NYSE standards, a director is not independent if:

He or she is, or has been within the last three years, an employee of the company, or an immediate family member is, or has been within the last three years, an executive officer of the company;

The director has received, or has an immediate family member who has received, during any 12-month period within the past three years, more than $120,000 in direct compensation from the company, other than director and committee fees and pension or other forms of deferred compensation for prior service (provided such compensation is not contingent in any way on continued service);

(A) The director or an immediate family member is a current partner of a firm that is our internal or external auditor; (B) the director is a current employee of such a firm; (C) the director has an immediate family member who is a current employee of such a firm and who participates in the firm’s audit, assurance or tax compliance (but not tax planning) practice; or (D) the director or an immediate family member was within the last three years (but is no longer) a partner or employee of such a firm and worked on our audit within that time;

The director or an immediate family member is, or has been employed as an executive officer of another company within the last three years, where any of our present executive officers at the same time serves or served on that company’s compensation committee; or

The director is a current employee, or an immediate family member is a current executive officer of a company that has made payments to, or received payments from, our company for property or services in an amount which, in any of the last three fiscal years, exceeds the greater of $1 million or 2% of such other company’s consolidated gross revenues.

In addition, the Board has determined that the following relationships between a director and the company are not considered to be material relationships that would impair the director’s independence:

Unum Group45


About the Board of Directors2012 Proxy Statement

The director is a current employee, or an immediate family member of the director is a current executive officer, of a third party that has made payments to, or received payments from, the company for property or services in an amount which, in any of the last three fiscal years, does not exceed the greater of $1 million or 2% of the third party’s consolidated gross revenues and, where there are comparable transactions, the relationship is in the ordinary course of our business and is on substantially the same terms as those prevailing under competitive circumstances at the time for comparable transactions with non-affiliated parties; and

The director serves as an executive officer or employee of a charitable organization that receives contributions from the company that do not, in any single fiscal year, exceed the greater of (A) 2% of the charitable organization’s goal for the year (or other comparable goal as determined by the Governance Committee) or (B) $500,000; provided, however, that this limitation shall not apply to annual United Way contributions by the company that have traditionally been made in communities in which the company has operations centers with more than 500 employees and do not materially exceed the amount of the contribution in the prior year.

Our Corporate Secretary gathers information about the directors’ relationships and entities with which they are affiliated that might affect their independence from the company. The Governance Committee reviews this information and makes recommendations to the Board as to the independence of the directors. The Board reviews the Committee’s findings and recommendations and makes a determination as to the independence of directors.

Does the company have any non-independent directors on its Board?

There is only one member of our Board who is not independent, Thomas R. Watjen, our President and Chief Executive Officer. The Board believes that there should not be more than two directors who are not independent, as stated in our Corporate Governance Guidelines.

Non-independent directors generally include current officers and any person who has been an officer within the past five years. All others are regarded as independent, outside or non-management directors. As required by NYSE, a majority of the Board must have no material relationship with the company and must otherwise meet NYSE’s criteria for independence.

The Board has determined that the following current directors are independent: E. Michael Caulfield, Pamela H. Godwin, Ronald E. Goldsberry, Kevin T. Kabat, Thomas Kinser, Gloria C. Larson, A.S. (Pat) MacMillan, Jr., Edward J. Muhl, Michael J. Passarella and William J. Ryan.

In reaching the determination that all other directors are independent, the Board applied the standards described above.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

During fiscal 2011,2013, none of the members of the Human Capital Committee was an officer or employee of the company, and none of our executive officers served as a member of a board of directors or compensation committee of any other entity that has one or more executive officers serving as a member of our Board or Human Capital Committee.

 

 

46Unum Group

Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and 2014 Proxy Statement | 27 


2012 Proxy StatementAbout the Board of Directors

Corporate Governance

 

 

Our Related Party TransactionTransactions and Policy

OurThe Board has adopted a written policy concerning related party transactions, which was approved by the Board in May 2007, defines “related party transaction” astransactions. This policy covers any transaction in which we werethe company was or areis to be a participant and the amount involved exceeds $120,000, and in which any related party had or will have a direct or indirect material interest. “RelatedA “related party” includesmeans any of our directors, director director nominee,nominees or executive officerofficers, any of the company,their immediate family members, any person whoknown to us to beneficially ownsown more than 5% of the company’sour outstanding common stock, and any member or any of their immediate families or any company or other entity in which they have at least aany of these persons has an interest as an employee, principal or 10% interestor greater beneficial owner or other material financial interest. Immediate family members covered under this policy include any child, stepchild, parent, stepparent, spouse, sibling, mother-in-law, father-in-law, son-in-law, daughter-in-law, brother-in-law, sister-in-law and any other person (other than a tenant or employee) sharing the household with the nominee, director, executive officer, or 5% beneficial owner.

Prior to entering into a transaction that may be viewed as a related party transaction, the related party must notify our General Counselgeneral counsel of the facts and circumstances of the transaction. The General CounselIf the general counsel determines whetherthat the proposed transaction is a related party transaction. If the transaction is determined to be a related party transaction, it is submitted to the disinterested members of the Audit Committee for consideration at the next Committee meeting (or to the chair of the Committee if it is not practical to wait until the next meeting and the chair is not a related party to the transaction). The Committee considers all relevant facts and circumstances, including the benefits to the company, benefits to the related party, and if the related party is an independent director or nominee, the potential effect of entering into the transaction on the director’s or nominee’s independence, of entering into the transaction, any improper conflict of interest that may exist, the availability of other sources for the products and services, the terms of the transaction, and the terms available from or to unrelated third parties generally.

The transaction may be approved if it is determined in good faith not to be inconsistent with the best interests of the company and its shareholders. Certain types of transactions are deemed to be pre-approved by the Audit Committee, including executive officer and director compensation arrangements approved by the Board of Directors or the Human Capital Committee and any transaction between the company and any entity in which a related party has a relationship solely as a director, less than 10% equity holder, or an employee (other than an executive officer), or all of these relationships.

Transactions with Related Persons

During 2011,2013 and up to the date of this Proxy Statement,proxy statement, there have been no related party transactions, other than those described above as being deemed pre-approved.

Codes of Conduct and Ethics

The Board has adopted a code of conduct establishing certain business practices and ethics applicable to all orof our directors, officers and employees. The Board has also adopted a separate code of ethics applicable to our CEO and certain of our senior financial officers. Both of these codes are available on our investor relations website at www.unum.com inunder the Investors area under Corporate Governance. Copies also are available free of charge by submitting a request to the Office of the Corporate Secretary.

Unum Group47


About the Board of Directors2012 Proxy Statement

“Corporate Governance” heading atwww.investors.unum.com.

We will provide notice of any waivers of the code of conduct granted to executive officers or directors on our website, and will report to the SEC any waivers of the code of ethics granted to our CEO or certain of our senior financial officers. No waivers have been requested or granted to date, and no such requests for waivers are anticipated.

Interested Parties’ Communications with the Board

Shareholders or other interested parties may communicate with our Chairman, William J. Ryan, or any Board members by contacting the Office of the Corporate Secretary as described on page 12.

In March 2006, the Board approved a process for handling letters received by the company and addressed to non-management members of the Board. Under this process, our Corporate Secretary reviews all such correspondence and regularly provides a log and copies of the correspondence to the lead independent director, who determines whether further distribution of correspondence is appropriate and to whom it should be sent. Any director may at any time review this log and request copies of correspondence. Concerns relating to accounting, internal controls or auditing matters are promptly brought to the attention of the internal auditor and handled in accordance with procedures established by the Audit Committee. Copies of correspondence relating to corporate governance matters are also provided to the chair of the Governance Committee.

The Board has requested that certain items unrelated to the duties and responsibilities of the Board be excluded from the process, including mass mailings, resumes and other forms of job inquiries, surveys, business solicitations or advertisements, and matters related to claims or employment.

Corporate Governance Guidelines

The full text of our Corporate Governance Guidelines can be accessed on our website at www.unum.com in the Investors area under Corporate Governance. These guidelines are reviewed annually by the Governance Committee, including a determination of whether any changes are appropriate in response to regulatory requirements or other developments.

A copy of the Corporate Governance Guidelines is also available by contacting the Office of the Corporate Secretary as described on page 12.

 

 28 | Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and 2014 Proxy Statement

48Unum Group


2012 Proxy StatementAbout the Independent Auditors

 

About the Independent AuditorsLOGO

What fees were charged by Ernst & Young LLP?

The fees charged by Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm in 2011 and 2010 are described below.

Audit Fees

The aggregate fees and expenses related to professional services rendered by Ernst & Young LLP for audit services were $7,608,443 for 2011 and $7,151,455 for 2010. Services rendered by the firm were:

The fiscal year audit of our annual financial statements;

The audit of internal control over financial reporting;

The interim reviews of the financial statements included in our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q; and

Services provided in connection with statutory and regulatory filings.

Audit-Related Fees

The aggregate fees and expenses related to professional services rendered by Ernst & Young LLP for audit-related services, comprised primarily of accounting consultations, SOC 1 reviews, and audit-related services for our employee benefit plans, were $618,579 for 2011 and $405,450 for 2010.

Tax Fees

The aggregate fees and expenses related to professional services rendered by Ernst & Young LLP for tax compliance and advisory services were $96,662 for 2011 and $32,695 for 2010.

All Other Fees

The aggregate fees billed for products and services provided by Ernst & Young LLP other than those reported above for audit, audit-related and tax services were $0 for 2011 and $119,006 for 2010.

Who is responsible for retaining the independent auditors?

The Audit Committee is directly responsible for the appointment, compensation, oversight and replacement of the independent auditors.

Does the Audit Committee have a policy of pre-approving services performedappointed by the independent auditors?

Yes. The Audit Committee has a policy that requires advance approval of all audit, audit-related, tax services and other services performed by the independent auditors. The policy provides for setting pre-approval limits for specifically defined audit and non-audit services. In pre-approving the services, the Committee considers whether such services are consistent with SEC rules on auditor independence.

Unum Group49


About the Independent Auditors2012 Proxy Statement

Specific approval by the Committee will be required if fees for any particular service or aggregate fees for services of a similar nature exceed the pre-approved limits. The Committee has delegated to its Chair authority to approve permitted services, and the Chair must report any such decisions to the Committee at its next scheduled meeting.

Will the auditors be at the Annual Meeting to respond to questions?

Representatives of Ernst & Young LLP are expected to be present at the Annual Meeting. They will have the opportunity to make a statement if they desire to do so and are expected to be available to respond to appropriate questions.

50Unum Group


2012 Proxy StatementAudit Committee Report

Audit Committee Report

The primary purpose and responsibilities of the Audit Committee are to assist the Board of Directors in its oversight of:

and operates under a written charter adopted by the integrityBoard, a copy of the financial statements of the company;

the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting;

compliance with legal and regulatory requirements;

the qualifications and independence of the company’s independent auditors;

the performance of the internal audit function and independent auditors;

financial risk, operational risk and any other risks the oversight of which is not allocated to another committee of the Board; and

the company’s enterprise risk management program.

The Committee’s duties and responsibilities are summarized on page 34 under the caption “Audit Committee” and are more fully described in the Committee’s charter, which is available on the company’s investor relations website www.unum.com inatwww.investors.unum.com. The Committee is comprised solely of independent directors who meet the Investors area under Corporate Governance. The charter is also available by contacting the Officerequirements of the Corporate SecretarySEC, the NYSE and the company’s corporate governance guidelines. All members of the Committee are “financially literate” as described on page 12.required by the NYSE and four members are “audit committee financial experts” as defined by the SEC.

The primary purpose of the Committee is to assist the Board in its oversight of the:

Integrity of the company’s financial statements and related disclosures;

Effectiveness of the company’s internal control over financial reporting;

Compliance by the company with legal and regulatory requirements;

Qualifications, independence and performance of the company’s independent auditor;

Responsibilities and performance of the company’s internal audit function;

Enterprise risk management program of the company; and

Management of the company’s financial risks, operational risks, which include cyber security risk, and other risks not specifically allocated to another committee.

In fulfilling its oversight responsibilities, the Committee met 12 times during 2013 to facilitate communication among the members of the Committee, management, the internal auditors and the independent auditor. The Committee held executive sessions and met separately with the independent auditor and with the internal auditors without management present.

The Committee reviewed and discussed with management and the company’s independent auditor, Ernst & Young, matters relating to the company’s accounting and financial reporting processes, including the internal control over financial reporting; reviewed and discussed with management and the independent auditor the company’s annual and quarterly financial statements and related disclosures in reports filed with the SEC; pre-approved all audit services and permitted non-audit services to be performed by the company’s independent auditor; reviewed and discussed with management the responsibilities and performance of the internal audit function; obtained, reviewed and discussed with management reports with respect to the adequacy and effectiveness of the company’s enterprise risk management program, as well as specific financial risks and operational risks, including cyber security risk; and obtained and reviewed reports concerning the company’s policies and procedures for ensuring compliance with applicable laws, regulations and the company’s Code of Conduct.

Management has the primary responsibilityis primarily responsible for the preparation, presentation and integrity of the company’s financial statements and for the reporting process, including the establishment and effectiveness of the company’s internal controlscontrol over financial reporting. The company’s independent registered public accounting firm, Ernst & Young LLP,auditor is responsible for performing an independent audit of the financial statements and expressing an opinion on whether they conform to generally accepted accounting principles. The independent registered public accounting firm also is responsible for auditingof the effectiveness of the company’s internal control over financial reporting.reporting in accordance with auditing standards promulgated by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (PCAOB). The independent registered public accounting firmauditor reports directly to the Committee, which is responsible for the appointment, compensation, retention and oversight of the work performed by the independent registered public accounting firm.auditor.

In fulfilling its oversight responsibilities, theThe Committee has reviewed and discussed with management the company’s audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2011,2013, including a discussion of the quality, not just the acceptability, of

Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and 2014 Proxy Statement | 29 


Report of the Audit Committee

the accounting principles, the reasonableness of significant judgments, and the clarity of disclosures in the financial statements. The Committee has reviewed and discussed with the independent registered public accounting firmauditor the overall scope and results of the independent audit and its judgments of the quality and acceptability of the company’s accounting principles. The Committee has discussed with the independent registered public accounting firmauditor the matters required to be discussed by the statement on Auditng Standards No. 61, as amended (AICPA,Professional Standards, Vol. 1,PCAOB AU section 380), as adopted by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board in Rule 3200T.Section 380. The Committee has received the written disclosures and the letter from the independent registered public accounting firmauditor required by applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight BoardPCAOB regarding the independent registered public accounting firm’sauditor’s communications with the Committee concerning independence, and hasindependence. The Committee also discussed with the independent registered public accounting firmauditor matters relating to its independence, including consideration of whether the independenceindependent auditor’s provision of that firm.

Unum Group51


Audit Committee Report2012 Proxy Statement

non-audit services to the company is compatible with the auditor’s independence.

The company’s internal audit function, under the direction of the chief auditor, reports directly to the Committee, haswhich is responsible for the oversight of the work performed by the internal auditors. The internal auditors are responsible for, among other matters, conducting internal audits designed to evaluate the company’s system of internal controls. The Committee reviewed and discussed with the company’s internal auditors, and independent registered public accounting firm, and has received regular status reports from them concerning, the overall scope and plans for their respective audits. The Committee has met with the internal auditors, and independent registered public accounting firm, with and without management present, to discuss their audit observations and findings, and management’s responses, and their evaluation of the results of their examinations, their evaluationseffectiveness of the company’s internal controls andcontrol over financial reporting. Additionally, as the overall qualityformer chief auditor of the company retired in early 2013, the Chair of the Committee met with the candidate proposed as the successor in this role, as well as discussed the candidate’s qualifications with management.

In evaluating the performance of the company’s financial reporting.independent auditor, the Committee took into consideration a number of factors, including the professional qualifications of the firm and the lead audit partner, the quality and candor of the firm’s communications with the Committee and the company, and evidence supporting the firm’s independence, objectivity, and professional skepticism. Additionally, as the lead audit partner has completed five years of service to the company in 2013 and under SEC rules is subject to rotation requirements, a subgroup of the Committee met with the candidates proposed for this role in 2014, as well as discussed the candidates qualifications with management.

Based on this evaluation, the Committee has determined that the continued retention of Ernst & Young as independent auditor is in the best interests of the company and its shareholders. Accordingly, the Committee appointed Ernst & Young as the company’s independent auditor for 2014. Although the Committee has sole authority to appoint the independent auditor, the Committee recommended that the Board of Directors seek shareholder ratification of the appointment at the Annual Meeting.

Based on the reviews and discussions referred to above, the Committee recommended to the Board of Directors, (andand the Board approved)approved, that the company’s audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 20112013 be included in the company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

Michael J. Passarella, Chair

Theodore H. Bunting, Jr.

E. Michael Caulfield

Kevin T. KabatTimothy F. Keaney

Thomas Kinser

 

 

52Unum Group

 30 | Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and 2014 Proxy Statement


2012 Proxy StatementReport of the Human Capital Committee

 

Report of the Human Capital CommitteeLOGO

The Human Capital Committee has reviewed and discussed the following Compensation Discussion and AnalysisIn this section, with Unum’s management. Based on this review and discussion, the Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that this Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in both the Proxy Statement and in the company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.

A.S. (Pat) MacMillan, Jr., Chair

Kevin T. Kabat

Thomas Kinser

Edward J. Muhl

Unum Group53


54Unum Group


2012 Proxy StatementCompensation Discussion and Analysis

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

The Compensation Discussion and Analysis is organized as follows:

Compensation Discussion and Analysis55

Executive Summary

56

2011 Overview

58

Compensation Philosophy and Processes

62

Benchmarking and Peer Group Design

65

Individual Performance Assessment

68

Elements of Pay

69

Executive Compensation Summaries

86

Contracts and Agreements

94

Policies and Practices

96

Compensation Tables

100

Post-Employment Compensation

108

Unum Group55


Compensation Discussion and Analysis2012 Proxy Statement

The Human Capital Committee has overall responsibility for approving and evaluating compensation plans, benefit plans, workforce management, and policies and programs of the company as they affect directors, executive officers and other employees of the company. This Compensation Discussion and Analysis section provideswe provide an overview of our compensation philosophy and processes and explain how the Human Capital Committee arrivesof our Board (the Committee) arrived at its compensation decisions specifically related tofor the base and incentive pay for our five highest paid executives in 2011. These five individuals, whobelow named executive officers (NEOs), all of whom are included in the 2013 Summary Compensation Table on page 100 and are referred to as “named executive officers” throughout this section, are:62.

 

Thomas R. Watjen, President and Chief Executive Officer;

Thomas R. Watjen, President and Chief Executive Officer

 

Richard P. McKenney, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer;

Richard P. McKenney, Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

 

Kevin P. McCarthy, Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer

Randall C. Horn, Executive Vice President, President and Chief Executive Officer, Colonial Life

Breege A. Farrell, Executive Vice President, Chief Investment Officer

In May 2013, Mr. McCarthy Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer; President and Chief Executive Officer, Unum US;

Robert O. Best, former Executive Vice President, Global Services (retired); and

Randall C. Horn, Executive Vice President, President and Chief Executive Officer, Colonial Life.

Mr. Best retiredannounced his intent to retire from the company in March 2014, after approximately 35 years of service with the company. He stepped down from his duties as CEO of Unum US on December 31, 2011, andJuly 1, 2013, at which time his responsibilities have beenwere assumed by other officers.

Executive Summary

Overall, 2011 was another successful year forMichael Q. Simonds. Mr. McCarthy continued to serve as Chief Operating Officer of Unum Group until his retirement on March 31, 2014. Following his retirement, Mr. McCarthy may provide consulting services to the company despite a very difficult external environment. We met or exceeded our primary financial targets (excluding special items discussedpursuant to an arrangement described on page 75), including earnings per share, return on equity, after-tax operating earnings58.

Business and revenue. In addition, we continued to deliver on our customer commitments and strengthened our culturePerformance Review

Our Business

We are a leading provider of social responsibility.

In terms of operating performance, the company continued to do better than othersfinancial protection benefits in the industry. As noted on page 60, company performance as measured by operating earnings per share growthUnited States and operating return on equity significantly exceededUnited Kingdom. Our products, which are primarily offered through the S&Pworkplace, include disability, life, accident and critical illness insurance and help protect millions of working people and their families from the financial hardships that can occur in the event of illness, injury or loss of life. In 2013, we paid more than $6 billion in benefits to hundreds of thousands of customers who faced illness, injury or loss of life.

Our business operations are divided into three primary segments selling products – Unum US, Unum UK and Colonial Life & Health insurance index.

Total shareholder return, as noted on page 61, surpassed industry averages on both– and a three-Closed Block of business that includes products we service and five-year basis. Although total shareholder return decreased 11.63% in 2011, that compares to a decrease of 20.71% for the S&P Life & Health index over the same period.support but no longer market.

In making its compensation decisions, the Committee reviewed and analyzed overall company and business area performance, as well as important strategic initiatives and the external environment. Additionally, the individual performance of our named executive officers was considered in making the following decisions relative to base salary and incentive payments:

Approved base salary increases for named executive officers ranging from 0% to 2.5%, effective March 1, 2012 (details on page 70);

56Unum Group


2012 Proxy StatementCompensation Discussion and Analysis

Approved an increase to Mr. Watjen’s annual incentive target from 150% to 200% for 2012 (details on page 73);

Approved annual incentive awards for 2011 performance for named executive officers ranging from 83% to 133% of target (details on page 76);

Approved long-term incentive grants for 2011 performance for named executive officers, other than Mr. Best who was not eligible due to his retirement, ranging from 106% to 140% of target (details on page 82); and

Approved increases to long-term incentive targets for Mr. Watjen from $5,000,000 to $6,000,000 and Messrs. McKenney and McCarthy from 150% to 200% for 2012 (details on page 83).

In addition, and working with senior management over the last several years, the Committee has instituted the following key compensation practices:

Adopted a clawback policy;

Eliminated any new excise tax gross-ups;

Eliminated most perquisites;

Suspended company-paid personal use of corporate aircraft;

Increased stock ownership guidelines;

Implemented stock holding periods;

Adopted a “double trigger” vesting of awards upon a change-in-control; and

Implemented an anti-hedging policy.

These key compensation practices are summarized on page 62.

 

 

Unum Group57

Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and 2014 Proxy Statement | 31 


Compensation Discussion and Analysis2012 Proxy Statement

 Compensation Discussion and Analysis

 

 

2011 Business Overview

Environment

The economic environment in 2011 presented a number of general challenges:

An overall weak economy;

A slow recovery from the recession and its continued impact on consumer confidence;

Continuing high unemployment in the U.S. and U.K.;

The ongoing European debt crisis and its impact on global financial markets;

Austerity measures in the U.K. that put greater pressure on the costs of state-sponsored benefit programs; and

Uncertainty in Washington, D.C., on debt relief and the future of health care reform.

For financial services firms like Unum, additional factors contributed to a difficult economic environment, including:

Low interest rates that impacted the returns on investment portfolios; and

Weak employment trends resulting from firms continuing to reduce employment or delay hiring.

Company2013 Performance

Company performance is the key factor the Committee considers when making compensation decisions, along with any external factors that may be outside the company’s control. By any significant measure, 2011Fiscal year 2013 was anothera successful yearone for Unum as we delivered strong financial and operating performance across the company. Although we continued to deliver steadyface some economic headwinds, particularly in the form of low interest rates and disciplined operating performancemodest job and salary growth, our businesses have adapted well to these challenges. We grew in spitemany of the difficultareas we targeted for growth, remained solidly profitable and continued to generate excess capital that we used to strengthen our business and economic environment.return value to shareholders.

Unum built on a solidOur key financial foundation. The company:highlights for 2013 include:(1)

 

 

Pre-tax operating income of $1.24 billion and after tax operating income of $882.5 million, both record highs, and operating revenues of $10.35 billion;

Record operating earnings per share of $3.32, a 5.4% increase from the prior year and the eighth consecutive year of operating EPS growth;

Consolidated return on equity of 11.4% (14.2% in our three primary operating businesses);

Book value per share growth (excluding AOCI) of 9.4%, the fifth consecutive year of growth in book value per share; and

Strong investment results and, through our emphasis on sound risk management, a credit quality that remains among the best in the industry.

Our key operating highlights for 2013 include:

Consistent operating performance from all of our businesses as a result of disciplined pricing, focused sales growth and improvement of internal processes;

Meeting our commitments to customers by paying more than $6 billion in benefits to people facing illness, injury or loss of life;

Strong customer satisfaction metrics that generally exceeded our plan benchmarks;

Our brand and image remaining at historically high levels; and

 

Posted strong earnings that resultedRecognition of our corporate citizenship efforts by several independent organizations, including being named one ofForbesMost Reputable Companies and 100 Most Trustworthy Companies, a member of the Dow Jones Sustainability North American Index and one of the Best Places to Work in pre-tax operating income for the year of $1.3 billion(1) and consolidated after-tax operating income of $896.8 million(1);Insurance byBusiness Insurance.

 

Achieved Operating Earnings Per Share growthLOGO

 32 | Notice of 9.7 percent;Annual Meeting of Shareholders and 2014 Proxy Statement


  Compensation Discussion and Analysis  

 

Delivered consistent operating results, solid investment performanceBecause of these and other accomplishments in 2013, our capital generation remained strong and we were able to deploy that capital to invest in and strengthen our businesses, as well as return it to shareholders through share repurchases totaling more than $318 million and a disciplined capitaldividend payout of $146.5 million, an 11.5% increase from the prior year. Our credit ratings also remain high as a result of the progress we have made over the last several years.

      CAPITAL GENERATION AND DEPLOYMENT
    Share Repurchases     Dividend Increase  

2008      

  $ 700 million 

2009      

   10.0%

2010      

  $ 356 million 12.1%

2011  ��   

  $ 620 million 13.5%

2012      

  $ 500 million 23.8%

2013      

  $ 318 million 11.5%

Business Highlights

The following are 2013 performance highlights(1) within our primary business segments:

Our Unum US segment, representing 59.2% of our consolidated premium income in 2013, reported record operating income with a 1.4% increase over 2012 results driven by growth in premium income and overall favorable risk results. While premium income increased 1.4%, sales decreased 2% for the year, although they trended upward in the latter part of 2013 and were higher in the markets we targeted for growth. Unum US continued to generate above-market returns across all of its primary business segments, with a return on equity of 13.6%.

Unum UK, representing 7.3% of our consolidated premium income in 2013, reported a slight increase in operating income of 0.5% over 2012 results, due principally to overall favorable risk results. Premium income decreased 19.9% while sales decreased 19.5%, driven by lower group life sales as Unum UK continued to take actions to address profitability concerns in this line of business. The Unum UK return on equity was 14.0%.

Colonial Life, representing 16.2% of our consolidated premium income in 2013, reported record operating income with a 3.9% increase over 2012 results, driven mostly by higher operating revenue and stable risk results. Premium income grew 3.2% while sales increased 1.6% in the year. Consistent with past years, Colonial Life continues to generate solid margins and returns, with a return on equity of 16.5%.

Our Closed Block performed at or above expectations and grew before-tax operating income by nearly 15%. We added management strategy which ledresources and additional capabilities to oversee this important portion of our business, and due to this greater focus, we saw more consistent performance throughout the year.

Our investment results remain solid, although we recorded a slight drop in net investment income in 2013, primarily due to a further strengtheningdecline in yield on invested assets as we continue to invest new cash flows at lower rates. Our asset quality remains strong, with a net unrealized gain on our fixed maturity securities of the balance sheet:$4.1 billion at December 31, 2013.

¡

Risk-based capital was 405% (above our target range); and

¡

Holding company cash and marketable securities of $756 million, which was aligned with our expectations.

 

(1)Operating results referenced throughout this document exclude certain specified items. For 2013, these include net realized investment gains and losses, non-operating retirement-related gains or losses, the unclaimed death benefits reserve increase and the group life waiver of premium benefit reserve reduction. For reconciliations of the non-GAAP financial measures, including operating income, operating revenue, operating earnings per share, return on equity and book value per share (excluding accumulated other comprehensive income, or AOCI), to the most directly comparable GAAP measures, refer toAppendix BA.

 

 

58Unum Group

Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and 2014 Proxy Statement | 33 


2012 Proxy StatementCompensation Discussion and Analysis

 

Continued buyback of company stock of $619.9 million in 2011; and

Strengthened reserves for future benefits in the individual disability closed block through an after-tax charge of $119.3 million.

Unum delivered on its customer commitment. The company:

Paid more than $6 billion in benefits to individualsCompensation Discussion and families impacted by life-changing events;Analysis

Earned customer and claimant satisfaction ratings that, as measured through third-party surveys, were well above industry benchmarks; and

Invested in our business and leveraged global capabilities to capitalize on current and future growth opportunities.

Unum remained committed to good corporate citizenship. The company:

Contributed more than $12 million through donations and employee volunteerism to charitable organizations throughout the United States and United Kingdom;

Drove industry and public policy discourse on the important role workplace benefits has in providing a financial safety net for working individuals and their families; and

Reduced our impact on the environment through resource conservation, recycling and employee education.

Unum advanced several important strategic initiatives. The company:

Implemented a new Global Services organization and plan. As part of this effort, work has begun to improve effectiveness and leverage resources across the enterprise;

Continued to invest in new capabilities, products and services designed to further profitable growth in target areas; and

Completed a strategic review of the long-term care business which resulted in the decision to discontinue sales of group long-term care policies and move the group and individual long-term care business to a closed block. This strategic decision allows us to sharpen our focus on those products which provide the greatest long-term opportunity and strengthen the company’s risk profile. As a result of the strategic review, the company took an after-tax charge of $561.2 million. The company has generally received a positive reaction to this announcement from rating agencies and analysts.

Unum Group59


Compensation Discussion and Analysis2012 Proxy Statement

Within the specific business areas, performance against plan was as follows:

Unum US(1) – Pre-tax operating income above plan due to favorable risk results. Sales were on plan and the company maintained pricing discipline in a competitive market. Earned premium was slightly below plan due to the difficult economic environment impacting employment levels and salary growth;

Colonial Life – Pre-tax operating income was below plan driven by unfavorable risk results and a higher expense ratio. Premium income was slightly below plan. Sales were below plan with shortfalls in both the commercial and public sector markets;

Unum UK – Pre-tax operating income was below plan due primarily to unfavorable risk results. Premium income was favorable to plan. Sales were below plan. Expense ratio was favorable to plan; and

Investments – Overall investment performance was above plan. Net investment income, as defined for purposes of the investment incentive plan, was below plan, avoided losses when compared to the market were favorable, and the market composite performance, which measures average credit spreads and yields on investment purchases to specified benchmarks, and realized investment losses relative to a specified peer group, was above plan.

Industry Comparison

The company has generally performed well in comparison to others in its industry over the past five years. As shown in the charts below, operating earnings per share growth has exceeded the industry while the company’s operating return on equity has remained consistent and the industry return on equity has fallen.

LOGO

(1)For purposes of incentive plan measurement, Unum US includes financial results of the long-term care and individual disability closed blocks of business, as adjusted to account for the special items discussed on page 75.

(2)Operating EPS Growth is indexed. Operating results referenced throughout this document exclude certain special items. For reconciliations to the most comparable GAAP measures, refer toAppendix B.

60Unum Group


2012 Proxy StatementCompensation Discussion and Analysis

 

 

Total Shareholder ValueReturn

A primary goal ofTotal shareholder return (TSR) comparisons vary significantly based upon the company is to create long-term shareholder value throughindices and time periods considered. On a focus on profitable growth and financial flexibility. We have worked to return value to shareholders primarily through share repurchases and dividend increases. As a result, we have significantly outperformed relevant key indices over a five-year period.

The charts below compare the three-year and five-year returns for the company against certain key indices. Theone-year basis, our TSR was 71.8%, outperforming our proxy peer group is informative in making compensation decisions because it is a primary labor market from which we recruit talent, and the size and structure of these companies are similar to Unum. However, it includes insurance brokerage, healthcare, and property and casualty insurers. These sectors trade on different business fundamentals and different cycles and, as a result, we believepeers, the S&P Life and Health index isIndex, and the broader S&P 500. On a better indicatorthree- and five-year basis, we were consistent with the S&P Life and Health Index – the group that most closely aligns with our industry – and were generally in line with the S&P 500. Our performance trailed our proxy peers during that time, illustrating the significant volatility seen as a result of benchmarked performance.the financial crisis and the impact it had on the smaller Proxy Peer Group when compared with broader indices.

We are pleased that our track record of solid operating performance and returning value to shareholders was recognized in 2013 with our share price reaching levels near the historical valuation of our company.

 

LOGO

LOGO

2013 Compensation and Benefits Actions

The financial and operational performance of the company, as outlined on the preceding pages and in our 2013 10-K, resulted in above plan achievement for all of our business segments (see page 49). This high performance is also recognized in the individual performance assessments and achievement levels of our NEOs found beginning on page 42.

During 2013, we took the following actions with respect to compensation and benefits:

 

(1)

We amended the terms of our defined benefit pension plans to freeze further accrual of retirement benefits provided to U.S. employees on December 31, 2013. Effective January 1, 2014, we transitioned to a defined contribution plan for U.S. employees in which Unum provides a 4.5% company contribution for those employees who have completed one year of service. The Proxy Peer Group includes both propertyplan is described in further detail in the “Retirement and casualty insurers, and life and health insurers. UnumWorkplace Benefits” section beginning on page 55.

By freezing further accrual of retirement benefits provided to U.S. employees under the defined benefit pension plans, we effectively eliminated a change in control benefit otherwise available to executives who are parties to change in control severance agreements with the company. The benefit eliminated is not parta lump sum payment equal to the increased actuarial present value of the Proxy Peer Group. Please refer to page 66 for a list of Unum’s Proxy Peer Group companies.executive’s

 

 

 34 | Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and 2014 Proxy Statement


Compensation Discussion and Analysis  

retirement benefit under the defined benefit pension plan assuming two additional years of age and service credit following termination of employment in connection with a change in control.

oIn the future, executives currently covered by change in control severance agreements will receive two additional years of contributions under the company’s non-qualified defined contribution plan in the event of a termination of employment in connection with a change in control.

Unum Group 61

At Mr. Watjen’s request to be consistent with all other employees, we amended his employment agreement to freeze further accrual of his retirement benefit under the Unum Group Senior Executive Retirement Plan (SERP) (which is described in his employment agreement) as of December 31, 2013. As part of the revisions to Mr. Watjen’s employment agreement, we also:


oEliminated the Section 280G excise tax gross-up;

Compensation Discussion and AnalysisoReduced severance payable in the event of termination by the company without “cause” or by Mr. Watjen for “good reason” outside of certain “change in control” periods (each as defined in his employment agreement) by:

¡ 2012 Proxy Statement

Decreasing the severance multiple from three times the sum of base salary and average bonus to two times the sum of base salary and average bonus, and

¡

Reducing health and welfare benefits continuation from three years of continuation to two years of continuation; and

oEliminated a lump sum severance payment that was equal to the increased actuarial present value of Mr. Watjen’s retirement benefit under the SERP assuming three additional years of age and service credit following termination of employment.

2013 Say-on-Pay Vote

Last year’s advisory vote on executive compensation (or “say-on-pay” vote) passed with 76% approval. This was higher than the previous year’s vote and included support from 12 of our 13 largest shareholders. We continue to strive to improve the level of shareholder support for our named executive officer compensation.

Over the last several years, the company has had an extensive outreach program to shareholders and proxy advisory firms, with a particular focus on soliciting input on our executive compensation program.

The Human Capital Committee (the Committee) provided feedback and guidance with respect to the proposed agenda to be used during our shareholder outreach program. Throughout the process, the Committee was updated on our conversations with both institutional investors as well as proxy advisory firms, including their feedback on our executive compensation programs. The Committee values shareholder feedback and takes the results of the say-on-pay vote and the shareholder feedback into consideration as it makes compensation decisions.

In 2012, we received specific feedback, including:

A preference for a three-year performance cycle for the long-term incentive plan;

Requests for a reduction in the amount of overlap between annual and long-term incentive plan goals; and

Requests for enhanced disclosure with respect to the goals for the annual and long-term incentive plans.

Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and 2014 Proxy Statement | 35 


 Compensation Discussion and Analysis

 

 

The Committee responded to the feedback and made changes in 2013, which included:

Introducing performance share units (PSUs) based on three-year, prospective average return on equity and average earnings per share goals, with a modifier tied to relative total shareholder return;

Establishing new performance goals for our long-term incentive plan to reduce the overlap with the performance goals for our annual incentive plan;

Enhancing proxy disclosure to provide a more detailed explanation of the rationale behind compensation decisions and a more comprehensive discussion of goals, individual performance and the linkage to compensation; and

Supplementing disclosure of our annual and long-term incentive performance metrics by including threshold, maximum and actual performance levels for each metric.

In 2013, the company again solicited feedback from institutional shareholders and proxy advisory firms. The feedback from our shareholder outreach in 2013 indicated that shareholders agreed with the changes we made to the long-term incentive program, particularly the use of PSUs with three-year corporate performance goals and a payout modifier tied to relative total shareholder return. No additional concerns were identified by shareholders with respect to our executive compensation programs in the course of our 2013 shareholder outreach.

Compensation PhilosophyProgram Structure and ProcessesCommittee Decisions

Our executive compensation philosophy is based on two core goals: (1)designed to reward performance that helps us achieve our corporate objectives;objectives, increase shareholder return and (2) to attract and retain talented employees. In practice,individuals. We do this means that we:by:

 

Offer

Offering a base salary that reflects the competitive market as well as the roles, skills, abilities, experience and performance of employees;

Provide incentive opportunities for all employees based on the achievement of corporate and individual performance; and

Align the long-term interests of management and shareholders, as well as promote a culture of ownership and accountability in the company, by offering performance-based equity compensation opportunities and requiring senior executive officers to own shares and retain equity awards for a specified period of time after vesting.

What key compensation practices has the company implemented during recent years?

Adopted a clawback policy. In 2009, we adopted a policy to seek recoupment of performance-based compensation paid to certain senior officers in the event of a material restatement of the company’s financial results. The Committee will review this policy once the SEC has adopted rules to implement the recoupment provisions of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (Dodd-Frank Act) and will make any appropriate changes at that time. Details of our current recoupment policy are discussed further on page 98.

 

 

Eliminated excise tax gross-ups. In 2010,Providing incentive opportunities for all employees based on the Committee determined that it will not enter into any new or amended agreements with executive officers that include provisions for any excise tax gross-up for severance payments made in connection with a change in control.achievement of corporate and individual performance goals; and

 

 

Eliminated most perquisites. We eliminated most perquisites beginning January 1, 2008. Today,Aligning the company provides only a limited numberlong-term interests of perquisitesmanagement and shareholders by offering performance-based equity compensation opportunities and requiring senior officers to named executive officers. We believe the remaining perquisites provide a business value. These perquisites are described on page 85.

Suspended company-paid personal use of corporate aircraft. Under company policy, Mr. Watjen is allowed 40 hours each year of company-paid personal use of corporate aircraft as part of his employment. Mr. Watjen has voluntarily discontinued use of this benefit since 2009. Instead, he has elected to reimburse the company for any personal use through a time-sharing agreement.

Increased stock ownership guidelines. Stock ownership guidelines based on a multiple of salary were implemented in 2007. Following its review of stock ownership practices benchmarked against peer companies, in order to align with market practice, the Committee increased stock ownership guidelines for the CEO to a multiple of six times salary in December of 2011. As of December 31, 2011, each named executive officer exceeded these ownership guidelines. Additional information is provided beginning on page 96.

62Unum Group


2012 Proxy StatementCompensation Discussionown shares and Analysis

Implemented stock holding periods. The Committee updated its stock retention guidelines during 2007. These guidelines require a percentage of net shares (shares after tax withholding) to be heldretain equity awards for a specified period of time. Additional information is provided beginning on page 96.

Adopted “double trigger” vestingtime after vesting. This practice also promotes a culture of awards upon a change-in-control. Grants made on or after December 14, 2011 require both (1) a change-in-control eventownership and (2) a termination of employment, for specified reasons within two years ofaccountability in the event, in order for acceleration of vesting to occur. Additional information is provided beginning on page 114.

Implemented an anti-hedging policy. We have a policy, implemented in 2007, that prohibits our directors and executive officers from engaging in certain hedging transactions involving Unum stock. Additional information is provided beginning on page 97.company.

Who is responsible for evaluating and administering executive compensation?Elements of Pay

The Committee, which consists solely of independent directors, evaluates, designs and administers a compensation program for executive officers that appropriately links pay, company performance, individual performance and the creation of shareholder value.

The Committee, with input from the full Board, is directly responsible for evaluating the performance of the CEO as well as for determining theThere are five primary elements of his compensation. The Committee also determines compensation for each of the named executive officers.

At our 2011 annual meeting, we presented shareholders with an advisory vote to approve the compensation of our named executive officers as describedpay in the proxy statement for that meeting. The Committee was pleased that 97% of the votes cast on this item (excluding abstentions and broker non-votes) were in favor of our executive compensation program, which are summarized in the table below.

Those pay elements that are “at risk,” or contingent on individual or corporate performance, are noted in the table below. Our NEOs, as structured. The Committee considered the results of this vote as support for maintaining its continued application of similar practices and philosophymost senior officers in determining executive compensation for the 2011 performance year.

Is the CEO involved in setting executive compensation?

Mr. Watjen provides a self-assessment to the Committee outlining his own performance for the year. In addition, Mr. Watjen provides performance assessments and compensation recommendations to the Committee for those executives who report to him, which includes all of the named executive officers. Mr. Watjen does not participate in decisions related to the establishment of his own pay, nor does he have any decision-making authority with regard to his compensation. Mr. Watjen provides input regarding compensation of all other named executive officers. This input is considered when decisions are made by the Committee.

Mr. Watjen also provides his perspective to the Committee on the business environment and the company’s performance. While the Committee considers this in its decision process, it exercises its own independent judgment in determining compensation for the CEO and other named executive officers based on its assessment of company and individual performance.

Unum Group63


Compensation Discussion and Analysis2012 Proxy Statement

Does the Committee use an outside consultant for advice?

The Committee engaged Pay Governance LLC as its compensation consultant. Pay Governance LLC provided the Committee with objective, expert analyses, independent advice and information with respect to executive and director compensation during their engagement period.

What steps are taken to ensure independence of the consultant?

The Committee adopted a policy in 2009 establishing standards designed to ensure that compensation consultants are independent of the persons for whom compensation advice or recommendations are solicited. This policy stipulates the following:

Compensation paid to the Committee’s compensation consultant must not be directly affected by amounts paid by the company, to the consultant for services unrelated to those provided to the Committee;

The individuals providing services to the Committee on behalf of the compensation consultant must not have a family relationship with any covered person; and

The compensation consultant must certify to the Committee on an annual basis that eachmajority of the foregoing standards has been satisfied.

Pay Governance LLC reports directly to the Committee and has attested to its independence. Furthermore, Pay Governance LLC only provides executive compensation consulting services and does not perform any other services for the company.

In addition, an executive session was held without management present at most Committee meetings to discuss compensation issues with these consultants. Management interacts with the consultants only when doing so on behalf of the Committee or as it relates to proposals the Committee will review for approval.

Members of Unum’s finance, human resources and legal staffs also supported the Committee in its work by providing information and responding to questions. Employees from these departments discuss various executive compensation topics with Pay Governance LLC, including how the compensation plans fit with other programs and business objectives. Although these staff members may make recommendations, the final decision on all executive compensation matters rests solely with the Committee.

What were the fees paid to our executive compensation consultant during 2011?

Pay Governance LLC received $194,140 for executive compensation consulting services during 2011.

64Unum Group


2012 Proxy StatementCompensation Discussion and Analysis

Benchmarking and Peer Group Design

To what extent does the Committee use external data to compare executive compensation?

When making compensation decisions, the Committee compares the compensation of our CEO and other named executive officers to that of similarly situated executives at peer companies. This process is often referred to as “benchmarking.” These comparisons are used as points of reference but do not take the place of internal analyses or consideration of company and individual performance.

The Committee uses two sources for benchmarking executive compensation:

The Proxy Peer Group reflects a mix of 17 publicly traded insurance and financial services companies that are Unum’s primary competitors for talent.

The Towers Watson Diversified Insurance Study of Executive Compensation (Diversified Insurance Study) is a private study of 28 large insurance companies (including Unum) containing compensation data for a broad range of executive-level positions.

The following table reflects the source of data referenced by the Committee:

BENCHMARKING REFERENCE

Purpose

Proxy Peer Group

Diversified Insurance Study

CEO compensation

Primary reference

Secondary reference

CFO compensation

Primary reference

Secondary reference

Other named executive officer compensation

-

Primary reference

Programs and practices

Primary reference

Secondary reference

The Diversified Insurance Study is used as the primary reference for executives other than the CEO and CFO because responsibilities of heads of subsidiaries and other business units may not be directly comparable across other companies.

The Committee reviews the Proxy Peer Group annually, and companies are added and removed from this list as either industry consolidation occurs or our corporate objectives change. The companies that make up the Proxy Peer Group changed in 2010 (Phoenix was removed). The revised Proxy Peer Group was used as a reference for compensation decisions made in relation to 2011.

Unum Group65


Compensation Discussion and Analysis2012 Proxy Statement

The table below sets forth the companies that comprise the Proxy Peer Group and the firms included in the Diversified Insurance Study.

BENCHMARKINGAND PEER GROUPS(1)
CompanyProxy
Peer
Group(2)
Diversified
Insurance Study
CompanyProxy
Peer
Group(2)
Diversified
Insurance
Study

Aegon USA

Marsh & McLennan

Aetna

Massachusetts Mutual

AFLAC

MetLife

AIG

Nationwide

Allstate

New York Life

American United Life

Northwestern Mutual

Aon

Pacific Life

Assurant

Phoenix Companies

AXA Group

Principal Financial

CIGNA

Protective Life

CNO Financial

Prudential Financial

Genworth Financial

Securian Financial

Guardian Life

Stancorp

Hartford Financial Services

Sun Life Financial

Humana

Thrivent Financial

ING

TIAA-CREF

John Hancock

Torchmark

Lincoln Financial

USAA

(1)For compensation decisions made in early 2011, benchmarking comparisons were made to the 2010 Diversified Insurance Study of Executive Compensation and the 2010 Proxy Peer Group. Although Unum participates in the Diversified Insurance Study, we are excluded from this table.

(2)The Proxy Peer Group includes both property and casualty insurers, and life and health insurers with Unum being slightly above the peer median for assets and revenue for the year ended December 31, 2011. Unum is not part of the Proxy Peer Group.

66Unum Group


2012 Proxy StatementCompensation Discussion and Analysis

Does the Committee set targets for how its executive compensation compares to other companies?

Each element of compensation is targeted at the approximate median of the market as defined by the Proxy Peer Group and the Diversified Insurance Study, although this comparison is only one of a number of factors that guide the Committee’s determinations. The elements of our compensation program are: (1) base salary; (2) targeted total cash (base salary plus targeted annual incentive); (3)their targeted total direct compensation (base salary plus both targeted annualat risk. This design creates an incentive for achievement of performance goals (short- and long-term incentives)long-term) and (4) benefits and perquisites. The comparisonaligns the interests of executives with those of our total cash andshareholders. For 2013, 84.6% of Mr. Watjen’s targeted total direct compensation elements to thosewas at peer companies helps to ensure thatrisk. For the balance among the elementsremaining NEOs, 70.6% of their aggregate targeted total direct compensation is competitive. At the same time, company and individual performance determines a majority of the compensation received by our named executive officers.

With respect to the CEO and the CFO (beginning in 2011), the Committee compares each of the compensation elements to the Proxy Peer Group using the same methodology described above. Additionally, the CEO and CFO pay is compared to the median of the compensation paid to executives in comparable roleswas at the companies in the Diversified Insurance Study as an additional source of data. Although we compare CEO and CFO pay targets to the median of pay in comparable roles at other companies, the actual pay determined by the Committee each year is primarily based on company and individual performance as well as the business environment.risk.

Does the Committee rely solely on peer group data when making decisions?

While peer group data is important, it is secondary to the primary factors considered by the Committee when making compensation decisions, which include the following:

Company performance;

Individual performance;

The executive’s level of responsibility;

The creation of shareholder value;

Our executive compensation philosophy; and

The results of shareholders’ “say-on-pay” vote.

 

 

Unum Group67

 36 | Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and 2014 Proxy Statement


Compensation Discussion and Analysis2012 Proxy Statement

Compensation Discussion and Analysis  

 

Individual Performance Assessment

How is individual performance evaluated for the CEO and the other named executive officers?

The individual performance of each named executive officer is measured against the following six leadership criteria:

Delivers results;

Builds organizational talent;

Makes effective decisions;

Creates business and enterprise value;

Engages employees in the corporate vision; and

Adheres to company’s values.

In evaluating how effectively each named executive met the above criteria, the Committee considers information from the following:

Company performance;

Mr. Watjen’s performance assessment of each other named executive officer which includes a self assessment of their own performance and a 360 degree evaluation of performance completed by their manager, peers, direct reports and other partners; and

A Board assessment of each named executive officer against stated goals in areas of:

 

¡PAY ELEMENTS

  Strategic planning

¡

Demonstrated performance

¡

Building and sustaining a high-functioning organization and team

¡

Humility and ego maturity

¡

Statesmanship

¡

Balance of putting the company first with appropriate self-care and resilience

¡

Ability to balance complex competing factors

¡

Commitment to enterprise as well as business unit

Based on this evaluation, the Committee sets the individual performance percentage for each named executive officer. This percentage is then used in the calculation of annual and long-term incentive awards as described on the following pages. In assessing performance for 2011, the Committee highlighted certain items for each named executive officer. These highlights can be found in the executive profiles beginning on page 89.

68Unum Group


2012 Proxy StatementCompensation Discussion and Analysis

Elements of Pay

The elements of compensation for Unum’s named executive officers are described in the table below.

PAY ELEMENTS

 

Compensation Element

  

Objective/Purpose

Annual base salary
(not at risk)

  

To provide a fixed amount of compensation which is reflective of the market for similar jobs as well as individual skills, abilities and performance. Aligns with our compensation philosophy of attracting and retaining talented individuals.

Annual incentive awards

(at risk)

  

To motivate executives to achieve short-term corporate financial goals as well as individual objectives. Aligns with our compensation philosophy of rewarding performance in the achievement of short-term corporate objectives.

Long-term incentive awards
(at risk)

  

To motivate long-term performance and align the interests of management and shareholders. Aligns with our compensation philosophy of rewarding long-term performance and attracting and retaining talented individuals.

Retirement and workplace benefits
(not at risk)

  

To provide a competitive program which addresses health, welfare and retirement needs of executives and other employees. Aligns with our compensation philosophy of attracting and retaining talented individuals.

Perquisites and other personal benefits
(not at risk)

  

Most perquisites were eliminated as of January 1, 2008. The limited perquisites we currently offer are provided as the resultin support of a specific business purpose or a contractual arrangement.

 

ConsistentRoles of the Committee, CEO and Consultants

The Committee, CEO and compensation consultant each have important roles in our compensation program. The Committee, with our philosophyinput from the CEO and compensation consultant, exercises its own independent judgment to:

Evaluate, design and administer a compensation program for executive officers that appropriately links pay, company and individual performance, and the creation of shareholder value;

Review the performance of the CEO, with input from the full Board, and determine his compensation; and

Determine compensation for each of the other NEOs.

The CEO provides input to the Committee on compensation issues but does not participate in any decisions related to his own compensation. He provides to the Committee:

A self-assessment outlining his own performance for the year;

Performance assessments and compensation recommendations for executives who report to him, which includes all of the NEOs except Ms. Farrell, who reports to Mr. McKenney; and

His perspective on the business environment and the company’s performance.

Pay Governance LLC was retained by the Committee as its compensation consultant in 2013 to provide objective, expert analyses, independent advice and information on executive and director compensation. Pay Governance reports directly to the Committee, which is responsible for the appointment, compensation, retention and oversight of tying the work performed by them. A senior representative of the

Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and 2014 Proxy Statement | 37 


 Compensation Discussion and Analysis

compensation consultant generally attends Committee meetings, participates in executive sessions of the Committee without management present and communicates directly with Committee members outside of meetings. Management interacts with the performancecompensation consultant only when doing so on behalf of the Committee or as it relates to proposals the Committee will review for approval.

The Committee has adopted a policy requiring that its compensation consultant be independent. During 2013, the Committee assessed the independence of Pay Governance LLC, taking into account the following factors:

Compliance with the Committee’s independence policy;

Other services, if any, provided to the company by the consultant;

The amount of fees paid by the company to the consultant as a percentage of its total revenues;

Any business or personal relationships between the consultant (including its representatives) and the company’s directors or senior officers; and

The policies and procedures the consultant has in place to prevent conflicts of interest, which includes a prohibition against stock ownership in the company.

Pay Governance LLC has attested to its independence and does not provide any services to the company other than those related to director and executive compensation consulting. Fees paid to Pay Governance LLC for such services provided in 2013 totaled $188,062. Based on its assessment, the Committee concluded that the compensation consultant is independent under the Committee’s policy and that the compensation consultant’s work has not raised any conflict of interest.

In addition, the company’s finance, human resources and legal staff, including the chief financial officer, support the Committee in its work. Employees from these departments discuss various executive compensation topics with the Committee and its compensation consultant, including how compensation plans fit in with other programs and business objectives. Although these staff members may make recommendations, the final decision on all executive compensation matters rests solely with the Committee.

Compensation Benchmarking

The Committee compares the compensation of our named executive officers to the median pay of executives asin similar positions at peer companies. By targeting each pay element to the most senior officers, haveapproximate median of the applicable comparator group (as described below), we ensure that the balance among the elements is competitive, while at the same time allowing company and individual performance to determine a majority of the compensation received by our NEOs. Overall, these benchmarking comparisons are used as points of reference and are secondary to the primary factors considered by the Committee when making compensation decisions. The primary factors are: company performance; individual performance; the executive’s level of responsibility; the creation of shareholder value; our executive compensation philosophy; and the results of the most recent shareholder say-on-pay vote.

The two sources used by the Committee for benchmarking executive compensation are:

For CEO and CFO compensation, a proxy peer group comprised of insurance and financial services companies that are either our business competitors or primary competitors for talent (Proxy Peer Group). The Proxy Peer Group is also a reference for compensation programs and practices. The composition of the Proxy Peer Group is reviewed annually by the Committee as outlined below.

 38 | Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and 2014 Proxy Statement


Compensation Discussion and Analysis  

For the compensation of our other NEOs, the Towers Watson Diversified Insurance Study of Executive Compensation (Diversified Insurance Study). This source is used because responsibilities of our NEOs may not be directly comparable with those of named executives at other companies in the Proxy Peer Group.

The following table lists the companies in the Proxy Peer Group and the Diversified Insurance Study.

PROXY PEER GROUP(1)(2)

    DIVERSIFIED INSURANCE STUDY(1)
AetnaLincoln FinancialAFLACNationwide
AFLACMarsh & McLennanAIGNew York Life
AonMetLifeAllstateNorthwestern Mutual
AssurantPrincipal FinancialAXA GroupOne America Financial
CIGNAProtective LifeCIGNAPacific Life
CNO FinancialPrudential FinancialCNO FinancialPhoenix Companies
Genworth FinancialStancorp FinancialGenworth FinancialPrincipal Financial
Hartford Financial ServicesTorchmarkGuardian LifePrudential Financial
HumanaHartford Financial ServicesSecurian Financial
INGSun Life Financial
John HancockThrivent Financial
Lincoln FinancialTIAA-CREF
Massachusetts MutualTransamerica
MetLifeUSAA

(1)For compensation decisions made in early 2013, benchmarking comparisons were made to the 2012 Diversified Insurance Study and the 2012 Proxy Peer Group. Although Unum participates in the Diversified Insurance Study, we are excluded from this table. One America Financial and Transamerica were new participants in the Diversified Insurance Study for 2012, while Aegon USA and America United Life (both of which had participated in 2011) did not participate in 2012, which kept the number of participants at 29.

(2)The Proxy Peer Group includes both property and casualty insurers and life and health insurers, with Unum being slightly above the peer median for assets and slightly below the peer median for revenue for the year ended December 31, 2012. Unum is not part of the Proxy Peer Group.

The Committee evaluates the composition of the Proxy Peer Group every year. In 2013, the peer companies were determined based on five primary criteria (life and health GICS code; reasonable range of: assets; revenues; market capitalization; and whether they compete with Unum for talent and/or market share). Based on the review in 2013, on average, the peer companies met three of the five criteria. Overall, Unum is within +/-10% of the median on peer assets and revenue. Additionally, 11 of the 17 peers (65%) selected Unum as a peer for compensation benchmarking purposes in their most recent proxy statements, which indicates that they also consider us a competitor for talent.

Since the group contains a wide dispersion of companies (7 peers are larger than Unum based on assets; 10 are smaller), annual sensitivity tests are performed to understand the impact of both larger and smaller peers on overall CEO compensation. For the tests conducted in 2013, removing the two smallest and two largest peers had minimal impact on CEO targeted total direct compensation “at risk.” Compensation(TDC). Asset regression yielded a TDC that is “at risk” is contingent upon named executive officer performance orwas +5% of the achievement of specifictabular results and revenue regression yielded a TDC that was -5% of the tabular results. Based on the analysis, the Committee decided not to change the Proxy Peer Group in 2013.

Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and 2014 Proxy Statement | 39 


 Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Individual Performance Assessments

The Committee uses individual performance assessments as a factor in its determination of compensation for each NEO. Individual performance is subjectmeasured against the six leadership criteria and board assessment goal areas listed in the table below, as well as the common performance goals outlined on the following page. Collectively, these can be used to Committee discretion.

We do not, however, have a predetermined policy for allocating cash and non-cash, oradjust earned annual incentive and long-term incentive compensation. Instead,awards between 0% and 125%.

Evaluation Criteria

In evaluating how effectively each NEO met the leadership criteria, the Committee annually reviews the Diversified Insurance Study described earlier to ensure an appropriate level and mix of compensation based on competitive practices. The pie charts shown in each named executive officer’s profile of the Executive Compensation Summaries section, beginning on page 89, provide an overview of each executive’s actual pay mix for 2011.considers:

 

Company performance;

The Board’s assessment of Mr. Watjen’s performance, as well as Mr. Watjen’s self assessment of his own performance;

The CEO’s and CFO’s performance assessments of the NEOs that report to them (all NEOs report to the CEO other than Ms. Farrell, who reports to Mr. McKenney). For each individual, the performance assessment includes a self assessment and a “360 evaluation” of performance by a combination of the individual’s direct manager, peers, direct reports and other partners; and

Written assessments by all Board members of each NEO against the stated goals in the areas listed in the table below.

 

Unum GroupLEADERSHIP CRITERIA 69BOARD ASSESSMENT GOAL AREAS
Delivers resultsStrategic planning
Builds organizational talentDemonstrated performance
Makes effective decisionsBuilding and sustaining a high-functioning organization and team
Creates business and enterprise valueHumility and ego maturity
Engages employees in the corporate visionStatesmanship
Adheres to the company’s valuesBalance of putting the company first with appropriate self-care and resilience
Ability to balance complex competing factors
Commitment to enterprise as well as business unit

 40 | Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and 2014 Proxy Statement


Compensation Discussion and Analysis 

2013 Performance Assessment and Highlights

As noted above, the named executive officers’ achievement levels, for purposes of annual incentive paid in 2013 and long-term incentive awards granted in February 2014, were determined in part based on the following common performance goals. Each common performance goal has specific areas of focus for each executive and his or her respective business areas.

      2013 COMMON PERFORMANCE GOALS

 1.Achieve the business and financial objectives the Board approved for the company, which includes the following areas of focus:

Positioning each business to leverage current market positions and opportunities

Appropriately redeploying the company’s excess capital

Continuing to consider and develop additional centers of excellence

 2.Deepen the management talent and employee engagement throughout the company

Strengthen the CEO and senior executive team succession plan

Compensation Discussion and Analysis 2012Build organizational depth throughout the company
Continue to take actions to assure that our workforce diversity matches that of our key stakeholders
 3.Continue to develop the culture and values of the company at all levels which includes:
Ethics and compliance
Social responsibility
Risk management
 4.Further enhance the image and reputation of the company

Including with regulators, media, and public policy makers

Based on the above criteria, the Committee assessed the individual performance of our NEOs and awarded each an individual performance percentage. These percentages were used in calculations for annual and long-term incentive awards described later in this section.

Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and 2014 Proxy Statement | 41 


 Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Individual performance highlights for each NEO, and their respective awarded performance percentages, are included below:

Thomas R. Watjen, President and Chief Executive Officer

In assessing Mr. Watjen’s performance for 2013, the Committee noted that he:

Achieved substantially all of the company’s business objectives, with each segment meeting or exceeding their goals for the year. This resulted in operating earnings per share growth of 5.4%, which is the eighth consecutive year of operating earnings per share growth;

 

Maintained a strong balance sheet and capital position. The company returned capital to shareholders by increasing the dividend for the fifth successive year and repurchasing $318 million in shares in 2013, and a total of $2.5 billion since 2007;

Strengthened leadership and deepened the talent level throughout the organization, including actions to enhance workforce diversity;

Continued to develop, through his leadership, the company’s culture and values, including ethics, risk management and social responsibility; and

Further enhanced the already solid brand and image of the organization.

Given these accomplishments, the Committee awarded Mr. Watjen an individual performance percentage of 115% for his 2013 annual incentive award and 118% as the individual performance modifier for his long-term incentive award granted in February 2014. The Committee awarded a greater percentage in Mr. Watjen’s long-term incentive award based on the factors noted above as well as his strategic leadership of the company.

Richard P. McKenney, Chief Financial Officer

In assessing Mr. McKenney’s performance for 2013, the Committee noted that he:

 

Achieved substantially all of the company’s financial objectives, with each business segment meeting or exceeding their goals for the year. This resulted in operating earnings per share growth of 5.4%, which is the eighth consecutive year of operating earnings per share growth;

Maintained a strong balance sheet and capital base which allowed the company to further invest in the growth of the businesses while also returning capital to shareholders through dividend increases and share repurchases;

Expanded his operating responsibilities and continued to deepen his involvement with the businesses at all levels, including being named as chair of the company’s operating committee;

Effectively balanced near-term operating performance and results with long-term strategic planning, which positions the company for future success; and

Took steps to enhance the effectiveness of his organization, including further talent and leadership development.

Given these accomplishments, the Committee awarded Mr. McKenney an individual performance percentage of 115% for his 2013 annual incentive award and 120% as the individual performance modifier for his long-term incentive award granted in February 2014. The Committee awarded a greater percentage in Mr. McKenney’s long-term incentive award based on the factors noted above as well as his leadership role in helping to position the company for long-term success.

 42 | Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and 2014 Proxy Statement


Compensation Discussion and Analysis 

Kevin P. McCarthy, Chief Operating Officer

In assessing Mr. McCarthy’s performance for 2013, the Committee noted that he:

Delivered results, in his role as Chief Operating Officer, that met or exceeded the overall plan in each of the company’s primary businesses;

Led Unum US until his transition at mid-year. Unum US once again exceeded its before-tax operating earnings plan;

Focused the company’s operating committee on enhancing operating effectiveness through business process improvements and leveraging enterprise-wide capabilities;

Continued to represent the company with a variety of external constituents, including shareholders, customers, regulators and the communities where we have significant locations; and

Effectively executed a planned leadership transition in Unum US and has positioned the company well for his retirement in 2014.

Given these accomplishments, the Committee awarded Mr. McCarthy an individual performance percentage of 125% for his 2013 annual incentive award and 125% as the individual performance modifier for his long-term incentive award granted in February 2014.

Randall C. Horn, President and Chief Executive Officer of Colonial Life

In assessing Mr. Horn’s performance for 2013, the Committee noted that he:

Led Colonial Life to solid financial results. The Colonial Life business segment achieved nearly all of its financial and operating goals with the exception of sales;

Achieved high customer service and retention, driving ongoing premium growth despite a sales shortfall;

Continued to strengthen his leadership team and implemented a number of organizational changes to build depth and enhance effectiveness;

Partnered with others, as a member of the company’s operating committee, to create several new centers of excellence to leverage enterprise capabilities; and

Represented the company effectively with a variety of key stakeholders, including customers, brokers and the Columbia community.

Given these accomplishments, the Committee awarded Mr. Horn an individual performance percentage of 110% for his 2013 annual incentive awards and 110% as the individual performance modifier for his long-term incentive award granted in February 2014.

Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and 2014 Proxy Statement | 43 


 Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Breege A. Farrell, Chief Investment Officer

In assessing Ms. Farrell’s performance for 2013, the Committee noted that she:

Achieved investment results that were very good despite a difficult interest rate environment;

Delivered performance for the Investment department that was slightly above plan, and maintained the strong overall credit quality of the portfolio;

Forged stronger links with our business segments over the past year to ensure our investment strategy was fully aligned with our business strategy;

Focused significant time and effort in adapting the Investment organization to better position it for talent development and succession planning; and

Has maintained strong connections in the investment community, which allow us to capitalize on opportunities and stay abreast of investment trends.

Given these accomplishments, the Committee awarded Ms. Farrell an individual performance percentage of 105% for her 2013 annual incentive award and 105% as the individual performance modifier for her long-term incentive award granted in February 2014.

Company Performance Targets

Each year, the Committee sets targets for several performance measures that are used to calculate annual and long-term incentive awards. Performance measures and their respective targets are established for the company as a whole as well as for each of our business units, and weightings are assigned to each performance measure based on its relative importance to the company or business unit.

Incentive Funding Performance Requirement

Our annual and long-term incentive plans are not funded unless the company achieves a specified level of performance. We apply an incentive funding performance requirement because we believe employees and officers should receive incentive awards only after our shareholders and creditors are paid. Additionally, the company expects that meeting this incentive funding performance requirement will result in the company avoiding having certain deductions limited under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code (the Code). However, the Committee may elect to pay compensation that is not deductible under Section 162(m) of the Code, and it is possible that compensation intended to qualify for exemption under Section 162(m) of the Code may not so qualify if all requirements for the “qualified performance-based compensation” exemption are not met.

For 2013, the performance requirement established by the Committee to fund the annual and long-term incentive plans was $250 million, which is more than enough to cover dividends to shareholders and after-tax interest on our recourse debt. Funds used to attain the performance requirement were derived from statutory after-tax operating earnings and other sources of cash flow available from the company’s insurance and non-insurance subsidiaries. The company successfully achieved the 2013 performance requirement for funding the 2013 annual incentive awards and long-term incentive grants made in February 2014.

 44 | Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and 2014 Proxy Statement


Compensation Discussion and Analysis 

Annual Incentive Targets

The Committee established performance targets as part of our annual incentive program. The following table outlines these targets for annual incentives awarded for 2013 performance and how the company and business units performed against those targets in 2013.

     2013 ANNUAL INCENTIVE AWARD PERFORMANCE TARGETS    ($s/£s in millions)   
Performance Measure 

 

Component   

Weighting   

    Threshold(1)        Target        Maximum          Actual      

 

Unum Group

 

            

 

After-tax operating income(2)

 40%  $636.8  $849.0  $976.4  $882.5

 

Business area composite(3)

 40%  0%  100%  150%  106%

 

Return on equity(4)

 20%  8.47%  11.30%  12.99%  11.41%

 

Unum US and Closed Block

 

            

 

Before-tax operating income(5)

 40%  $673.9  $962.7  $1,155.2  $968.4

 

Earned premium

 20%  $4,991.6  $5,872.5  $7,047.0  $5,835.9

 

Sales

 15%  $599.9  $799.9  $1,119.9  $745.6

 

Service(6)

 15%  90.0%  100%  130%  112%

 

Operating expense ratio

 10%  19.78%  17.78%  15.78%  17.79%

 

Colonial Life

 

            

 

Before-tax operating income(5)

 40%  $194.0  $277.2  $332.6  $284.9

 

Earned premium

 20%  $1,056.9  $1,243.4  $1,492.1  $1,232.2

 

Sales

 15%  $288.0  $384.0  $537.6  $367.6

 

Service(6)

 15%  90.0%  100%  130%  107%

 

Operating expense ratio

 10%  18.35%  16.35%  14.35%  16.07%

 

Unum UK

 

            

 

Before-tax operating income(5)

 40%  £58.0  £82.8  £99.4  £84.3

 

Earned premium

 20%  £294.4  £346.4  £415.7  £355.9

 

Sales

 15%  £35.3  £47.1  £65.9  £48.4

 

Service(6)

 15%  90.0%  100%  130%  106%

 

Operating expense ratio

 10%  22.70%  20.70%  18.70%  20.43%

 

Investments

 

            

 

Net Investment Income(7)

 50%  $2,418.7  $2,543.7  $2,668.7  $2,551.4

 

Avoided Losses(8)

 25%  ($100.0)  $6.3  $150.0  $12.6

 

Market Composite(9)

 25%  83%  100%  175%  118%
(1)At the threshold and below, there is no payout for a performance measure. At the maximum, the payout would be 200% for that performance measure. However, the maximum overall payout for the annual incentive plan is 150%.

Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and 2014 Proxy Statement | 45 


 Compensation Discussion and Analysis

(2)After-tax operating income is defined as net income adjusted to exclude after-tax net realized investment gains or losses and after-tax non-operating retirement-related gains or losses and certain other items specified in the reconciliation of non-GAAP measures.

(3)The business area composite component weighting for Unum Group includes a weighted average of the overall business unit incentive plan results (excluding before-tax operating earnings which is already captured in both after-tax operating income and return on equity), weighted as follows: Unum US at 40%, Unum UK at 25%, Colonial Life at 25% and Investments at 10%. Performance for each business unit could be zero to a maximum of 150%.

(4)Return on equity is calculated by taking after-tax operating income and dividing it by the average of the beginning-and-end-of-year stockholders’ equity adjusted to exclude the net unrealized gain or loss on securities and the net gain on cash flow hedges.

(5)Before-tax operating income is defined as net income adjusted to exclude net realized investment gains or losses, non-operating retirement-related gains or losses and certain other items specified in the reconciliation of non-GAAP measures and income tax expense.

(6)Service is based on the average of several service metrics for policyholders, producers and claimants.

(7)Net investment income reflects the impact of investment results on after-tax operating income. Net investment income excludes interest on policy loans, investment income on floating rate securities backing floating rate debt, investment income on index-linked securities which support claim reserves that provide for index-linked claim payments, variances to plan for asset levels and specified portions of miscellaneous net investment income, and includes investment income related to investments managed by Unum supporting reserves related to a block of individual disability business assumed through a modified coinsurance agreement.

(8)Avoided losses are calculated by multiplying an industry standard weighted default rate by Unum’s total credit exposure and comparing to Unum’s actual investment losses.

(9)Market composite consists of comparing the average of three targets: (1) credit spreads on purchases to a specified benchmark, (2) yields on purchases to a specified benchmark, and (3) realized investment losses to a specified peer group.

Each performance target has been selected because the Committee believes it is an appropriate driver of long-term shareholder value:

The growth and competitiveness of the company are measured using sales and earned premium targets;

Profitability achievement is measured using after-tax operating income for Unum Group and pre-tax operating income for Unum US, Colonial Life and Unum UK;

The balance of profitability and capital management effectiveness is measured using return on equity; and

Effective and efficient customer service is measured using the service and operating expense ratio targets.

A business area performance composite measure is also included in our annual incentive targets to better align our corporate staff functions, which provide support to each of our business units, with the results generated in those units.

Depending on their role in the company, our NEOs’ annual incentive awards are tied in various ways to the performance of Unum Group and its business units. The annual incentive awards of Messrs. Watjen, McKenney and McCarthy are based entirely on Unum Group performance. For Mr. Horn, 25% of his award is based on Unum Group performance and 75% is based on Colonial Life performance. For Ms. Farrell, 25% of her award is based on Unum Group performance and 75% is based on Investments performance.

 46 | Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and 2014 Proxy Statement


Compensation Discussion and Analysis 

Long-Term Incentive Targets

Prior to 2014, the calculation of long-term incentive grants made in that year included a corporate achievement factor based on the prior year’s performance. Beginning in 2014, as a result of the move to the use of performance share units (PSUs) with vesting based on prospective three-year corporate performance goals, we no longer use a one-year corporate performance multiplier in calculating the amount of the long-term incentive award. However, achievement of a corporate performance threshold must continue to be met before any award may be granted, as described on page 44.

The Committee established performance targets as part of our long-term incentive program. The following table outlines these targets for long-term incentives awarded in 2013 (for 2012 performance), how each target represents a driver of shareholder value and how the company performance against those targets.

     2013 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE FOR 2012 PERFORMANCE AWARD TARGETS ($s in millions)
Corporate Performance Factors 

 

Driver of  

Shareholder Value  

  

 

Component  

Weighting  

              

Unum Group

     Threshold(1)   Target  Maximum  Actual

After-tax operating earnings

 Profitability  40%  $721.9  $902.4  $1,037.8 $887.5

Return on equity

 

Profitability/Capital   Management    

  40%  9.91%  12.38%  14.24% 12.26%

Operating Revenue

 Long-Term Growth  20%  $9,362.3  $10,402.6  $11,963.0 $10,459.2

(1)At the threshold and below, there is no payout for a performance measure. At the maximum, the payout would be 200% for that performance measure. However, the overall maximum payout for the long-term incentive plan is 150%.

The Committee believes these performance targets represent long-term drivers of shareholder value:

Value creation is measured on the basis of growth, profitability and effective capital management;

Long-term growth is measured using overall company revenue as the target;

Profitability achievement is measured using after-tax operating earnings; and

The balance of profitability and capital management effectiveness is measured using return on equity.

For our long-term incentive program, all of our NEOs’ awards are based on the long-term performance targets of Unum Group.

Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and 2014 Proxy Statement | 47 


 Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Mr. Watjen was the only NEO to receive PSUs in 2013. The PSUs will vest based on the achievement of three-year, prospective (2013-2015) average earnings per share and average return on equity goals, and the achievement will be modified (+/-20%) based on our total shareholder return relative to 10 members of our Proxy Peer Group. These 10 companies (AFLAC, Assurant, Hartford Financial, Lincoln Financial, MetLife, Principal Financial, Protective Life, Prudential Financial, Stancorp, and Torchmark) were selected because they are considered to be direct business competitors of Unum. The table below outlines the three-year performance targets established by the Committee for Mr. Watjen’s PSU grant.

      TARGETS FOR PERFORMANCE SHARE UNITS GRANTED IN 2013
Corporate Performance Factors  Driver of Shareholder Value  Component  
Weighting  
  Threshold    Target    Maximum

Average 3-year return on equity(2013-2015)

  Profitability/Capital Management  50%  8.56%  11.41%  13.12%

Average 3-year after-tax EPS(2013-2015)

  Profitability  50%  $2.66  $3.55  $4.08

Relative Total Shareholder Return (TSR)

  Modifier  

-20% @

P35

  

0 @

P50

  

+20% @

P75

Items Excluded When Determining Company Performance

When setting the performance measures and weightings for 2013, the Committee determined that certain items not included in the 2013 financial plan would be excluded from the calculation of the company’s performance, for purposes of both the annual and long-term incentive plans, should they occur. The Committee believes it is appropriate to exclude these items because they are either unusual or infrequent in nature, do not directly reflect company or management performance, or could serve as a disincentive to decisions which are in the best interest of the company and shareholders. These items were:

Unplanned adjustments resulting from accounting policy changes, legal or regulatory rule or law changes;

The impact of any unplanned acquisitions, divestitures, or block reinsurance transactions;

Unplanned adjustments to the Closed Block of business;

The effect of any unplanned regulatory, legal or tax settlements;

The effect of unplanned changes to strategic asset allocation;

Unplanned debt issuance, repurchasing or retirement; or stock repurchase or issuance;

The effect of differences between actual currency exchange rates versus exchange rates assumed in the financial plan;

Unplanned fees or assessments, including tax assessments, from new legislation; and

The effect on revenue from unplanned variances from floating rate securities and index-linked securities.

The Committee adjusted targets for the impact of the following items on our 2013 financial results that were not included in the 2013 financial plan from which the targets were initially derived:

 48 | Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and 2014 Proxy Statement


Compensation Discussion and Analysis 

The effect of differences between actual stock repurchase versus the amount assumed in the financial plan; and

The effect of differences between actual foreign currency rates versus exchange rates assumed in the financial plan.

Each year, the Committee undertakes an overall assessment of the results while also maintaining the discretion to make final pool adjustments. Any adjustments are based on a review of the actual achievement for each performance measure compared to the targets listed on pages 45 and 47, as well as a qualitative assessment of results. For 2013, the Committee made minor adjustments to each business unit’s performance based on qualitative factors which slightly reduced the aggregate payout (less than 1%). The resulting plan achievement levels for 2013 and 2012 are shown in the accompanying table.

    PLAN ACHIEVEMENT LEVELS

Plan

  2013  2012

Unum Group

  111%  95%

Unum US

  103%  105%

Unum UK

  110%  65%

Colonial Life

  105%  95%

Investments

  109%  105%

The resulting plan achievement levels for 2013 and 2012 were used in calculations for annual and long-term incentive awards described in the “Compensation Decisions” section below.

Performance-Contingent Adjustments to CEO Incentive Targets

Mr. Watjen’s annual and long-term incentive targets for 2012 and 2013 were subject to adjustment based upon the company’s 1- and 3-year TSRs at year-end relative to peer companies. If the company’s TSRs exceeded the medians of the comparable TSRs of the Proxy Peer Group, his annual and long-term incentive targets would be 200% and $6 million, respectively. If the company’s TSRs did not exceed the medians of the comparable TSRs of the Proxy Peer Group, his annual and long-term incentive targets would be 150% and $5 million, respectively. The company fell short of these goals for 2012 and 2013; therefore, the lower targets were applied in calculating Mr. Watjen’s incentive compensation as outlined beginning on pages 51 and 53.

The following chart depicts how Mr. Watjen’s annual and long-term incentive awards in 2013 were calculated. The awards included performance hurdles which had to be met for either annual incentive awards or long-term incentive awards to be made, as well as additional hurdles to determine his annual and long-term incentive targets and a third set of hurdles to determine the size of the annual and long-term incentive awards. Additionally, for the 50% of his long-term incentive grant which was paid in PSUs, there are additional hurdles (i.e., three-year goals with a TSR modifier) which will determine the amount of vesting, if any.

Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and 2014 Proxy Statement | 49 


 Compensation Discussion and Analysis

LOGO

  *    The Summary Compensation Table is on page 62.

Compensation Decisions

Annual Base Salary

How are the base salaries of named executive officers determined?

Salaries for our NEOs are established based on a named executive officer’stheir position, skills, experience, responsibility and performance. Competitiveness of salary levels is assessed annually relative to the approximate median of salaries in the marketplace using the sources noted above beginning on page 38 for similar executive positions. Increases may be considered for factors such as changes in responsibilities, individual performance and/or changes in the competitive marketplace.

At its February 20112013 meeting, given that the company has continued to meet or exceed its primary financial targets despite a difficult economic period, the Committee, with input from the CEO, approved base salaries to be effective March 1, 2011. The Committee considered the approximate median market data, individual performance, responsibilities and tenure and approved the following with any increase noted in parentheses: Mr. Watjen $1,100,000 (no change); Mr. McKenney $665,000 (2.3%); Mr. McCarthy $585,000 (3.5%); Mr. Best $532,000 (3.3%); and Mr. Horn $485,000 (2.1%).

Effective January 1, 2012, Mr. McCarthy assumed the additional responsibilities of Chief Operating Officer. He received an increase in base salary to $615,000 (5.1%) reflecting his additional responsibilities and a merit increase.

With respect to salary adjustments for 2012, the Committee considered the approximate median market data, individual performance, responsibilities and tenure. Along with input from the CEO, the Committee approved the following changes to base salaries with any increase noted in parentheses. Effectivesalary for NEOs, effective March 1, 2012:2013: Mr. Watjen $1,100,000 (no change)$1,122,000 (2.0%); Mr. McKenney $681,500 (2.5%$700,000 (2.7%); Mr. McCarthy

 50 | Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and 2014 Proxy Statement


Compensation Discussion and Analysis 

$630,000 (2.4%); Mr. Horn $500,000 (1.5%); and Mr. Horn $492,500 (1.5%Ms. Farrell $415,000 (2.2%). Mr. Best retiredFor a discussion of 2014 salary adjustments, see “2014 Compensation Decisions” on December 31, 2011.page 55.

Annual Incentive Awards

The purpose of theOur annual incentive is toawards reward performance based on the achievement of both company and individual performance, thereby aligningwhich the Committee believes aligns compensation with the objectives of shareholders. The ManagementAnnual Incentive Compensation Plan, of 2008 (MICP),under which became effective January 1, 2008, is our principal vehicle for awarding2013 annual incentive compensation.

Under the plan:awards were granted, includes:

 

All

Eligibility for all non-sales employees are eligible to receive an annual incentive;

Our named executive officers participate in the Executive Officer Incentive Plan, which also is a part of the MICP; and

The Committee establishes an objective performance measure in the beginning of the year to provide funding for incentive payments. If this goal is achieved, participants are eligible to receive an award for that performance year. If this goal is not achieved, the plan is not funded.

For 2011, the threshold to fund the plan, which was established by the Committee and must be attained before any plan payout, equaled two times the sum of dividends to stockholders and after-tax interest on recourse debt, or $414.6 million. Funds included in the measurement of threshold attainment were comprised of statutory after-tax operating earnings from insurance subsidiaries as well as other

70Unum Group


2012 Proxy StatementCompensation Discussion and Analysis

specified sources of cash flow made available to Unum Group to pay dividends and cover interest on debt.

The company successfully achieved the threshold allowing for funding and deductibility of the incentive plan. The total annual incentive payments awarded to all employees under this plan for 2011 were less than 1% of the company’s total operating revenue.

How does the annual incentive plan work?

Once the corporate threshold is met as described above, company and business unit performance percentages are calculated by comparing actual results to the targets (disclosed on page 73). Company and business unit performance achievement levels are approved by the Committee. Individual performance for each named executive officer is then established by the Committee and a percentage assigned based on the process described below.

As shown in the table below, the annual incentive target for each named executive officer is multiplied by the company performance percentage and then by the individual performance percentage (which can range from 0% to 125%) to arrive at the annual incentive award. The maximum award that an individual may receive under the Executive Officer Incentive plan is $8 million.

             ANNUAL INCENTIVE FORMULA
Beginning of Each YearApplication of Annual Incentive Criteria/
Award Determination
Final Review
by the Committee

Threshold and Target
performance goals
set and approved
by the Committee

Annual
Incentive Target

for Position

($)

XCompany

Performance

(%)

XIndividual
Performance
(1)

(%)

=Annual

Incentive

($)

(2)

 

(1)Individual performance may range from 0% to 125%.

An Executive Officer Incentive Plan in which our NEOs participate; and

 

(2)

An objective performance target of $250 million of statutory after-tax operating earnings for the fiscal performance year that provides funding for incentive payments. This goal must be achieved before participants are eligible to receive an award. If the goal is not achieved, the plan is not funded.

The decision making process to determine 2013 annual incentive awards was as follows:

LOGO

(1)The Committee exercises discretion as to the final paymentpercentage considering all performance factors, including, but not limited to, the quality of financial results and personal contributions to these results.

What are the annual incentive targets and how are they determined?

The Committee sets individual annual incentive targets at the approximate market median for each named executive officer. These targets are stated as a percentage of each individual’s base salary, and are established based on a number of factors, including the approximate median of the Proxy Peer Group for the CEO and CFO and the Diversified Insurance Study for other named executive officers as previously discussed on page 65. The Committee also considers each individual’s target relative to other named executive officers, given their respective levels of responsibility. For 2011, the annual incentive targets (as a percentage of base salary) for the named executive officers were: 150% for Mr. Watjen; 100% for Messrs. McCarthy and McKenney; 90% for Mr. Best; and 80% for Mr. Horn.

Unum Group71


Compensation Discussion and Analysis2012 Proxy Statement

What were the company performance targets for 2011?

In February of each year, the Committee sets targets for several performance measures with the levels or ranges of payment for each target. Performance measures and their respective targets are established for the company as a whole (Unum Group) as well as for each of our business units (Unum US, Colonial Life, Unum UK, and Investments), and weightings are assigned to each performance measure based on its relative importance to the company or business unit. The list of targets and weightings by business unit is shown in the table on the following page.

The 2011 performance measures and their weightings in determining company performance for the annual incentive awards are:

72Unum Group


2012 Proxy StatementCompensation Discussion and Analysis

2011 ANNUAL INCENTIVE AWARD PERFORMANCE TARGETS 
Performance Measure  Component Weighting  Target 

Unum Group

    

After-tax operating income(1)

  40%   $897.9 million  

Business area composite(2)

  40%   100%  

Return on equity(3)

  20%   10.87%  

Unum US

    

Before-tax operating income(4)

  40%   $898.5 million  

Earned premium

  20%   $5,704.5 million  

Sales

  15%   $745.0 million  

Service(5)

  15%   100%  

Operating expense ratio

  10%   18.25%  

Colonial Life

    

Before-tax operating income(4)

  40%   $292.4 million  

Earned premium

  20%   $1,146.5 million  

Sales

  15%   $402.0 million  

Service(5)

  15%   100%  

Operating expense ratio

  10%   16.53%  

Unum UK

    

Before-tax operating income(4)

  40%   £128.4 million  

Earned premium

  20%   £423.4 million  

Sales

  15%   £66.5 million  

Service(5)

  15%   100%  

Operating expense ratio

  10%   21.42%  

Investments

    

Net Investment Income(6)

  50%   $2,519.9 million  

Avoided Losses(7)

  25%   $25.0 million  

Market Composite(8)

  25%   100%  

Performance measure descriptions for purposes of the annual incentive plan:

(1)After-tax operating income is defined as net income adjusted to exclude after-tax net realized investment gains and losses. For details on adjustments for 2013, see page 49.

 

(2)Individual performance may range from 0% to 125%.

Once it was determined that the performance threshold had been met, specific awards for our NEOs were arrived at by:

Individual annual incentive targets, which were set in early 2013 as a percentage of each individual’s base salary. In establishing the target, the Committee considers market data from the appropriate peer group as well as each individual’s target relative to other NEOs, given their respective levels of responsibility. The business area composite component weightingannual incentive targets for Unum Group includes a weighted average of the overall incentive plan results for Unum US at 40%, Unum UK at 25%, Colonial Life at 25% and Investments at 10%.Mr. Watjen were subject to adjustment as described above on page 49;

 

(3)Return

Calculating company and business unit performance percentages by comparing actual results to the performance targets listed on equity is calculatedpage 45 (the Committee may also take into account other factors, including economic considerations as well as non-financial goals);

Establishing an individual performance percentage (from 0% to 125%) using the individual assessment process described beginning on page 40; and

Multiplying company and business unit performance by taking after-tax operating income and dividing it by the average of beginning and end of year stockholders’ equity adjusted to exclude the net unrealized gain or loss on securitiesindividual performance and the net gain on cash flow hedges.NEO’s annual incentive target. The “qualified performance-based compensation” exemption under Section 162(m)

 

 

Unum Group73

Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and 2014 Proxy Statement | 51 


Compensation Discussion and Analysis2012 Proxy Statement

 Compensation Discussion and Analysis

 

 

(4)Before-tax operating income

of the Code requires that a maximum individual award be established. The maximum award that an individual may receive under the Annual Incentive Plan is defined as net income adjusted to exclude income tax and net realized investment gains and losses.$8 million.

(5)Service is based on the average of several service metrics for policyholders, producers and claimants.

(6)Net investment income reflects the impact of investment results on after-tax operating income. Net investment income excludes interest on policy loans, investment income on floating rate securities backing floating rate debt, investment income on index-linked securities which support claim reserves that provide for index-linked claim payments, variances to plan for asset levels and specified portions of miscellaneous net investment income, and includes investment income related to investments managed by Unum supporting reserves related to a block of individual disability business assumed through a modified coinsurance agreement.

(7)Avoided losses is calculated by multiplying an industry standard weighted default rate by Unum’s total credit exposure and comparing to Unum’s actual investment losses.

(8)Market composite consists of comparing the average of three targets: (1) credit spreads on purchases to a specified benchmark, (2) yields on purchases to a specified benchmark, and (3) realized investment losses to a specified peer group.

Why are these performance measures and their respective targets selected?

The Committee selected these performance targets because it believes they represent long-term drivers of shareholder value:

The growth and competitiveness of the company are measured using sales, earned premium and revenue targets;

Profitability achievement is measured using after-tax operating income for Unum Group and pre-tax operating income for Unum US, Colonial Life and Unum UK;

Capital management effectiveness is measured using return on equity; and

Effective and efficient customer service is measured using the service and operating expense ratio targets.

A business area performance composite measure is included in Unum Group’s performance measures. Given that the corporate staff organization provides support to the business areas, this measure closely aligns Unum Group’s results with those generated in the business units.

How aretable below describes the annual incentive awards made by the Committee to our NEOs for 2013 performance. For a discussion of the named executive officers related to the performance of the company and the performance of its business units?

The portion of each named executive officer’s2014 annual incentive award that is tied to Unum Group’s performance and the performance of its business units differ. For Messrs. Watjen, McKenney and Best, their incentive awards for results achieved in 2011 were based entirely (100%)targets, see “2014 Compensation Decisions” on the results of Unum Group for each of its performance measures as described above. For Mr. McCarthy, 25% of his award was based on Unum Group performance and 75% on Unum US performance. For Mr. Horn, 25% of his award was based on Unum Group performance and 75% on Colonial Life performance.

For Messrs. McCarthy and Horn, basing a portion of their annual incentive awards on the performance of Unum Group best reflects the contribution each makes to the effective management of the total company.page 55.

 

74Unum Group


2012 Proxy StatementCompensation Discussion and Analysis

Does the Committee take into consideration any exceptions when determining company performance?

When the Committee set the performance measures and weightings for 2011, it agreed to items that would be excluded from the calculation of the company’s performance for purposes of the annual and long-term incentive plans. Among these items were:

Reserve adjustments resulting from accounting, legal or regulatory rule or law changes that were not included in the 2011 financial plan;

The impact of any acquisitions, divestitures, or block reinsurance transactions not included in the 2011 financial plan;

The effect of any regulatory, legal or tax settlements not included in the 2011 financial plan;

Debt issuance, repurchasing or retirement; or stock repurchase or issuance not included in the 2011 financial plan;

Effect of any differences of actual currency exchange rates vs. exchange rates assumed in the 2011 financial plan; and

Fees or assessments, including tax assessments, from new legislation not included in the basic 2011 financial plan.

In measuring financial results for 2011, the Committee excluded the impact of the following items not included in the 2011 financial plan or that the Committee felt was justified because they arose out of strategic actions taken in the best long term interests of the company:

The after-tax charge of $561.2 million as a result of the company’s completion of its strategic review of its long-term care business;

The after-tax charge of $119.3 million to strengthen reserves in the individual disability closed block;

An income tax benefit of $41.3 million due to a final settlement with the IRS with respect to our appeal of audit adjustments for the tax years 1996 to 2004;

An income tax charge of $18.6 million related to the repatriation of £150.0 million of dividends from our U.K. subsidiaries; and

The variance in foreign currency exchange rates from those assumed in the 2011 financial plan.

How did the Committee determine the total annual incentive award in 2012 to each named executive officer for 2011 performance?

As described in this section, the Committee considers company (including business unit) and individual performance when determining annual incentive award amounts for named executive officers.

Unum Group75


Compensation Discussion and Analysis2012 Proxy Statement

Company and Business Unit Performance

In determining company and business unit performance percentages, the Committee evaluates performance against each of the targets listed on page 73. The Committee may also take into account other factors, including economic considerations as well as non-financial goals. Based on the review of performance, the Committee approved the payments outlined in the table below, by certifying that the performance of Unum Group was above plan at 105%; Unum US was above plan at 107%; and Colonial Life was below plan at 81%.

Individual Performance

In arriving at the individual performance percentage for Mr. Watjen, the Committee considers the overall performance of the company, input from the company’s 360 degree review process, the Board’s assessment of his performance, and Mr. Watjen’s self-assessment of his own performance.

In determining the individual performance percentage of each other named executive officer, the Committee considers both the company and the individual’s business unit results, as well as individual contributions to those results, input from the company’s 360 degree review process, Mr. Watjen’s assessment and feedback of the individual’s performance, the Board’s assessment of the individual’s performance and the individual’s self-assessment of his own performance. The individual performance percentage ranges from 0% to 125% of their target.

Specific highlights of each named executive officer’s individual performance for 2011 are included in the executive profiles beginning on page 89.

  ANNUAL INCENTIVE PAIDIN 2012     

ANNUAL INCENTIVE PAID IN 2014 (for 2013 performance)

ANNUAL INCENTIVE PAID IN 2014 (for 2013 performance)

  

 
Executive  

Eligible
Earnings

($)

   2011
Incentive Target
(%)
   Company
Performance
(%)
  Individual
Performance
(%)
  2011 Annual
Incentive Paid
($)
   

2013
Incentive
Target
(%)

   Eligible
Earnings
($)
   Company
Performance
(%)
   Individual
Performance
(%)
   2013 Annual
Incentive Paid
($)
 
Mr. Watjen(1)(2)   $1,100,000    X   150%              X  105.0%  X  115%  =   $2,000,000    150% X   $1,118,277   X  111.0% X  115% =   $2,141,221     
Mr. McKenney(2)   662,635    X   100%              X  105.0%  X  115%  =   800,132    100% X   696,869   X  111.0% X  115% =   889,553     
Mr. McCarthy(3)(2)   581,846    X   100%              X  106.5%  X  125%  =   774,582    100% X   627,462   X  111.0% X  125% =   870,604     
Mr. Best(2)   529,319    X   90%              X  105.0%  X  115%  =   575,237  
Mr. Horn(4)   483,423    X   80%              X    87.0%  X    95%  =   319,639  
Mr. Horn(3)  80% X   498,731   X  106.5% X  110% =   467,411     
Ms. Farrell(4)(5)  116.96% X   417,131   X  109.5% X  105% =   560,922     

 

(1)Company performanceMr. Watjen’s annual incentive target for Mr. Watjen is based2013 was reduced from 200% to 150%, as described on Unum Group achievementpage 49, because the company’s 3-year TSR for the period ending December 31, 2013 did not exceed the median of 105%. The Committee awarded Mr. Watjen with $2,000,000, which equates to individual performancethe comparable TSRs of 115.44%.the Proxy Peer Group.

 

(2)Company performance for Messrs. Watjen, McKenney and Best isMcCarthy was based on Unum Group achievement of 105%111%.

 

(3)Company performance for Mr. McCarthy was weighted with 75% based on Unum US and 25% based on Unum Group performance. Unum US achievement was 107% and Unum Group achievement was 105%, which when weighted, is an achievement of 106.5%.

(4)Company performance for Mr. Horn was weighted with 75% based on Colonial Life and 25% based on Unum Group performance. Colonial Life achievement was 81%105% and Unum Group achievement was 105%111%, which when weighted, isresulted in an achievement of 87%106.5%.

 

(4)Company performance for Ms. Farrell was weighted with 75% based on Investments and 25% based on Unum Group performance. Investments achievement was 109% and Unum Group achievement was 111%, which when weighted, resulted in an achievement of 109.5%.

 

(5)
76Unum GroupMs. Farrell’s incentive target was increased from 115% to 120% upon her promotion to Executive Vice President in August 2013. Therefore, the 2013 annual incentive target was prorated (rounded to two decimal places) based on her time in each position.


2012 Proxy StatementCompensation Discussion and Analysis

What are the individual annual incentive targets for 2012 performance?

During its February 2012 meeting, the Committee set an individual target for each named executive officer based on the approximate median of the comparison group. The Committee also considered each individual’s target relative to other named executive officers, given their respective levels of responsibility. These targets are set as a percentage of base salary for each named executive officer.

Based on a review of market data, the annual incentive targets (as a percent of salary) for 2012 performance for the named executive officers are: 200%, increased from 150% for Mr. Watjen; 100% for Messrs. McCarthy and McKenney; and 80% for Mr. Horn. Mr. Best retired at the end of 2011; therefore, he does not have an annual incentive target for 2012.

Long-Term Incentive Awards

As previously outlined, our goal is to alignOur long-term incentive plan aligns the long-term interests of management and shareholders. The long-term incentive plan creates this alignmentshareholders by tying a substantial portion of the executive’sexecutive compensation directly to the company’s stock price. TheFor awards which are a combinationgranted in 2013, the mix of stock options andthe CEO’s award was 50% performance-based restricted stock units (PBRSUs) and 50% performance share units (PSUs), while other NEOs received 75% PBRSUs and 25% stock options (with the exception of Ms. Farrell who received 100% PBRSUs). The PBRSUs and stock options vest ratably over three years while the PSUs vest based upon the achievement of three-year, prospective (2013-2015) average earnings per share and average return on equity goals, modified (+/-20%) based on Unum’s relative total shareholder return as described above. Beginning with the February 2014 grant, the CEO long-term incentive awards continued to be a mix of 50% PBRSUs and 50% PSUs, while the other

 52 | Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and 2014 Proxy Statement


Compensation Discussion and Analysis  

NEOs received 75% PBRSUs and 25% PSUs. PSUs granted in February 2014 will vest based upon the achievement of three-year, prospective goals (2014-2016), modified by relative total shareholder return.

All long-term incentive awards are granted under the Stock Incentive Plan of 2007.

What form of2012. Our long-term incentive awards are paid to named executive officers?

We currently provide aaward mix of restricted stock units and stock options as part of our long-term incentive plan for named executive officers. Seventy-five percent of the award is granted as restricted stock units and 25% is granted as stock options. This mix was based on a review of peer practices and ensures that a portion of each executive’s compensation is tied to the increase of our stock price over the long term.

Mr. Watjen’s current ownership stake of 17 times his salary is far in excess of the ownership guidelines for the CEO. In the interest of prudent risk management, and given his significant ownership, in 2009 the Board recommended to Mr. Watjen that he take steps to slow the growth of his stock ownership. As a result, in each of the last three years Mr. Watjen has entered into a Rule 10b5-1 trading plan for a one-year term providing for the sale of shares at a certain stock price each quarter during the term of the plan. The current plan provides for the sale of 60,000 shares each quarter. In addition, beginning with his February 2010 grant, the Committee made the decision that 50% of Mr. Watjen’s restricted stock unit grants will be settled in cash with the remaining 50% continuing to be settled in stock.

What are restricted stock units?

Restricted stock units, granted on the basis of company and individual performance,PBRSUs, which are valued in terms of company stock, but nodo not include any actual stock is issued at the time of grant. Instead, company stock is issued only when the grant is settled. Restricted stock units differ fromDuring the restricted stock in two ways:

Dividendsperiod, dividends are not paid in the form of cash on a quarterly basis, but rather as additional restricted stock units; and

TherePBRSUs. In addition, there are no shareholder voting rights unless and until the award is settled in shares.

PSUs are notional units that will track the value of our share price over the three-year performance period, and will vest based upon the achievement of predetermined performance metrics. Dividend equivalents accrue during the three-year performance period and will vest with the underlying shares, as applicable.

Unum Group77


Compensation Discussion and Analysis2012 Proxy Statement

Is there a company performance threshold established for theThe decision-making process to determine long-term incentive awards similar to thatgranted in place for the annual incentive?

Yes. As is the case with the Executive Officer Incentive Plan, for 2011, the threshold to fund the plan, which2013 was established by the Committee and must be attained before any plan payout, equaled two times the sum of dividends to stockholders and after-tax interest on recourse debt, or $414.6 million. Funds included in the measurement of threshold attainment were comprised of statutory after-tax operating earnings from insurance subsidiaries as well as other specified sources of cash flow made available to Unum Group to pay dividends and cover interest on debt.

How does the long-term incentive plan work?

Once the performance threshold is met and the plan is funded, the Committee considers the company’s performance against the targets listed on pages 79 and80. In arriving at the company performance achievement percentage, other factors may also be taken into consideration by the Committee, including economic and relative performance considerations as well as the achievement of non-financial goals.

As shown in the table below, the individual’s long-term incentive target is multiplied by the corporate performance percentage and then by the individual performance percentage, which ranges from 0% to 125%, to reach the overall long-term incentive award. The value of the long-term incentive award is then delivered 75% as restricted stock units and 25% as stock options. The awards vest based on the named executive officer’s continued service over a three-year period. The maximum award that each named executive could receive for the 2011 performance year was 300% of target.

This structure serves both objectives of our compensation philosophy: the retention of key executives and linking compensation to performance. The one-year performance goals that determine the awards to be granted give our named executive officers strong incentives to meet corporate performance objectives. At the same time, the three-year vesting requirement both helps us retain the named executive officer and links the value of the award to the performance of the company during that period.follows:

 

             LONG -TERM INCENTIVE FORMULA
Beginning of Each Year

Application of Long-Term Incentive Criteria/

LOGO

Award Determination

Final Review

by the Committee

Threshold and Target
performance goals
set and approved
by the Committee

Long-Term
Incentive Target
for Position
(1)
($)

X

Company

Performance
(%)

X

Individual
Performance
(2)
(%)

=

Long-Term
Incentive
(3)
($)

(4)

 

(1)Target incentive for position is individually determined and detailed below for each named executive officer.The Committee exercises discretion as to the final percentage considering all performance factors, including, but not limited to, the quality of financial results.

 

(2)Individual performance may range from 0% to 125%.

As outlined in the diagram above, once it was determined that the performance threshold had been met, the long-term incentive awards for our NEOs (based on 2012 performance) were determined by:

 

(3)Long-term

Individual long-term incentive is deliveredtargets, which were set in early 2012 by considering the formmarket data from the appropriate comparator group (as described beginning on page 38) as well as each individual’s target relative to other NEOs, given their respective levels of responsibility. The long-term incentive targets are set as a dollar amount for Mr. Watjen and as a percentage of base salary for other NEOs. The long-term incentive targets for Mr. Watjen were also subject to adjustment as described above on page 49;

Calculating company and business unit performance percentages by comparing actual results to the performance targets listed on page 47. The Committee may also take into account other factors, including economic considerations as well as non-financial goals;

Establishing an individual performance percentage (from 0% to 125%) using the individual assessment process described beginning on page 40; and

Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and 2014 Proxy Statement | 53 


 Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Multiplying company and business unit performance by individual performance and the NEO’s long- term incentive target. The maximum award that each NEO could receive for 2013 grants was 300% of target.

Once the long-term incentive award value was determined, it was delivered as described below:

The CEO’s 2013 long-term incentive award was divided evenly between performance-based restricted stock units (50%) and performance share units (50%);

The 2013 long-term incentive awards for all other NEOs were granted as 75% performance-based restricted stock units and 25% stock options.options (except Ms. Farrell, who received 100% PBRSUs); and

 

(4)The Committee exercises discretion as to the final payment considering all performance factors, including, but not limited to, the quality of financial results and personal contributions to these results.

78 Unum Group

The performance-based restricted stock unit and stock option awards vest based on each NEO’s continued service over a three-year period. The CEO’s performance share units vest based on the achievement of prospective three year goals (2013-2015) for return on equity and earnings per share, modified by relative total shareholder return as described above.


2012 Proxy StatementCompensation Discussion and Analysis

What were the individual long-term incentive targets for each named executive officer?

Each year at its February meeting, the Committee sets an individual target for each named executive officer based on the approximate median of the comparison group. The Committee also considers each individual’s target relative to other named executive officers, given their respective levels of responsibility. These targets are set as a dollar amount for Mr. Watjen and as a percentage of base salary for other named executive officers.

For 2011, the long-term incentive targets for the named executive officers were: $5 million for Mr. Watjen; 150% for Messrs. McCarthy and McKenney; 125% for Mr. Best; and 100% for Mr. Horn.

What were the company performance targets for long-term incentive awards?

Each year at its February meeting, the Committee establishes corporate performance measures for the long-term incentive award plan. Much like the annual incentive plan, each factor is then weighted based on its relative importance to the company or business unit as well as on its potential impact on shareholder returns.

In addition to disclosing the 2011 grants for performance in 2010 in the Summary Compensation Table and the Grants of Plan-Based Awards table as required by SEC rules, we are also disclosing the long-term incentive awards granted in February 2012 for 2011 performance.

In February 2011, the Committee granted long-term incentive awards based on 2010 performance. The corporate performance factors, weightings and targets for 2010 were:

2011 LONG-TERM INCENTIVEFOR 2010 PERFORMANCE AWARD TARGETS 
 
Corporate Performance Factors      Component            
Unum Group      Weighting          Target 
After-tax operating earnings  40%  $887.6 million  
Return on equity  40%   10.90%  
Revenue(1)  20%  $10,222.0 million  

(1)Revenue is defined as total revenue adjusted to exclude net realized investment gains and losses, includes the impact of investment results on after-tax operating income, and excludes investment income on floating rate securities and index-linked securities.

Unum Group79


Compensation Discussion and Analysis2012 Proxy Statement

In February 2012, the Committee granted long-term incentive awards for 2011 performance. The corporate performance factors, weightings and targets for 2011 were:

2012 LONG-TERM INCENTIVEFOR 2011 PERFORMANCE AWARD TARGETS 
 
Corporate Performance Factors      Component            
Unum Group      Weighting          Target 
After-tax operating earnings  40%  $897.9 million  
Return on equity  40%   10.87%  
Revenue(1)  20%  $10,226.3 million  

(1)Revenue is defined as total revenue adjusted to exclude net realized investment gains and losses, includes the impact of investment results on after-tax operating income, and excludes investment income on floating rate securities and index-linked securities.

Why were these performance targets selected?

The Committee believes these performance targets represent long-term drivers of shareholder value. Consistent with our annual incentive plan, each measure is weighted based on its relative importance to the achievement of the company’s long-term business plan:

Value creation is measured on the basis of growth, profitability and effective capital management;

Long-term growth is measured using overall company revenue as the target; and

Capital management effectiveness is measured using return on equity.

How is individual performance considered for long-term incentive grants?

The Committee evaluates individual performance by considering company performance, individual contributions to those results, input from the company’s 360 degree review process, a self assessment of performance and a formal evaluation by the Board of Directors. In the case of other named executive officers, Mr. Watjen’s recommendation is also considered.

What were the individual long-term incentive grants for 2010 performance?

The Committee assessed the company’s performance and compared the actual corporate results to the targets established for each measure to arrive at the corporate performance percentage. The Committee then determined an individual performance percentage, which ranged from 0% to 125% for each named executive officer based on an assessment of individual performance. The award amount was then calculated and expressed in U.S. dollars. Finally, 75% of the award was converted to a number of restricted stock units using the closing price of the stock on the grant date. The remaining 25% was converted to stock options based on the Black-Scholes value of the stock options on the grant date.

80Unum Group


2012 Proxy StatementCompensation Discussion and Analysis

In February 2011, based on 2010 performance,2013, the Committee approved grants of performance-based restricted stock units, performance share units and stock options, as applicable, for the named executive officersNEOs as outlined in the Grantsbelow. For a discussion of Plan Based Awards table and in the following table:2014 long-term incentive award targets, see “2014 Compensation Decisions” on page 55.

 

LONG-TERM INCENTIVE GRANTED IN 2013 (Based on Performance in 2012) LONG-TERM INCENTIVE GRANTED IN 2013 (Based on Performance in 2012)  
 LONG-TERM INCENTIVE GRANTEDIN 2011(1) (Based on Performance in 2010)  
Executive 2010
Long-Term
Incentive
Target
 

2010

Long-Term
Incentive
Target

    

Company
Perfor-

mance

    

Individual
Perfor-

mance

    

2010

Long-Term
Incentive
Granted

 

Shares of
Restricted
Stock Units
Granted

(Feb. 2011)

 Stock
Options
Granted
(Feb. 2011)
   2012 Long-Term
Incentive Target
   Company
Performance
   Individual
Performance
   2012 Long-Term
Incentive Granted(2)
 
 (% of Salary) ($)    (%)    (%)    ($) (#) (#) 

Mr. Watjen(1)

 400% $4,400,000    X   109%  X   121% = $5,803,160    165,552(2)   123,682       $5,000,000        X  95% X  115% =   $5,462,500        

Mr. McKenney

 150%  975,000    X   109%  X   115% =  1,222,163    34,866     26,048       1,363,000        X  95% X  120% =   1,553,820        

Mr. McCarthy

 150%  847,500    X   109%  X   125% =  1,154,719    32,942     24,610       1,230,000        X  95% X  125% =   1,460,625        

Mr. Best

 125%  643,750    X   109%  X   110% =  771,856    22,019     16,450    

Mr. Horn

 100%  475,000    X   109%  X   100% =  517,750    14,770     11,035       492,500        X  95% X  90% =   421,088        

Ms . Farrell

   406,000        X  95% X  110% =   424,270        
(1)Mr. Watjen’s target is set as a dollar amount vs. a percentage of salary for the other NEOs. Mr. Watjen’s 2012 long- term incentive target was reduced from $6 million to $5 million, as described on page 49, because the company’s 1- and 3-year TSR for the period ended December 31, 2012 did not exceed the median of the comparable TSRs of the Proxy Peer Group.

 

(1)(2)The 20102012 long-term incentive was granted in February 20112013 based on performance in 2010.2012. The grant date fair market value of the long-term incentive grant (as reported in the Summary Compensation Table on page 62) differs slightly based on the rounding of shares:shares and the valuation of the PSUs based on the Monte Carlo valuation:

 

Executive  Grant Date 
 Fair Value 
   Performance Share
Units Granted
(Feb. 2013)
   Restricted Stock
Units Granted
(Feb. 2013)
   

Stock Options
Granted

(Feb. 2013)

 

Mr. Watjen

  $5,803,152    $5,609,489         113,945      113,944         -    

Mr. McKenney

  $1,222,170     1,553,813              48,056         39,760    

Mr. McCarthy

  $1,154,720     1,460,624              45,174         37,375    

Mr. Best

  $771,839  

Mr. Horn

  $517,744     421,080              13,023         10,775    
Ms. Farrell   424,278              17,496         -    

(2)Of the 75% portion of Mr. Watjen’s long-term incentive award that was paid in restricted stock units, 50% will be settled in stock and 50% will be settled in cash upon vesting.

Did the Committee take into consideration any exceptions when determining company performance for purposes of the 2011 grants based on 2010 performance?

In measuring financial results for 2010, the Committee excluded the impact of the following items not already assumed in the 2010 financial plan:

The variance in foreign currency exchange rates from those assumed in the 2010 financial plan; and

The first quarter of 2010 tax charge of $10.2 million recorded as a result of the impact of the tax law change related to the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010.

In measuring financial results for 2010, the Committee did not exclude the impact of the September 2010 issuance of $400.0 million of unsecured senior notes and the 2010 repurchases of Unum Group

Unum Group81


Compensation Discussion and Analysis2012 Proxy Statement

common stock totaling $356.0 million because these items generally offset each other and the net impact of these items combined was not considered as having a material impact on the incentive plan targets.

What were the individual long-term incentive grants for 2011 performance?

The Committee assessed the company’s performance and compared the actual corporate results to the targets established for each measure to arrive at the corporate performance percentage. The Committee then determined an individual performance percentage for each named executive officer, which ranged from 0% to 125% based on an assessment of individual performance. The award amount was then calculated and expressed in U.S. dollars. Finally, 75% of the award was converted to a number of restricted stock units using the closing price of the stock on the grant date. The remaining 25% was converted to stock options based on the Black-Scholes value of the stock options on the grant date.

In February 2012, based on 2011 performance, the Committee approved grants of restricted stock units and stock options for the named executive officers as outlined in the following table:

   LONG-TERM INCENTIVE GRANTEDIN 2012(1)  (Based on Performance in 2011) 
Executive 2011
Long-Term
Incentive
Target
 2011
Long-Term
Incentive
Target
      

Company
Perfor-

mance

      

Individual
Perfor-

mance

    

2011

Long-Term
Incentive
Granted

  Shares of
Restricted
Stock Units
Granted
(Feb. 2012)
  Stock
Options
Granted
(Feb. 2012)
 
   (% of Salary) ($)      (%)      (%)    ($)  (#)  (#) 

Mr. Watjen

 455% $5,000,000    X   112%  X    125% = $7,000,000    224,840(2)   178,937    

Mr. McKenney

 150%  997,500    X   112%  X    120% =  1,340,640    43,061     34,270    

Mr. McCarthy

 150%  877,500    X   112%  X    125% =  1,228,500    39,459     31,403    

Mr. Best(3)

 -  -    -   -   -        -    

Mr. Horn

 100%  485,000    X   112%  X    95% =  516,040    16,575     13,191    

(1)The 2011 long-term incentive was granted in February 2012 based on performance in 2011. The fair market value of the long-term incentive grant differs slightly based on the rounding of shares:

Mr. Watjen

  $7,000,018  

Mr. McKenney

  $1,340,635  

Mr. McCarthy

  $1,228,489  

Mr. Best

  $-  

Mr. Horn

  $516,034  

(2)Of the 75%50% portion of Mr. Watjen’s long-term incentive award that was paid in performance-based restricted stock units, 50% will be settled in stock and 50% will be settled in cash upon vesting. This change was made in February 2010 by the Committee to reflect the fact that Mr. Watjen had a very significant ownership position in the company and it was in the best interest of the company to reduce the amount of additional equity issued.

 54 | Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and 2014 Proxy Statement


Compensation Discussion and Analysis 

2014 Compensation Decisions

At its February 2014 meeting, the Committee made decisions with respect to our NEOs’ base salaries as well as annual and long-term incentive targets for each of the NEOs for 2014 as outlined below.

After consideration of company and individual performance during 2013, each executive’s responsibilities, tenure and market data, the Committee approved the following base salaries for the NEOs effective March 1, 2014: Mr. Watjen $1,150,000 (2.5%); Mr. McKenney $715,000 (2.1%); Mr. Horn $515,000 (3.0%); and Ms. Farrell $435,625 (2.5%). Mr. McCarthy was not given an increase due to his retirement on March 31, 2014.

Based on its review of Proxy Peer Group data provided by its consultant, the Committee set Mr. Watjen’s annual incentive target for 2014 at 200% and his long-term incentive target at $6 million and determined that these targets will no longer be subject to adjustment based on the company’s 1- and 3-year TSRs relative to the medians of the comparable TSRs of the Proxy Peer Group. These decisions were based on consideration of the following:

Mr. Watjen’s targeted total direct compensation compared with peers (as described in their 2013 proxy statements):

 

(3)Mr. Best retired on December 31, 2011. Therefore, under the terms of the Plan, he was not eligible to receive a long-term incentive grant in 2012.

82Unum Group


2012 Proxy Statemento

Compensation DiscussionThe Committee philosophy is to target the approximate median of peers. The lower targets were at the 44thpercentile, or 11% below the median; and Analysis

 

o

Given Mr. Watjen’s tenure and consistent performance, the Committee believes the new targets, which are at the 53rdpercentile, or 7% above the median, are more appropriate;

 

At the time the relative TSR hurdles were added, there was no TSR component in Mr. Watjen’s compensation. However, 50% of his long-term incentive award is now paid in the form of performance share units, which are tied to three-year prospective performance goals with a relative TSR modifier; and

Did

The company’s consistent performance during 2013 (1-year TSR of 71.8%) and over the past several years, especially during a difficult financial environment.

For the Committee take into consideration any exceptions when determining company performance for purposes ofremaining NEOs, the 2012 grantstargets were set based on 2011 performance?

In measuring financial results for 2011, the Committee excluded the impactconsideration of the following items not included in the 2011 financial plan:

The variance in foreign currency exchange rates from those assumed in the 2011 financial plan;

The after-tax charge of $561.2 million as a result of the Company’s completion of its strategic review of its long-term care business;

The after-tax charge of $119.3 million to strengthen reserves in the individual disability closed block;

An income tax benefit of $41.3 million due to a final settlement with the IRS with respect to our appeal of audit adjustments for the tax years 1996 to 2004; and

An income tax charge of $18.6 million related to the repatriation of £150.0 million of dividends from our U.K. subsidiaries.

What are the individual long-term incentive targets for 2012 performance?

During its February 2012 meeting, the Committee set an individualeach NEO’s current target, for each named executive officer based on the approximate median of the comparison group. The Committee also consideredappropriate comparator group and each individual’s target relative to other named executive officers,NEOs, given their respective levels of responsibility. These

The 2014 annual incentive targets arewere set as follows: Mr. McKenney 100% (no change); Mr. McCarthy 100% (no change); Mr. Horn 80% (no change); and Ms. Farrell 120% (no change). In accordance with the terms of the Annual Incentive Plan, Mr. McCarthy will be eligible for a dollar amountprorated payout for Mr. Watjen and as a percentage2014 based on his retirement date of base salary for other named executive officers.March 31, 2014.

Based on a review of market data, the long-termLong-term incentive targets for the named executive officer, for 2012 performance are: $6 million2014 were set as follows: Mr. McKenney 200% (no change); Mr. McCarthy (not applicable given his retirement on March 31, 2014); Mr. Horn 110% (increased from $5 million) for Mr. Watjen; 200% (increased from 150%100%) for Messrs. McCarthy; and McKenney; andMs. Farrell 100% for Mr. Horn. Mr. Best retired at the end of 2011; therefore, he does not have a long-term incentive target for 2012.(no change).

Equity Performance Grant

An Equity Performance Grant was approved by the Board of Directors in 2007 and reported in our 2008 Proxy Statement. This special grant of performance-based restricted stock units was granted to approximately 50 key officers who, through their performance and leadership, were identified as being able to truly impact Unum’s ability to achieve ongoing corporate objectives.

Grant recipients, including Messrs. Watjen, McCarthy, Best and Horn (Mr. McKenney was not an employee at the time of the grant), were eligible to receive restricted stock units upon vesting over three different periods, based on performance between 2007 and December 31, 2011. In order for the grants to vest in any period, these factors had to be met:

Achievement of thresholds for growth in EPS, risk-based capital, assessments by rating agencies and regulatory compliance; and

Unum Group83


Compensation Discussion and Analysis2012 Proxy Statement

Once the above thresholds were achieved, the percentage vesting was based on a schedule of the highest closing stock price attained for 20 consecutive business days, beginning at $26 per share.

Since the plan required that the threshold goals must be met and maintained, the Committee provided a final review of plan performance through 2011 in February 2012. At that time, the Committee confirmed that all thresholds had been maintained for the remaining performance period. However, no vesting occurred because the required stock price appreciation was not achieved. Therefore, the restricted stock units were forfeited.

Retirement and Workplace Benefits

What employee benefits does the company provide its named executive officers and other employees?

We provide a benefits package for employees, including all NEOs, and their dependents, portions of which are paid for, in whole or in part, by the employee. Benefits

Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and 2014 Proxy Statement | 55 


 Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Among the retirement benefits we offer are:

Pension plans.We sponsor a tax-qualified defined benefit pension plan, and a non-qualified defined benefit pension plan for employees whose benefits under the tax-qualified plans are limited by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS). Base pay and annual incentives are counted toward the defined benefit pension plans, but long-term incentives are not. Since 2000, the CEO also has participated in the Unum Group Senior Executive Retirement Plan (the SERP) and is the only active employee covered under the SERP. During 2013, we amended the terms of our defined benefit pension plans (tax-qualified and non-qualified) and the SERP to freeze the further accrual of retirement benefits provided under those plans as of December 31, 2013. For a more complete description of pension benefits for our NEOs, see page 69.

401(k).We provide a tax-qualified 401(k) retirement plan for all regular U.S. employees who are scheduled to work at least 1,000 hours per year, and, effective January 1, 2014, a non-qualified 401(k) plan for employees whose benefits under the tax qualified plans are limited by the IRS. Base pay and annual incentives are counted toward 401(k) plans but long-term incentives are not. Unum provides up to a 4% (5% effective January 1, 2014) company match for those employees who contribute to these plans and have completed one year of service.

Defined Contribution. Beginning January 1, 2014, within our existing tax-qualified 401(k) plan, we offer new defined contribution plans that replace our defined benefit pension plans which were frozen as to further accruals as of December 31, 2013, as described above. These include a non- contributory tax-qualified defined contribution plan for all regular U.S. employees who are scheduled to work at least 1,000 hours per year, and a non-qualified defined contribution plan for employees whose benefits under the tax qualified plans are limited by the IRS. Base pay and annual incentives are counted towards these defined contribution plans but long-term incentive awards are not. Unum provides a 4.5% company contribution for those employees who have completed one year of service. In addition, for employees who meet specific age and service requirements, a company “transition contribution” of 3.5% is made on all earnings, with an additional 3.5% transition contribution for earnings above $70,000. The transition contributions are being provided to eligible employees to more closely track the means by which benefits were accrued under the frozen defined benefit plans, for the benefit of those employees who, due to their age and years of service, would not have the same opportunity to adjust to the new defined contribution plan as other employees. Transition contributions will be made to active eligible employees until December 31, 2020.

The workplace benefits we offer include: life, health, dental, vision and disability insurance; pension; 401(k); dependent and healthcare reimbursement accounts; tuition reimbursement; an employee stock purchase plan; paid time off; holidays; and a matching gifts program for charitable contributions. Named executive officers have the same benefits package as other employees.

In April 2000, the companywe purchased corporate owned life insurance (COLI) on all officers who gave their approval. In the event of a covered officer’s death while still employed, the company provideswe will provide a death benefit to the executive’sofficer’s beneficiary in the amount of $200,000 (this amount is shown in the appropriate column of the Termination Table on page119).$200,000. Of the named executive officers,NEOs, Messrs. Horn and McKenney and Ms. Farrell were not employees of the company at that time, and therefore they are not covered under a COLI policy.

What types of retirement plans does the company offer?

We sponsor a tax-qualified, defined benefit pension plan. We also provide a non-qualified pension plan for employees whose benefits under the tax-qualified plans are limited by the Internal Revenue Code. Base pay and annual incentive awards are counted toward the defined benefit pension plans; long-term incentives are not. In addition to the qualified and non-qualified pension plans, Mr. Watjen also has a supplemental executive retirement plan under the terms of his employment agreement. He has been covered under this plan since 2000 and is the only active employee covered under the plan.

In addition, Unum provides a tax-qualified, 401(k) retirement plan for all regular employees who are scheduled to work at least 1,000 hours per year. This plan provides funded, tax qualified benefits up to the limits on compensation and benefits under the Internal Revenue Code. Unum provides up to a 4% company match for those employees who contribute to the plan and have completed one year of service.

For a complete description of pension benefits for the named executive officers, please see the “2011 Pension Benefits” section beginning on page 109.

84Unum Group


2012 Proxy StatementCompensation Discussion and Analysis

Perquisites and Other Personal Benefits

The company providesWe provide a limited number of perquisites, which are described below:

 

One of our largest employee locations is in Tennessee, which has no state income tax. Due to the frequency of travel between our corporate offices and other locations, employees often incur

Many states require non-residents to pay state income taxes if a certain amount

 56 | Notice of time is spent in that state. Due to the frequencyAnnual Meeting of travel between Unum’s corporate officesShareholders and other locations, named executive officers often incur non-resident state taxes in multiple states. A tax gross-up is provided for non-resident state taxes when any employee travels to other company locations outside of their primary state of employment2014 Proxy Statement


Compensation Discussion and incurs state income tax based on another state’s law (see footnote (e) to the All Other Compensation table on page 102 for additional details).Analysis 

 

Given the demands of the job, when Mr. Watjen has to travel, we believe the use of corporate aircraft allows him to most efficiently utilize his time. Mr. Watjen voluntarily elected to discontinue his company paid benefit of up to 40 personal hours per year (with no gross-up) on June 30, 2009. Mr. Watjen continues to use the time-sharing agreement with the company and reimburses the company for all expenses associated with this type of travel. Refer to page 94 for more information.

The company hosts a limited number of events each year to recognize the contributions of employees at all levels in the organization. These functions serve specific business purposes, with very clear guidelines for attendance and content, including community outreach activities in the location of each significant event. While the focus of these events is on recognizing the contributions of a broad group of employees, for some of these events, attendance of a named executive officer and his spouse or guest is expected. When this occurs, the company attributes income to the named executive officer for his attendance and the attendance of his spouse or guest, when required under Internal Revenue Service regulations. Because the company considers these events to be business functions, a tax gross-up is provided on the income attributed to these events.

A detailed table of all other compensation for 2011, including executive perquisites, is included as footnote (5) to the Summary Compensation Table on page 100.

 

Unum Group85


Compensation Discussion

non-resident state taxes in multiple states. Therefore, when any employee travels to other company locations outside of their primary state of employment and Analysis

2012 Proxy Statement

Executive Compensation Summaries

Each element of pay has been outlined within this document. The individual profile summaries for each named executive officer, beginning on page 89, provide a clear picture of pay for 2011 performance from the Committee’s perspective. Additionally, on each profile page you will find highlights of each named executive officer’s individual performance for the year.

Total Compensation

The Summary Compensation Table on page 100 outlines executive compensation as required by the Securities and Exchange Commission. However, the Summary Compensation Table includes pay elements that the Committee did not consider when making compensation decisions based on 2011 performance. The Summary Compensation Table includes the actual increase in the present value of pension benefits, although this amount is not within the Committee’s control, as well as the long-term incentive granted in February 2011 for 2010 performance. In addition, the Summary Compensation table does not include long-term incentive awards granted by the Committee in 2012 for 2011 performance.

We believe the supplemental table and the related tables in the executive profiles on the following pages provide a better overview of the principal elements of executive pay that the Committee actually considered when making compensation decisions. These tables differ from the Summary Compensation table in that they:

Exclude the actuarial increase of the present value of pension benefits;

Exclude the long-term incentive awards for the previous year; and

Include the long-term incentive awards based on current-year performance.

Please note that the supplemental table below and the tables on each profile page are not substitutes for the required Summary Compensation Table.

86Unum Group


2012 Proxy StatementCompensation Discussion and Analysis

2011AND 2010 TOTAL COMPENSATION(1) 
 
Executive  Performance
Year
 Salary  Annual
Incentive(2)
  Long-Term
Incentive(3)
  All Other
Compensation(4)
  Total 

Mr. Watjen

  2011  $1,100,000      $2,000,000        $7,000,018        $86,551              $10,186,569        
   2010  1,100,000      1,851,300        5,803,152        75,486              8,829,938        

Mr. McKenney

  2011  662,635      800,132        1,340,635        39,774              2,843,176        
   2010  650,000      729,300        1,222,170        31,023              2,632,493        

Mr. McCarthy

  2011  581,846      774,582        1,228,489        47,674              2,632,591        
   2010  565,000      757,453        1,154,720        47,380              2,524,553        

Mr. Best

  2011  531,365      575,237        -        17,214              1,123,816        
   2010  515,000      543,226        771,839        15,588              1,845,653        

Mr. Horn

  2011  483,423      319,639        516,034        39,112              1,358,208        
   2010  475,000      353,400        517,744        47,616              1,393,760        

(1)The amounts in the table reflect the principal elements of the named executive officers’ compensationincurs state income tax based on another state’s law, we provide a tax gross-up for the 2011 and 2010 performance years that the Committee considered when they made these compensation decisions.non-resident state taxes.

 

(2)For 2011 performance,

While corporate policy would entitle Mr. Watjen to a company-paid benefit of up to 40 hours of personal use of the annual incentive amounts were determined bycorporate aircraft, he has voluntarily elected to discontinue this company-paid benefit. In addition, he has entered into a time-sharing agreement where he reimburses the Committeecompany for the costs of the aircraft for personal use. During 2013, he made payments to the company of $60,734 for 22.1 hours of personal usage. This amount has not been included in February 2012 and paid in March 2012. For 2010 performance, the annual incentive amounts were determined bySummary Compensation Table because there is no incremental cost to the Committee in February 2011 and paid in March 2011.company.

 

(3)The long-term incentive

A tax gross-up is shown atprovided to employees who incur income on company-sponsored events where attendance is expected. We host a limited number of events each year to recognize the fair market valuecontributions of the restricted stock units and stock options on the date of grant as described on page 80. The long-term incentive amounts were determined by the Committee and granted in February 2012 based on 2011 performancevarious employees. These functions serve specific business purposes, and in February 2011 based on 2010 performance.

(4)The all other compensation amounts paid in 2011 are further detailed insome cases the attendance of an NEO and his or her spouse or guest is expected. If so, we attribute income to the NEO for these costs when required under Internal Revenue Service regulations. For more information, see the All Other Compensation table on page 102 and the Summary Compensation Table on page 100. The all other compensation amounts paid in 2011 were reported in the All Other Compensation table and the Summary Compensation Table in our 2011 Proxy Statement.

Unum Group87


Compensation Discussion and Analysis2012 Proxy Statement

Compensation Reconciliation

The following table reconciles the 2011 compensation information as reported for each named executive officer in the Summary Compensation Table on page 100 to the 2011 compensation information provided on the previous page and in each named executive officer’s profile page.

2011 COMPENSATION RECONCILIATION 
Executive Summary
Compensation
Table
  Change in
Pension Value
and Non-
Qualified
Deferred
Compensation(1)
  Long-Term
Incentive
Granted in
2011 for 2010
Performance(2)
  Long-Term
Incentive
Granted in
2012 for 2011
Performance(3)
  2011 Total
Compensation
 
   Total  Subtract  Subtract  Add  Total 

  Mr. Watjen

  $12,233,703        ($3,244,000)     ($5,803,152)     $7,000,018        $10,186,569      

  Mr. McKenney

  2,824,711        (100,000)     (1,222,170)     1,340,635        2,843,176      

  Mr. McCarthy

  3,629,944        (1,071,122)     (1,154,720)     1,228,489        2,632,591      

  Mr. Best

  2,608,655        (713,000)     (771,839)     -        1,123,816      

  Mr. Horn

  1,552,918        (193,000)     (517,744)     516,034        1,358,208      

(1)The actuarial increase in the present value of pension benefits has been excluded since the Committee does not consider this to be a principal element of compensation when making compensation decisions.

(2)2010 long-term incentive was granted in February 2011 for performance in 2010. The amount shown in this table is the fair market value of the LTI grant, which is slightly different than the award shown in the long-term incentive Granted in 2011 table (on page81) based on the rounding of shares.

(3)2011 long-term incentive was granted in February 2012 for performance in 2011. The amount shown in this table is the fair market value of the LTI grant, which is slightly different than the award shown in the Long-Term Incentive Granted in 2012 table (on page 82) based on the rounding of shares.

88Unum Group


2012 Proxy StatementCompensation Discussion and Analysis

Thomas R. Watjen

President and Chief Executive Officer

Mr. Watjen has been President and Chief Executive Officer since March 2003. He served as Vice Chairman and Chief Operating Officer from May 2002 until March 2003. He became Executive Vice President, Finance in June 1999. Mr. Watjen has 18 years of service with the company.

Individual Performance

In assessing Mr. Watjen’s performance for 2011, the Committee noted that he:

•    Delivered strong results in a difficult environment as the company met or exceeded most of its key goals including operating performance, financial strength, return on equity, customer satisfaction, brand image, corporate social responsibility, and long term shareholder return;

•    Ensured that the company is well positioned to meet the future needs of the business, including investments in areas targeted for growth and the discontinuation of certain businesses that have less favorable outlooks;

•    Strengthened the depth of management and leadership development to meet current and future business needs, including succession planning at all levels; and

•    Provided outstanding leadership with a variety of stakeholders both internally and externally.

Pay for 2011 Performance

Base salary earnings for 2011:$1,100,000

Annual Incentive for 2011 performance:(2)

            Target: $1,650,000             Actual: $2,000,000

Long-term Incentive for 2011 performance:(3)

            Target: $5,000,000             Actual: $7,000,018

LOGO63.

2011 and 2010 Compensation(4)

Performance Year  Salary   Annual
Incentive
   Long-Term
Incentive
   All Other
Compensation
   Total 

2011

  $1,100,000    $2,000,000     $7,000,018     $86,551      $10,186,569  

2010

   1,100,000     1,851,300     5,803,152     75,486       8,829,938  

(1)Details of All Other Compensation for 2011 are located in the table on page 102. Details of All Other Compensation for 2010 may be found in the 2011 Proxy Statement.

(2)Details on how annual incentive is calculated begin on page 70.

(3)Details on how long-term incentive is calculated begin on page 77.

(4)This is not a substitute for the Summary Compensation Table. The amounts shown in the table above reflect the Committee’s view of compensation decisions based on the performance year, regardless of the year in which the amounts were actually paid. A reconciliation of these to the Summary Compensation Table is located on page 88.

Unum Group89


Compensation Discussion and Analysis2012 Proxy Statement

Richard P. McKenneyEVP and Chief Financial Officer

Mr. McKenney joined our company on July 20, 2009 as Executive Vice President and assumed the position of Chief Financial Officer effective August 10, 2009. He was previously Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Sun Life Financial, and Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer for Genworth Financial.

Individual Performance

In assessing Mr. McKenney’s performance for 2011, the Committee noted that he:

•    Ensured the company met or exceeded most of its financial objectives while making prudent investments in targeted growth areas;

•    Significantly strengthened the company’s corporate development capabilities and focus;

•    Restructured the enterprise finance function and enhanced the depth of key management talent; and

•    Played a significant leadership role in the company’s strategic review of the long term care business and its decision to discontinue the sale of new policies.

Pay for 2011 Performance

Base salary earnings for 2011:$665,000

Annual Incentive for 2011 performance:(2)

            Target: $662,635            Actual: $800,132

Long-term Incentive for 2011 performance:(3)

            Target: $997,500            Actual: $1,340,635

LOGO

2011 and 2010 Compensation(4)

Performance Year  Salary   Annual
Incentive
   Long-Term
Incentive
   All Other
Compensation
   Total 

2011

  $662,635    $800,132    $1,340,635     $39,774      $2,843,176  

2010

   650,000     729,300     1,222,170     31,023       2,632,493  

(1)Details of All Other Compensation for 2011 are located in the table on page 102. Details of All Other Compensation for 2010 may be found in the 2011 Proxy Statement.

(2)Details on how annual incentive is calculated begin on page 70.

(3)Details on how long-term incentive is calculated begin on page 77.

(4)This is not a substitute for the Summary Compensation Table. The amounts shown in the table above reflect the Committee’s view of compensation decisions based on the performance year, regardless of the year in which the amounts were actually paid. A reconciliation of these to the Summary Compensation Table is located on page 88.

90Unum Group


2012 Proxy StatementCompensation Discussion and Analysis

Kevin P. McCarthy

EVP and Chief Operating Officer;

President and CEO, Unum US

Mr. McCarthy became Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer in January 2012, in addition to continuing to serve as President and Chief Executive Officer, Unum US, a position he has held since 2007. He has been with the company for 32 years, including serving as Executive Vice President of Risk Operations and Senior Vice President of Underwriting, along with other leadership positions.

Individual Performance

In assessing Mr. McCarthy’s performance for 2011, the Committee noted that he:

•    Delivered strong results when measured against key business goals, operating income, return on equity, earned premium, and sales;

•    Positioned the business for future success through both investments in products and services, and leadership of our strategic review of the company’s long term care business and subsequent exit;

•    Developed management talent both within Unum US as well as across the enterprise; and

•    As COO and head of the company’s Operating Committee, drove companywide strategy and implemented plans to improve efficiency and performance across the enterprise.

Pay for 2011 Performance

Base salary earnings for 2011: $585,000

Annual Incentive for 2011 performance:(2)

            Target: $581,846             Actual: $774,582

Long-term Incentive for 2011 performance:(3)

            Target: $877,500             Actual: $1,228,489

LOGO

2011 and 2010 Compensation(4)

Performance Year  Salary   Annual
Incentive
   Long-Term
Incentive
   All Other
Compensation
   Total 

2011

  $581,846    $774,582    $1,228,489     $  47,674      $2,632,591  

2010

   565,000     757,453     1,154,720     47,380       2,524,553  

(1)Details of All Other Compensation for 2011 are located in the table on page 102. Details of All Other Compensation for 2010 may be found in the 2011 Proxy Statement.

(2)Details on how annual incentive is calculated begin on page 70.

(3)Details on how long-term incentive is calculated begin on page 77.

(4)This is not a substitute for the Summary Compensation Table. The amounts shown in the table above reflect the Committee’s view of compensation decisions based on the performance year, regardless of the year in which the amounts were actually paid. A reconciliation of these to the Summary Compensation Table is located on page 88.

Unum Group91


Compensation Discussion and Analysis2012 Proxy Statement

Robert O. BestEVP, Global Services (retired)

Mr. Best served as Executive Vice President, Global Services, from March 2010 until his retirement on December 31, 2011. He served as Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer, Unum US, from January 2007 until March 2010. He began his career with Colonial Life and had leadership roles with our predecessor companies, including Executive Vice President of our Client Service Center and Chief Information Officer.

Individual Performance

In assessing Mr. Best’s performance for 2011, the Committee noted that he:

•    Met or exceeded the financial objectives set for the organization;

•    Successfully developed the Global Services team, implemented its first plan and demonstrated the importance of this as a critical strategic initiative;

•    Built talent and depth in the Global Services team and instituted a smooth transition in leadership upon his retirement at year-end; and

•    Made significant contributions across the enterprise (as he has throughout his career with the company), including in the areas of risk management, corporate development and strategy, people development and community leadership.

Pay for 2011 Performance

Base salary earnings for 2011:$532,000

Annual Incentive for 2011 performance:(2)

            Target: $478,229             Actual: $575,237

Long-term Incentive for 2011 performance:(3)$-

LOGO

2011 and 2010 Compensation(4)

Performance Year  Salary   Annual
Incentive
   Long-Term
Incentive
   All Other
Compensation
   Total 

2011

  $531,365    $575,237     $ -       $17,214      $1,123,816  

2010

   515,000     543,226     771,839       15,588       1,845,653  

(1)Details of All Other Compensation for 2011 are located in the table on page 102. Details of All Other Compensation for 2010 may be found in the 2011 Proxy Statement.

(2)Details on how annual incentive is calculated begin on page 70.

(3)Mr. Best retired on December 31, 2011, therefore he was not eligible to receive a long-term incentive grant in February of 2012.

(4)This is not a substitute for the Summary Compensation Table. The amounts shown in the table above reflect the Committee’s view of compensation decisions based on the performance year, regardless of the year in which the amounts were actually paid. A reconciliation of these to the Summary Compensation Table is located on page 88.

92Unum Group


2012 Proxy StatementCompensation Discussion and Analysis

Randall C. HornEVP, President and CEO, Colonial Life

Mr. Horn has been Executive Vice President, President and Chief Executive Officer, Colonial Life since 2004. He joined the company after a 27-year career with Mutual of Omaha, having served in several leadership roles including Executive Vice President of Individual Services and Executive Vice President of Group Benefit Services.

Individual Performance

In assessing Mr. Horn’s performance for 2011, the Committee noted that he:

•    Delivered good overall profitability and return on equity at Colonial Life, although the business fell short of its key financial goals for the year;

•    Positioned the company for improved performance in 2012;

•    Strengthened his management team and enhanced capabilities through cross-enterprise partnerships; and

•    Identified strategies and implemented plans to improve performance across the enterprise, as a member of the company’s Operating Committee.

Pay for 2011 Performance

Base salary earnings for 2011:$485,000

Annual Incentive for 2011 performance:(2)

            Target: $386,738            Actual: $319,639

Long-term Incentive for 2011 performance:(3)

            Target: $485,000            Actual: $516,034

LOGO

2011 and 2010 Compensation(4)

Performance Year  Salary   Annual
Incentive
   Long-Term
Incentive
  All Other
Compensation
   Total 

2011

  $483,423    $319,639    $516,034   $39,112      $1,358,208  

2010

   475,000     353,400    517,744   47,616       1,393,760  

(1)Details of All Other Compensation for 2011 are located in the table on page 102. Details of All Other Compensation for 2010 may be found in the 2011 Proxy Statement.

(2)Details on how annual incentive is calculated begin on page 70.

(3)Details on how long-term incentive is calculated begin on page 77.

(4)This is not a substitute for the Summary Compensation Table. The amounts shown in the table below reflect the Committee’s view of compensation decisions based on the performance year, regardless of the year in which the amounts were actually paid. A reconciliation of these to the Summary Compensation Table is located on page 88.

Unum Group93


Compensation Discussion and Analysis2012 Proxy Statement

Compensation Contracts and Agreements

We have the following compensation contracts and agreements with NEOs.

Employment Agreements

Mr. Watjen is the only named executive officerNEO covered under an employment agreement. UnderAt his request, effective December 30, 2013, the terms of his agreement Mr. Watjen is entitledwas amended and restated primarily to freeze the following compensation:

Base salary of $1,100,000;

A target annual incentive of not less than 150% of his base salary, excluding any special or supplemental bonuses that may be awarded;

Eligibility for annual equity grants and/or cash-based awards as determined by the Committee;

Participation in all saving, retirement, health and welfare benefit programs generally available to our other senior executive officers;

A minimum annual retirement benefit equal to 2.5% of his final average earnings multiplied by his years of service up to 20 years;

Post-retirement welfare benefit coverage for a period of three years following the date of termination; and

A lump-sum payment representing the increase in present valuefurther accrual of his retirement benefit as if he had accumulated three additional yearsunder the SERP. Additional changes to his agreement, including the elimination of age and service.

Mr. Watjen’s employmentSection 280G excise tax gross-up provisions, are described on page 35. The agreement which was originally effective January 1, 2002, and amended on December 16, 2005, currently extends through December 16, 2013,30, 2015, and is subject to automatic one-year extensions unless either party gives the required notice of its intention not to renew at least 60 days priorrenew. Under the agreement, Mr. Watjen is entitled to the extension date, which isfollowing compensation:

Base salary of $1,122,000;

Target annual incentive of no less than 150% of his base salary, excluding any special or supplemental bonuses that may be awarded;

Eligibility for annual equity grants and/or cash-based awards as determined by the Committee;

Participation in all savings, retirement, health and welfare benefit programs generally available to our other senior executive officers;

A minimum annual retirement benefit equal to 2.5% of Mr. Watjen’s final average earnings multiplied by his years of service, which benefit was frozen as to further accruals as of December 31, 2013 (see pages 34 and 35 for additional details); and

Post-retirement welfare benefit coverage for a period of three years following the date of termination in the event of termination by the company without cause or by Mr. Watjen for good reason within certain change in control periods, and for a period of two years if such terminations occur outside of these change in control periods.

Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and 2014 Proxy Statement | 57 


 Compensation Discussion and Analysis

The agreement further stipulates that is one year prior to the expiration of the then current term.

Mr. Watjen’s agreement prohibits himWatjen would be prohibited from using or divulging confidential information and from competing with us or soliciting any officer at the level of vice president or above for a period of 18 months after his employment terminates.termination. These non-competition and non-solicitation covenants would be terminated upon a change in control.

In 2007, the companyMr. Watjen also entered into an aircraft time-sharing agreement with Mr. Watjen. Under this agreement, Mr. Watjen will reimburse the costs incurred by us beyond the first 40 hours of personal use by him each year of the corporate aircraft. Since June 30, 2009, Mr. Watjen has voluntarily elected to discontinue use of the 40 hours the company provides. However, he retainedin 2007. Details about that agreement can be found in the option to use his time-sharing agreementPerquisites and reimburse the company for any costs. During 2011, he made payments to the company of $109,314 for a total of 44.1 hours of personal usage.

94Unum Group


2012 Proxy StatementCompensation Discussion and Analysis

Change in Control Agreements

Each of the named executive officers, other than Mr. Watjen, is covered by a change in control agreement with the company. Please refer to the “Terminations Related to a Change in Control”Other Personal Benefits section beginning on page 113 for more information.56.

Severance and Change in Control Benefits

The company provides severance benefits to all employees in the event of involuntary termination, other than for death, disability or cause. Mr. Watjen’s severance benefits are provided under his employment agreement and are described in detailoutlined beginning on page 117.74. The remaining named executive officersNEOs are covered under our Separation Pay Plan for Executive Vice Presidents. In general, we provide severance in order to give our employees competitive benefits with respect to the possibility of an involuntary termination of their employment.

InWhen termination of employment is accompanied by severance payments, the former executive is required to release all claims he or she may have against us. The release contains restrictions on the former executive with respect to confidentiality, solicitation of company employees, competition, and disparagement. We also agree to indemnify the former executive for certain actions taken on our behalf during his or her employment.

Change in Control Severance Agreements

Each of the NEOs, other than Mr. Watjen, is covered by a change in control severance agreement with the company. These agreements provide an enhanced severance benefit in the event of a termination following a change in control, we provide an enhanced severance benefit to Mr. Watjen and the other named executive officers.control. This is to ensureensures that shareholders have the benefit of our named executive officers’NEOs’ focused attention during the critical time before and after a major corporate transaction even thoughdespite the transaction may result in uncertainty with respect to the named executive officers’their future employment. These benefits are defined for Mr. Watjen under his employment agreement, and for the other named executive officers in Change in Control Severance Agreements. We describeDetails about these agreements in further detailcan be found in the section entitled “Terminations Related to a Change in Control” section beginning on page 113.74.

On May 4, 2010,While some of these agreements include a modified excise tax gross-up provision, the company decided in May 2010 not to enter into any new or materially amended agreements with executive officers providingthat provide for excise tax gross-up provisions with respect to payments contingent upon a change in control. Given Ms. Farrell’s employment date of April 2011, she does not have an excise gross-up provision in her agreement.

Change in control benefits are available to Mr. Watjen under the terms of his employment agreement.

Other Contracts

The Company also entered into an agreement with Mr. McCarthy to provide consulting services upon his retirement until the end of 2014. The agreement provides for Mr. McCarthy to advise the company on business projects where his knowledge and expertise would be needed and add value. In return for his services, a consulting fee of $300 per hour will be provided to Mr. McCarthy. He is not expected to work more than 300 total hours during this timeframe.

 

 

Unum Group95

 58 | Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and 2014 Proxy Statement


Compensation Discussion and Analysis2012 Proxy Statement

Compensation Discussion and Analysis 

 

 

Compensation Policies and Practices

Equity Grant Practices

How does Unum set dates for equity grants?

Equity grants awarded under the long-term incentive program are approved at the February meeting of the Committee, andwhich typically occurs two to three weeks after the date of this meeting is typically set a year in advance.company’s annual earnings are released to the public. The date the equity grant is approved is considered the grant date and as a result it is also the date upon which the stock price is based. This date is typically 2 to 3 weeks after the company’s earnings are released to the public.

For employees who are not required by Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 to report their trades of Unum stock, the Human Capital Committee has authorized the CEO to make equity and deferred cash grants collectively totaling up to $500,000 per year (based on grant date value), and these grants are reported to the Committee annually. Mr. Watjen made grants totaling $116,500 during 2011. All other equity grants must be approved by the Committee in advance of the grant.

Stock Ownership and Retention and SaleRequirements

What are Unum’s policies regardingEnsuring that senior officers have a significant ownership stake in the retention of stock by its executives?

In order to aligncompany aligns the long-term interests of management and shareholders and to promotepromotes a culture of ownership, we believe our senior executives should have a significant ownership stake in the company. With this in mind,ownership. We require certain senior executivesofficers, including each named executive officer are required to adhereNEO, to:

Stock Ownership Guidelines: requirement to hold a multiple of the executive’s base salary in Unum shares throughout employment

Retention requirements: requirement to retain a fixed percentage of the net shares (shares after tax withholding) received as compensation for a specified period of time. Both the percentage and time period are determined by the individual’s position with the company. Exceptions to this requirement may be made only by the Board of Directors

In December 2011, based on a review of competitive practices, the Committee decided to increase the CEO ownership guideline to 6x base salary.

Mr. Watjen’s current ownership stake of 17 times his salary exceeds the ownership guideline for the CEO. In the interest of prudent risk management, and given his significant ownership, in 2009 the Board recommended to Mr. Watjen that he take steps to slow the growth of his stock ownership. As a result, in each of the last three years Mr. Watjen has entered into a Rule 10b5-1 trading plan for a one-year term providing for the sale of shares at a certain stock price each quarter during the term of the plan. The current plan provides for the sale of 60,000 shares each quarter. In addition, beginning with his February 2010 grant, the Committee made the decision that 50% of Mr. Watjen’s restricted stock unit grants will be settled in cash with the remaining 50% continuing to be settled in stock.

 

96 

Hold a multiple of the officer’s base salary in Unum Group


2012 Proxy StatementCompensation Discussionshares throughout employment; and Analysis

 

Retain a fixed percentage of the net shares (shares after the payment of taxes and the costs of exercise and commissions) received as compensation for a specified period of time. These retention requirements apply to shares acquired upon the exercise of options and the vesting of performance-based restricted stock units and performance share units. Exceptions to this requirement may be made only by the Board of Directors.

The following table presents by position, Unum’sthe stock ownership guidelines (expressed as a multiple of salary) and retention guidelines (expressed as a percentage of net shares to be heldrequirements for a specified holding period). Shares of common stock and restricted stock units count toward ownership, but stock options do not.our NEOs. Newly promoted or newly hired executivessenior officers have five years to achieve the ownership guidelines, while current executives have three. Our management provides a report annually to the Committee that shows how each named executive officer’s ownership compares to the guidelines.requirement. Not meeting the guidelinesrequirements may impact future equity grants. All of our named executive officersNEOs exceeded the guidelinesrequirements as of December 31, 2011.2013.

 

                                         STOCK OWNERSHIPAND REQUIREMENTS  (as of December  31, 2011) 
Executive      

Restricted

   Total   

Ownership

as % of Salary

  Retention
Requirements
 
  Common
Stock(1)
   Stock
Units(2)
   Current
Ownership
   Owned  Required  Retention
%(3)
   Holding
Period(4)
 

Mr. Watjen

   $13,442,934       $5,288,886       $18,731,820      17.0x  6x   75%       3 years    

Mr. McKenney

   1,812,884       2,534,426       4,347,310        6.5x  3x   60%       1 year    

Mr. McCarthy

   3,359,590       2,111,024       5,470,614        9.4x  3x   60%       1 year    

Mr. Best

   2,990,844       1,288,557       4,279,401        8.0x  3x   60%       1 year    

Mr. Horn

   1,624,623       905,441       2,530,064        5.2x  3x   60%       1 year    

    STOCK OWNERSHIP AND RETENTION REQUIREMENTS         (as of December 31, 2013)
        

 

Ownership

 Retention
        as % of Salary Requirements
  Common   Restricted   Total Current         Retention   Holding
Executive Stock(1)   Stock  Units(2)   Ownership     Owned     Required %(3) Period(4)
Mr. Watjen $18,574,299     $5,779,781     $24,354,080    21.7x 6x 75%     3 years    
Mr. McKenney 4,112,779     3,185,860     7,298,639    10.4x 3x 60% 1 year
Mr. McCarthy 3,583,212     2,972,223     6,555,435    10.4x 3x 60% 1 year
Mr. Horn 3,619,379     1,048,261     4,667,640      9.3x 3x 60% 1 year
Ms. Farrell 426,924     1,214,820     1,641,744      3.9x 3x 60% 1 year
(1)Amount includes shares held in certificate form, brokerage accounts and 401(k) accounts. Shares were valued using a closing stock price of $21.07$35.08 on December 30, 2011,31, 2013, the last businesstrading day of the year.

 

(2)Shares/units were valued using a closing stock price of $21.07$35.08 on December 30, 2011,31, 2013, the last trading day of the year. Messrs. Watjen, McKenney, McCarthy and Horn’sPerformance-based restricted stock units will vest over the next three years (see the Vesting Schedule for Unvested Restricted Stock Units table on page 10667 for vesting schedule). Mr. Best’s restricted stock units vested upon his retirement and will be distributed no earlier than six months after December 31, 2011. The value of units shown does not include any units subject to performance-based thresholds under the equity performance grant described on page 83.

 

(3)Retention percentage is the net percentage of shares to be held after the payment of taxes.taxes and the costs of exercise and commissions. Retention requirements apply to shares acquired upon the exercise of options and the vesting of performance-based restricted stock units and performance share units.

 

(4)After this holding period, the executiveofficer would then be able to sell the shares as long as his or her ownership guidelinerequirement is met or would be reached in the time period allotted.

Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and 2014 Proxy Statement | 59 


 Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Hedging and Insider Trading Policies

Are there policies in place that prohibit or restrict the purchase or sale of stock by named executive officers?

Yes. We have established a policy that no director or executive officer, which includes our named executive officers,NEOs, may purchase or sell options, puts, calls, straddles, equity swaps or other derivatives that are directly linked to Unumour stock.

In addition, we have established anour insider trading policy which prohibits each of our directors, executive officers (including the named executive officers)NEOs) and employees from buying or selling Unumour stock while in possession of material nonpublic information about the company and from conveying any

Unum Group97


Compensation Discussion and Analysis2012 Proxy Statement

such information to others. Under this policy, additional trading restrictions apply to our named executive officersthe NEOs and other “corporate insiders,” which include all of our directors and executive officers, certain other employees and certain related parties of these persons (including family members sharing their households). Generally, these corporate insiderswho are generally permitted to buy or sell Unumour stock only during predetermined window periods following earnings announcements, and only after they have pre-cleared the transactions with our General Counsel or his designee. Also under this policy, no corporate insider (including our named executive officers) may make “short sales” of Unumour stock, and no director or executive officer may pledge Unumour stock as security for a loan.

Recoupment Policy

Does the company have a policy for recouping performance-based compensation?

If the company makes a material restatement of its financial results, then the Board will, to the extent permitted by applicable law, seek recoupment of performance-based compensation paid to certain senior officers if it determines that: (1) the senior officer has committed or engaged in fraud or willful misconduct that resulted, either directly or indirectly, in the need to make such restatement; and (2) such performance-based compensation paid or awarded to the senior officer would have been a lesser amount if calculated using the restated financial results.

The senior officer has committed or engaged in fraud or willful misconduct that resulted, either directly or indirectly, in the need to make such restatement; and

Such performance-based compensation paid or awarded to the senior officer would have been a lesser amount if calculated using the restated financial results.

The amount of performance-based compensation to be recouped will be determined by the Board after taking into account the relevant facts and circumstances. Performance-based compensation includes annual cash incentive awards, bonuses and all forms of equity compensation. The company’s right to recoup compensation is in addition to other remedies that may be available to us under applicable law.

The Dodd-Frank Act, which contemplates an expansion of the reach of recoupment policies, was enacted into law in July 2010. TheOnce the Securities and Exchange Commission is scheduled to provideprovides rules and administrative guidance on requirements of this legislation, by the end of 2012. The Human Capital Committee will review the SEC rules and implement any necessary changes to our current recoupment policy at that time.

Tax and Accounting Considerations

Does the company take Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code into account in designing its compensation programs?

Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Codegenerally places a limit of $1,000,000$1 million per year on the amount of deductible compensation paid to all named executive officers other than the CFO, unless the compensation satisfies the “performance-based“qualified performance-based compensation” exception to Section 162(m).

The current annual incentive payout and long-term incentive grants are designedintended to be deductible under Section 162(m). From time to time, the Committee may, in its sole discretion, pay compensation that is not deductible under Section 162(m) if it determines that paying such compensation is needed in order to attract, retain or provide incentive to our named executive officers.

98Unum Group


2012 Proxy StatementCompensation Discussion and Analysis

What assumptionsNEOs, or is otherwise desirable, and it is possible that compensation intended to qualify for the “qualified performance-based compensation” exception does the company make in accounting for stock awards?not so qualify.

We account for stock-based payments under the requirements of ASC Topic 718. A complete discussion of the assumptions made as well as the financial impact of this type of compensation can be found in

 60 | Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and 2014 Proxy Statement


Compensation Discussion and Analysis 

Notes 1 and 1011 of the Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011.2013 10-K. Each year, the company provides a report to the Committee of the expense for stock-based payments. Additionally, in the event the Committee is considering new equity-based compensation programs or changes to existing programs, the accounting implications of the program or change are presented and discussed as part of the decision process.

 

LOGO

Unum Group99


Compensation Discussion and Analysis2012 Proxy Statement
The Human Capital Committee has reviewed and discussed with management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis contained in this proxy statement. Based on such review and discussions, the Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this proxy statement and incorporated by reference into the company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013.

Kevin T. Kabat, Chair

Thomas Kinser

A.S. (Pat) MacMillan, Jr.

Edward J. Muhl

 

Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and 2014 Proxy Statement | 61 


LOGO

 

2013 Summary Compensation TablesTable

 

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE 

Name and

Principal Position

  Year  Salary  Bonus  

Stock

Awards

  Option
Awards
  Non- Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation
  Change in
Pension Value
& Non-qualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings
  All Other
Compensation
  Total 
        ($)  ($)  ($)  ($)  ($)  ($)  ($)  ($) 
 

Thomas R. Watjen

President and Chief Executive Officer, and a Director

   2011   $1,100,000    -   $4,352,362(1)  $1,450,790(2)  $2,000,000(3)  $3,244,000(4)  $86,551(5)  $12,233,703  
  

 

 

 

2010

 

  

  1,100,000    -    4,174,494   $1,391,500    1,851,300    2,892,000    75,486    11,484,780  
  

 

 

 

2009

 

  

  1,108,461    -    3,201,303    1,067,092    2,007,700    1,884,000    109,807    9,378,363  
 

Richard P. McKenney

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

   2011    662,635    -    916,627(1)   305,543(2)   800,132(3)   100,000(4)   39,774(5)   2,824,711  
  

 

 

 

2010

 

  

  650,000    -    731,248    243,746    729,300    70,000    31,023    2,455,317  
  

 

 

 

2009

 

  

  300,000   $635,000    2,999,994    -    315,000    13,000    72,235    4,335,229  
 

Kevin P. McCarthy

Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer, President and Chief Executive Officer, Unum US

   2011    581,846    -    866,045(1)   288,675(2)   774,582(3)   1,071,122(4)   47,674(5)   3,629,944  
  

 

 

 

2010

 

  

  565,000    -    873,986    291,332    757,453    1,017,308    47,380    3,552,459  
  

 

 

 

2009

 

  

  569,346    -    1,515,299    305,101    747,267    660,927    34,421    3,832,361  
 

Robert O. Best(6)

Former Executive Vice President, Global Services

   2011    531,365    -    578,880(1)   192,959(2)   575,237(3)   713,000(4)   17,214(5)   2,608,655  
  

 

 

 

2010

 

  

  515,000    -    584,209    194,731    543,226    485,000    15,588    2,337,754  
  

 

 

 

2009

 

  

  518,961    -    637,311    212,439    539,460    325,000    18,463    2,251,634  
 

Randall C. Horn

Executive Vice President, President and Chief Executive Officer, Colonial Life

   2011    483,423    -    388,303(1)   129,441(2)   319,639(3)   193,000(4)   39,112(5)   1,552,918  
  

 

2010

  

  475,000    -    431,060    143,691    353,400    181,000    47,616    1,631,767  
  

 

2009

  

  478,654    -    448,876    149,627    401,208    120,000    59,701    1,658,066  

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

 

Name and

Principal Position

 Year 

Salary

($)

 

Bonus

($)

 

Stock

Awards

($)

  

Option

Awards

($)

  

Non-Equity

Incentive

Plan

Compen-

sation

($)

  

 

Change in

Pension

Value &

Non-

qualified

Deferred

Compen-

sation

Earnings

($)

  

All Other

Compen-

sation

($)

  

Total

($)

 
Thomas R. Watjen         
President and Chief Executive Officer, and a Director 2013   $1,118,277  $5,609,489    (1)       $2,141,221    (4)   $144,000    (5)   $99,933    (7)   $9,112,920  
 

 

2012

 

 

1,100,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

5,250,014

 

  

 

 

 

 

1,750,004

 

  

 

 

 

 

1,489,125

 

  

 

 

 

 

4,133,000

 

  

 

 

 

 

89,164

 

  

 

 

 

 

13,811,307

 

  

 

 

2011

 

 

1,100,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

4,352,362

 

  

 

 

 

 

1,450,790

 

  

 

 

 

 

2,000,000

 

  

 

 

 

 

3,244,000

 

  

 

 

 

 

86,551

 

  

 

 

 

 

12,233,703

 

  

Richard P. McKenney 

 

2013

 

 

696,869

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,165,358

 

    (2) 

 

 

 

 

388,455

 

    (3) 

 

 

 

 

889,553

 

    (4) 

 

 

 

 

26,000

 

    (5) 

 

 

 

 

51,413

 

    (7) 

 

 

 

 

3,217,648

 

  

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer 

 

2012

 

 

678,771

 

 

 

 

 

 

1,005,474

 

  

 

 

 

 

335,161

 

  

 

 

 

 

709,316

 

  

 

 

 

 

177,000

 

  

 

 

 

 

74,658

 

  

 

 

 

 

2,980,380

 

  

 

 

2011

 

 

662,635

 

 

 

 

 

 

916,627

 

  

 

 

 

 

305,543

 

  

 

 

 

 

800,132

 

  

 

 

 

 

100,000

 

  

 

 

 

 

39,774

 

  

 

 

 

 

2,824,711

 

  

Kevin P. McCarthy             
Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer 2013 627,462   1,095,470    (2)   365,154    (3)   870,604    (4)   4,023    (6)   33,332    (7)   2,996,045  
 

 

2012

 

 

615,000

 

 

 

 

 

 

921,368

 

  

 

 

 

 

307,121

 

  

 

 

 

 

738,000

 

  

 

 

 

 

1,604,312

 

  

 

 

 

 

23,626

 

  

 

 

 

 

4,209,427

 

  

 

 

2011

 

 

581,846

 

 

 

 

 

 

866,045

 

  

 

 

 

 

288,675

 

  

 

 

 

 

774,582

 

  

 

 

 

 

1,071,122

 

  

 

 

 

 

47,674

 

  

 

 

 

 

3,629,944

 

  

Randall C. Horn         
Executive Vice President, President and Chief Executive Officer, Colonial Life 2013 498,731   315,808    (2)   105,272    (3)   467,411    (4)   53,000    (5)   68,180    (7)   1,508,402  
 

 

2012

 

 

491,260

 

 

 

 

 

 

387,026

 

  

 

 

 

 

129,008

 

  

 

 

 

 

336,022

 

  

 

 

 

 

224,000

 

  

 

 

 

 

45,935

 

  

 

 

 

 

1,613,251

 

  

 

 

2011

 

 

483,423

 

 

 

 

 

 

388,303

 

  

 

 

 

 

129,441

 

  

 

 

 

 

319,639

 

  

 

 

 

 

193,000

 

  

 

 

 

 

39,112

 

  

 

 

 

 

1,552,918

 

  

Breege A. Farrell         
Executive Vice President and Chief Investment Officer 2013 417,131   424,278    (2)       560,922    (4)   234,000    (5)   17,242    (7)   1,653,573  
         
                              

 

(1)

The award was comprised of 50% performance share units and 50% performance-based restricted stock units granted to Mr. Watjen on February 21, 2013 for his performance in 2012. The grant date fair value of stock awards for restricted stockthe performance share units on February 22, 2011 was calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 –Compensation – Stock Compensation(ASC 718) as the number of units multiplied by the Monte Carlo simulation value of $25.26 on the grant

 62 | Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and 2014 Proxy Statement


Compensation Tables 

date. The grant date fair value of stock awards for the performance-based restricted stock units was calculated in accordance with ASC 718 as the number of units multiplied by the closing market price of $26.29$23.97 on the grant date.

100Unum Group


2012 Proxy StatementCompensation Discussion and Analysis

This amount represents 75% of the long-term incentive granted to each named executive for performance in 2010. For Mr. Watjen, this amountWatjen’s performance-based restricted stock units will be 50% stock settled and 50% cash settled upon vesting.

 

(2)The grant date fair value of stock awards for performance-based restricted stock units on February 20, 2013 was calculated in accordance with ASC 718 as the number of units multiplied by the value of $24.25 on the grant date. This amount represents 75% of the long-term incentive granted to Messrs. McKenney, McCarthy and Horn, and 100% of the long-term incentive granted to Ms. Farrell, for performance in 2012.

(3)This amount represents 25% of the long-term incentive granted to eachthe named executive on February 22, 201120, 2013 for performance in 2010.2012. The weighted average grant date fair value of options granted during 2011, 20102013, 2012 and 20092011 calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 was $11.73, $9.04$9.77, $9.78, and $4.45,$11.73, respectively. We estimated the fair value on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes valuation model. The following assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of the 2013, 2012 and 2011 2010 and 2009 grants:grants are set forth in Note 11 of our Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 of our 2013 10-K.

 

(a)Expected volatility of 53%, 55% and 50% , respectively, based on our historical daily stock prices;

(b)Expected life of 5.5 years, 5 years and 5 years, respectively, based on historical average years to exercise;

(c)Expected dividend yield of 1.41%, 1.59% and 1.68%, respectively, based on the dividend rate at the date of grant; and

(d)Risk-free rate of 2.37%, 2.33% and 1.89%, respectively, based on the yield of treasury bonds at the date of grant.

(3)(4)Amounts reflect the annual incentive awards granted in February 20122014 for performance in 2011.2013. These are discussed in further detail beginning on page 7051 under the Annual Incentive Awards heading.

 

(4)(5)The amounts shown reflect the actuarial increase in present value since December 31, 20102012 of the named executive officer’s benefits under all pension plans established by the company. The amounts were determined using interest rate and mortality rate assumptions consistent with those usedset forth in the company’s financial statements (see Note 89 of our Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 of our Annual Report on Form2013 10-K, for the year ended December 31, 2011, for those assumptions or withinexcept as otherwise provided in footnote 1 to the Pension Benefits table on page 109).72.

(6)For 2013, the change in actuarial present value of accumulated benefits for Mr. McCarthy was a decrease of $175,000. The amount reported in the table for Mr. McCarthy also includesconsists of the amount of above-market interest that exceeds 120% of the applicable federal long-term rate prescribed under section 1274(d) of the Internal Revenue Code. During 2011,2013, that amount was $2,122.$4,023.

 

(5)(7)“All Other Compensation” amounts are included within the following table:table.

 

2011 ALL OTHER COMPENSATION 

2013 ALL OTHER COMPENSATION

               
  Mr.
Watjen
   Mr.
McKenney
   Mr.
McCarthy
   Mr.
Best
   Mr.
Horn
   

Mr.

Watjen

  

Mr.

McKenney

  

Mr.

McCarthy

  

Mr.

Horn

  

Ms.    

Farrell    

Tax Reimbursement Payments(a)

   $3,484     $278     $440     $71     $16,347      $8,368        $6,907        $151        $31,562        $101        

Employee and Spouse/ Guest Attendance at Company Business Functions(b)

   7,237     3,394     -     -     21,322  

Employee and Spouse/Guest

    37,547        16,633        9,200        36,368        -  

Attendance at Company

               

Business Functions(b)

               

Total Perquisites

   $10,721     $3,672     $440     $71     $37,669      $45,915        $23,540        $9,351        $67,930        $101        

Matching Gifts Program(c)

   $3,000     $7,500     $7,500     $2,500     $700      -      $7,500        $7,500        $250        $2,750        

Matching Contributions Under our 401(k) Retirement Plan(d)

   9,800     9,800     9,800     9,800     -  

Matching Contributions Under

    10,200        10,200        10,200        -      10,200        

our 401(k) Retirement Plan(d)

   -  

Non-Resident State Taxes(e)

   63,030     18,802     29,934     4,843     743      43,818        10,173       6,281     -      4,191        

Total All Other Compensation

   $86,551     $39,774     $47,674     $17,214     $39,112      $99,933        $51,413        $33,332        $68,180        $17,242        

 

(a)The amounts shown in this row represent tax payments made by Unumus on behalf of each named executive officer relating to other items in this table.

 

(b)

As described beginning on page 85,Spouses or guests sometimes accompany the named executive officers and their spouses or guests are sometimes required to attendofficer at company business functions. IfWhen their attendance is expected, a gross up payments were calculated onpayment is provided. Where applicable, these expenses, theypayments have been included under “Tax Reimbursement Payments.” Some ofAdditionally, when these trips included travel on the corporate aircraft. Theaircraft, the incremental cost was calculated to determine amounts to be included. For purposes of compensation disclosure, the use of company aircraft is valued using an incremental cost that takes into account fuel costs, landing fees, parking, weather monitoring and maintenance fees per hour of flight. Crew travel expenses are included based on

Unum Group101


Compensation Discussion and Analysis2012 Proxy Statement

the actual amount incurred for a particular trip. Fixed costs that do not change based on usage, such as pilot salaries and depreciation of the aircraft, are excluded.

 

(c)

Amounts represent matching gifts made on behalf of the named executive officer to qualified non-profit organizations and educational institutions. The Matching Gifts Program is available to all full-time employees and

Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and 2014 Proxy Statement | 63 


 Compensation Tables

non-employee directors and will match eligible gifts from a minimum of $50 to an aggregate maximum gift of $7,500 per employee/non-employee director, per calendar year.

 

(d)Matching contributions under Unum’sour 401(k) Retirement Plan are provided to all eligible employees participating in the plan as described beginning on page 84.55 in the Retirement and Workplace Benefits section. For each participant who maximized their contribution (5%)contributed at least 5%, the company ensured the participant received the maximum company match ofmatched 4%. in 2013.

 

(e)Many of our employees are required to travel to other company locations outside of their primary state of employment. While working in a state other than their primary state of employment, employees may be required to pay state income taxes to that state if days worked or earnings exceed an amount specified in state law. When this happens, we pay the state income tax on behalf of the employee and gross up the income amount for FICA and Medicare taxes.

2013 Grants of Plan-Based Awards

(6)Mr. Best retired from the company on December 31, 2011.

GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS

      Estimated Future Payouts
Under Non-Equity
Incentive Plan Awards(1)
 

Estimated Future
Payouts Under Equity

Incentive Plan
Awards (4)

 

 

All
Other

Stock

Awards

(Number

of
Shares

of Stock
or Units)

(#)(5)

 

All Other

Option

Awards

(Number
of

Securities

Underlying

Options)

(#)(6)

 

Exercise

or Base

Price of

Option

Awards

($)/SH(7)

 

Grant

Date Fair

Value of

Stock
and

Option

Awards
($)(8)(9)

Name 

Grant

Date

 

Threshold

($)

 

Target

($)

 

Max

($ )

 

Threshold

(#)

 

Target

(#)

 

Max

(#)

            

Mr.

Watjen(2)(3)

   419,354 1,677,416 3,354,832              
 02/21/13             113,944     2,731,238
 02/21/13       45,578 113,945 205,101       2,878,251

Mr.

McKenney

   174,217 696,869 1,393,738              
 02/20/13             48,056     1,165,358
 02/20/13               39,760 24.25 388,455

Mr.

McCarthy(2)

   156,866 627,462 1,254,924              
 02/20/13             45,174     1,095,470
 02/20/13               37,375 24.25 365,154
Mr. Horn   99,746 398,985 797,970              
 02/20/13             13,023     315,808
 02/20/13               10,775 24.25 105,272

Ms.

Farrell

   121,966 487,864 975,728              
 02/20/13             17,496     424,278
                         

 

 

102Unum Group

 64 | Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and 2014 Proxy Statement


2012 Proxy StatementCompensation Discussion and Analysis

Compensation Tables  

 

GRANTSOF PLAN-BASED AWARDS 
Name Grant Date 

Estimated Future Payouts
Under Non-Equity

Incentive Plan Awards(1)

 Estimated Future
Payouts Under
Equity Incentive
Plan Awards
    All Other
Stock
Awards
  

All

Other
Option
Awards

  Exercise
or Base
Price of
Option
Awards
  Grant Date
Fair Value
of Stock
and Option
Awards
 
      Threshold  Target  Max     Threshold Target Max    Number of
Shares of
Stock or
Units
  Number of
Securities
Underlying
Options
         
      ($)  ($)  ($)     (#) (#) (#)    (#)  (#)  ($)/SH  ($) 

Mr. Watjen(2)

    412,500    1,650,000    3,300,000                
  2/22/11            165,552(4)       4,352,362(7) 
  2/22/11              123,682(5)   26.29(6)   1,450,790(8) 

Mr. McKenney

    166,250    665,000    1,330,000                
  2/22/11            34,866(4)       916,627(7) 
  2/22/11              26,048(5)   26.29(6)   305,543(8) 

Mr. McCarthy(2)

    146,250    585,000    1,170,000                
  2/22/11            32,942(4)       866,045(7) 
  2/22/11              24,610(5)   26.29(6)   288,675(8) 

Mr. Best(3)

    119,700    478,800    957,600                
  2/22/11            22,019(4)       578,880(7) 
  2/22/11              16,450(5)   26.29(6)   192,959(8) 

Mr. Horn

    97,000    388,000    776,000                
  2/22/11            14,770(4)       388,303(7) 
  2/22/11                            11,035(5)   26.29(6)   129,441(8) 

 

(1)These amounts reflect the threshold, target and maximum award under the annual incentive plan. The threshold is the minimum level, which is 25% of the amount shown in the Target column. Target amounts are based on the individual’sindividuals’ earnings for 20112013 and their annual incentive target. The maximum award is 200% of such Target.target.

 

(2)

Messrs. Watjen’s and McCarthy’s performance-based restricted stock optionunits (PBRSUs) are no longer subject to risk of forfeiture because they meet the age and years of service requirements for retirement eligibility. Their PBRSUs will continue to vest ratably over three years on each anniversary of the grant date. If they were to retire, any unvested PBRSUs would vest immediately upon retirement and the PBRSUs would be distributed no sooner than six months after the retirement date in accordance with Section 409A of the Code.

(3)As described beginning on page 49, Mr. Watjen’s annual incentive target was determined based on whether both the company’s 1- and 3-year TSRs for the periods ending on December 31, 2013 exceeded the median of the comparable TSRs of our Proxy Peer Group. Because the company’s 3-year TSR did not exceed the median for 2013, his target is shown at $1,677,416 (150%) in the table above instead of $2,236,554 (200%).

(4)The grant of performance share units (PSUs) ranges from 40% to 180% of target based on the performance and market conditions noted on page 47.

(5)This grant of performance-based restricted stock units, made on February 20, 2013 for Messrs. McKenney, McCarthy and Horn and Ms. Farrell and on February 21, 2013 for Mr. Watjen, was based on 2012 company and individual performance and vests ratably over three years. These awards were granted under the Stock Incentive Plan of 2012. Details are provided in the Long-Term Incentive Granted in 2013 table on page 54. For Mr. Watjen, 50% of these shares will be stock settled and 50% will be cash settled upon vesting.

(6)Options were granted on February 20, 2013 based on 2012 company and individual performance and vest ratably over three years. Details are provided in the Long-Term Incentive Granted in 2013 table on page 54.

(7)The amount shown is the closing market price on February 20, 2013, which is the exercise price of the options.

(8)The grant date fair value of stock awards for performance-based restricted stock units on February 20, 2013 and February 21, 2013 was calculated as the number of units multiplied by the closing market price of $24.25 and $23.97, respectively, on the grant dates. The grant date fair value of each performance share unit was calculated in accordance with ASC 718 using a Monte Carlo simulation based on historical volatility, risk-free rates of interest and pairwise correlation coefficients.

(9)The grant date fair value of options granted on February 20, 2013, calculated in accordance with ASC 718, was $9.77. The fair value on the date of grant was estimated using the Black-Scholes valuation model. The following assumptions were used to value the 2013 grant:
(a)Expected volatility of 52%, based on our historical daily stock prices;
(b)Expected life of 6.0 years, based on historical average years to exercise;
(c)Expected dividend yield of 2.14%, based on the dividend rate at the date of grant; and
(d)Risk-free rate of 1.12%, based on the yield of treasury bonds at the date of grant.

Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and 2014 Proxy Statement | 65 


 Compensation Tables

2013 Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End

  OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR-END  
  Option Awards  Stock Awards 
Name Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
  Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
  Equity
Incentive
Plan Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Unearned
Options
  Option
Exercise
Price
  Option
Expiration
Date
  Number of
Shares or
Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested
  Market Value
of Shares or
Units of Stock
That Have Not
Vested(1)
  

Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number

of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other
Rights That
Have
Not Vested

  Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Market or
Payout
Value of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other
Rights That
Have Not
Vested
 
   (# Exercisable)  (# Unexercisable)  (#)  ($)      (#)  ($)  (#)  ($) 

Mr.

                      329,520    11,559,562         -  

Watjen

  331,519             23.740    2/21/16                -  
  239,796             11.370    2/24/17                -  
  153,927             20.780    2/25/18                -  
  82,454     41,228        26.290    2/22/19                -  
   59,645     119,292        23.350    2/21/20                -  

Mr.

                      90,817    3,185,860        -  

McKenney

  26,963            20.780    2/25/18                -  
  17,365    8,683        26.290    2/22/19                -  
  11,423    22,847        23.350    2/21/20                -  
       39,760        24.250    2/20/21                -  

Mr.

                      84,727     2,972,223         -  

McCarthy

      8,204        26.290    2/22/19                -  
      20,936        23.350    2/21/20                -  
       37,375        24.250    2/20/21                -  

Mr. Horn

                      29,882    1,048,261        -  
  29,623            23.740    2/21/16                -  
  33,624            11.370    2/24/17                -  
  15,895            20.780    2/25/18                -  
  7,356     3,679        26.290    2/22/19                -  
  4,397     8,794        23.350    2/21/20                -  
       10,775        24.250    2/20/21                -  

Ms. Farrell

         ��            34,630    1,214,820         -  
(1)Represents the aggregate value of performance-based restricted stock units (including dividend equivalents) shown in the “Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested” column based on the closing price of $35.08 on December 31, 2013, the last trading day of the year.

 66 | Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and 2014 Proxy Statement


Compensation Tables  

Vesting Schedule for Unvested Restricted Stock Units

 

    VESTING SCHEDULE FOR UNVESTED RESTRICTED STOCK UNITS

  

     

 

Number of Restricted Shares/Units Vesting(1)

 
Vesting Date Grant Date    

 

Mr.
Watjen
(2)

   

 

Mr.
McKenney

   

 

Mr.
McCarthy
(2)

   

 

Mr.
Horn

   

 

Ms.    
Farrell    

 

February 20, 2014

 2/20/13     16,241     15,267     4,402     5,913  

February 21, 2014

 2/21/12   77,818     14,906     13,657     5,737     5,518  

February 21, 2014

 2/21/13   38,509          

February 22, 2014

 2/22/11   58,336     12,283     11,608     5,204       

April 25, 2014

 4/25/11           5,855  

February 20, 2015

 2/20/13        16,241     15,267     4,401     5,913  

February 21, 2015

 2/21/12   77,841     14,905     13,661     5,737     5,518  

February 21, 2015

 2/21/13   38,509                      

February 20, 2016

 2/20/13     16,241     15,267     4,401     5,913  

February 21, 2016

 2/21/13   38,507                      

Total

     329,520     90,817     84,727     29,882     34,630  

(1)These performance-based restricted stock units include dividend equivalents earned through December 31, 2013.

(2)Messrs. Watjen’s and McCarthy’s performance-based restricted stock unit grants are no longer subject to risk of forfeiture because they meet the age and years of service requirement for retirement eligibility. Messrs. Watjen’s and McCarthy’sThese grants will continue to vest ratably over three years on each anniversary of the grant date. If Messrs. Watjen or McCarthy were to retire, any unvested stock options and restricted stock units would vest immediately upon retirement

Unum Group103


Compensation Discussion and Analysis2012 Proxy Statement

and the restricted stock units would be distributed no sooner than six months after the retirement date per Internal Revenue Code Section 409A.

(3)Mr. Best also met the age and years of service requirement for retirement eligibility at the time of his retirement on December 31, 2011. Accordingly, his unvested stock options and restricted stock units vested at that time, with each such stock option being exercisable by him at any time thereafter until the earlier of December 31, 2016 and the expiration of the term of the stock option and, in order to comply with Internal Revenue Code Section 409A, such restricted stock units to be distributed in shares of common stock not earlier than six months after his retirement date.

(4)This grant of restricted stock units was made on February 22, 2011 based on 2010 company and individual performance and vests ratably over three years. This award was granted under the Stock Incentive Plan of 2007. Details are provided in the Long-Term Incentive Granted in 2011 table on page81. For Mr. Watjen, 50% of these shares will be stock settled and 50% will be cash settled upon vesting.

(5)These options were granted on February 22, 2011 based on 2010 company and individual performance and vest ratably over three years. Details are provided in the Long-Term Incentive Granted in 2011 table on page81.

(6)The amount shown is the closing market price for February 22, 2011.

(7)The grant date fair value of stock awards for restricted stock units on February 22, 2011 was calculated as the number of units multiplied by the closing market price of $26.29 on the grant date.

(8)The grant date fair value of options granted on February 22, 2011 calculated in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 was $11.73. The fair value on the date of grant was estimated using the Black-Scholes valuation model. The following assumptions were used to value the 2011 grant:

(a)Expected volatility of 53%, based on our historical daily stock prices;

(b)Expected life of 5.5 years, based on historical average years to exercise;

(c)Expected dividend yield of 1.41%, based on the dividend rate at the date of grant; and

(d)Risk-free rate of 2.37%, based on the yield of treasury bonds at the date of grant.

104Unum Group


2012 Proxy StatementCompensation Discussion and Analysis

OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDSAT FISCAL YEAR-END
    Option Awards      Stock Awards
Name  Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
   Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Options
   Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Unexercised
Unearned
Options
  Option
Exercise
Price
   Option
Expiration
Date
      

Number

of Shares
or Units
of Stock
That Have
Not
Vested

   Market
Value of
Shares or
Units of
Stock That
Have Not
Vested(1)
   Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Number of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other
Rights
That Have
Not
Vested(2)
  Equity
Incentive
Plan
Awards:
Market or
Payout
Value of
Unearned
Shares,
Units or
Other
Rights
That
Have Not
Vested(2
    (# Exercisable)   (# Unexercisable)   (#)  ($)           (#)   ($)   (#)  ($)

Mr. Watjen

   -     -    -   -     -       403,811     8,508,298    -  -
    166,100     -    -   21.680     2/23/15       -     -      -
    331,519     -    -   23.740     2/21/16       -     -    -  
    159,864     79,932    -   11.370     2/24/17       -     -    -  -
    51,309     102,618    -   20.780     2/25/18       -     -      -
    -     123,682    -   26.290     2/22/19       -     -    -  -

Mr. McKenney

   -     -    -   -     -       120,286     2,534,426    -  -
    8,987     17,976    -   20.780     2/25/18       -     -    -  -
    -     26,048    -   26.290     2/22/19       -     -    -  -

Mr. McCarthy

   -     -    -   -     -       100,191     2,111,024    -  -
    52,969     -    -   23.740     2/21/16       -     -      -
    -     22,854    -   11.370     2/24/17       -     -    -  -
    10,742     21,485    -   20.780     2/25/18       -     -    -  -
    -     24,610    -   26.290     2/22/19       -     -      -

Mr. Best(3)

   -     -    -   -     -       -     -    -  -
    33,507     -    -   23.740     2/21/16       -     -    -  -
    47,739     -    -   11.370     12/30/16       -     -    -  -
    21,541     -    -   20.780     12/30/16       -     -    -  -
    16,450     -    -   26.290     12/30/16       -     -      -

Mr. Horn

   -     -    -   -     -       42,973     905,441    -  -
    29,623     -    -   23.740     2/21/16       -     -    -  -
    22,416     11,208    -   11.370     2/24/17       -     -    -  -
    5,298     10,597    -   20.780     2/25/18       -     -      -
    -     11,035    -   26.290     2/22/19       -     -    -  -

Unum Group105


Compensation Discussion and Analysis2012 Proxy Statement

(1)Represents the aggregate value of restricted stock units (including dividend equivalents) shown in the “Number of Shares or Units of Stock That Have Not Vested” column based on the closing price on December 30, 2011 of $21.07, the last trading day of the year.

(2)No amounts have been reported for the Equity Performance Grant made on September 11, 2007 because the required stock price appreciation for the awards to vest was not achieved. The aggregate number of restricted stock units (including dividend equivalents through December 31, 2011) that had been awarded to each named executive officer, subject to the achievement of performance thresholds, was: Mr. Watjen 322,188; Mr. McCarthy 128,875; Mr. Best 107,396; and Mr. Horn 107,396.

(3)Mr. Best met the age and years of service requirement for retirement eligibility at the time of his retirement on December 31, 2011. Mr. Best’s unvested stock options and restricted stock unit grants vested at that time. His stock options are exercisable by him at any time thereafter until the earlier of December 31, 2016 or the expiration of the term of the stock option. In accordance with Internal Revenue Code Section 409A, we will not distribute shares of common stock to him in settlement of his restricted stock units until at least six months after his retirement date.

VESTING SCHEDULEFOR UNVESTED RESTRICTED STOCK UNITS(1) 
           Number of Restricted Shares/ Units Vesting(2) 
Vesting Date  Grant
Date
       Mr. Watjen(3)   Mr. McKenney   Mr. McCarthy(3)   Mr. Best(4)   Mr. Horn 

February 22, 2012

   2/22/11        55,906     11,775     11,124     -     4,988  

February 24, 2012

   2/24/09        98,218     -     28,082     -     13,772  

February 25, 2012

   2/25/10        68,928     12,074     14,431     -     7,118  

July 20, 2012

   7/20/09        -     60,812     -     -     -  

August 19, 2012(5)

   8/19/09        -     -     9,869     -     -  

February 22, 2013

   2/22/11        55,906     11,775     11,125     -     4,988  

February 25, 2013

   2/25/10        68,929     12,074     14,432     -     7,118  

February 22, 2014

   2/22/11        55,924     11,776     11,128     -     4,989  

Total

           403,811     120,286     100,191     -     42,973  

(1)The Equity Performance Grant made on September 11, 2007 has not been included in this table because no vesting had occurred as of December 31, 2011.

(2)These restricted stock units include dividend equivalents earned through year-end 2011.

(3)Messrs. Watjen’s and McCarthy’s restricted stock unit grants are no longer subject to risk of forfeiture because they meet the age and years of service requirement for retirement eligibility. Messrs. Watjen’s and McCarthy’s grants will continue to vest ratably over three years on each anniversary of the grant date. If Messrs. Watjen or McCarthy were to retire, any unvestedperformance-based restricted stock units would vest immediately upon retirement and would be distributed no sooner than six months after the retirement date per Internal Revenue Code Section 409A.

(4)Mr. Best’s restricted stock unit grants are no longer subject to risk of forfeiture because he met the age and years of service requirement for retirement eligibility on his retirement date. These grants vested immediately upon his retirement. We will distribute shares of common stock to him in settlement of his restricted stock units no sooner than six months after his retirement date, in order to complyaccordance with Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code.

(5)The August 19, 2010 vesting was close to a dividend date, therefore the quarterly dividends earned for the first tranche were allocated to the third tranche scheduled for vesting August 19, 2012.

 

 

106Unum Group

Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and 2014 Proxy Statement | 67 


2012 Proxy StatementCompensation Discussion and Analysis

 Compensation Tables

 

 

OPTION EXERCISESAND STOCK VESTED 
    Option Awards      Stock Awards(3) 
Name  Number of Shares
Acquired on
Exercise(1)
   Value Realized
on Exercise(2)
      Number of Shares
Acquired on
Vesting(4)
   Value Realized
on Vesting(5)
 
    (#)   ($)      (#)   ($) 

Mr. Watjen

   600,000     $3,229,337       194,429     $5,153,077  

Mr. McKenney

   -     -       72,145     1,842,561  

Mr. McCarthy

   22,854     336,015       63,545     1,635,706  

Mr. Best

   -     -       37,524     993,359  

Mr. Horn

   -     -       27,799     736,376  

2013 Option Exercises and Stock Vested

 

    OPTION EXERCISES AND STOCK VESTED

    Option Awards  Stock Awards(3)
   

Number of Shares
Acquired

on Exercise(1)

  Value Realized    
on Exercise(2)    
  

Number of Shares
Acquired

on Vesting(4)

  Value Realized    
on Vesting(5)    
    Name  (#)  ($)  (#)  ($)

    Mr. Watjen

  166,100  1,784,800  205,185  $4,915,947

    Mr. McKenney

  -  -    39,237      940,682

    Mr. McCarthy

  134,923  1,687,829    39,762      952,445

    Mr. Horn

  -  -    18,114      433,715

    Ms. Farrell

  -  -    11,191      289,009

 

(1)A portion of the underlying shares were withheld to cover their taxes due upon exercise.

(2)AmountThe amount is calculated as the number of shares acquired multiplied by the market price at the point of exercise less the option exercise/strike price.

(3)Reflects the performance-based restricted stock units that vested during 2011.2013.

(4)Includes the total number of unrestricted shares acquired upon the vesting of performance-based restricted stock units. A portion of these shares were withheld to cover taxes due upon vesting. Mr. Best retired on December 31, 2011. At that time, 61,156 restricted stock units vested but will not be distributed until at least six months after his retirement date to comply with Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code.

(5)AmountThe amount calculated includes performance-based restricted stock units acquired multiplied by the closing price on the vesting date. Mr. Best retired on December 31, 2011. On the last business day of the year, Mr. Best’s restricted stock units were valued at $1,288,557 but are not included in this table because the value will not be realized until the restricted stock units are distributed six months after his retirement date to comply with Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code.

 

 

Unum Group107

 68 | Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and 2014 Proxy Statement


Compensation Discussion and Analysis2012 Proxy Statement

 

LOGO

 

Unum has provided for post-employment compensation in a number of ways. These are detailed in this section.

Post-Employment CompensationPension Benefits

We maintain three defined benefit plans in the United States (all of which are describedwere frozen to further accrual as of December 31, 2013), as defined in the following table:table below:

 

DEFINED BENEFIT PLANS    DEFINED BENEFIT PLANS

Plan Name

  Purpose

Unum Group Pension Plan

    (Qualified Plan)

  

Provides funded, tax-qualified benefits up to the limits on compensation and benefits under the Internal Revenue Code. The Qualified Plan was designed to provide tax-qualified pension benefits for most employees. During 2013, the terms of the Qualified plan were amended to freeze the further accrual of retirement benefits provided to employees on December 31, 2013. Therefore, no additional pension benefits will accrue to any participant after this date.

Unum Group

    Supplemental Pension

    Plan (Excess Plan)

  

Provides unfunded, non-qualified benefits for compensation that exceeds the IRS limits in the Qualified Plan. During 2013, the terms of the Excess Plan were amended to freeze the further accrual of retirement benefits provided to employees on December 31, 2013. Therefore, no additional supplemental pension benefits will accrue to any participant after this date.

Unum Group Senior

    Executive Retirement Plan

    (SERP)

  Mr. Watjen is the only active employee covered.

Provides unfunded, non-qualified benefits that are offset by benefits under the Qualified Plan and the Excess Plan. Mr. Watjen is the only active employee covered under the SERP. The SERP supplements the pension benefits that are provided under the Qualified and Excess Plans and was designed(as outlined above). In connection with amendments to provide competitiveMr. Watjen’s employment agreement during 2013, the terms of the SERP were amended to freeze the further accrual of his retirement benefit on December 31, 2013. Therefore, no additional SERP benefits forwill accrue to Mr. Watjen.Watjen after this date.

 

Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and 2014 Proxy Statement | 69 


 Post-Employment Compensation

Plan Descriptions

Following are details of how each of our plan benefits is calculated. These formulas incorporate base pay received in each plan year during which the employee accrues credited service and payments received from the regular annual incentive plan and any field or sales compensation plans. Not included are other bonuses, long-term incentive awards, commissions, prizes, awards or allowances for incidentals.

Qualified Plan

In calculating the basic pension benefits in our Qualified Plan, three criteria are used:

 

108

    QUALIFIED PLAN CRITERIA

    Criteria

  Unum Group


Definition
2012 Proxy Statement    Credited service  Compensation Discussion

A measure of the time individuals are employed at the company. One year of credited service is granted for each plan year in which 1,000 hours of employment are completed. No additional credited service will accrue after December 31, 2013.

    Highest average earnings

The average of the highest 5 years of compensation (whether or not consecutive) during the 10 years ending on the earlier of the date of termination of employment or December 31, 2013.

    Social Security covered

    compensation

The average of the taxable wage bases in effect for each calendar year during the 35-year period ending with the last day of the calendar 2013 year.

The basic benefit is provided as an annual single life annuity and is calculated as follows:

LOGO

(1)Can range from 3%, if the sum of an employee’s age and Analysisyears of credited service is less than 30, to 8%, if the sum equals or exceeds 95.
(2)Equal to 9.0 for retirement at age 65 and increased by 0.2 for each whole year retirement occurs prior to age 65.

All benefits are indexed on the first day of each plan year following the participant’s date of termination using the National Average Wage rate of increase published by the Social Security Administration in the preceding year (minimum of 2.75% and maximum of 5%).

Benefits provided under the Qualified Plan are based on pensionable earnings up to a compensation limit of $255,000 under the Internal Revenue Code. In addition, benefits may not exceed $205,000 (payable as a single life annuity beginning at any age from 62 through Social Security Normal Retirement Age) under the Internal Revenue Code.

 70 | Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and 2014 Proxy Statement


Post-Employment Compensation 

 

 

2011Excess Plan

The Excess Plan takes into account pension benefits outside of the current Qualified Plan and is calculated as follows:

LOGO

Mr. McCarthy was a member of pension plans maintained by our predecessor company, UNUM Corporation, and accrues an additional benefit for his 21 years of service prior to 2000.

SERP

The SERP is provided as a single life annuity beginning on the first day of the month following retirement. The benefit is calculated as follows:

LOGO

Mr. Watjen is the only NEO covered under the SERP.

Retirement Age

Participants in the pension plans outlined above are eligible to retire as early as age 55. Under the Qualified and Excess Plans, participants may retire early at age 55 with 5 years of vesting service. However, if a participant begins receiving a benefit prior to the normal retirement age of 65, the normal retirement benefit will be reduced based on the applicable early reduction factors defined in the plan.

Under the SERP, Mr. Watjen is eligible for an unreduced pension at age 60, and the amount of his unreduced pension is shown in the Pension Benefits table below. If he terminates employment and commences his benefit prior to age 60, the single life annuity will be reduced by 5% per year.

Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and 2014 Proxy Statement | 71 


 Post-Employment Compensation

Current Value of Pension Benefits

BenefitsPension benefits payable to each named executive officer pursuant to our pension benefit plansNEO are summarized in the following table.table:

 

PENSION BENEFITS
PENSION BENEFITS PENSION BENEFITS    
Name  Plan Name 

Number of Years

of Credited Service

(#)

   

Present Value of

Accumulated Benefits

($)(1)

   Payments During
Last Fiscal Year
($)
       Plan Name             Number of Years of
Credited Service
(#)
 Present Value of
Accumulated Benefits
($)
(1)
 

Payments During Last 
Fiscal Year 

($) 

Mr. Watjen

  Qualified  17.50     $435,000    $- Qualified        19.50   535,000  $ –
  Excess  17.50     5,745,000    - Excess        19.50   6,980,000  
  SERP(2)  17.50     7,930,000    - SERP        19.50   10,872,000  

Mr. McKenney(3)

  Qualified  2.42     30,000    - Qualified        4.42   60,000  
  Excess  2.42     153,000    - Excess        4.42   326,000  

Mr. McCarthy

  Qualified  33.00     894,000    - Qualified        35.00   1,063,000  
  Excess  33.00     3,934,000    - Excess        35.00   5,192,000  

Mr. Best(4)

  Qualified  17.50     1,110,000    -
  Excess  17.50     1,966,000    -

Mr. Horn

  Qualified  8.00     200,000    - Qualified        10.00   281,000  
  Excess  8.00     578,000    - Excess        10.00   774,000  

Ms. Farrell

 Qualified        3.00   68,000  
 Excess        3.00   166,000  

 

(1)The “Present Value of Accumulated Benefits” is based upon a measurement date of December 31, 2011.2013. Accordingly, all calculations utilize credited service and pensionable earningsPensionable Earnings as of the same date. The results shown are estimates (except for Mr. Best) only and actual (Mr. Best) benefits will be based upon data, pay, service, form of benefit elected and age at the time of retirement. The primary assumptions used in the calculations are based on the measurement date ASCper FASB Accounting Standards Codification Topic 715,Compensation – Retirement Benefits assumptions. Specifically, the accumulated benefit value calculations utilize a rate of 5.40%5.30% to discount expected future plan benefit payments to the measurement date, an annual increase in Social Security Wage Base of 3.5% to index the Qualified and Excess Plan benefits from the measurement date to commencement date and a post commencementpost-commencement life expectancy assumption based upon the RP-2000 Combined Healthy Participant Mortality Table projected 175 years past the measurement date with Projection Scale AA. Other assumptions used in the calculations are based on our understanding of the disclosure regulations. In particular, participants are assumed to commence benefits at their unreduced retirement age in each of the plans. That is age 65 in the Qualified and Excess plans and, under the SERP, age 60 for Mr. Watjen. Also, no turnover (e.g., death, disability, termination, retirement) is assumed prior to retirement age.

(2)Assumes retirement at unreduced retirement age of 60.

(3)Mr. McKenney is not vested in the pension or excess plans as of December 31, 2011 and will not be eligible to receive a benefit until he obtains three years of service to meet vesting requirements of the plans.

(4)

Mr. Best retired on December 31, 2011. Therefore, he elected to begin his qualified benefit on January 1, 2012. Amounts include the Colonial Life and Accident Insurance Company’s Employee Retirement Plan deferred vested monthly benefit of $3,359.03 and his Qualified Unum Pension benefit of $3,464.50. The current pension benefit is based on Post-Colonial Life benefit service and all (Colonial Life + Unum) vesting service. His pension payments under the excess plan were delayed six months to comply with Internal Revenue Code Section 409A. These Excess Pension

Unum Group109


Compensation Discussion and Analysis2012 Proxy Statement

Payments will commence on July 2, 2011, beginning with a lump sum payment for the six months delayed and monthly payments thereafter for his lifetime, and then as a survivor benefit to his spouse for her lifetime, if she is living at his death.

How are benefits determined under the Qualified Plan?

Under the Qualified Plan, retirement benefits include: a basic benefit based upon retirement age, years of credited service,highest average earnings and Social Security covered compensation. The definitions of these terms are in the following table.

QUALIFIED PLAN CRITERIA
CriteriaDefinition

Credited service

A measure of the time individuals are employed at the company. One year of credited service is granted for each plan year in which 1,000 hours of employment are completed.

Highest average earnings

The average of the highest 5 years of compensation (whether or not consecutive) during the last 10 years of employment.

Social Security covered compensation

The average of the taxable wage bases in effect for each calendar year during the 35-year period ending with the last day of the calendar year in which an employee attains or will attain his or her Social Security retirement age.

As an annual single life annuity, the basicbenefit for participants is equal to:

A percentage of highest average earnings (which can range from 3%, if the sum of an employee’s age and years of credited service is less than 30, to 8%, if the sum equals or exceeds 95), multiplied by years of credited service; added to

3.5% of highest average earnings in excess of Social Security covered compensation, multiplied by years of credited service.

This sum is divided by a conversion factor based on the individual’s retirement commencement age (equal to 9.0 for retirement at age 65 and increased by 0.2 for each whole year retirement occurs prior to age 65).

All benefits are indexed on the first day of each plan year following the participant’s date of termination using the National Average Wage rate of increase published by the Social Security Administration in the preceding year (minimum of 2.75% and maximum of 5.0%).

Benefits provided under the Qualified Plan are based on pensionable earnings (which are described below) up to a compensation limit of $245,000 under the Internal Revenue Code. In addition, benefits provided under the Qualified Plan may not exceed $195,000 (payable as a single life annuity beginning at any age from 62 through Social Security Normal Retirement Age) under the Internal Revenue Code.

110Unum Group


2012 Proxy StatementCompensation Discussion and Analysis

What additional provisions are included in the Excess Plan and SERP?

The Excess Plan provides a benefit equal to the payment that would be provided under the Qualified Plan if the IRS compensation and benefit limits outlined above did not exist, minus the payment actually provided under the Qualified Plan. This plan takes into account pension benefits outside of the current Qualified Plan. Mr. McCarthy was a member of pension plans maintained by our predecessor company, UNUM Corporation, and accrues an additional benefit for his 21 years of service prior to 2000. Mr. Best was a member of the Colonial Life & Accident Employee’s Retirement Plan under which he commenced his monthly single life annuity benefit of $3,359.03 on January 1, 2012.

The benefit provided under the SERP is payable as an annuity beginning on the first day of the month following retirement. The SERP benefit for Mr. Watjen, expressed as an annual single life annuity, is equal to: 2.5% of Highest Average Earnings times years of service up to 20, minus the annual single life annuity provided under the Qualified Plan and the Excess Plan beginning on benefit commencement.

Mr. Watjen is presently the only named executive officer covered under the SERP. This coverage is required under the terms of his employment agreement and he has been covered under this plan since 2000.

Are named executive officers eligible for pensions before normal retirement age?

Under the Qualified and Excess plans, participants may retire early at age 55 with 5 years of vesting service. However, if a participant begins receiving a benefit prior to normal retirement age (age 65, except for the Colonial Life & Accident Employee’s Retirement Plan portion of Mr. Best’s benefit was reduced from age 66), the normal retirement benefit calculated will be reduced based on the applicable early reduction factors defined in the plan. Messrs. Watjen, McCarthy and Horn currently meet the eligibility requirements for early retirement under these plans. Mr. Best was eligible to receive benefits because he met the criteria for early retirement under these plans and began receipt of these benefits on January 1, 2012.

Under the SERP, Mr. Watjen is eligible for an unreduced pension at age 60, and the amount of his unreduced pension is shown in the Pension Benefits table on page 109. If he terminates employment and commences his benefit prior to age 60, the single life annuity will be reduced by 5% per year.

What types of compensation are used in the payment and benefit formula?

The payment and benefit formula incorporates: base pay received in each plan year during which the employee accrues credited service; and payments received from the regular annual incentive plan and any field or sales compensation plan.

Not included in the formula are other bonuses, long-term incentive awards, commissions, prize awards or allowances for incidentals.

Are additional years of credited service granted to participants?

Additional years of credited service are generally not granted to participants in any of the three plans, and no extra years of service have been granted to the named executive officers other than service granted under prior plans. Their respective years of credited service are included in the Pension Benefits table on page 109.

Unum Group111


Compensation Discussion and Analysis2012 Proxy Statement

Are lump sum distributions available under the plans?

Lump sum distributions are only available under the plan only to vested employees who have a present value of future pension benefits of $10,000 or less. None of the named executive officersNEOs are eligible for lump sum distributions from the Qualified or Excess plans,Plans, or the SERP. Based on current benefit levels, pension payouts for the named executive officersNEOs will be paid in the form of a monthly annuity.

 72 | Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and 2014 Proxy Statement


Post-Employment Compensation  

Nonqualified Deferred Compensation

Does the company have any nonqualified programs that allow named executive officers to defer compensation?

We do not have any active nonqualified programs that allow for deferrals of compensation by our named executive officers.NEOs. However, Mr. McCarthy does have balances under two inactive plans and his aggregate earnings and balance are shown in the table below. These predecessor company plans gave executives the opportunity to elect deferralthat did allow for deferrals of amounts of their base salary and/or annual incentive and the time and the form of distribution of those amounts.compensation. The last year ofthat compensation deferrals occurred under the plans inwas 2000.

While we do not have any active nonqualified programs that allow for deferrals of compensation by our named executive officers, under certain circumstances, restricted stock units (RSUs) granted to executives may be considered deferred compensation. Mr. Best will not receive shares of common stock in settlement of his vested and undistributed RSUs until at least six months after his retirement. The reason for this delay is to comply with the requirements of Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code.

NONQUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION

NONQUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION

NONQUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION

      
Name Executive
Contributions
in Last FY
  Registrant
Contributions
in Last FY
  Aggregate
Earnings
in Last FY
  Aggregate
Withdrawals/
Distributions
  

Aggregate
Balance

at Last FYE

  

 

Executive
Contributions

in Last FY

$

  

Registrant
Contributions
in Last FY

$

  

Aggregate
Earnings

in Last FY

$

  Aggregate
Withdrawals/
Distributions
$
  

Aggregate      
Balance      

at Last FYE      

$      

 ($)  ($)  ($)  ($)  ($)

Mr. Watjen

 -  -  -  -  -          –      

Mr. McKenney

 -  -  -  -  -          –      

Mr. McCarthy(1)

 -  -  1,177  -  134,239      33,908    174,993      

Mr. Best(2)

 -  1,288,557  -  -  1,288,557

Mr. Horn

 -  -  -  -  -          –      

Ms. Farrell

          –      

 

(1)

Mr. McCarthy has balances under two inactive deferred compensation plans. The first inactive plan (the former UNUM Corporation Deferred Compensation Plan) earned interest at a rate of 6.70%6.5%. The interest rate for this plan is set once each year at the rate which is equivalent to the interest rate Unum receives on the Unum America Consolidated Portfolio (consisting of bonds, commercial mortgage loans and preferred stocks). The amount of above-market interest that exceeds 120% of the rate prescribed under section 1274(d) of the Internal Revenue Code has been included in the Change in Pension Value & Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings column of the Summary Compensation

112Unum Group


2012 Proxy StatementCompensation Discussion and Analysis

Table on page 100.62. The second inactive plan (a non-qualified 401(k) plan) includes 100% Unum stock to be paid out in cash. The change in market value and dividends earned is included in the Aggregate Earnings in Last FY amount. The value of the balance is included in the Aggregate Balance at Last FYE amounts.

 

(2)Mr. Best had a total of 61,156 vested and undistributed restricted stock units as of December 31, 2011. The aggregate balance was calculated using the market closing price on December 30, 2011, the final trading day of the year, of $21.07.

Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and 2014 Proxy Statement | 73 


 Post-Employment Compensation

Other Post-Employment Payments

The discussion below outlines estimated benefits payable under company policy to named executive officersour NEOs under various termination scenarios. We have separated the discussions between terminations occurring upon a “change in control” of the company, and all others.

Mr. Watjen has an employment agreement that specifically addresses post-employment payments, which are discussed beginning on page 117.

Definitions

The following terminology will be used throughout the discussion of the various termination scenarios:

 

DEFINITIONS    DEFINITIONS

Terminology

  Descriptions
Termination with cause  One of the following factors is present: the failure to substantially perform duties; the willful engagement in illegal conduct or gross misconduct harmful to the company; or the conviction of a felony (or plea of “guilty” or “no contest”).
    
Termination without cause  One of the following factors is present: poor performance, other than for misconduct or cause (as defined above); job elimination; job requalification; or the decision to fill the position with a different resource consistent with the direction of the company.
    
Resignation for good reason  One or more of the following events have preceded the resignation of the named executive officer: assignment to a position inconsistent with his existing position or any other action that diminishes such position; reduction of his base salary or annual incentive target; failure to continue any material employee benefit or compensation plan in which he participates; relocation to an office more than 50 miles from his current location.
    Change in controlA change in control occurs when one of the following situations exist: (a) the incumbent directors cease to be a majority for two years; (b) an entity acquires 20% of our voting stock (30% in some instances); (c) we consummate certain transactions such as a merger or disposition of substantially all of our assets; or (d) shareholders approve a plan of liquidation or distribution.

In the event of any termination of employment, all named executive officers would receive benefits to which they are entitled, including unpaid base salary through the date of termination, accrued vacation, and accrued benefits under the retirement plan.

Terminations Related to a Change in Control

As outlined in the Compensation Contracts and Agreements section on page 57, Mr. Watjen has an employment agreement that specifically addresses post-employment payments, including a change in control. The company has entered into a Change in Control Severance Agreement with each named executive officer, except for Mr. Watjen. Mr. Watjen’sremaining NEOs are covered by change in control benefits are outlined on page 117.

Unum Group113


Compensation Discussion and Analysis2012 Proxy Statement

What is a “change in control” for each named executive officer?

A change in control occurs when oneseverance agreements. In the event of the following situations exist:

The incumbent directors cease to be a majority for two years;

An entity acquires 20% of our voting stock (30% in some instances);

We consummate certain transactions such as a merger or disposition of substantially all of our assets; or

Shareholders approve a plan of liquidation or distribution.

What benefits does a named executive officer (other than Mr. Watjen) receivetermination upon termination and the occurrence of a change in control?

The named executive officer receivescontrol, NEOs would receive the following benefits:

 

Two

Three times the sum of his annual base salary and the average annual incentive paid to him in the three years prior to the date of termination for Mr. Watjen; two times base salary and annual incentive (the greater of the current year target or the prior year annual incentive paid) for the remaining NEOs;

Prorated annual incentive through the date of termination of employment;

 74 | Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and annual incentive (the greater of the current year target or the prior year annual incentive paid);2014 Proxy Statement


Post-Employment Compensation  

 

Unpaid base salary and a prorated annual incentive through the termination date;

 

Lump sum payment representing the increase in present value of retirement from two additional years of age and service credit;

Health and welfare benefits for up to 3 years for Mr. Watjen and up to two years for the remaining NEOs;

 

Health and welfare benefits for up to two years;

Payment of all deferred compensation;

 

Payment of all deferred compensation;

Outplacement services (20% of base salary, maximum of $50,000);

 

Outplacement services (20% of base salary, maximum of $50,000);

Vesting of equity awards:

Vesting of equity awards as follows:

 

 ¡o

Grants of performance-based restricted stock unitunits and stock option awards made before December 14, 2011 would vest upon the occurrence of a change in control. A change in control event and upon termination,would not trigger the stock options would remain exercisable for 90 days from the termination date

¡

Grantsvesting of grants made on or after December 14, 2011 require the occurrence of both (1) a change-in-control event and (2)this date unless a termination of employment for any of the following reasons: death, disability, involuntary (without cause), or good reason (defined as material diminutionwere to occur within two years of authority, material reduction of compensation or relocation greater than 50 miles)the change in order forcontrol. Upon termination, the restricted stock unit awards to vest and for stock options towould remain exercisable until the earlier of the expiration date or the 90th day after termination of employment. For Messrs. Watjen and McCarthy, who are retirement eligible under the plan, the options would remain exercisable until the earlier of the expiration date or the fifth anniversary of such termination;

Grants of performance share units would be deemed earned at target performance and be settled at the earlier of the end of the performance period or a termination of employment due to death, disability, or retirement, by the company without cause or by the executive for 90 days fromgood reason within two years after the change in control; and

In the event of a change in control and termination, dateNEOs other than Mr. Watjen and Ms. Farrell may receive a reimbursement for any excise tax owed. If a reduction in the payments by no more than 10% would result in no excise tax being owed, the reduction will occur.

 

 ¡o

IfFor Mr. Watjen and Ms. Farrell, the namedchange in control payments would be reduced if such reduction would result in greater after-tax proceeds to the executive is retirement eligible, equity awards would vest as described in “What benefits doesabsent such a namedreduction. Otherwise, the executive officer receive if he retires?”receives payment of all change in control benefits and is responsible for paying any excise tax imposed on page 116.

the payment.

Potential tax gross-up. If a reduction in the payments by no more than 10% would result in no excise tax being owed, the reduction will occur. Reimbursement will occur if a named executive officer is subject to any excise tax.

114Unum Group


2012 Proxy StatementCompensation Discussion and Analysis

If the named executive officer (other than Mr. Watjen) is terminated or resigns immediately prior to a change in control, is he eligible for any benefits?

The named executive officer will get all the benefits described above if the following events occur:

The executive is terminated without cause or at the request of a third party who has signaled its intention to effect a change in control or has taken steps to that effect; and

A change in control involving that third party has, in fact, occurred.

Terminations Not Related to a Change in Control

There are instances absent a change in control in which a named executive officer’san NEO’s employment may be terminated. The company may terminate a named executive officer’s employment for cause or without cause. Additionally, termination of employment may occur upon a named executive officer resigning,an NEO’s voluntary resignation, retirement, becoming disabled or dying. A named executive officer may also retire.

In the event of the death, disability or retirement (if eligible) of an NEO, all of the NEO’s unvested performance-based restricted stock units and stock options would vest and the stock options would remain exercisable until the earlier of the expiration date or, as applicable, the third anniversary of the date of death or the fifth anniversary of the date of retirement. At December 31, 2013, Mr. Watjen’s unvested performance share units would vest on a prorated basis based upon the actual performance at the end of the three-year performance cycle. Messrs. Watjen and McCarthy arewere eligible for retirement under the terms of the Stock Incentive PlanPlans of 2007. In the event of termination other than for cause,2007 and 2012 and their unvested equity would accelerate and vest as of the date of termination.award agreements. However, to the extent necessary to avoid the imposition of penalty taxes under Internal Revenue Code Section 409A, stock would not be distributed until at least six months after the date of termination.

Mr. Best was eligible for retirement under the terms of the Stock Incentive Plan of 2007. Therefore, his unvested equity accelerated and vested as of the date of his retirement. However, the stock will not be distributed until at least six months after the date of termination to comply with Internal Revenue Code Section 409A.

What benefits does a named executive officer receive if he is terminated for cause or if he voluntarily resigns?

The named executive officer would receive the following benefits:

 

Unpaid salary through the dateNotice of termination;Annual Meeting of Shareholders and 2014 Proxy Statement | 75 


 

Accrued vacation; and

Accrued benefits under the retirement plan.

What benefits does a named executive officer (other than Mr. Watjen) receive if he is terminated without cause?

The named executive officer would receive the following benefits:Post-Employment Compensation

 

Eighteen months of base salary;

 

Accrued vacation;

Outplacement services (20% of base salary, maximum of $50,000);

AccruedNEOs receive additional benefits underdepending upon the retirement plan; and

termination scenario as outlined in the table below:

 

Unum Group115


Compensation Discussion and Analysis    TERMINATION BENEFITS RECEIVED BY CEO AND NEOs UNDER NON-CHANGE IN CONTROL SCENARIOS

Benefits Received

  2012 Proxy StatementTermination
for Cause or
Voluntary
Resignation
Termination  
Without  
Cause or  
Resignation  
with Good  
Reason*  
Disability  Death  Retirement

Severance(1)

CEO, NEOs  

Prorated Annual Incentive(2)

CEO  CEO, NEOs  CEO, NEOs  CEO, NEOs

Early Vesting of Equity(3)

CEO  CEO, NEOs  CEO, NEOs  

If Retirement

Eligible

Benefit Continuation(4)

CEO  

Outplacement Services(5)

CEO, NEOs  

Disability Benefits(6)

CEO, NEOs  

Group Life Ins. Benefits(7)

CEO, NEOs  

Corporate Owned Life Ins.(7)

CEO, NEOs  

 *Mr. Watjen is the only NEO entitled to benefits in the event of a resignation for good reason absent a change in control.

(1)If Mr. Watjen is terminated without cause or resigns with good reason, he will receive severance of two times the sum of his annual base salary and the average annual incentive paid to him in the two years prior to the date of termination. The amount of severance was reduced as part of the amendments to Mr. Watjen’s employment agreement, effective December 30, 2013, as described on page 35. Other NEOs who are terminated without cause will receive eighteen months of base salary. See the following table for termination benefits related to a change in control.

(2)Annual incentive will be prorated based on the date of termination of employment. For all NEOs other than Mr. Watjen, the NEO will be eligible for prorated annual incentive in the event of death, disability or retirement only if such termination occurs on or after the last business day in March.

(3)If Mr. Watjen is terminated without cause or resigns with good reason, his unvested equity awards, with the exception of his performance share units, will accelerate vesting due to his eligibility for retirement under the terms of the award agreements. In the event of his death, disability or retirement or if he is terminated without cause or resigns for good reason, Mr. Watjen would be eligible to receive a prorated portion of the performance share units based on actual performance at the end of the three-year performance cycle, For the remaining NEOs, absent a change in control their unvested equity will accelerate only in the event of death, disability or retirement (if eligible).

(4)If Mr. Watjen is terminated without cause or resigns with good reason, he will receive health and welfare benefits for up to 2 years.

(5)Outplacement services are equal to 20% of base salary (maximum of $50,000).

(6)Monthly benefits from the company’s long-term disability plan until the earlier of age 65 or death.

(7)Group life insurance benefits are $50,000 for each full-time employee; Corporate owned life insurance benefits as applicable (if Messrs. Watjen and McCarthy are active employees on the date of death, their respective beneficiaries as defined in the policy will receive $200,000).

 76 | Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and 2014 Proxy Statement


Post-Employment Compensation 

 

 

In the event of a job elimination, prorated early vesting of equity.

What benefits does a named executive officer receive if he becomes disabled?Termination Payments

The named executive officer would receive the following benefits:

Unpaid salary through the date of termination;

Prorated annual incentive through the date of disability;

Accrued vacation;

Accrued benefits under the retirement plan;

Accelerated vesting of equity awards: restricted stock unit awards would vest and stock option awards would vest and remain exercisable for the earlier of the original expiration date or three years from the date of disability; and

Monthly benefits from the company’s long-term disability plan until the earlier of age 65 or death.

What benefits does a named executive officer’s beneficiary receive if he dies?

The named executive officer’s beneficiary would receive the following benefits:

Unpaid salary through the date of death;

Prorated annual incentive through the date of death;

Accrued vacation;

Accrued benefits under the retirement plan (if the beneficiary is the executive’s spouse);

Accelerated vesting of equity awards: restricted stock unit awards would vest and stock option awards would vest and remain exercisable by the beneficiary for the earlier of the original expiration date or three years from the date of death;

Group life insurance benefits ($50,000 for each full-time employee); and

Corporate owned life insurance benefits as applicable (if Messrs. Watjen and McCarthy are active employees on the date of death, their respective beneficiaries as defined in the policy would receive $200,000).

What benefits does a named executive officer receive if he retires?

The named executive officer would receive the following benefits:

Unpaid salary through the date of retirement;

Prorated annual incentive through the date of retirement if this occurs on or after the last business day in March;

Accrued vacation;

116Unum Group


2012 Proxy StatementCompensation Discussion and Analysis

Accrued benefits under the retirement plan; and

If the named executive officer meets the definition of “retirement eligible” under the stock plans, restricted stock unit awards would vest and stock option awards would vest and remain exercisable for the earlier of the original expiration date or five years from the termination date. Under the stock plans, “retirement eligible” is defined as age 55 and 15 years of service, or at least age 65.

Post-Termination Payments Specific to Mr. Watjen

What benefits does Mr. Watjen receive if he is terminated without cause, due to a change in control, or resigns with good reason?

Mr. Watjen would receive the following benefits:

Three times the sum of his annual base salary and the average annual incentive paid to him in the three years prior to the date of termination;

Unpaid salary through the date of termination;

Prorated annual incentive through the date of termination of employment;

Lump sum payment representing the increase in present value of his retirement benefit as if he had accumulated three additional years of age and service;

Health and welfare benefits for up to three years;

Accelerated vesting of equity awards: restricted stock unit awards would vest and stock option awards would vest and remain exercisable for the earlier of the original expiration date or 3 years from the termination date;

Accrued vacation;

Accrued benefits under the retirement plan; and

In the event of a change in control and termination, he may receive a reimbursement for any excise tax owed. If a reduction in theTermination payments by no more than 10% would result in no excise tax being owed, the reduction will occur. Reimbursement will occur if Mr. Watjen is subject to any excise tax.

What amounts would be paid to the named executive officers under various termination scenarios?

Payments, or termination benefits, are provided to the named executive officersNEOs as outlined in the following table and vary with the circumstances under which the termination occurs. In the event of termination as a result of death, payments will be made to the named executive officer’s beneficiary.

All termination scenarios in the table assume a termination date of December 31, 2011. The amounts in the table exclude2013. Excluded are amounts received as an annuity under our retirement plans and the “in-the-money” value of vested unexercised stock options held by the named executive officersNEOs since these amounts are not impacted by a termination. The amounts shown in the table also do not include distributions of plan

Unum Group117


Compensation Discussion and Analysis2012 Proxy Statement

balances under a nonqualified deferred compensation plan. Those amounts are shown in the Nonqualified Deferred Compensation table on page 112.73.

The amounts in the following table are hypothetical based on the rules of the SEC. Actual payments depend on the circumstances and timing of any termination. The information provided in this table constitutes forward-looking statements for purposes of the Private Litigation Securities Reform Act of 1995.

 

 

118Unum Group

Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and 2014 Proxy Statement | 77 


2012 Proxy StatementCompensation Discussion and Analysis

Post-Employment Compensation

 

 

TERMINATION TABLE 
TERMINATION TABLE TERMINATION TABLE
Termination Scenario  

Mr.

Watjen

   Mr.
McKenney
   Mr.
McCarthy
   

Mr.

Best(1)

   

Mr.

Horn

  

Mr.

Watjen

 Mr.
McKenney
 Mr.
McCarthy
 

Mr.

Horn

 

Ms.

Farrell

Termination for Cause or Voluntary

Resignation

               

Termination for Cause or Voluntary Resignation

Total

   $  -     $  -     $  -     $  -     $  -   $-       $-       $-       $-       $            -     

Termination Without Cause or

Resignation with Good Reason (CEO)

          

Termination Without Cause or Resignation with Good Reason (CEO)

  

 

Severance

   $9,427,750     $997,500     $877,500     $798,000     $727,500    $5,804,283    $1,050,000    $945,000    $750,000   $637,500 

Prorated Annual Incentive

   2,042,583     -     -     -     -    1,780,142    -        -        -       -     

Early Vesting of Equity(2)(1)

   9,313,397     -     -     -     -    13,321,251    -        -        -       -     

Benefit Continuation

   78,127     -     -     -     -    78,907    -        -        -       -     

Outplacement Services

   50,000     50,000     50,000     50,000     50,000    50,000    50,000    50,000    50,000   50,000 

Pension Enhancement

   5,185,000     -     -     -     -    -        -        -        -       -     

Total

   $26,096,857     $1,047,500     $927,500     $848,000     $777,500    $21,034,583    $1,100,000    $995,000    $800,000   $687,500 

Disability

               

Prorated Annual Incentive

   $2,042,583     $800,132     $774,582     $575,237     $319,639    $1,780,142    $889,553    $870,604    $467,411   $560,922 

Early Vesting of Equity

   8,508,298     2,534,426     2,111,024     1,288,557     905,441    11,559,562    3,185,861    2,972,223    1,048,260   1,214,820 

Disability Benefits

   187,257     390,078     203,112     74,231     138,975    144,963    372,804    162,460    91,103   254,514 

Total

   $10,738,138     $3,724,636     $3,088,718     $1,938,025     $1,364,055    $13,484,667    $4,448,218    $4,005,287    $1,606,774   $2,030,256 

Death

               

Prorated Annual Incentive

   $2,042,583     $800,132     $774,582     $575,237     $319,639    $1,780,142    $889,553    $870,604    $467,411   $560,922 

Early Vesting of Equity

   8,508,298     2,534,426     2,111,024     1,288,557     905,441    11,559,562    3,185,861    2,972,223    1,048,260   1,214,820 

Group Life Ins. Benefits

   50,000     50,000     50,000     50,000     50,000    50,000    50,000    50,000    50,000   50,000 

Corporate Owned Life Ins.

   200,000     -     200,000     200,000     -    200,000    -        200,000    -       -     

Total

   $10,800,881     $3,384,558     $3,135,606     $2,113,794     $1,275,080    $13,589,704    $4,125,414    $4,092,827    $1,565,671   $1,825,742 

Termination Related to a Change in Control

          

Termination Related to a Change in Control

  

 

Severance

   $9,427,750     $2,788,600     $2,684,906     $2,150,452     $1,746,000    $8,706,425    $2,818,632    $2,736,000    $1,800,000   $1,877,000 

Prorated Annual Incentive

   2,042,583     665,000     585,000     478,800     388,000    1,780,142    700,000    630,000    400,000   487,864 

Early Vesting of Equity

   12,707,648     2,539,639     3,696,637     2,578,495     2,148,649    17,318,442    3,960,781    3,694,687    1,300,445   1,214,820 

Benefit Continuation

   78,127     42,700     58,134     40,778     58,518    107,061    68,230    84,368    63,639   52,671 

Outplacement Services

   50,000     50,000     50,000     50,000     50,000    50,000    50,000    50,000    50,000   50,000 

Pension Enhancement(3)(2)

   5,185,000     239,000     1,578,000     -     320,000    -        434,000    1,111,000    344,000   295,000 

Estimated Tax Gross Up(4)(3)

   5,960,458     -     2,302,006     -     -    -        -        -        -       -     

Total

   $35,451,566     $6,324,939     $10,954,683     $5,298,525     $4,711,167    $27,962,070    $8,031,643    $8,306,055    $3,958,084   $3,977,355 

Retirement

               

Prorated Annual Incentive

   $2,042,583     $  -     $774,582     $575,237     $  -  

Prorated Annual Incentive(4)

  $1,780,142    -        $870,604    $467,411   -     

Early Vesting of Equity(5)

   8,508,298       -     2,111,024     1,288,557       -    11,559,562    -        2,972,223    -       -     

Total

   $10,550,881     $  -     $2,885,606     $1,863,794     $  -    $13,339,704    $-        $3,842,827    $467,411   $-     

 

 

Unum Group119

 78 | Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and 2014 Proxy Statement


Compensation Discussion and Analysis2012 Proxy Statement

Post-Employment Compensation 

 

 

(1)Mr. Best retired on December 31, 2011. However, his amounts are provided as if each of the termination events had occurred on that date. In addition, the company is currently in the process of concluding negotiation and documentation of a consulting agreement with Mr. Best. Under this arrangement, Mr. Best would serve as a technology advisor to the Board of Directors for a twelve-month period and would work not more than 32 hours per month at an hourly rate of $250.

(2)In the event of job elimination, the prorated early vesting of equity awards would be as follows: Mr. McKenney $1,799,884 and$2,076,245, Mr. Horn $663,768.$715,807 and Ms. Farrell $795,229. Messrs. Watjen and McCarthy are eligible for “retirement”retirement status under the terms of the Stock Incentive Plan of 2007.2007 and the Stock Incentive Plan of 2012. Therefore, they would receive full vesting of their unvested stock options and performance-based restricted stock units, as noted in the Retirement section of this table. The amounts represent the value of the shares at a market price of $21.07$35.08 (the closing price on December 30, 2011,31, 2013, the last trading day of the year).

 

(3)(2)Pension enhancement is a lump sum payment representing the increase in present value of retirement from threetwo years additional years of age and service credit for Messrs. McKenney, McCarthy and Horn and Ms. Farrell. As a result of the amendments to his employment agreement effective December 30, 2013, Mr. Watjen and two additional years of age and service creditis not eligible for the remaining named executives.a pension enhancement.

 

(4)(3)If any payments pursuant to Mr. Watjen’s employment agreement orIn the Changeevent of termination following a change in Control Severance Agreements, or otherwise would be subject tocontrol, Messrs. McKenney, McCarthy and Horn are eligible for a gross-up payment for any excise taxtaxes due under Sectionsections 280G and 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code, as amended. For Mr. Watjen and Ms. Farrell, in the company will provideevent that a change in control payments trigger an additional payment such that the named executive officer will retain a net amount equal to the payments he would have retained if such excise tax, had not applied. If the value of such payments (calculated in accordance with the IRS rules) exceeds the IRS limit by 10% or less, then the payments would be reduced to avoid such excise tax if such reduction would result in greater after-tax proceeds to the excise tax. The payments for each namedexecutive absent such a reduction. Otherwise, the executive officer would exceedreceives payment of all change in control benefits and is responsible for paying any excise tax imposed on the IRS limit by more than 10%,payment.

(4)Messrs. Watjen, McCarthy and as a result,Horn are eligible for retirement status under the full additional paymentterms of the Annual Incentive Plan. Therefore, they would be made.eligible for a prorated annual incentive. Mr. McKenney and Ms. Farrell do not meet the eligibility criteria as of December 31, 2013.

 

(5)Messrs. Watjen and McCarthy would beare eligible for early vesting of equityretirement under the terms of the Plan for “retirement” status. Mr. Best was eligible for earlyretirement status and therefore would be entitled to the accelerated vesting of equity upon his retirement on December 31, 2011.in the event of retirement. Messrs. McKenney, Horn and HornMs. Farrell did not meet the eligibility criteria of combination of age and years of service as of December 31, 2011.

General Releases, Waivers and Post Employment Covenants

When termination of employment is accompanied by severance payments, the former executive is required to release all claims he or she may have against the company. The release contains restrictions on the former executive with respect to confidentiality, solicitation of company employees, competition, and disparagement. The company also agrees to indemnify the former executive for certain actions taken on behalf of the company during his or her employment.

120Unum Group


2012 Proxy StatementEquity Compensation Plan Information

Equity Compensation Plan Information

The following table gives information as of December 31, 2011 about the common stock that may be issued under all of our existing equity compensation plans.

Plan Category

(a)

    Number of securities     

to be issued upon

exercise of

outstanding options,

warrants and rights

(b)

Weighted-average

exercise price of
outstanding options,
    warrants and rights 
(5)

(c)

Number of securities

remaining available for

future issuance under
    equity compensation plans     
(excluding securities

reflected in column (a))

Equity Compensation Plans Approved by Shareholders(1)

    4,266,980 (3)$20.13  19,706,487 (6)(7)

Equity Compensation Plans Not Approved by Shareholders(2)

         95,592 (4)N/A    465,344(7)

Total

4,362,57220,171,831 (7)

(1)Our shareholders have approved the following plans: (a) Stock Plan of 1999, (b) Stock Incentive Plan of 2007, (c) Unum Group Employee Stock Purchase Plan, (d) Unum European Holding Company Limited Savings-Related Share Option Scheme 2008 (formerly the Unum Limited Savings-Related Share Option Scheme 2008) and (e) Unum Ireland Savings-Related Share Option Scheme 2008.

(2)Our shareholders have not approved the following plans: (a) Unum European Holding Company Limited Savings-Related Share Option Scheme 2000 (formerly the Unum Limited Savings-Related Share Option Scheme 2000) and (b) Unum Group Non-Employee Director Compensation Plan of 2004.

(3)Includes 1,477,041 shares issuable upon the exercise of outstanding options, and 2,743,525 and 46,414 shares issuable pursuant to outstanding restricted stock units and deferred share rights (including dividend equivalents accrued thereon), respectively, under our Stock Plan of 1999 and our Stock Incentive Plan of 2007.

Of the 2,743,525 restricted stock units issuable, 1,044,426 shares were performance-based restricted stock units (the 2007 Equity Performance Grant) outstanding at December 31, 2011, which were forfeited in February 2012 as discussed under “Equity Performance Grant” beginning on page 83.

(4)All are deferred share rights (each representing the right to one share of common stock), including dividend equivalents accrued thereon, granted to non-employee directors under the Unum Group Non-Employee Director Compensation Plan of 2004 in accordance with the deferral elections of such directors in respect of cash retainers and meeting fees payable to them.

(5)Restricted stock units (including performance-based restricted stock units) and deferred share rights are not included in determining the weighted-average exercise price in column (b) because they have no exercise price.

(6)Includes 75,000 shares authorized for issuance under the Unum Ireland Limited Savings-Related Share Option Scheme 2008, even though none have been reserved given that the plan is not expected to be utilized. Does not include 200,000 shares to be made available for issuance under the Unum European Holding Company Limited Savings-Related Share Option Scheme 2011, which was approved by shareholders on May 25, 2011, as this plan had not received regulatory approval necessary for commencement as of December 31, 2011. As of December 31, 2011, our Stock Incentive Plan of 2007 had 18.2 million shares remaining available for future issuance. Each full-value award is counted as 2.7 shares. We currently grant a majority of awards as restricted stock units, which are full-value awards.

(7)

In accordance with SEC rules, the table above shows the number of shares of our common stock available for issuance under our existing equity compensation plans as of December 31, 2011. In connection with our proposed Stock

2013.

 

 

Unum Group121


Equity Compensation Plan Information2012 Proxy Statement

Incentive PlanNotice of 2012, which is described beginning on page 14, we are providing information in this footnote about the shares remaining available for issuance under our existing equity compensation plans as of March 15, 2012.

As part of our annual compensation cycle, we made grants of 859,030 restricted stock units and 276,109 options under our Stock Incentive Plan of 2007 after December 31, 2011. Also since December 31, 2011, we issued dividend equivalents in respect of outstanding awards granted under our existing equity compensation plans and there have been option exercises, forfeitures and settlements of restricted stock units, including shares withheld for taxes, and shares purchased under employee stock purchase plans. In addition, following regulatory approval of the Unum European Holding Company Limited Savings-Related Share Option Scheme 2011 on February 14, 2012, 200,000 shares of our common stock have been made available for issuance under that plan, and 121,128 shares previously available for issuance under the Unum European Holding Company Limited Savings-Related Shared Option Scheme 2000 were removed from reserve following the final purchase of shares thereunder.

After taking into account these changes, as of March 15, 2012, under all of our equity compensation plans there were:

1,738,844 shares underlying outstanding options, with a weighted average exercise price of $20.71 and a weighted average remaining contractual term of 5.4 years;

1,762,647 outstanding full-value awards (consisting of 1,619,994 restricted stock units and 142,653 deferred share rights); and

19,474,500 shares remaining available for future issuance, of which 19,130,467 were available under plans approved by shareholders (including 17,474,271 shares under our Stock Incentive Plan of 2007) and 344,033 were available under plans not approved by shareholders. Upon the forfeiture of the 2007 Equity Performance Grant in February 2012, a total of 1,788,083 shares were again made available for issuance under our Stock Incentive Plan of 2007 in accordance with the terms of the plan.

Our Stock Incentive Plan of 2007 is the only plan from which we currently grant new awards. If our proposed Stock Incentive Plan of 2012 is approved by shareholders at the Annual Meeting grants of new awards will be made under that plan,Shareholders and will no longer be made under our Stock Incentive Plan of 2007.2014 Proxy Statement | 79 

Below is a brief description of the equity compensation plans not approved by shareholders:


Unum European Holding Company Limited Savings-Related Share Option Scheme 2000

This plan allows our UK employees to acquire options for shares of our common stock by making an election to purchase stock at a price of at least 85% of the market value of the stock on the date prior to the date the invitation to apply for the option is made or, if greater, the nominal value of a share (the Acquisition Price). The total number of options available for grant under this plan was 200,000. The maximum contribution per month per employee is £200. Contributions are made for a three-year period at the end of which the employee can elect to receive cash plus interest or purchase shares at the Acquisition Price. The plan is administered by the Human Capital Committee. There are provisions for early expiration of options due to termination of employment and acceleration of vesting and expiration due to death, disability or retirement. The plan also provides for acceleration of vesting upon a change of control, reconstruction or voluntary winding up of our company. The plan includes provisions for adjustments to the number of shares available for grants, and the number of shares subject to outstanding grants in the event of capitalization, consolidation sub-division or reduction or other variation of our share capital.

Unum Group Amended and Restated Non-Employee Director Compensation Plan of 2004

This plan provided for the payment of compensation to the non-employee directors who serve on our Board. Non-employee directors received an annual retainer of $80,000, the chairman of the Board received a supplemental retainer of $160,000 annually, the chair of the Audit Committee received a supplemental retainer of $15,000 annually, and each of the other chairs of the standing committees received an annual supplemental retainer of $7,500, and all directors received $2,000 for each meeting attended in person and $500 for each conference call meeting of the Board and of the committees on

122Unum Group


2012 Proxy StatementEquity Compensation Plan Information

which they participate, including special committees. Under the plan, directors made an irrevocable election each year to receive all or a portion of their retainers and meeting fees in either cash or deferred share rights. A deferred share right is a right to receive one share of common stock on the earlier of (i) the director’s separation from service as a director of our company, or (ii) another designated date at least three years after the date of the deferral election. The number of deferred share rights granted is calculated as the number of whole shares equal to (i) the dollar amount of the annual retainer and/or fees that the director elects to have paid in deferred share rights, divided by (ii) the fair market value per share on the grant date. The aggregate number of shares which can be issued under the plan is 500,000. This plan terminated in May 2010. The plan is administered by the Human Capital Committee. The plan includes provisions restricting the transferability of the deferred share rights, provisions for adjustments to the number of shares available for grants, and the number of shares subject to outstanding grants in the event of recapitalization, reclassification, stock split, reverse stock split, reorganization, merger, consolidation, or other similar corporate transaction. There are stock ownership guidelines for participants under the plan.

Unum Group123


124Unum Group


2012 Proxy StatementOwnership of Company Securities

LOGO

 

Ownership of Company Securities

Security Ownership of Directors and Officers

The following table shows the number of shares of the company’sour common stock beneficially owned as of March 15, 2012,2014, by each director and each named executive officer and by all directors and executive officers as a group. The table and related footnotes also include information about stock options, deferred share rights and restricted stock units credited to the accounts of directors and executive officers under various compensation and benefit plans. Based upon the representations made by each director and executive officer, the company doeswe do not believe that any shares held by any such personthem are pledged as security. Except as otherwise indicated below, the beneficial owners have sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares beneficially owned.

 

BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP OF COMMON STOCK         (as of March 15, 2014)

Name  Shares of
Common
Stock(1)
   

Shares Subject

to Exercisable

Options(2)

   

Shares Subject

to Settleable

Rights or

Units(3)(4)(5)

   

Total Shares

Beneficially

Owned

   

Percent of  

Class  

Theodore H. Bunting, Jr.

   -     -         -         -        *  

E. Michael Caulfield

   9,099     -         30,743         39,842        *  

Pamela H. Godwin

   18,095     -         11,667         29,762        *  

Ronald E. Goldsberry

   13,789     -         12,887         26,676        *  

Kevin T. Kabat

   14,475     -         10,132         24,607        *  

Timothy F. Keaney

   271     -         4,497         4,769        *  

Thomas Kinser

   -     -         44,622         44,622        *  

Gloria C. Larson

   589     -         57,834         58,423        *  

A.S. (Pat) MacMillan, Jr.

   3,999     -         15,481         19,480        *  

Edward J. Muhl

   25,542     -         4,413         29,955        *  

Michael J. Passarella

   14,554     -         13,399         27,953        *  

William J. Ryan

   23,701     -         17,445         41,146        *  

Thomas R. Watjen

   535,672     1,027,861         121,577         1,685,110        *  

Breege A. Farrell

   20,413     -         -         20,413        *  

Randall C. Horn

   113,218     102,562         -         215,780        *  

Kevin P. McCarthy

   131,830     35,385         79,397         246,612        *  

Richard P. McKenney

   131,836     89,110         -         220,946        *  
All directors and executive officers as a group (22 persons)   1,210,804     1,302,619         446,836         2,960,259        1.14%  

Unum Group125


Ownership of Company Securities2012 Proxy Statement

* Denotes less than 1%.

 

    BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIPOF COMMON STOCK     (as of March 15, 2012)
Name  Shares of
Common Stock(1)
   Shares Subject
to Exercisable
Options(2)
   Shares Subject
to Settleable
Rights or
Units(3)(4)(5)
   Total Shares
Beneficially
Owned
   Percent of
Class

E. Michael Caulfield

   2,813     -     25,246     28,060    *

Pamela H. Godwin

   13,622     -     13,546     27,167    *

Ronald E. Goldsberry

   5,263     -     26,182     31,445    *

Kevin T. Kabat

   7,504     -     8,400     15,904    *

Thomas Kinser

   2,840     -     32,641     35,481    *

Gloria C. Larson

   4,901     -     51,962     56,863    *

A.S. (Pat) MacMillan, Jr.

   7,377     -     7,853     15,231    *

Edward J. Muhl

   14,735     -     4,699     19,434    *

Michael J. Passarella

   8,470     -     8,616     17,086    *

William J. Ryan

   12,894     -     17,195     30,088    *

Thomas R. Watjen

   757,303     1,193,961     203,211     2,154,474    *

Robert O. Best

   8,000     119,237     61,434     188,671    *

Randall C. Horn

   94,338     77,521     -     171,859    *

Kevin P. McCarthy

   196,833     164,063     86,224     447,120    *

Richard P. McKenney

   88,645     26,657     -     115,302    *

All directors and

executive officers as a

group (16 persons)(6)

   1,285,112     1,522,843     513,486     3,321,441    1.14%

 

*Denotes less than 1%.

 80 | Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and 2014 Proxy Statement


Ownership of Company Securities 

 

(1)Includes shares credited to the accounts of certain executive officers, including Mr. Watjen – 12,91513,364 shares, under the company’s 401(k) plan. Does not include shares credited to the accounts of certain executive officers, including Mr. McCarthy – 1,7881,864 shares, under an inactive non-qualified 401(k) plan because, though measured in share value, they will be settled only in cash.

 

(2)Represents the number of shares underlying stock options that may be exercised within 60 days after March 15, 2012.2014. For Messrs. Watjen and McCarthy the amount includes shares underlying unvested stock options that would vest upon retirement because they meet certain age and years of service requirements.

 

(3)

Represents the number of shares underlying deferred share rights and restricted stock units payable solely in shares (including dividend equivalent rights accrued on such rights or units) that may be settled within 60 days after March 15, 2012,2014, including deferred share rights and restricted stock units that may be settled upon the termination of a director’s service on the Board. For each non-employee director other than Mr. Kabat,Messrs. Bunting and Keaney, the amount includes shares underlying

126Unum Group


2012 Proxy StatementOwnership of Company Securities

unvested restricted stock units that would vest upon retirement because the director meets a certain years of service requirement. Does not include 8,7329,106 shares credited to the account of Dr. Goldsberry in respect of deferred share rights under the UNUM Corporation Director Deferred Compensation Plan because, though measured in share value, they will be settled only in cash. Also does not include shares underlying time-vesting restricted stock units (including dividend equivalent rights accrued thereon) that will not vest or cannot be settled within 60 days after March 15, 20122014 or that are payable only in cash.

 

(4)As of March 15, 2012,2014, the total number of shares underlying deferred share rights (including dividend equivalent rights accrued thereon) held by our non-employee directors, including those rights which cannot be settled in shares or within 60 days after March 15, 20122014 and thus are not deemed to be beneficially owned for purposes of this table, was as follows:

 

Mr. Bunting

        Mr. Kabat  9,053        Mr. MacMillan  –  
Mr. Caulfield 12,804    Mr. Kinser 22,966    Mr. Passarella 1,521  13,353      Mr. Keaney          Mr. Muhl  –  
Ms. Godwin 16,541    Ms. Larson 42,673    Mr. Ryan 9,341  14,413      Mr. Kinser  23,952        Mr. Passarella  1,587  
Dr. Goldsberry (a) 24,665    Mr. MacMillan         -       3,573      Ms. Larson  37,567        Mr. Ryan  9,742  
Mr. Kabat   6,004    Mr. Muhl         -     

 

 (a)Includes 8,7329,106 shares credited to the account of Dr. Goldsberry in respect of cash-settled deferred share rights, as described in footnote (3) above.

 

(5)As of March 15, 2012,2014, the total number of shares underlying time-vesting restricted stock units (including dividend equivalent rights accrued thereon) held by our directors and executive officers, including those units which will not vest, or be settleable in shares, within 60 days after March 15, 20122014 and thus are not deemed to be beneficially owned for purposes of this table, was as follows:

 

Mr. Bunting

  1,912      Mr. Kinser  23,556      Mr. Watjen(a)  243,153    
Mr. Caulfield 12,443    Mr. MacMillan     7,853    Mr. Horn   33,748  17,390      Ms. Larson  20,267      Ms. Farrell  33,233    
Ms. Godwin 12,443    Mr. Muhl     4,699    Mr. McCarthy   86,224  18,655      Mr. MacMillan  15,481      Mr. Horn  26,829    
Dr. Goldsberry 10,249    Mr. Passarella     7,095    Mr. McKenney 139,937  9,314      Mr. Muhl  4,413      Mr. McCarthy  79,397    
Mr. Kabat   7,095    Mr. Ryan     7,853    All directors and executive officers as a group (a) 806,598  15,481      Mr. Passarella  11,812      Mr. McKenney  84,939    
Mr. Kinser 12,443    Mr. Watjen (a) 406,421     
Ms. Larson   9,289    Mr. Best   61,434     

Mr. Keaney

  8,911      Mr. Ryan  7,703      All directors and executive officers as a group(a)  728,676    

 

 (a)Includes 203,211121,577 shares underlying unvested cash-settled restricted stock units (including dividend equivalent rights accrued thereon) that have been granted to Mr. Watjen.

 

(6)The total number of directors and executive officers does not include Mr. Best, who retired on December 31, 2011. In addition, all amounts set forth in this row exclude the shares beneficially owned by Mr. Best.

Security Ownership of Certain Shareholders

Detailed information about the shareholders with more than 5% of our common stock can be found in the table below, including beneficial ownership based on sole and/or shared voting power and investment (dispositive) power.

We do not know of any other person that is a beneficial owner of more than 5% of our common stock. Information is given as of the dates noted in the footnotes below.

 

 

Unum Group127

Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and 2014 Proxy Statement | 81 


Ownership of Company Securities2012 Proxy Statement

 Ownership of Company Securities

 

 

BENEFICIAL OWNERSHIPBENEFICIAL OWNERSHIP

Name and Address of Beneficial

Owner

  

Amount of Beneficial

Ownership(1)(1)

 

Percent of Company Common

Stock Outstanding(2)

Wellington Management Company, LLPThe Vanguard Group, Inc.

280 Congress Street

Boston, MA 02210

100 Vanguard Blvd.

  24,544,980(2)8.39%(2)

FMR LLC

82 Devonshire Street

Boston, MA 02109

21,096,70417,457,778(3) 7.215%(3)6.76%

Malvern, PA 19355

Blackrock, Inc.FMR LLC

40 East 52nd245 Summer Street

New York, NY 10022

  20,734,22516,997,252(4) 7.09%(4)6.58%

Boston, MA 02210

The Vanguard Group,Blackrock, Inc.

100 Vanguard Blvd.

Malvern, PA 19355

40 East 52nd Street

  17,391,96814,380,479(5) 5.94%(5)5.57%

NWQ Investment Management Company, LLC

2049 Century Park East, 16th Floor

Los Angeles, CA 90067

New York, NY 10022

  16,152,520(6) 5.52%(6)

 

(1)Beneficial ownership of securities is disclosed according to Rule 13d-3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

 

(2)This information isPercentages are based on the Schedule 13G/A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission by Wellington Management Company, LLP on February 14, 2012, which reflects beneficial ownership as of December 31, 2011. Wellington Management Company, LLP reported that, in its capacity as investment adviser, it had shared voting power with respect to 16,020,286258,202,951 shares of our common stock shared dispositive power with respect to 24,544,980 shares of our common stock, and sole voting and dispositive power with respect to none of our shares.outstanding on March 15, 2014.

 

(3)This information is based on the Schedule 13G/A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission by FMR LLCThe Vanguard Group, Inc. on February 14, 2012,12, 2014, which reflects beneficial ownership as of December 31, 2011.2013. The Vanguard Group, Inc. reported that, in its capacity as investment adviser, it had sole voting power with respect to 435,667 shares of our common stock, shared voting power with respect to none of our shares, sole dispositive power with respect to 17,053,477 shares of our common stock, and shared dispositive power with respect to 404,301 shares of our common stock.

(4)This information is based on the Schedule 13G/A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission by FMR LLC on February 14, 2014, which reflects beneficial ownership as of December 31, 2013. FMR LLC reported that, in its capacity as a parent holding company, it had sole voting with respect to 210,940143,352 shares of our common stock, sole dispositive power with respect to 21,096,70416,997,252 shares of our common stock, and shared voting and dispositive power with respect to none of our shares. The Schedule 13G/A includes shares beneficially owned by subsidiaries controlled by or through FMR LLC, Edward C. Johnson 3d, Chairman of FMR LLC, and/or members of the family of Edward C. Johnson 3d as follows: Fidelity Management & Research Company, a registered investment adviser to various registered investment companies (20,851,054 shares, or 7.131%); Fidelity Low-Priced Stock Fund, a registered investment company (15,900,000 shares, or 5.438%); Fidelity Management Trust Company, a bank serving as investment manager of institutional accounts (94,084 shares, or 0.032%); Strategic Advisers, Inc., a registered investment adviser to individuals (2,556 shares, or 0.001%); Pyramis Global Advisors, LLC, a registered investment adviser to institutional accounts, non-U.S. mutual funds or registered investment companies (13,290 shares, or 0.005%); Pyramis Global Advisors Trust Company, a bank serving as investment manager of institutional accounts (94,380 shares, or 0.032%); and FIL Limited (“FIL”), a qualified institution providing investment advisory and management services to non-U.S. investment companies and certain institutional investors (41,340 shares, or 0.014%). The Schedule 13G/A states that Mr. Johnson and various family members, through their ownership of FMR LLC voting common shares and the execution of a shareholders’ voting agreement, may be deemed a controlling group with respect to FMR LLC. The Schedule 13G/A also states that although FMR LLC and FIL are separate and independent corporate entities and of the view that they are not acting as a group for purposes of Section 13(d) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and thus that the shares held by each need not be aggregated, FMR LLC has nonetheless filed the Schedule 13G/A on a voluntary basis as if all of the shares are beneficially owned by FMR LLC and FIL on a joint basis.3d.

 

128Unum Group


2012 Proxy StatementOwnership of Company Securities

(4)(5)This information is based on the Schedule 13G/A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission by BlackRock, Inc. on February 10, 2012,January 31, 2014, which reflects beneficial ownership as of December 30, 2011.31, 2013. BlackRock, Inc. reported that, in its capacity as the parent holding company or control person of the subsidiaries listed therein, it had sole voting andpower with respect to 11,954,058 shares of our common stock, sole dispositive power with respect to 20,734,22514,380,479 shares of our common stock, and shared voting and dispositive power with respect to none of our shares.

(5)This information is based on the Schedule 13G/A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission by The Vanguard Group, Inc. on February 9, 2012, which reflects beneficial ownership as of December 31, 2011. The Vanguard Group, Inc. reported that, in its capacity as investment adviser, it had sole voting power with respect to 411,917 shares of our common stock, shared voting power with respect to none of our shares, sole dispositive power with respect to 16,980,051 shares of our common stock, and shared dispositive power with respect to 411,917 shares of our common stock, and that Vanguard Fiduciary Trust Company, a wholly owned subsidiary of The Vanguard Group, Inc., is the beneficial owner of and has sole voting power with respect to the 411,917 shares mentioned above as a result of its serving as investment manager of collective trust accounts.

(6)This information is based on the Schedule 13G filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission by NWQ Investment Management Company, LLC on February 14, 2012, which reflects beneficial ownership as of December 31, 2011. NWQ Investment Management Company, LLC reported that, in its capacity as investment adviser, it had sole voting power with respect to 12,674,554 shares of our common stock, sole dispositive power with respect to 16,152,520 shares of our common stock, and shared voting and dispositive power with respect to none of our shares.

Section 16(a) — Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Under Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, our directors, executive officers, and 10% beneficial holders of our common stock are required to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission certain forms reporting their beneficial ownership of and transactions in our common stock. Based solely upon information provided by each such person,these persons, we believe each of our directors and executive officers and 10% beneficial owners filed all required reports on a timely basis during the last fiscal year.year, with the exception of two late filings described in last year’s proxy statement.

 

 82 | Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and 2014 Proxy Statement


LOGO

Election of Directors

(Item 1 on the Proxy Card)

Our Board of Directors currently has 13 members divided among three classes as equally as possible, with the directors in each class standing for election every third year for three-year terms of office. In 2013, our shareholders approved a proposal to declassify the Board over a three-year period beginning in 2014 without changing the terms of office of current directors. Starting with this year’s Annual Meeting, shareholders will elect directors to serve for one-year terms at each annual meeting. Before the Board is fully declassified in 2016 (see the table below), directors appointed or elected to fill newly created directorships or vacancies in a class will hold office for a term that coincides with the remaining term of that class. Pursuant to the company’s director retirement policy, Michael J. Passarella will retire from the Board effective at the Annual Meeting, at which time the number of Board members will decrease to 12.

 

Unum Group

Annual Meeting

  129Classes Standing for Election to One-Year Terms

2014

Class IIITimothy F. Keaney, Gloria C. Larson, William J. Ryan, Thomas R. Watjen

2015*

Class IPamela H. Godwin, Thomas Kinser, A.S. (Pat) MacMillan, Jr., Edward J. Muhl
Class IIITimothy F. Keaney, Gloria C. Larson, William J. Ryan, Thomas R. Watjen

2016*

Class IPamela H. Godwin, Thomas Kinser, A.S. (Pat) MacMillan, Jr., Edward J. Muhl
Class IIE. Michael Caulfield, Ronald E. Goldserry, Kevin T. Kabat, Theodore H. Bunting, Jr.
Class IIITimothy F. Keaney, Gloria C. Larson, William J. Ryan, Thomas R. Watjen

Thereafter

    Board fully declassified – All directors stand for one-year terms


*Current directors are listed for each class, but may not stand for election in future years due to the company’s director retirement policy or unforeseen circumstances.

Upon the recommendation of the Governance Committee, the Board of Directors has nominated Timothy F. Keaney, Gloria C. Larson, William J. Ryan and Thomas R. Watjen for election to one-year terms expiring at the 2015 annual meeting of shareholders. Each nominee currently serves on the Board and has agreed to continue to serve if elected. The Board has no reason to believe that any nominee will be unable to serve if elected. However, if any nominee becomes unable or unwilling to serve before the Annual Meeting, proxies may be voted for another person nominated as a substitute by the Board, or the Board may reduce the number of directors. Information concerning these nominees is provided under the section titled “Nominees for Election as Directors with Terms Expiring in 2015” beginning on page 12.

The Board of Directors unanimously recommends that you voteFOR the election of each of the nominees for director: Timothy F. Keaney, Gloria C. Larson, William J. Ryan and Thomas R. Watjen.

 

 

130Unum Group

Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and 2014 Proxy Statement | 83 


2012 Proxy StatementRisk Analysis

 Items to Be Voted On

 

 

Risk AnalysisAdvisory Vote to Approve Executive Compensation

Risk Management(Item 2 on the Proxy Card)

The Board hasAs required by Section 14A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, we are asking you to approve an active role,advisory resolution on the compensation of our named executive officers as described in this proxy statement. This proposal, commonly known as a whole“say-on-pay” proposal, gives you the opportunity to endorse or not endorse our 2013 executive compensation programs and also atpolicies for the committee level, in overseeing managementnamed executive officers through the following resolution:

RESOLVED, that the shareholders approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the company’s risks. The Board regularly reviews information regarding our capital, liquidity and operations,named executive officers, as well as the risks associated with each, and receives an enterprise risk management report from our Chief Risk Officer at least annually, and usually more frequently. The Audit Committee is responsible for oversightdisclosed pursuant to Item 402 of Regulation S-K in the company’s risk management process, financial risk, operational riskproxy statement for the 2014 annual meeting of shareholders, including the Compensation Discussion and any other risk not specifically assigned to another committee. The Chief Risk Officer provides a report onAnalysis, the company’s riskcompensation tables and risk managementrelated narrative discussion.

For additional detail concerning the compensation of our named executive officers, please refer to the Audit Committee at least quarterly. The Finance CommitteeCompensation Discussion and Analysis beginning on page 31.

Although your vote is responsible for oversight of risks associated with investments and related financial matters. The Human Capital Committee is responsible for overseeingnot binding on the management of risks relating to our compensation plans and programs; in connection with this oversight it receives an analysis from the Chief Risk Officer with respect to these risks. The Regulatory Compliance Committee oversees management of risks related to regulatory, compliance, policy and legal matters, both current and emerging and whether of a local, state, federal or international nature. While each committee is responsible for evaluating certain risks and overseeing the management of such risks, the entire Board of Directors is regularly informed through committee reports about such risks in addition to the risk information it receives directly.

Compensation Risk

Our Chief Risk Officer, in consultation withor the Human Capital Committee, has undertaken a risk assessment ofthe Human Capital Committee will review the voting results and seek to understand the factors that influenced the vote. As it did last year, the Human Capital Committee will consider constructive feedback obtained through this process in making future decisions about our executive compensation programs and practices. policies.

We currently hold a say on pay vote every year. Therefore, shareholders will next have an opportunity to cast a say-on-pay vote in 2015.

The process includedBoard unanimously recommends that you voteFOR approval of named executive officer compensation, as provided in the following steps:resolution above.

 

ReviewRatification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

(Item 3 on the overall design and philosophyProxy Card)

The Audit Committee of the incentive compensation programs;

Review and assessBoard of Directors has appointed Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm (independent auditor) for 2014. As a matter of good corporate governance, the 2011 Performance Based Incentive (PBI) and Long Term Incentive (LTI) performance measures for alignment between actual results and achievement payout levels;

Identify fundamental principles to test, includingBoard is seeking shareholder ratification of the SEC’s non-exclusive list of situations where compensation programs may haveappointment even though it is not legally required. If the potential to raise material risks toappointment is not ratified, the company; and

AssessAudit Committee will consider the 2012 incentive programshareholders’ views in lightthe future selection of the company’s primary risks (as describedindependent auditor.

Representatives of Ernst & Young LLP are expected to be present at the Annual Meeting. They will have the opportunity to make a statement if they so desire and are expected to be available to respond to appropriate questions.

The Board unanimously recommends that you voteFOR the ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2014.

 84 | Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and 2014 Proxy Statement


Items to Be Voted On 

Independent Auditor Fees

Aggregate fees billed for audit and other services rendered by Ernst & Young LLP for our fiscal years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 are presented in the company’s Annual Reporttable below.

  Types of Fees  2013     2012 

  Audit Fees

   $9,256,000       $  8,583,000

  Audit-Related Fees

   446,000       518,000  

  Tax Fees

   35,000       104,000  

  All Other Fees

   -       -  

  Total

   $9,737,000       $  9,205,000

  *Includes $520,000 in audit fees for 2012 services that were billed in 2013 after the filing of our proxy statement.

Audit Fees. This category includes fees associated with the audit of our annual financial statements, the review of financial statements included in our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-K10-Q, the audit of internal control over financial reporting, and services provided in connection with statutory and regulatory filings.

Audit-Related Fees. This category consists of fees for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of financial statements or internal control over financial reporting. These services principally include accounting consultations, control reviews, and audit-related services for our employee benefit plans.

Tax Fees. This category consists of fees for tax compliance and advisory services.

All Other Fees. This category consists of fees for services not included in any of the above categories.

Policy for Pre-Approval of Audit and Non-Audit Services

The Audit Committee has a policy requiring advance approval of all audit and permissible non-audit services performed by the independent auditor. Under this policy, the Audit Committee sets pre-approved limits for specifically defined audit and non-audit services. The Committee considers whether such services are consistent with SEC rules on auditor independence. Specific approval by the Committee is required if fees for any particular service or aggregate fees for services of a similar nature exceed the pre-approved limits. The Committee has delegated to its chair the authority to approve permitted services, and the chair must report any such decisions to the Committee at its next scheduled meeting.

Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and 2014 Proxy Statement | 85 


LOGO

Proxies

We are soliciting proxies on behalf of the Board of Directors in connection with the Annual Meeting. This means we are asking you to sign a proxy designating individuals (known as proxies) to vote on your behalf at the Annual Meeting and at any later meeting to which the Annual Meeting may be adjourned or postponed. By use of a proxy, you can vote whether or not you attend the Annual Meeting.

Because we are soliciting your proxy, we are required to send you either our proxy materials or a Notice of Internet Availability of proxy materials (described in the next section). Our proxy materials include this proxy statement and our annual report to shareholders, which contains audited consolidated financial statements for our fiscal year ended December 31, 2011), the company’s annual financial plan, and any proposed changes to the incentive plans.

Based on this assessment, the following conclusions were reached:

The company’s incentive targets, thresholds, caps, weights and payout curves are effective control mechanisms.

The incentive plans are balanced and align the long-term interests2013. If you received a printed copy of shareholders and management.

The program’s goals are effectively balanced and consistent with the risk levels embedded in the company’s 2012 financial and capital plans.

Unum Group131


Risk Analysis2012 Proxy Statement

All potential awards are subject to Human Capital Committee discretion and the company hasour proxy materials by mail, you also received a recoupment policy in place.

Our Chief Risk Officer and the Human Capital Committee do not believe the company’s compensation programs create risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on the company.

132Unum Group


2012 Proxy StatementAbout the Annual Meeting

Aboutproxy card or voting instruction form for the Annual MeetingMeeting.

Internet availability of proxy materials

How can IWe are furnishing proxy materials to our shareholders primarily over the Internet. In most cases, we are mailing only a brief Notice of Internet Availability of proxy materials, rather than a full set of printed materials. The Notice of Internet Availability contains instructions on how to access our proxy materials and vote online. It also includes instructions on how to request paper or email delivery of our proxy materials. If you previously chose to receive our proxy materials electronically, you will continue to receive access to these materials via email until you elect otherwise. Our proxy materials may also be viewed on our investor relations website under the “SEC Filings” header atwww.investors.unum.com.

Attending the Annual Meeting in person

If you attend the Annual Meeting?

You will needMeeting in person, you must present photo identification, such as a driver’s license, and an admission ticket or proof of ownership of the company’s common stockour shares as of the close of business on March 26, 2012, and valid picture identification (such as a driver’s license or passport) to enter27, 2014, the Annual Meeting.record date. If you are a shareholder of record, theyour Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials will serve as an admission ticket, or if you received a printed setthe top half of proxy materials, an admission ticket is attached to your proxy card. Bringcard is your admission ticket. If you are a beneficial owner, you will need proof of ownership to enter the notice or detach and bring the ticket with you to the meeting.

If your shares are held beneficially in the name Examples of a bank, broker or other holderproof of record and you plan to attend the meeting, you may presentownership include a recent brokerage statement or letter from athe holder of record (your broker, bank or broker as an example of proof of ownership. If you arrive at the meeting without an admission ticket, you will be admitted only after we can verify that you are a shareholder.

There will be signsother nominee) confirming your beneficial ownership on the campus of our corporate offices in Portland, Maine directing you to parking and the meeting location. Directions to this location are provided inAppendix C of this Proxy Statement and are also available on our website at www.unum.com/directions.record date. For your safety and that of other shareholders, we reserve the right to inspect all personal items prior to admission.

Can I listen to If you arrive at the Annual Meeting onwithout proper documentation or refuse to comply with our security procedures, you may not be admitted.

You are a “shareholder of record” if your shares are registered directly in your name with our registrar and transfer agent, Computershare Trust Company, N.A.

You are a “beneficial owner” if your shares are held through a broker, bank or other nominee (i.e., held in street name). In this case, the Internet?broker, bank or nominee is the shareholder of record.

Directions

Yes, you can access aDirections to the location of the Annual Meeting in Columbia, South Carolina are provided inAppendix B and are also available on our website atwww.unum.com/directions.

 86 | Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and 2014 Proxy Statement


About the Annual Meeting and Voting 

Webcast

A live audio webcast of the Annual Meeting will be available on our investor relations website at www.unum.com, in the Investors area.www.investors.unum.com. To register, access the webcast on the website and provide the information requested. The meetingwebcast will begin at 10:00 a.m. Eastern Time on Thursday, May 24, 2012,20, 2014, and will be archived on ourthe website through June 7, 2012.3, 2014.

Who canPersons entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting?Meeting

HoldersShareholders of our common stock atrecord as of the close of business on the March 26, 2012,27, 2014 record date are entitled to receive this Proxy Statement and to vote their shares at the Annual Meeting, and at any adjournment or postponement thereof. On that date, thereMeeting. There were approximately 285,812,401257,837,242 shares of our common stock outstanding. The common stock isoutstanding on the only classrecord date. Each of equity securities entitled to be voted at the meeting. Each share of common stockthose shares is entitled to one vote on each matter properly brought before the meeting.

If your shares are registered directly in your name, you are the holderitem of record and these proxy materials have been sent directly or made availablebusiness to you by the company.

If you own your shares in a stock brokerage account or through a bank or other holder of record, you are the “beneficial owner” of shares held in “street name.” As a result, these proxy materials have been forwarded to you by your broker, bank or other holder of record. As the beneficial owner, you have the right to direct the holder of record how to vote your shares. To ensure that shares you beneficially own arebe voted please follow the instructions provided to you by the holder of record.

Unum Group133


About the Annual Meeting2012 Proxy Statement

How do I vote?

You may cast your vote prior toon at the Annual Meeting by using one of three methods listed below. Information on revoking your proxy or changing your vote is on page 136.

By InternetMeeting.

If you are a holder of record, you may vote by Internet at www.envisionreports.com/unm. Internet voting is available 24 hours a day, although your vote by Internet must be received by 2:00 a.m. Eastern Time, May 24, 2012. You will need the control number found either on the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials or on the proxy card ifbeneficial owner, you are receiving a printed copy of these materials. If you vote by Internet, do not return your proxy card or voting instruction card. If you hold your shares in “street name,” please referentitled to the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials or voting instruction card provided to you by your broker, bank or other holder of record for Internet voting instructions.

By telephone

If you are a holder of record, you may vote by calling 800-652-VOTE (8683). Telephone voting is available 24 hours a day, although your vote by phone must be received by 2:00 a.m. Eastern Time, May 24, 2012. You will need the control number found either on the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials or on the proxy card if you are receiving a printed copy of these materials. If you vote by telephone, do not return your proxy card or voting instruction card. If you hold your shares in “street name,” please refer to the Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials or voting instruction card provided to you by your broker, bank or other holder of record for telephone voting instructions.

By mail

If you are a holder of record and received a printed copy of the proxy materials, you may vote by mail by completing, signing, and dating the proxy card and returning it in the accompanying pre-addressed, stamped envelope. Your vote by mail must be received by our tabulator, Computershare Investor Services, at the address below by the close of business on May 23, 2012. If you vote by mail, do not vote by Internet or by telephone.

Proxy Services

c/o Computershare Investor Services

P.O. Box 43126

Providence, RI 02940-5138

If you hold your shares in “street name” and you received a printed copy of the proxy materials, please refer to the voting instruction card provided to you by your broker, bank or other holder of record for mailing instructions.

Note that the Internet and telephone voting procedures are designed to authenticate shareholders’ identities, allow shareholders to give their voting instructions and confirm that shareholders’ instructions have been recorded properly. If you incur usage charges from Internet access providers and telephone companies or any other charges in connection with voting via the Internet or telephone, these charges must be paid by you.

134Unum Group


2012 Proxy StatementAbout the Annual Meeting

You may also vote in person at the Annual Meeting by submitting a signed ballot, which you may obtain shortly before the meeting. If you are a beneficial owner of shares, you must obtainwithout a legal proxy from the broker, bank or other nominee that is the shareholder of record of your shares. You must ask your broker, bank or other holder of record andnominee to furnish you with the legal proxy before the Annual Meeting. You must then bring itthat document with you to hand inthe Annual Meeting and submit it with youra signed ballot that will be provided to you there.

Voting items and Board recommendations; Vote required; Abstentions and broker non-votes

You may either vote for, against or abstain on each of the voting items to be able to vote at the meeting.

How will votes be counted?

Proxies for shares that have been properly submitted, and not revoked, will be votedacted on at the Annual Meeting in accordance with your instructions. If you vote by proxy card and signMeeting. The table below summarizes, for each voting item, the card without indicating how you want your shares to be voted, your shares will be voted in accordance with the following recommendationsvoting recommendation of the Board of Directors:

FOR electionDirectors, the vote threshold required for approval, and the effect of each ofabstentions and broker non-votes (i.e., shares held in street name that cannot be voted on certain matters by the nominees for director: Pamela H. Godwin, Thomas Kinser, A.S. (Pat) MacMillan, Jr. and Edward J. Muhl; and

FOR approval of the compensation of our named executive officers as disclosed in this Proxy Statement, including the Compensation Disclosure and Analysis, compensation tables and related narrative discussion;

FOR approval of our Stock Incentive Plan of 2012; and

FOR ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2012.

Representatives of our transfer agent, Computershare Trust Company, N.A., will tabulate the votes and act as inspectors of the election. Proxies that are not signed and returned or otherwise properly submitted, including those not returned by banks, brokers, or other holdersshareholder of record willbecause the beneficial owner has not be counted for quorum orprovided voting purposes.

We will include the voting results from the Annual Meeting in a Form 8-K, which we expect to file with the SEC on or about May 25, 2012.

instructions).

 

Unum Group135


About the Annual Meeting

VOTING ITEMS

 2012 Proxy Statement

Board Voting
    Recommendation    

    Vote Required for    
Approval

    Abstentions    

    Broker Non-    

    Votes    

1.Election of four directors for terms expiring in
2015

FOR each

nominee

Majority of votes

cast with respect to

the nominee

No effect

    Not voted/    

    No effect    

2.Advisory vote to approve executive
compensation
FOR

Majority of shares

represented and

entitled to vote

Counted as
AGAINST

    Not voted/    

    No effect    

3.

Ratification of the appointment of Ernst &
Young LLP as our independent registered

public accounting firm for 2014

FORMajority of shares
represented and
entitled to vote
Counted as
AGAINST

    Discretionary    

    vote by broker    

What vote is required to approve each measure?Majority voting standard for election of directors

For Item 1,Our bylaws provide that, in an election of directors where the affirmative votenumber of a majoritynominees does not exceed the number of the votes cast at the Annual Meeting with respect to each nominee is required to elect that nominee to the Board. Accordingly, in order for a nomineedirectors to be elected as a director, the number of votes “for” the(an “uncontested election”), each nominee must exceed 50%receive a majority of the votes cast with respect to the nominee. Each vote “for” or “against” athat nominee will countto be elected as a vote cast with respect to that nominee, butdirector. If an abstention will not count as a vote cast and thus will not impact the election of directors. As provided in our bylaws, anyincumbent director who is a nominee and is not electedre-elected under this majority-votemajority voting standard, the director must offer to tender his or hersubmit an irrevocable letter of resignation to the Board of Directors, which shall become effective upon acceptance by the Board. The Governance Committee will make a recommendation to the Board on whether to accept or reject the resignation, or

Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and 2014 Proxy Statement | 87 


 About the Annual Meeting and Voting

whether other action should be taken. If the director who tenders his or hersubmitting the resignation is a member of the Governance Committee, that director will not participate in the Governance Committee’s recommendation to the Board. The Board will act on the Governance Committee’s recommendation and publicly disclose its decision and the rationale behind it within 90 days from the date of the certification of the election results.

For Item 2, the affirmativeVoting your shares

If you are a shareholder of record, you may vote of a majorityyour shares using any of the votes entitled to be cast by the shareholders represented and entitled following methods:

In person – Attend the Annual Meeting and vote in person.

Mail – If you received a paper copy of our proxy materials, mark, date and sign the proxy card and mail it to Proxy Services, c/o Computershare Investors Services, P.O. Box 43126, Providence, Rhode Island 02940-5138, using the accompanying pre-addressed, stamped envelope, so that it is received no later than the close of business on May 19, 2014.

Internet or telephone – Visitwww.envisionreports.com/unmto vote over the Internet or call toll free1-800-652-VOTE (8683) to vote using a touchtone telephone, in either case no later than 2:00 a.m. Eastern Time, May 20, 2014. You will need the control number found on the Notice of Internet Availability or the proxy card.

For shareholders of record, votes submitted by mail, over the Internet or by telephone will be voted at the Annual Meeting is required to give advisory approval of the compensation of our named executive officers as disclosed in this Proxy Statement.

For Item 3, the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes entitled to be cast by the shareholders representedproxies named in the proxy card in the manner you indicate. If you sign and entitledreturn a proxy card without marking specific voting instructions, the proxies will vote your shares FOR each director nominee and FOR each other voting item, as recommended by the Board of Directors.

If you are a beneficial owner, please refer to votethe Notice of Internet Availability or voting instruction form provided to you by your broker, bank or other nominee for details on how to provide voting instructions to such person. If your broker, bank or other nominee does not receive voting instructions from you, whether your shares can be voted by such person depends on the type of item being considered for vote. The only item of business at the Annual Meeting is required to approve our Stock Incentive Plan of 2012.

For Item 4, the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes entitled to be cast by the shareholders represented and entitledfor which your broker, bank or other nominee has discretion to vote atyour shares without your voting instructions is the Annual Meeting is required to approve ratification of the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm for 2012.

How is a quorum determined for(Item 3). Unless it receives your voting instructions, your broker, bank or other nominee will not have discretion to vote your shares (a “broker non-vote”) on any other item of business at the Annual Meeting?Meeting (Items 1 and 2), including the election of directors. To ensure that your shares are voted on each of the important matters being voted on at the Annual Meeting, we encourage you to provide instructions to your broker, bank or nominee on how to vote your shares. As noted above, beneficial owners may vote in person at the Annual Meeting only if they bring a legal proxy obtained from their broker, bank or other nominee.

Changing your vote and revoking your proxy

If you are a shareholder of record and wish to change your vote after submitting a proxy, you may revoke that proxy by submitting a new proxy (either by mailing a new proxy card or by providing new voting instructions over the Internet or by telephone), by giving written notice of revocation to our Corporate Secretary, or by attending the Annual Meeting and voting in person.

If you are a beneficial owner, you may revoke a previously submitted proxy by submitting new voting instructions in the manner specified by your broker, bank or other nominee. If you obtain a legal proxy from your broker, bank or other nominee, you may also revoke a previously submitted proxy by voting in person at the Annual Meeting and submitting it with a signed ballot that will be provided to you there.

 88 | Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and 2014 Proxy Statement


About the Annual Meeting and Voting 

Quorum

A quorum is required to transact business at the Annual Meeting and is reached if the holdersshareholders of record of a majority of the shares entitled to vote at the meeting are present either in person or represented by proxy.proxies. Abstentions, broker non-votes and signed but unmarked proxy cards will count for purposes of determining whether a quorum is present at the Annual Meeting.

How can I revoke myInspectors of election

Representatives of our transfer agent, Computershare Trust Company, N.A., will tabulate the votes and act as inspectors of the election.

Other business

We are not aware of any business to be conducted at the Annual Meeting, other than as described in this proxy or change my vote?

statement. If you aresubmit a holder of record, you can revoke your proxy, before it is exercised by giving written notice of revocationthe individuals named on the proxy card will use their own judgment to our Corporate Secretary. An earlier proxy is also revoked by a valid later proxy or later vote by telephone or by the Internet, or by appearing at the meeting and voting by ballot. If you are a beneficial owner of shares, you may submit new voting instructions by contacting your broker, bank or other holder of record. You may also vote in person at the meeting if you obtain a legal proxy from your broker, bank or other holder of record and present it to the inspectors of election with your ballot.

What if I don’t vote?

A New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) member broker who holds shares in “street name” for a customer has the authoritydetermine how to vote your shares on certain items ifany business not described in this proxy statement that is properly brought before the broker does not receive instructions fromAnnual Meeting.

Voting results

We will report the customer.final voting results of the Annual Meeting on a Form 8-K to be filed with the SEC within four business days after the Annual Meeting. The NYSE rules permit member brokers who do not receive instructions to voteForm 8-K will be available on certain “routine” matters, includingour investor relations website under the proposal to ratify“SEC Filings” header atwww.investors.unum.com or on the appointment of our independent registered public accounting firm (Item 4)SEC’s website atwww.sec.gov. However, if brokers do not receive instructions to vote on certain “non-routine” matters, including the election of directors (Item 1), the advisory vote to approve executive compensation

 

 

136Unum Group

Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and 2014 Proxy Statement | 89 


2012 Proxy StatementAbout the Annual Meeting

LOGO

 

(Item 2), and the vote on approvalCost of our Stock Incentive Plan of 2012 (Item 3), they may not vote. Therefore, it is very important that you vote on each of these non-routine matters.

How can I access the company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K on the Internet or obtain a written copy?

You can access our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011, via the Internet by going to the Investors area of our website at www.unum.com. The 2011 Annual Report on Form 10-K is not incorporated into this Proxy Statement and is not considered proxy soliciting material.

Shareholders wishing to receive a free printed copy of the 2011 Annual Report on Form 10-K, including the financial statements and financial statement schedules filed as part of the report, may do so by contacting the Office of the Corporate Secretary as described on page 12.

Who pays the cost of this proxy solicitation?solicitation

We pay the cost of soliciting proxies from our shareholders. Proxies are solicited by mail, and e-mail, and may also be solicited personally, electronically or by telephone by our directors, officers and employees.or employees, though none will receive additional compensation for doing this. We have also retained Innisfree M&A Incorporated a proxy soliciting firm, to assist in distributing and soliciting the solicitation of proxies for the Annual Meeting, and Computershare Trust Company, N.A., to provide certain administrative services in connection with distributing the proxies for the meeting.Meeting. We will pay Innisfree a fee of $20,000 and reasonable out-of-pocket expenses for its services. We also make appropriate arrangements with brokerage houses,reimburse brokers, banks and other custodians, nominees and fiduciariesfor their expenses in sending proxy materials to help solicit proxies from thetheir customers who are beneficial owners of shares held of record by such persons.and obtaining their voting instructions.

Will other business be conducted at the Annual Meeting?Shareholder proposals and nominations for our 2015 annual meeting

At the time this Proxy Statement was furnished, there were no other matters that the Board of Directors intended to present, or had reason to believe others would present, at the Annual Meeting. If you grantintend to submit a proxy, the persons namedproposal for inclusion in the accompanying form of proxy will have the discretionstatement for our 2015 annual meeting pursuant to vote your shares on any additional matters properly presented for a vote at the meeting. If for any reason any of our nominees is not available as a candidate for director, the proxy holders will vote your proxy for such other candidate or candidates as maySEC Rule 14a-8, it must be nominatedreceived by the Board.Corporate Secretary at our principal executive offices no later than December 10, 2014. Submitting a shareholder proposal does not guarantee that we will include it in our proxy statement if the proposal does not satisfy the requirements of SEC Rule 14a-8.

How can shareholders include in the company’s proxy materialsOur bylaws also establish advance notice procedures with respect to proposals and director nominations submitted by a shareholder for presentation directly at the 2013 Annual Meeting?

SEC rules and our bylaws allow for the submission of proposals by shareholdersan annual meeting, rather than for inclusion in our proxy materials and presentation atstatement. To be properly before our 2015 annual meetings, although simply submittingmeeting, a proposal does not guarantee its inclusionnotice of the business matter or presentation. While it is too late for proposalsnomination the shareholder wishes to be submitted for inclusion in these proxy materials or presentation at this year’s meeting, if a shareholder wants to include a proposal in our proxy materials for presentationpresent at the 2013 Annual Meeting, the proposalmeeting must be received by the Corporate Secretary at our principal executive offices no earlier than January 20, 2015 and no later than March 6, 2015. All such proposals and director nominations must satisfy the requirements set forth in writingour bylaws, a copy of which is available on our investor relations website under the “Corporate Governance” header atwww.investors.unum.com and may also be obtained at no cost from the Office of the Corporate Secretary.

Communications with the Board of Directors

Shareholders and interested parties may communicate with our non-executive Chairman, William J. Ryan, or any other director by contacting the Office of the Corporate Secretary as described on the following page.

In accordance with a process approved by our Board of Directors, the Corporate Secretary reviews all correspondence received by the company and addressed to non-management directors. A log and copies of the correspondence are provided to the non-executive Chairman (or lead independent director), who determines whether further distribution is appropriate and to whom it should be sent. Any director may at any time review this log and request copies of correspondence. Concerns relating to accounting, internal controls or auditing matters are promptly brought to the address specified on page 12 not later than December 13, 2012.attention of our internal auditors and handled in accordance with procedures established by the Audit Committee. Copies of correspondence relating to corporate governance matters are also provided to the chair of the Governance Committee.

The Board has requested that certain items unrelated to the duties and responsibilities of the Board be excluded from the process, including mass mailings, resumes and other forms of job inquiries, surveys, business solicitations or advertisements, and matters related to claims or employment.

 

 

Unum Group137

 90 | Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and 2014 Proxy Statement


About the Annual Meeting2012 Proxy Statement

Additional Information 

 

 

Is the company “householding” for shareholders sharing the same address?Eliminating duplicate proxy materials

The SEC’s rules for delivery ofA single proxy materialsstatement and annual report to shareholders, permit us to deliver a single copyalong with individual proxy cards, or individual Notices of these documents to an address shared by two or more of our shareholders. This method of delivery is called “householding,” and its use can significantly reduce the volume of mail you receive. This year, we are delivering onlyInternet Availability will be delivered in one set of proxy materialsenvelope to multiple shareholders sharing a singlehaving the same last name and address and to shareholders with multiple accounts registered at our transfer agent with the same address, unless we receivecontrary instructions have been received from an affected shareholder. This is known as “householding” and it enables us to reduce the contrary from one or morecosts and environmental impact of those shareholders.the Annual Meeting. We will still be required, however,deliver promptly upon written or oral request a separate copy of the proxy statement, annual report to sendshareholders or Notice of Internet Availability to any shareholder residing at a shared address to which only one copy was delivered. If you and each otherare a shareholder at your address an individual proxy voting card. If youof record and would like to receive more than one setseparate copies of our proxy materials, copies are availablewhether for this year or future years, please contact Computershare Investor Services by calling toll-free 800-446-2617 or by writing the address below or calling toll-free 800-446-2617:

Computershare Investor Services

to them at P.O. Box 43069,

Providence, RI 02940-3069

Rhode Island 02940-3069. The same phone number and address may be used to notify us that you wish to receive a separate set of proxy materials in the future, or to request delivery of a single copy of our proxy materials if you share an address with another shareholder and are receiving multiple copies. If you are a beneficial owner, you should contact your broker, bank or other nominee.

Contacting the Office of the Corporate Secretary

You may contact the Office of the Corporate Secretary by calling toll-free 800-718-8824 or by writing to:

Office of the Corporate Secretary

Unum Group

1 Fountain Square

Chattanooga, Tennessee 37402

Principal executive offices

Our principal executive offices are at 1 Fountain Square, Chattanooga, Tennessee 37402. Our main telephone number is 423-294-1011.

Annual Report on Form 10-K

Upon request, we will provide to you by mail a free copy of our Annual Report on Form 10-K (including financial statements and financial statement schedules) for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013. Please direct your request to the Office of the Secretary. The Annual Report on Form 10-K may also be accessed on our investor relations website under the “SEC Filings” header atwww.investors.unum.com or on the SEC’s website atwww.sec.gov.

Incorporation by reference

To the extent that this proxy statement has been or will be specifically incorporated by reference into any of our other filings under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the sections of this proxy statement entitled “Report of the Audit Committee” (to the extent permitted by the rules of the SEC) and “Report of the Human Capital Committee” shall not be deemed to be so incorporated, unless specifically provided otherwise in such filing.

 

Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and 2014 Proxy Statement | 91 


LOGO

Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measures

We analyze our company’s performance using non-GAAP financial measures which exclude certain items and the related tax thereon from net income. We believe the following non-GAAP financial measures are better performance measures and indicators of the revenue, profitability and underlying trends in our business:

Operating revenue, which excludes realized investment gains or losses;

Before-tax operating income, before-tax operating loss, and after-tax operating income which excludes realized investment gains or losses, non-operating retirement-related gains or losses, income tax, and certain other items which are discussed in “Executive Summary” in Part II Item 7 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013, as applicable;

Return on equity, which is calculated using after-tax operating income or loss and excludes unrealized gain on securities and net gain on cash flow hedges; and

Book value per common share, which is calculated excluding accumulated other comprehensive income (AOCI).

Realized investment gains or losses, non-operating retirement-related gains or losses, unrealized gains or losses on securities and net gains on cash flow hedges depend on market conditions and do not necessarily relate to decisions regarding the underlying business of our company. Book value per common share excluding certain components of AOCI, certain of which tend to fluctuate depending on market conditions and general economic trends, are important measures. We also exclude certain other items from our discussion of financial ratios and metrics in order to enhance the understanding and comparability of our operational performance and the underlying fundamentals, but this exclusion is not an indication that similar items may not recur and does not replace the comparable GAAP measures in the determination of overall profitability. A reconciliation of these non-GAAP financial measures to the most directly comparable GAAP measures is included in this Appendix.

Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and 2014 Proxy Statement | A-1


 Appendix A

  Year Ended December 31          
        2013              2012                
  (in millions)    
   

Before-tax Operating Income (Loss)

   

Unum US

   $859.0     $847.1     

Unum UK

  132.0      131.3     

Colonial Life

  284.9      274.3     

Closed Block

  109.4      95.5     

Corporate

  (143.5)     (108.5)    
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

Total

  1,241.8      1,239.7     

Net Realized Investment Gain

  6.8      56.2     

Non-operating Retirement-related Loss

  (32.9)     (46.4)    

Unclaimed Death Benefits Reserve Increase

  (95.5)     -       

Group Life Waiver of Premium Benefit Reserve Reduction

  85.0      -       

Income Tax

  (347.1)     (355.1)    
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

Net Income

   $858.1     $894.4     
 

 

 

  

 

 

    
  Year Ended December 31 
        2013              2012              2011              2010              2009       
  (in millions) 

After-tax Operating Income

   $882.5       $887.5       $905.4       $894.3       $875.6    

Net Realized Investment Gain (Loss), Net of Tax

  3.9      37.1      (3.6)     15.7      0.2    

Non-operating Retirement-related Loss, Net of Tax

  (21.4)     (30.2)     (20.7)     (21.1)     (28.5)   

Unclaimed Death Benefits Reserve Increase, Net of Tax

  (62.1)     -         -         -         -       

Group Life Waiver of Premium Benefit Reserve Reduction, Net of Tax

  55.2      -         -         -         -       

Deferred Acquisition Costs Impairment and Reserve Charges for Long-term Care Closed Block, Net of Tax

  -         -         (500.3)     -         -       

Reserve Charge for Individual Disability Closed Block, Net of Tax

  -         -         (119.3)     -         -       

Tax Reduction from IRS Settlement

  -         -         41.3      -         -       

Tax Related to U.K. Repatriation

  -         -         (18.6)     -         -       

Tax Related to Healthcare Reform Legislation

  -         -         -         (10.2)     -       
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net Income

   $858.1       $894.4       $284.2       $878.7       $847.3    
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
  Year Ended December 31    
        2013              2012        
  (in millions)  
   

Total Operating Revenue

   $10,347.0       $10,459.2     

Net Realized Investment Gain

  6.8      56.2     
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

Total Revenue

   $  10,353.8       $  10,515.4     
 

 

 

  

 

 

    
  After-tax
Operating
Income (Loss)
  Average
Allocated
Equity
  Operating
Return
       
  (in millions)  on Equity    
    

Year Ended December 31, 2013

    

Unum US

   $563.1       $4,141.8      13.6%    

Unum UK

  104.5      744.3      14.0%    

Colonial Life

  185.2      1,122.6      16.5%    
 

 

 

  

 

 

   

Total Primary Operating Businesses

  852.8      6,008.7      14.2%    

Closed Block

  71.3      2,580.4      

Corporate

  (41.6)     (856.8)     
 

 

 

  

 

 

   

Total

   $882.5       $7,732.3      11.4%    
 

 

 

  

 

 

    

 A-2 | Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and 2014 Proxy Statement


Appendix A 

  After-tax
    Operating    
Income
  Average
    Allocated    
Equity
  

Operating

Return

                   
  (in millions)   On Equity     
    

Year Ended December 31, 2012

   $887.5       $7,241.8      12.3%     

Year Ended December 31, 2011

  905.4      7,427.0      12.2%     

Year Ended December 31, 2010

  894.3      7,499.7      11.9%     

Year Ended December 31, 2009

  875.6      6,806.0      12.9%          
  December 31          
        2013              2012              2011              2010              2009              2008                
  (in millions)    
       

Total Stockholders’ Equity, As Reported

   $8,659.1       $8,612.6       $8,169.7       $8,484.9       $8,045.0       $5,941.5     

Net Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Securities

  135.7      873.5      614.8      416.1      382.7      (837.5)    

Net Gain on Cash Flow Hedges

  396.3      401.6      408.7      361.0      370.8      458.5     
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

Total Stockholders’ Equity, As Adjusted

   $8,127.1       $7,337.5       $7,146.2       $7,707.8       $7,291.5       $6,320.5     
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  
       

Average Equity, As Adjusted

   $7,732.3       $7,241.8       $7,427.0       $7,499.7       $6,806.0      
  Year Ended December 31 
        2013              2012              2011              2010              2009              2008          2007*      2006*      2005*   
  (per diluted common share) 

After-tax Operating Income

   $3.32       $3.15       $2.98       $2.73       $2.64       $2.54       $2.25       $1.85       $1.69    

Net Realized Investment Gain (Loss), Net of Tax

  0.02      0.13      (0.01)     0.05      -          (0.89)     (0.12)     0.01      (0.02)   

Non-operating Retirement-related Loss, Net of Tax

  (0.08)     (0.11)     (0.07)     (0.06)     (0.09)     (0.03)     (0.04)     (0.05)     (0.05)   

Unclaimed Death Benefits Reserve Increase, Net of Tax

  (0.24)     -          -          -          -          -          -          -          -        

Group Life Waiver of Premium Benefit Reserve Reduction, Net of Tax

  0.21      -          -          -          -          -          -          -          -        

Deferred Acquisition Costs Impairment and Reserve Charges for Long-term Care Closed Block, Net of Tax

  -          -          (1.65)     -          -          -          -          -          -        

Reserve Charge for Individual Disability Closed Block, Net of Tax

  -          -          (0.39)     -          -          -          -          -          -        

Regulatory Reassessment Charges, Net of Tax

  -          -          -          -          -          -          (0.10)     (0.79)     (0.16)   

Special Tax Items and Debt Extinguishment Costs, Net of Tax

  -          -          0.08      (0.03)     -          -          (0.10)     0.23      0.14    

Other, Net of Tax

  -          -          -          -          -          -          -          (0.04)     0.01    
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Income from Continuing Operations

  3.23      3.17      0.94      2.69      2.55      1.62      1.89      1.21      1.61    

Income from Discontinued Operations

  -          -          -          -          -          -          0.02      0.02      0.03    
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 

Net Income

   $3.23       $3.17       $0.94       $2.69       $2.55       $1.62       $1.91       $1.23       $    1.64    
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
* Does not reflect the impact of ASU 2010-26.  
  December 31          
        2013              2012              2011              2010              2009              2008                
  (per share)    
       

Total Stockholders’ Equity (Book Value)

   $33.30       $31.87       $27.91       $26.80       $24.25       $17.94     

Net Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Securities

  0.52      3.23      2.11      1.31      1.16      (2.53)    

Net Gain on Cash Flow Hedges

  1.52      1.48      1.39      1.14      1.12      1.38     
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

Subtotal

  31.26      27.16      24.41      24.35      21.97      19.09     

Foreign Currency Translation Adjustment

  (0.18)     (0.26)     (0.41)     (0.34)     (0.23)     (0.52)    
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

Subtotal

  31.44      27.42      24.82      24.69      22.20      19.61     

Unrecognized Pension and Postretirement Benefit Costs

  (0.88)     (2.13)     (1.51)     (1.00)     (1.00)     (1.23)    
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

Total Stockholders’ Equity, Excluding Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income

   $32.32       $29.55       $26.33       $25.69       $23.20       $20.84     
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and 2014 Proxy Statement | A-3 


LOGO

Directions to the Annual Meeting

This year’s Annual Meeting will be held at the offices of Colonial Life in Columbia, South Carolina, located at 1200 Colonial Life Boulevard, adjacent to I-126.

 

138

Directions from Downtown Columbia

Take Elmwood Avenue until it becomes I-126. Continue on I-126 and take the Colonial Life Boulevard exit. The Colonial Life campus is located one-tenth of a mile on the right. Follow the posted signs to the meeting location.

Directions from the Columbia Airport and Charleston

  Unum GroupLOGO


2012 Proxy StatementAppendix A

Take I-26 West to Exit 108A (Bush River Road/I-126 South). On the exit ramp, stay left toward Bush River Road. At the light, turn right onto Bush River Road. Drive half a mile and then turn right onto Colonial Life Boulevard. The Colonial Life campus is located approximately one-quarter of a mile on the left. Follow the posted signs to the meeting location.

Directions from Atlanta

Appendix A

UNUM GROUP

STOCK INCENTIVE PLAN OF 2012

SECTION 1.Purpose; Definitions

The purpose of this Plan is to allow the Company to attract, retain and motivate officers, employees, directors and/or consultantsTake I-20 East through Augusta and to provideSouth Carolina. Take Exit 63 and turn right onto Bush River Road. Drive 1.5 miles and then turn right onto Colonial Life Boulevard. The Colonial Life campus is located approximately one-quarter of a mile on the Company and its Subsidiaries and Affiliates with a long-term incentive plan providing incentives directly linked to stockholder value. Certain terms used herein have definitions given to them inleft. Follow the first place in which they are used. In addition, for purposes of this Plan, the following terms are defined as set forth below:

(a)“Affiliate” means a corporation or other entity controlled by, controlling or under common control with the Company.

(b)“Applicable Exchange” means the New York Stock Exchange or such other securities exchange as may at the applicable time be the principal market for the Common Stock.

(c)“Award” means an Option, Stock Appreciation Right, Restricted Stock, Restricted Stock Unit, Performance Unit or Other Stock-Based Award granted pursuantposted signs to the terms of this Plan.meeting location.

(d)“Award Agreement”Directions from Charlotte means

Take I-77 South to I-20. Drive West on I-20 toward Augusta. Take Exit 65 and turn left onto Broad River Road. Drive 0.7 miles and then turn right onto Bush River Road. Drive approximately half a written document or agreement setting forth the termsmile and conditionsthen turn left onto Colonial Life Boulevard. The Colonial Life campus is located approximately one-quarter of a specific Award.

(e)“Board” means the Board of Directors of the Company.

(f)“Cause” means, unless otherwise provided in an Award Agreement, (i) “Cause” as defined in any Individual Agreement to which the applicable Participant is a party, or (ii) if there is no such Individual Agreement or if it does not define “Cause”: (A) conviction of the Participant for committing a felony under federal law or the law of the state in which such action occurred, (B) dishonesty in the course of fulfilling the Participant’s employment duties, (C) failuremile on the partleft. Follow the posted signs to the meeting location.

Directions from Greenville

Take I-385 South to I-26. Drive East on I-26 to Exit 108. Turn left onto Bush River Road. Drive half a mile and then turn right onto Colonial Life Boulevard. The Colonial Life campus is located approximately one-quarter of a mile on the Participantleft. Follow the posted signs to perform substantially such Participant’s employment duties in any material respect, (D) a material violation of the Company’s ethics and compliance program, or (E) before a Change in Control, such other events as shall be determined by the Committee and set forth in a Participant’s Award Agreement. Notwithstanding the general rule of Section 2(c), following a Change in Control, any determination by the Committee as to whether “Cause” exists shall be subject to de novo review.meeting location.

(g)“Change in Control” has the meaning set forth in Section 10(e).

(h)“Code” means the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended from time to time, and any successor thereto, the Treasury Regulations thereunder and other relevant interpretive guidance issued by the Internal Revenue Service or the Treasury Department. Reference to any specific section of the Code shall be deemed to include such regulations and guidance, as well as any successor provision of the Code.

(i)“Commission” means the Securities and Exchange Commission or any successor agency.

 

 

Unum GroupA-1

Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders and 2014 Proxy Statement | B-1


Appendix A2012 Proxy Statement

 

(j)“Committee” has the meaning set forth in Section 2(a).

(k)“Common Stock” means common stock, par value $.10 per share, of the Company.

(l)“Company” means Unum Group, a Delaware corporation.

(m)“Disability” means (i) “Disability” as defined in any Individual Agreement to which the Participant is a party, (ii) if there is no such Individual Agreement or it does not define “Disability,” disability of a Participant means the Participant is (A) unable to engage in any substantial gainful activity by reason of any medically determinable physical or mental impairment that can be expected to result in death or can be expected to last for a continuous period of not less than 12 months, or (B) by reason of any medically determinable physical or mental impairment that can be expected to result in death or can be expected to last for a continuous period of not less than 12 months, receiving income replacement benefits for a period of not less than three months under an accident and health plan covering employees of the Company. The Committee may require such medical or other evidence as it deems necessary to judge the nature and duration of the Participant’s condition. Notwithstanding the above, with respect to an Incentive Stock Option, Disability shall mean Permanent and Total Disability as defined in Section 22(e)(3) of the Code.

(n)“Disaffiliation” means a Subsidiary’s or Affiliate’s ceasing to be a Subsidiary or Affiliate for any reason (including, without limitation, as a result of a public offering, or a spinoff or sale by the Company, of the stock of the Subsidiary or Affiliate) or a sale of a division of the Company and its Affiliates.

(o)“Eligible Individuals”means directors, officers, employees and consultants of the Company or any of its Subsidiaries or Affiliates, and prospective employees and consultants who have accepted offers of employment or consultancy from the Company or its Subsidiaries or Affiliates.

(p)“Exchange Act” means the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended from time to time, and any successor thereto.

(q)“Fair Market Value” means the closing price of a share of Common Stock on the Applicable Exchange on the date of measurement, or if Shares were not traded on the Applicable Exchange on such measurement date, then on the next preceding date on which Shares were traded, all as reported by such source as the Committee may select. If the Common Stock is not listed on a national securities exchange, Fair Market Value shall be determined by the Committee in its good faith discretion using a reasonable valuation method which shall include consideration of the following factors, as applicable: (i) the value of the Company’s tangible and intangible assets; (ii) the present value of the Company’s future cash-flows; (iii) the market value of stock or equity interests in similar corporations and other entities engaged in substantially similar trades or businesses, the value of which can be readily determined objectively (such as through trading prices on an established securities market or an amount paid in an arm’s-length private transaction); (iv) control premiums or discounts for lack of marketability; (v) recent arm’s-length transactions involving the sale or transfer of such stock or equity interests; and (vi) other relevant factors.

(r)“Free-Standing SAR” has the meaning set forth in Section 5(b).

(s)“Full-Value Award” means any Award other than an Option or Stock Appreciation Right.

 

 

A-2Unum Group


2012 Proxy StatementAppendix A

LOGO

(t)“Good Reason” has the meaning set forth in Section 10(e).

(u)“Grant Date” means (i) the date on which the Committee by resolution selects an Eligible Individual to receive a grant of an Award and determines the number of Shares to be subject to such Award, or (ii) such later date as the Committee shall provide in such resolution.

(v)“Incentive Stock Option” means any Option that is designated in the applicable Award Agreement as an “incentive stock option” within the meaning of Section 422 of the Code, and that in fact so qualifies.

(w)“Individual Agreement” means an employment, consulting or similar agreement between a Participant and the Company or one of its Subsidiaries or Affiliates.

(x)“Nonqualified Option” means any Option that is not an Incentive Stock Option.

(y)“Option” means an Award granted under Section 5.

(z)“Other Stock-Based Award” means Awards of Common Stock and other Awards that are valued in whole or in part by reference to, or are otherwise based upon, Common Stock, including (without limitation) unrestricted stock, dividend equivalents, and convertible debentures.

(aa)“Participant” means an Eligible Individual to whom an Award is or has been granted.

(bb)“Performance Goals” means the performance goals established by the Committee in connection with the grant of Restricted Stock, Restricted Stock Units, Performance Units or Other Stock-Based Awards. In the case of Qualified Performance-Based Awards, (i) such goals shall be based on the attainment of specified levels of one or more of the following measures: overall or selected premium or sales growth, expense efficiency ratios (ratio of expenses to premium income), market share, customer service measures or indices, underwriting efficiency and/or quality, persistency factors, return on net assets, economic value added, shareholder value added, embedded value added, combined ratio, expense ratio, loss ratio, premiums, risk based capital, revenues, revenue growth, earnings (including earnings before taxes, earnings before interest and taxes or earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization), earnings per share, operating income (including non-pension operating income), pre- or after-tax income, net income, cash flow (before or after dividends), cash flow per share (before or after dividends), gross margin, return on equity, return on capital (including return on total capital or return on invested capital), cash flow return on investment, return on assets or operating assets, economic value added (or an equivalent metric), stock price appreciation, total stockholder return (measured in terms of stock price appreciation and dividend growth), cost control, gross profit, operating profit, cash generation, unit volume, stock price, market share, sales, asset quality, cost saving levels, marketing-spending efficiency, core non-interest income, or change in working capital with respect to the Company or any one or more subsidiaries, divisions, business units or business segments of the Company either in absolute terms or relative to the performance of one or more other companies or an index covering multiple companies and (ii) such Performance Goals shall be set by the Committee within the time period prescribed by Section 162(m) of the Code.

(cc)“Performance Period” means that period established by the Committee at the time any Performance Unit is granted or at any time thereafter during which any Performance Goals specified by the Committee with respect to such Award are to be measured.

Unum GroupA-3


Appendix A2012 Proxy Statement

(dd)“Performance Unit” means any Award granted under Section 8 of a unit valued by reference to a designated amount of cash or other property other than Shares, which value may be paid to the Participant by delivery of such property as the Committee shall determine, including, without limitation, cash, Shares, or any combination thereof, upon achievement of such Performance Goals during the Performance Period as the Committee shall establish at the time of such grant or thereafter.

(ee)“Plan” means this Unum Group Stock Incentive Plan of 2012, as set forth herein and as hereafter amended from time to time.

(ff)“Qualified Performance-Based Award” means an Award intended to qualify for the Section 162(m) Exemption, as provided in Section 11.

(gg)“Replaced Award” has the meaning set forth in Section 10(b).

(hh)“Replacement Award” has the meaning set forth in Section 10(b).

(ii)“Restricted Stock” means an Award granted under Section 6.

(jj)“Restricted Stock Unit”has the meaning set forth in Section 7.

(kk)“Retirement” means the Participant’s Termination of Employment after the attainment of age 65 or the attainment of age 55 and at least 15 years of service.

(ll)“Section 162(m) Exemption” means the exemption from the limitation on deductibility imposed by Section 162(m) of the Code that is set forth in Section 162(m)(4)(C) of the Code.

(mm)“Share” means a share of Common Stock.

(nn)“Stock Appreciation Right” has the meaning set forth in Section 5(b).

(oo)“Subsidiary”means any corporation, partnership, joint venture, limited liability company or other entity during any period in which at least a majority of the voting or profits interest is owned, directly or indirectly, by the Company or any successor to the Company.

(pp)“Tandem SAR” has the meaning set forth in Section 5(b).

(qq)“Term” means the maximum period during which an Option or Stock Appreciation Right may remain outstanding, subject to earlier termination upon Termination of Employment or otherwise, as specified in the applicable Award Agreement.

(rr)“Termination of Employment” means the termination of the applicable Participant’s employment with, or performance of services for, the Company and any of its Subsidiaries or Affiliates. Unless otherwise determined by the Committee, (i) if a Participant’s employment with the Company and its Affiliates terminates but such Participant continues to provide services to the Company and its Affiliates in a non-employee capacity, such change in status shall not be deemed a Termination of Employment and (ii) a Participant employed by, or performing services for, a Subsidiary or an Affiliate or a division of the Company and its Affiliates shall be deemed to incur a Termination of Employment if, as a result of a Disaffiliation, such Subsidiary, Affiliate, or division ceases to be a Subsidiary, Affiliate or division, as the case may be, and the Participant does not immediately thereafter become an employee

A-4Unum Group


2012 Proxy StatementAppendix A

of, or service provider for, the Company or another Subsidiary or Affiliate. Temporary absences from employment because of illness, vacation or leave of absence and transfers among the Company and its Subsidiaries and Affiliates shall not be considered Terminations of Employment.

SECTION 2.Administration

(a)Committee. The Plan shall be administered by the Human Capital Committee of the Board or such other committee of the Board as the Board may from time to time designate (the “Committee”), which shall be composed of not less than two directors, and shall be appointed by and serve at the pleasure of the Board. The Committee shall, subject to Section 11, have plenary authority to grant Awards pursuant to the terms of the Plan to Eligible Individuals. Among other things, the Committee shall have the authority, subject to the terms and conditions of the Plan:

(i) to select the Eligible Individuals to whom Awards may from time to time be granted;

(ii) to determine whether and to what extent Incentive Stock Options, Nonqualified Options, Stock Appreciation Rights, Restricted Stock, Restricted Stock Units, Performance Units, Other Stock-Based Awards, or any combination thereof, are to be granted hereunder;

(iii) to determine the number of Shares to be covered by each Award granted hereunder;

(iv) to determine the terms and conditions of each Award granted hereunder, based on such factors as the Committee shall determine;

(v) subject to Section 12, to modify, amend or adjust the terms and conditions of any Award;

(vi) to adopt, alter and repeal such administrative rules, guidelines and practices governing the Plan as it shall from time to time deem advisable;

(vii) to interpret the terms and provisions of the Plan and any Award issued under the Plan (and any agreement relating thereto);

(viii) subject to Section 12, to accelerate the vesting or lapse of restrictions of any outstanding Award, based in each case on such considerations as the Committee in its sole discretion determines;

(ix) to decide all other matters that must be determined in connection with an Award;

(x) to determine whether, to what extent and under what circumstances cash, Shares and other property and other amounts payable with respect to an Award under this Plan shall be deferred either automatically or at the election of the Participant;

(xi) to establish any “blackout” period that the Committee in its sole discretion deems necessary or advisable; and

(xii) to otherwise administer the Plan.

Unum GroupA-5


Appendix A2012 Proxy Statement

(b)Procedures.

(i) The Committee may act only by a majority of its members then in office, except that the Committee may, except to the extent prohibited by applicable law or the listing standards of the Applicable Exchange and subject to Section 11, allocate all or any portion of its responsibilities and powers to any one or more of its members and may delegate all or any part of its responsibilities and powers to any person or persons selected by it.

(ii) Subject to Section 11(c), any authority granted to the Committee may also be exercised by the full Board. To the extent that any permitted action taken by the Board conflicts with action taken by the Committee, the Board action shall control.

(c)Discretion of Committee. Subject to Section 1(f), any determination made by the Committee or by an appropriately delegated officer pursuant to delegated authority under the provisions of the Plan with respect to any Award shall be made in the sole discretion of the Committee or such delegate at the time of the grant of the Award or, unless in contravention of any express term of the Plan, at any time thereafter. All decisions made by the Committee or any appropriately delegated officer pursuant to the provisions of the Plan shall be final, binding and conclusive on all persons, including the Company, Participants, and Eligible Individuals.

(d)Cancellation or Suspension. Subject to Section 5(d), the Committee shall have full power and authority to determine whether, to what extent and under what circumstances any Award shall be canceled or suspended. In particular, but without limitation, all outstanding Awards to any Participant may be canceled if the Participant, without the consent of the Committee, while employed by the Company or after termination of such employment, in either case prior to a Change in Control, becomes associated with, employed by, renders services to, or owns any interest in (other than any nonsubstantial interest, as determined by the Committee), any business that is in competition with the Company or with any business in which the Company has a substantial interest, as determined by the Committee or any one or more Senior Managers or committee of senior managers to whom the authority to make such determination is delegated by the Committee.

(e)Award Agreements. The terms and conditions of each Award, as determined by the Committee, shall be set forth in a written (or electronic) Award Agreement, which shall be delivered to the Participant receiving such Award upon, or as promptly as is reasonably practicable following, the grant of such Award. The effectiveness of an Award shall be subject to the Award Agreement’s being signed by the Company and the Participant receiving the Award unless otherwise provided in the Award Agreement. Award Agreements may be amended only in accordance with Section 12 hereof.

SECTION 3.Common Stock Subject to Plan

(a)Plan Maximums. The maximum number of Shares that may be granted pursuant to Awards under the Plan shall be 20,000,000. The maximum number of Shares that may be granted pursuant to Options intended to be Incentive Stock Options shall be 1,000,000 Shares. Shares subject to an Award under the Plan may be authorized and unissued Shares. On and after the Effective Date (as defined in Section 12(a)), no new awards may be granted under the Company’s Stock Incentive Plan of 2007, as amended, it being understood that (A) awards outstanding under such plan as of the Effective Date shall remain in full force and effect under such plan according to their respective terms, and (B) to the extent that any such award is forfeited, terminates, expires or lapses without being exercised (to the

A-6Unum Group


2012 Proxy StatementAppendix A

extent applicable), or is settled for cash, the Shares subject to such award not delivered as a result thereof shall not be available for Awards under this Plan;provided, however, that dividend equivalents may continue to be issued under such plan in respect of awards granted under such plan which are outstanding as of the Effective Date.

(b) Individual Limits. No Participant may be granted Qualified Performance-Based Awards (other than Stock Options and Stock Appreciation Rights) covering in excess of 1,200,000 Shares during any calendar year. No Participant may be granted Stock Options and Stock Appreciation Rights covering in excess of 800,000 Shares during any calendar year.

(c)Rules for Calculating Shares Delivered. For purposes of the limits set forth in Sections 3(a) and 3(b), each Full-Value Award shall be counted as 1.76 Shares. To the extent that any Award is forfeited, or any Option and the related Tandem SAR (if any) or Free-Standing SAR terminates, expires or lapses without being exercised, or any Award is settled for cash, the Shares subject to such Awards not delivered as a result thereof shall again be available for Awards under the Plan. If the exercise price of any Option and/or the tax withholding obligations relating to any Award are satisfied by delivering Shares (either actually or through attestation) or withholding Shares relating to such Award, the gross number of Shares subject to the Award shall nonetheless be deemed to have been granted for purposes of the first sentence of Section 3(a).

(d)Adjustment Provision. In the event of a merger, consolidation, acquisition of property or shares, stock rights offering, liquidation, disposition for consideration of the Company’s direct or indirect ownership of a Subsidiary or Affiliate (including by reason of a Disaffiliation), or similar event affecting the Company or any of its Subsidiaries (each, a “Corporate Transaction”), the Committee or the Board may in its discretion make such substitutions or adjustments as it deems appropriate and equitable to (A) the aggregate number and kind of Shares or other securities reserved for issuance and delivery under the Plan, (B) the various maximum limitations set forth in Sections 3(a) and 3(b) upon certain types of Awards and upon the grants to individuals of certain types of Awards, (C) the number and kind of Shares or other securities subject to outstanding Awards; and (D) the exercise price of outstanding Awards. In the event of a stock dividend, stock split, reverse stock split, reorganization, share combination, or recapitalization or similar event affecting the capital structure of the Company, or a Disaffiliation, separation or spinoff, in each case without consideration, or other extraordinary dividend of cash or other property to the Company’s shareholders (each, a “Share Change”), the Committee or the Board shall make such substitutions or adjustments as it deems appropriate and equitable to (A) the aggregate number and kind of Shares or other securities reserved for issuance and delivery under the Plan, (B) the various maximum limitations set forth in Sections 3(a) and 3(b) upon certain types of Awards and upon the grants to individuals of certain types of Awards, (C) the number and kind of Shares or other securities subject to outstanding Awards; and (D) the exercise price of outstanding Awards. In the case of Corporate Transactions, such adjustments may include, without limitation, (1) the cancellation of outstanding Awards in exchange for payments of cash, property or a combination thereof having an aggregate value equal to the value of such Awards, as determined by the Committee or the Board in its sole discretion (it being understood that in the case of a Corporate Transaction with respect to which stockholders of Common Stock receive consideration other than publicly traded equity securities of the ultimate surviving entity, any such determination by the Committee that the value of an Option or Stock Appreciation Right shall for this purpose be deemed to equal the excess, if any, of the value of the consideration being paid for each Share pursuant to such Corporate Transaction over the exercise price of such Option or Stock Appreciation Right shall conclusively be deemed valid); (2) the substitution of other property (including, without limitation, cash or other securities of the Company and securities of entities other than the

Unum GroupA-7


Appendix A2012 Proxy Statement

Company) for the Shares subject to outstanding Awards; and (3) in connection with any Disaffiliation, arranging for the assumption of Awards, or replacement of Awards with new awards based on other property or other securities (including, without limitation, other securities of the Company and securities of entities other than the Company), by the affected Subsidiary, Affiliate, or division or by the entity that controls such Subsidiary, Affiliate, or division following such Disaffiliation (as well as any corresponding adjustments to Awards that remain based upon Company securities). The Committee may adjust the Performance Goals applicable to any Awards to reflect any unusual or non-recurring events and other extraordinary items, impact of charges for restructurings, discontinued operations, and the cumulative effects of accounting or tax changes, each as defined by generally accepted accounting principles or as identified in the Company’s financial statements, notes to the financial statements, management’s discussion and analysis or other the Company’s SEC filings,provided that in the case of Performance Goals applicable to any Qualified Performance-Based Awards, such adjustment does not violate Section 162(m) of the Code.

(e)Section 409A. Notwithstanding the foregoing: (i) any adjustments made pursuant to Section 3(d) to Awards that are considered “deferred compensation” within the meaning of Section 409A of the Code shall be made in compliance with the requirements of Section 409A of the Code; and (ii) any adjustments made pursuant to Section 3(d) to Awards that are not considered “deferred compensation” subject to Section 409A of the Code shall be made in such a manner as to ensure that after such adjustments, either (A) the Awards continue not to be subject to Section 409A of the Code or (B) there does not result in the imposition of any penalty taxes under Section 409A of the Code in respect of such Awards.

SECTION 4.Eligibility

Awards may be granted under the Plan to Eligible Individuals;provided, however, that Incentive Stock Options may be granted only to employees of the Company and its subsidiaries or parent corporation (within the meaning of Section 424(f) of the Code).

SECTION 5.Options and Stock Appreciation Rights

(a)Types of Options. Options may be of two types: Incentive Stock Options and Nonqualified Options. The Award Agreement for an Option shall indicate whether the Option is intended to be an Incentive Stock Option or a Nonqualified Option.

(b)Types and Nature of Stock Appreciation Rights.Stock Appreciation Rights may be “Tandem SARs,” which are granted in conjunction with an Option, or “Free-Standing SARs,” which are not granted in conjunction with an Option. Upon the exercise of a Stock Appreciation Right, the Participant shall be entitled to receive an amount in cash, Shares, or both, in value equal to the product of (i) the excess of the Fair Market Value of one Share over the exercise price of the applicable Stock Appreciation Right, multiplied by (ii) the number of Shares in respect of which the Stock Appreciation Right has been exercised. The applicable Award Agreement shall specify whether such payment is to be made in cash or Common Stock or both, or shall reserve to the Committee or the Participant the right to make that determination prior to or upon the exercise of the Stock Appreciation Right.

(c)Tandem SARs. A Tandem SAR may be granted at the Grant Date of the related Option. A Tandem SAR shall be exercisable only at such time or times and to the extent that the related Option is exercisable in accordance with the provisions of this Section 5, and shall have the same exercise price as

A-8Unum Group


2012 Proxy StatementAppendix A

the related Option. A Tandem SAR shall terminate or be forfeited upon the exercise or forfeiture of the related Option, and the related Option shall terminate or be forfeited upon the exercise or forfeiture of the Tandem SAR.

(d)Exercise Price. The exercise price per Share subject to an Option or Free-Standing SAR shall be determined by the Committee and set forth in the applicable Award Agreement, and shall not be less than the Fair Market Value of a share of the Common Stock on the applicable Grant Date. In no event may any Option or Stock Appreciation Right granted under this Plan be amended, other than pursuant to Section 3(d), to decrease the exercise price thereof, be cancelled in conjunction with the grant of any new Option or Free-Standing SAR with a lower exercise price, or otherwise be subject to any action that would be treated, under the Applicable Exchange listing standards or for accounting purposes, as a “repricing” of such Option or Free-Standing SAR, unless such amendment, cancellation, or action is approved by the Company’s stockholders.

(e)Term. The Term of each Option and each Free-Standing SAR shall be fixed by the Committee, but shall not exceed ten years from the Grant Date.

(f)Vesting and Exercisability. Except as otherwise provided herein, Options and Free-Standing SARs shall be exercisable at such time or times and subject to such terms and conditions as shall be determined by the Committee,provided that, except as otherwise determined by the Committee, in no event shall the normal vesting schedule of an Option or Free-Standing SAR provide that such Option or Free-Standing SAR vest prior to the first anniversary of the date of grant.

(g)Method of Exercise. Subject to the provisions of this Section 5, Options and Free-Standing SARs may be exercised, in whole or in part, at any time during the applicable term by giving written notice of exercise to the Company specifying the number of shares of Common Stock as to which the Option or Free-Standing SAR is being exercised. In the case of the exercise of an Option, such notice shall be accompanied by payment in full of the purchase price (which shall equal the product of such number of shares multiplied by the applicable exercise price) by certified or bank check or such other instrument as the Company may accept or, if approved by the Committee, payment, in full or in part, may also be made as follows:

(i) Payments may be made in the form of unrestricted shares of Common Stock (by delivery of such shares or by attestation) of the same class as the Common Stock subject to the Option already owned by the Participant (based on the Fair Market Value of the Common Stock on the date the Option is exercised).

(ii) To the extent permitted by applicable law, payment may be made by delivering a properly executed exercise notice to the Company, together with a copy of irrevocable instructions to a broker to deliver promptly to the Company the amount of sale or loan proceeds necessary to pay the purchase price, and, if requested, the amount of any federal, state, local or foreign withholding taxes. To facilitate the foregoing, the Company may, to the extent permitted by applicable law, enter into agreements for coordinated procedures with one or more brokerage firms. To the extent permitted by applicable law, the Committee may also provide for Company loans to be made for purposes of the exercise of Options.

(iii) Payment may be made by instructing the Company to withhold a number of shares of Common Stock having a Fair Market Value (based on the Fair Market Value of the

Unum GroupA-9


Appendix A2012 Proxy Statement

Common Stock on the date the applicable Option is exercised) equal to the product of (A) the exercise price multiplied by (B) the number of shares of Common Stock in respect of which the Option shall have been exercised.

(h)Delivery; Rights of Stockholders. No Shares shall be delivered pursuant to the exercise of an Option until the exercise price therefor has been fully paid and applicable taxes have been withheld. The applicable Participant shall have all of the rights of a stockholder of the Company holding the class or series of Common Stock that is subject to the Option or Stock Appreciation Right (including, if applicable, the right to vote the applicable Shares and the right to receive dividends) when the Participant (i) has given written notice of exercise, (ii) if requested, has given the representation described in Section 14(a), and (iii) in the case of an Option, has paid in full for such Shares.

(i)Nontransferability of Options and Stock Appreciation Rights. No Option or Free-Standing SAR shall be transferable by a Participant other than, for no value or consideration, (i) by will or by the laws of descent and distribution, or (ii) in the case of a Nonqualified Option or Free-Standing SAR, as otherwise expressly permitted by the Committee including, if so permitted, pursuant to a transfer to the Participant’s family members, whether directly or indirectly or by means of a trust or partnership or otherwise (for purposes of this Plan, unless otherwise determined by the Committee, “family member” shall have the meaning given to such term in General Instructions A.1(a)(5) to Form S-8 under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and any successor thereto). A Tandem SAR shall be transferable only with the related Option as permitted by the preceding sentence. Any Option or Stock Appreciation Right shall be exercisable, subject to the terms of this Plan, only by the applicable Participant, the guardian or legal representative of such Participant, or any person to whom such Option or Stock Appreciation Right is permissibly transferred pursuant to this Section 5(i), it being understood that the term “Participant” includes such guardian, legal representative and other transferee;provided, however, that the term “Termination of Employment” shall continue to refer to the Termination of Employment of the original Participant.

(j)Termination of Employment. A Participant’s Options and Stock Appreciation Rights shall be forfeited upon his or her Termination of Employment, except as set forth below:

(i) Upon a Participant’s Termination of Employment for any reason other than death, Disability, Retirement or Cause, any Option or Stock Appreciation Right held by the Participant that was exercisable immediately before the Termination of Employment may be exercised at any time until the earlier of (A) the 90th day following such Termination of Employment and (B) expiration of the Term thereof;

(ii) Upon a Participant’s Termination of Employment by reason of the Participant’s death, any Option or Stock Appreciation Right held by the Participant shall vest and be exercisable at any time until the earlier of (A) the third anniversary of the date of such death and (B) the expiration of the Term thereof;

(iii) Upon a Participant’s Termination of Employment by reason of Disability, any Option or Stock Appreciation Right held by the Participant shall vest and be exercisable at any time until (A) in the case of Nonqualified Options and Stock Appreciation Rights, the expiration of the Term thereof, and (B) in the case of Incentive Stock Options, the earlier of (x) the first anniversary of the date of such Termination of Employment and (y) the expiration of the Term thereof;

A-10Unum Group


2012 Proxy StatementAppendix A

(iv) Upon a Participant’s Termination of Employment for Retirement, any Option or Stock Appreciation Right held by the Participant shall vest and be exercisable at any time until the earlier of (A) in the case of Nonqualified Options and Stock Appreciation Rights, (x) the fifth anniversary of such Termination of Employment and (y) the expiration of the Term thereof, and (B) in the case of Incentive Stock Options, (x) the 90th day following such Termination of Employment and (y) the expiration of the Term thereof; and

(k) Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Committee shall have the power, in its discretion, to apply different rules concerning the consequences of a Termination of Employment,provided, that if such rules are less favorable to the Participant than those set forth above, such rules are set forth in the applicable Award Agreement.

SECTION 6.Restricted Stock

(a)Nature of Awards and Certificates. Shares of Restricted Stock are actual Shares issued to a Participant and shall be evidenced in such manner as the Committee may deem appropriate, including book-entry registration or issuance of one or more stock certificates. Any certificate issued in respect of Shares of Restricted Stock shall be registered in the name of the applicable Participant and shall bear an appropriate legend referring to the terms, conditions, and restrictions applicable to such Award, substantially in the following form:

“The transferability of this certificate and the shares of stock represented hereby are subject to the terms and conditions (including forfeiture) of the Unum Group Stock Incentive Plan of 2012 and an Award Agreement. Copies of such Plan and Agreement are on file at the offices of Unum Group, 1 Fountain Square, Chattanooga, Tennessee 37402.”

The Committee may require that the certificates evidencing such shares be held in custody by the Company until the restrictions thereon shall have lapsed and that, as a condition of any Award of Restricted Stock, the applicable Participant shall have delivered a stock power, endorsed in blank, relating to the Common Stock covered by such Award.

(b)Terms and Conditions. Shares of Restricted Stock shall be subject to the following terms and conditions:

(i) The Committee shall, prior to or at the time of grant, condition (A) the vesting of an Award of Restricted Stock upon the continued service of the applicable Participant, or (B) the grant or vesting of an Award of Restricted Stock upon the attainment of Performance Goals or the attainment of Performance Goals and the continued service of the applicable Participant. In the event that the Committee conditions the grant or vesting of an Award of Restricted Stock upon the attainment of Performance Goals or the attainment of Performance Goals and the continued service of the applicable Participant, the Committee may, prior to or at the time of grant, designate an Award of Restricted Stock as a Qualified Performance-Based Award. The conditions for grant or vesting and the other provisions of Restricted Stock Awards (including without limitation any applicable Performance Goals) need not be the same with respect to each recipient.

Unum GroupA-11


Appendix A2012 Proxy Statement

(ii) Subject to the provisions of the Plan and the applicable Award Agreement, during the period, if any, set by the Committee, commencing with the date of such Restricted Stock Award for which such vesting restrictions apply (the “Restriction Period”), and until the expiration of the Restriction Period, the Participant shall not be permitted to sell, assign, transfer, pledge or otherwise encumber Shares of Restricted Stock. Subject to the terms of the Plan and the applicable Award Agreement, any Award of Restricted Stock shall be subject to vesting during a Restriction Period of at least three years following the date of grant,providedthat a Restriction Period of at least one year following the date of grant is permissible if vesting is conditioned upon the achievement of Performance Goals, andprovided further that an Award may vest in part on a pro rata basis prior to the expiration of any Restriction Period, andprovided further that up to five percent of Shares available for grant as Restricted Stock (together with all other Shares available for grant as Full-Value Awards) may be granted without regard to the foregoing requirements and the Committee may accelerate the vesting and lapse of any restrictions with respect to any such Restricted Stock Awards.

(iii) Except as provided in this Section 6 and in the applicable Award Agreement, the applicable Participant shall have, with respect to the Shares of Restricted Stock, all of the rights of a stockholder of the Company holding the class or series of Common Stock that is the subject of the Restricted Stock, including, if applicable, the right to vote the Shares and the right to receive any cash dividends. If so determined by the Committee in the applicable Award Agreement and subject to Section 14(e), (A) cash dividends on the class or series of Common Stock that is the subject of the Restricted Stock Award shall be automatically deferred and reinvested in additional Restricted Stock, held subject to the vesting of the underlying Restricted Stock, and (B) subject to any adjustment pursuant to Section 3(d), dividends payable in Common Stock shall be paid in the form of Restricted Stock of the same class as the Common Stock with which such dividend was paid, held subject to the vesting of the underlying Restricted Stock.

(iv) If and when any applicable Performance Goals are satisfied and the Restriction Period expires without a prior forfeiture of the Shares of Restricted Stock for which legended certificates have been issued, unlegended certificates for such Shares shall be delivered to the Participant upon surrender of the legended certificates.

SECTION 7.Restricted Stock Units

(a)Nature of Awards. Restricted stock units and deferred share rights (together, “Restricted Stock Units”) are Awards denominated in Shares that will be settled, subject to the terms and conditions of the Restricted Stock Units, in an amount in cash, Shares, or both, based upon the Fair Market Value of a specified number of Shares.

(b)Terms and Conditions. Restricted Stock Units shall be subject to the following terms and conditions:

(i) The Committee shall, prior to or at the time of grant, condition (A) the vesting of Restricted Stock Units upon the continued service of the applicable Participant, or (B) the grant or vesting of Restricted Stock Units upon the attainment of Performance Goals or the attainment of Performance Goals and the continued service of the applicable Participant. In the event that the Committee conditions the grant or vesting of Restricted Stock Units upon the attainment of Performance Goals or the attainment of Performance Goals and the continued service of the

A-12Unum Group


2012 Proxy StatementAppendix A

applicable Participant, the Committee may, prior to or at the time of grant, designate the Restricted Stock Units as a Qualified Performance-Based Awards. The conditions for grant or vesting and the other provisions of Restricted Stock Units (including without limitation any applicable Performance Goals) need not be the same with respect to each recipient. An Award of Restricted Stock Units shall be settled as and when the Restricted Stock Units vest, at a later time specified by the Committee or in the applicable Award Agreement, or, if the Committee so permits, in accordance with an election of the Participant.

(ii) Subject to the provisions of the Plan and the applicable Award Agreement, during the period, if any, set by the Committee, commencing with the date of such Restricted Stock Units for which such vesting restrictions apply (the “Restriction Period”), and until the expiration of the Restriction Period, the Participant shall not be permitted to sell, assign, transfer, pledge or otherwise encumber Restricted Stock Units. Subject to the terms of the Plan and the applicable Award Agreement, any Restricted Stock Units shall be subject to vesting during a Restriction Period of at least three years following the date of grant,providedthat a Restriction Period of at least one year following the date of grant is permissible if vesting is conditioned upon the achievement of Performance Goals, andprovided further that a Restricted Stock Unit may vest in part prior to the expiration of any Restriction Period, andprovided further that up to five percent of Shares available for grant as Restricted Stock Units (together with all other Shares available for grant as Full-Value Awards) may be granted without regard to the foregoing requirements and the Committee may accelerate the vesting and lapse any restrictions with respect to any such Restricted Stock Units.

(iii) The Award Agreement for Restricted Stock Units shall specify whether, to what extent and on what terms and conditions the applicable Participant shall be entitled to receive payments of cash, Common Stock or other property corresponding to the dividends payable on the Common Stock (subject to Section 14(e) below).

SECTION 8.Performance Units.

Performance Units may be issued hereunder to Eligible Individuals, for no cash consideration or for such minimum consideration as may be required by applicable law, either alone or in addition to other Awards granted under the Plan. The Performance Goals to be achieved during any Performance Period and the length of the Performance Period shall be determined by the Committee upon the grant of each Performance Unit,providedthat the Performance Period shall be no less than one year following the date of grant. The Committee may, in connection with the grant of Performance Units, designate them as Qualified Performance-Based Awards. The conditions for grant or vesting and the other provisions of Performance Units (including without limitation any applicable Performance Goals) need not be the same with respect to each recipient. Performance Units may be paid in cash, Shares, other property or any combination thereof, in the sole discretion of the Committee as set forth in the applicable Award Agreement. The maximum value of the property, including cash, that may be paid or distributed to any Participant pursuant to a grant of Performance Units made in any one calendar year shall be five million dollars ($5,000,000).

SECTION 9.Other Stock-Based Awards

Other Stock-Based Awards may be granted under the Plan,provided that any Other Stock-Based Awards that are Awards of Common Stock that are unrestricted shall only be granted in lieu of other

Unum GroupA-13


Appendix A2012 Proxy Statement

compensation due and payable to the Participant. Subject to the terms of the Plan and the applicable Award Agreement, any Other Stock-Based Award that is a Full-Value Award shall be subject to vesting during a Restriction Period of at least three years following the date of grant,providedthat a Restriction Period of at least one year following the date of grant is permissible if vesting is conditioned upon the achievement of Performance Goals, andprovided further that an Other Stock-Based Award that is a Full-Value Award may vest in part on a pro rata basis prior to the expiration of any Restriction Period, andprovided further that up to five percent of Shares available for grant as Other Stock-Based Awards that are Full-Value Awards (together with all other Shares available for grant as Full-Value Awards) may be granted without regard to the foregoing requirements and the Committee may accelerate the vesting and lapse of any restrictions with respect to any such Other Stock-Based Awards.

SECTION 10.Change in Control Provisions

(a)General. The provisions of this Section 10 shall, subject to Section 3(d) and Section 10(f), apply notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan to the contrary, except to the extent the Committee specifically provides otherwise in an Award Agreement.

(b)Impact of Change in Control. Upon the occurrence of a Change in Control, unless otherwise provided in the applicable Award Agreement: (i) all then-outstanding Options and Stock Appreciation Rights shall become fully vested and exercisable, and all Full-Value Awards (other than performance-based Awards) shall vest in full, be free of restrictions, and be deemed to be earned and payable in an amount equal to the full value of such Award, except in each case to the extent that another Award meeting the requirements of Section 10(c) (any award meeting the requirements of Section 10(c), a “Replacement Award”) is provided to the Participant pursuant to Section 3(d) to replace such Award (any award intended to be replaced by a Replacement Award, a “Replaced Award”), and (ii) any performance-based Award that is not replaced by a Replacement Award shall be deemed to be earned and payable in an amount equal to the full value of such performance-based Award (with all applicable Performance Goals deemed achieved at the greater of (x) the applicable target level and (y) the level of achievement of the Performance Goals for the Award as determined by the Committee not later than the date of the Change in Control, taking into account performance through the latest date preceding the Change in Control as to which performance can, as a practical matter, be determined (but not later than the end of the applicable Performance Period)) multiplied by a fraction, the numerator of which is the number of days during the applicable Performance Period before the date of the Change in Control, and the denominator of which is the number of days in the applicable Performance Period;provided, however, that such fraction shall be equal to one in the event that the applicable Performance Goals in respect of such performance-based Awards have been fully achieved as of the date of such Change in Control.

(c)Replacement Awards. An Award shall meet the conditions of this Section 10(c) (and hence qualify as a Replacement Award) if: (i) it is of the same type as the Replaced Award; (ii) it has a value equal to the value of the Replaced Award as of the date of the Change in Control; (iii) if the underlying Replaced Award was an equity-based award, it relates to publicly traded equity securities of the Company or the entity surviving the Company following the Change in Control; (iv) it contains terms relating to vesting (including with respect to a Termination of Employment) that are substantially identical to those of the Replaced Award; and (v) its other terms and conditions are not less favorable to the Participant than the terms and conditions of the Replaced Award (including the provisions that would apply in the event of a subsequent Change in Control) as of the date of the Change in Control. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, a Replacement Award may take the form of a continuation of the applicable Replaced Award if the requirements of the preceding sentence are satisfied. If a Replacement

A-14Unum Group


2012 Proxy StatementAppendix A

Award is granted, the Replaced Award shall not vest upon the Change in Control. The determination whether the conditions of this Section 10(c) are satisfied shall be made by the Committee, as constituted immediately before the Change in Control, in its sole discretion.

(d)Termination of Employment. Upon a Termination of Employment of a Participant occurring upon or during the two years immediately following the date of a Change in Control by reason of death, Disability or Retirement, by the Company without Cause, or by the Participant for “Good Reason” (as defined in Section 10(e)), (i) all Replacement Awards held by such Participant shall vest in full, be free of restrictions, and be deemed to be earned in an amount equal to the full value of such Replacement Award, and (ii) unless otherwise provided in the applicable Award Agreement, notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan to the contrary, any Option or Stock Appreciation Right held by the Participant as of the date of the Change in Control that remains outstanding as of the date of such Termination of Employment may thereafter be exercised, until (A) in the case of Incentive Stock Options, the last date on which such Incentive Stock Options would be exercisable in the absence of this Section 10(d), and (B) in the case of Nonqualified Options and Stock Appreciation Rights, the later of (x) the last date on which such Nonqualified Option or Stock Appreciation Right would be exercisable in the absence of this Section 10(d) and (y) the earlier of (1) the third anniversary of such Change in Control and (y) expiration of the Term of such Nonqualified Option or Stock Appreciation Right.

(e)Definition of Change in Control. For purposes of the Plan:

(i) “Change in Control” shall mean any of the following events:

(i) during any period of two consecutive years, individuals who, at the beginning or such period, constitute the Board (the “Incumbent Directors”) cease for any reason to constitute at least a majority of the Board,provided that any person becoming a director and whose election or nomination for election was approved by a vote of at least two-thirds of the Incumbent Directors then on the Board (either by a specific vote or by approval of the proxy statement of the Company in which such person is named as a nominee for director, without written objection to such nomination) shall be an Incumbent Director;provided, however, that no individual initially elected or nominated as a director of the Company as a result of an actual or threatened election contest (as described in Rule 14a-11 under the Act) (“Election Contest”) or other actual or threatened solicitation of proxies or consents by or on behalf of any “person” (as such term is defined in Section 3(a)(9) of the Act and as used in Sections 13(d)(3) and 14(d)(2) of the Act) other than the Board (“Proxy Contest”), including by reason of any agreement intended to avoid or settle any Election or Contest or Proxy Contest, shall be deemed an Incumbent Director;

(ii) any person is or becomes a “beneficial owner” (as defined in Rule 13d-3 under the Act), directly or indirectly, of securities of the Company representing 20% (30% with respect to deferred compensation subject to Section 409A of the Code) or more of the combined voting power of the Company’s then outstanding securities eligible to vote for the election of the Board (the “Company Voting Securities”);provided, however, that the event described in this paragraph (ii) shall not be deemed to be a Change in Control of the Company by virtue of any of the following acquisitions: (A) by the Company or any Subsidiary, (B) by any employee benefit plan (or related trust) sponsored or maintained by the Company or any Subsidiary, (C) by an underwriter temporarily holding securities pursuant to an offering of such securities, (D) pursuant to a Non-Qualifying Transaction (as defined in paragraph (iii), or (E) a transaction (other than one described in (iii) below) in which Company Voting Securities are acquired from the Company, if a majority of the Incumbent Directors approve a resolution providing expressly that

Unum GroupA-15


Appendix A2012 Proxy Statement

the acquisition pursuant to this clause (E) does not constitute a Change in Control of the Company under this paragraph (ii);

(iii) the consummation of a merger, consolidation, statutory share exchange or similar form of corporate transaction involving the Company or any of its Subsidiaries that requires the approval of the Company’s stockholders, whether for such transaction or the issuance of securities in the transaction (a “Reorganization”), or sale or other disposition of all or substantially all of the Company’s assets to an entity that is not an Affiliate (a “Sale”), unless immediately following such Reorganization or Sale: (A) more than 50% of the total voting power of (x) the corporation resulting from such Reorganization or the corporation which has acquired all or substantially all of the assets of the Company (in either case, the “Surviving Corporation”), or (y) if applicable, the ultimate parent corporation that directly or indirectly has beneficial ownership of 100% of the voting securities eligible to elect directors of the Surviving Corporation (the “Parent Corporation”), is represented by the Company Voting Securities that were outstanding immediately prior to such Reorganization or Sale (or, if applicable, is represented by shares into which such Company Voting Securities were converted pursuant to such Reorganization or Sale), and such voting power among the holders thereof is in substantially the same proportion as the voting power of such Company Voting Securities among the holders thereof immediately prior to the Reorganization or Sale, (B) no person (other than any employee benefit plan (or related trust) sponsored or maintained by the Surviving Corporation or the Parent Corporation) is or becomes the beneficial owner, directly or indirectly, of 20% (30% with respect to deferred compensation subject to Section 409A of the Code) or more of the total voting power of the outstanding voting securities eligible to elect directors of the Parent Corporation (or, if there is no Parent Corporation, the Surviving Corporation) and (C) at least a majority of the members of the board of directors of the Parent Corporation (or, if there is no Parent Corporation, the Surviving Corporation) following the consummation of the Reorganization or Sale were Incumbent Directors at the time of the Board’s approval of the execution of the initial agreement providing for such Reorganization or Sale (any Reorganization or Sale which satisfies all of the criteria specified in (A), (B) and (C) above shall be deemed to be a “Non-Qualifying Transaction”); or

(iv) the stockholders of the Company approve a plan of complete liquidation or dissolution of the Company.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, a Change in Control shall not be deemed to occur solely because any person acquires beneficial ownership of more than 20% (30% with respect to deferred compensation subject to Section 409A of the Code) of the Company Voting Securities as a result of the acquisition of Company Voting Securities by the Company which reduces the number of Company Voting Securities outstanding;provided, that if after such acquisition by the Company such person becomes the beneficial owner of additional Company Voting Securities that increases the percentage of outstanding Company Voting Securities beneficially owned by such person, a Change in Control of the Company shall then occur.

(ii) “Good Reason” shall mean (A) a material adverse change in the Participant’s authority, powers, functions, duties or responsibilities as in effect immediately prior to the Change in Control; (B) a material reduction in the Participant’s base salary or annual bonus opportunity, in each case as in effect immediately prior to the Change in Control; or (C) the reassignment of the Participant’s place of employment to an office location more than 50 miles from the Participant’s then-current place of employment.

A-16Unum Group


2012 Proxy StatementAppendix A

(f) Notwithstanding the foregoing, if any Award is subject to Section 409A of the Code, this Section 10 shall be applicable only to the extent specifically provided in the Award Agreement and permitted pursuant to Section 11(e). Nothing in this Section 10 shall preclude the Company from settling upon a Change in Control an Award if it is not replaced by a Replacement Award, to the extent effectuated in accordance with Treas. Reg. § 1.409A-3(j)(ix).

SECTION 11.Qualified Performance-Based Awards; Section 16(b); Section 409A

(a) The provisions of this Plan are intended to ensure that all Options and Stock Appreciation Rights granted hereunder to any Participant who is or may be a “covered employee” (within the meaning of Section 162(m)(3) of the Code) in the tax year in which such Option or Stock Appreciation Right is expected to be deductible to the Company qualify for the Section 162(m) Exemption, and, unless otherwise determined by the Committee, all such Awards shall therefore be considered Qualified Performance-Based Awards and this Plan shall be interpreted and operated consistent with that intention (including, without limitation, to require that all such Awards be granted by a committee composed solely of members who satisfy the requirements for being “outside directors” for purposes of the Section 162(m) Exemption (“Outside Directors”)). When granting any Award other than an Option or Stock Appreciation Right, the Committee may designate such Award as a Qualified Performance-Based Award, based upon a determination that (i) the recipient is or may be a “covered employee” (within the meaning of Section 162(m)(3) of the Code) with respect to such Award, and (ii) the Committee wishes such Award to qualify for the Section 162(m) Exemption, and the terms of any such Award (and of the grant thereof) shall be consistent with such designation (including, without limitation, that all such Awards be granted by a committee composed solely of Outside Directors). To the extent required to comply with the Section 162(m) Exemption, within 90 days after the commencement of a Performance Period or, if earlier, by the expiration of 25% of a Performance Period, the Committee will designate one or more Performance Periods, determine the Participants for the Performance Periods and establish the Performance Goals for the Performance Periods.

(b) Each Qualified Performance-Based Award (other than an Option or Stock Appreciation Right) shall be earned, vested and/or payable (as applicable) upon the achievement of one or more Performance Goals, together with the satisfaction of any other conditions, such as continued employment, as the Committee may determine to be appropriate.

(c) The full Board shall not be permitted to exercise authority granted to the Committee to the extent that the grant or exercise of such authority would cause an Award designated as a Qualified Performance-Based Award not to qualify for, or to cease to qualify for, the Section 162(m) Exemption.

(d) The provisions of this Plan are intended to ensure that no transaction under the Plan is subject to (and not exempt from) the short-swing recovery rules of Section 16(b) of the Exchange Act (“Section 16(b)”). Accordingly, the composition of the Committee shall be subject to such limitations as the Board deems appropriate to permit transactions pursuant to this Plan to be exempt (pursuant to Rule 16b-3 promulgated under the Exchange Act) from Section 16(b), and no delegation of authority by the Committee shall be permitted if such delegation would cause any such transaction to be subject to (and not exempt from) Section 16(b).

(e) The Plan is intended to comply with the requirements of Section 409A of the Code or an exemption or exclusion therefrom and, with respect to amounts that are subject to Section 409A of the Code, it is intended that the Plan be administered in all respects in accordance with Section 409A of the

Unum GroupA-17


Appendix A2012 Proxy Statement

Code. Each payment under any Award shall be treated as a separate payment for purposes of Section 409A of the Code. In no event may a Participant, directly or indirectly, designate the calendar year of any payment to be made under any Award. Notwithstanding any provision of the Plan or any Award Agreement to the contrary, in the event that a Participant is a “specified employee” within the meaning of Section 409A of the Code (as determined in accordance with the methodology established by the Company), amounts that constitute “nonqualified deferred compensation” within the meaning of Section 409A of the Code that would otherwise be payable during the six-month period immediately following a Participant’s “separation from service” within the meaning of Section 409A of the Code (“Separation from Service”) shall instead be paid or provided on the first business day after the date that is six months following the Participant’s Separation from Service. If the Participant dies following the Separation from Service and prior to the payment of any amounts delayed on account of Section 409A of the Code, such amounts shall be paid to the personal representative of the Participant’s estate within 30 days after the date of the Participant’s death.

SECTION 12.Term, Amendment and Termination

(a)Effectiveness. The Plan was approved by the Human Capital Committee of the Board on February 21, 2012, subject to and contingent upon approval by at least a majority of the outstanding shares of the Company. The Plan will be effective as of the date of such approval by the Company’s stockholders (the “Effective Date”).

(b)Termination. The Plan will terminate on the tenth anniversary of the Effective Date. Awards outstanding as of such date shall not be affected or impaired by the termination of the Plan.

(c)Amendment of Plan. The Board or the Committee may amend, alter, or discontinue the Plan, but no amendment, alteration or discontinuation shall be made which would materially impair the rights of the Participant with respect to a previously granted Award without such Participant’s consent, except such an amendment made to comply with applicable law, including without limitation Section 409A of the Code, Applicable Exchange listing standards or accounting rules. In addition, no amendment shall be made without the approval of the Company’s stockholders (a) to the extent such approval is required (1) by applicable law or the listing standards of the Applicable Exchange as in effect as of the date hereof or (2) under applicable law or the listing standards of the Applicable Exchange as may be required after the date hereof, (b) to the extent such amendment would materially increase the benefits accruing to Participants under the Plan, (c) to the extent such amendment would materially increase the number of securities which may be issued under the Plan, (d) to the extent such amendment would materially modify the requirements for participation in the Plan or (e) that would accelerate the vesting of any Restricted Stock or Restricted Stock Units under the Plan except as otherwise provided in the Plan.

(d)Amendment of Awards. Subject to Section 5(d), the Committee may unilaterally amend the terms of any Award theretofore granted, but no such amendment shall cause a Qualified Performance-Based Award to cease to qualify for the Section 162(m) Exemption or without the Participant’s consent materially impair the rights of any Participant with respect to an Award, except such an amendment made to cause the Plan or Award to comply with applicable law, Applicable Exchange listing standards or accounting rules.

A-18Unum Group


2012 Proxy StatementAppendix A

SECTION 13.Unfunded Status of Plan

It is presently intended that the Plan constitute an “unfunded” plan for incentive and deferred compensation. The Committee may authorize the creation of trusts or other arrangements to meet the obligations created under the Plan to deliver Common Stock or make payments;provided, however, that unless the Committee otherwise determines, the existence of such trusts or other arrangements is consistent with the “unfunded” status of the Plan.

SECTION 14.General Provisions

(a)Conditions for Issuance. The Committee may require each person purchasing or receiving Shares pursuant to an Award to represent to and agree with the Company in writing that such person is acquiring the Shares without a view to the distribution thereof. The certificates for such Shares may include any legend which the Committee deems appropriate to reflect any restrictions on transfer. Notwithstanding any other provision of the Plan or agreements made pursuant thereto, the Company shall not be required to issue or deliver any certificate or certificates for Shares under the Plan prior to fulfillment of all of the following conditions: (i) listing or approval for listing upon notice of issuance, of such Shares on the Applicable Exchange; (ii) any registration or other qualification of such Shares of the Company under any state or federal law or regulation, or the maintaining in effect of any such registration or other qualification which the Committee shall, in its absolute discretion upon the advice of counsel, deem necessary or advisable; and (iii) obtaining any other consent, approval, or permit from any state or federal governmental agency which the Committee shall, in its absolute discretion after receiving the advice of counsel, determine to be necessary or advisable.

(b)Additional Compensation Arrangements. Nothing contained in the Plan shall prevent the Company or any Subsidiary or Affiliate from adopting other or additional compensation arrangements for its employees.

(c)No Contract of Employment. The Plan shall not constitute a contract of employment, and adoption of the Plan shall not confer upon any employee any right to continued employment, nor shall it interfere in any way with the right of the Company or any Subsidiary or Affiliate to terminate the employment of any employee at any time.

(d)Required Taxes. No later than the date as of which an amount first becomes includible in the gross income of a Participant for federal, state, local or foreign income or employment or other tax purposes with respect to any Award under the Plan, such Participant shall pay to the Company, or make arrangements satisfactory to the Company regarding the payment of, any federal, state, local or foreign taxes of any kind required by law to be withheld with respect to such amount. Unless otherwise determined by the Company, withholding obligations may be settled with Common Stock, including Common Stock that is part of the Award that gives rise to the withholding requirement, having a Fair Market Value on the date of withholding equal to the minimum amount (and not any greater amount) required to be withheld for tax purposes, all in accordance with such procedures as the Committee establishes. The obligations of the Company under the Plan shall be conditional on such payment or arrangements, and the Company and its Affiliates shall, to the extent permitted by law, have the right to deduct any such taxes from any payment otherwise due to such Participant. The Committee may establish such procedures as it deems appropriate, including making irrevocable elections, for the settlement of withholding obligations with Common Stock.

Unum GroupA-19


Appendix A2012 Proxy Statement

(e)Limitation on Dividend Reinvestment and Dividend Equivalents. Reinvestment of dividends in additional Restricted Stock at the time of any dividend payment, and the payment of Shares with respect to dividends to Participants holding Awards of Restricted Stock Units, shall only be permissible if sufficient Shares are available under Section 3 for such reinvestment or payment (taking into account then-outstanding Awards). In the event that sufficient Shares are not available for such reinvestment or payment, such reinvestment or payment shall be made in the form of a grant of Restricted Stock Units equal in number to the Shares that would have been obtained by such payment or reinvestment, the terms of which Restricted Stock Units shall provide for settlement in cash and for dividend equivalent reinvestment in further Restricted Stock Units on the terms contemplated by this Section 14(e).

(f)Designation of Death Beneficiary. The Committee shall establish such procedures as it deems appropriate for a Participant to designate a beneficiary to whom any amounts payable in the event of such Participant’s death are to be paid or by whom any rights of such eligible Individual, after such Participant’s death, may be exercised.

(g)Subsidiary Employees. In the case of a grant of an Award to any employee of a Subsidiary, the Company may, if the Committee so directs, issue or transfer the Shares, if any, covered by the Award to the Subsidiary, for such lawful consideration as the Committee may specify, upon the condition or understanding that the Subsidiary will transfer the Shares to the employee in accordance with the terms of the Award specified by the Committee pursuant to the provisions of the Plan. All Shares underlying Awards that are forfeited or canceled should revert to the Company.

(h)Governing Law and Interpretation. The Plan and all Awards made and actions taken thereunder shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of Delaware, without reference to principles of conflict of laws. The captions of this Plan are not part of the provisions hereof and shall have no force or effect.

(i)Non-Transferability. Except as otherwise provided in Section 5(i) or by the Committee, Awards under the Plan are not transferable except by will or by laws of descent and distribution.

(j)Foreign Employees and Foreign Law Considerations. The Committee may grant Awards to Eligible Individuals who are foreign nationals, who are located outside the United States or who are not compensated from a payroll maintained in the United States, or who are otherwise subject to (or could cause the Company to be subject to) legal or regulatory provisions of countries or jurisdictions outside the United States, on such terms and conditions different from those specified in the Plan as may, in the judgment of the Committee, be necessary or desirable to foster and promote achievement of the purposes of the Plan, and, in furtherance of such purposes, the Committee may make such modifications, amendments, procedures, or subplans as may be necessary or advisable to comply with such legal or regulatory provisions.

(k)Deferrals. The Committee shall be authorized to establish procedures pursuant to which the payment of any Award may be deferred. Subject to the provisions of this Plan and any Award Agreement, the recipient of an Award (including, without limitation, any deferred Award) may, if so determined by the Committee, be entitled to receive, currently or on a deferred basis, interest or dividends, or interest or (except with respect to Stock Options and Stock Appreciation Rights) dividend equivalents, with respect to the number of shares covered by the Award, as determined by the Committee, in its sole discretion, and the Committee may provide that such amounts (if any) shall be

A-20Unum Group


2012 Proxy StatementAppendix A

deemed to have been reinvested in additional Shares or otherwise reinvested. Notwithstanding the foregoing, dividends and dividend equivalents with respect to performance-based Awards may not be paid until vesting (if any) of such Awards, and the Committee shall not take or omit to take any action that would result in the imposition of penalty taxes under Section 409A of the Code.

Unum GroupA-21


2012 Proxy StatementAppendix B

Appendix B

 

RECONCILIATION OF NON-GAAP FINANCIAL MEASURESLOGO

($ in millions) Twelve Months Ended December 31, 2011    
  As Adjusted  Long-term
Care DAC
and Reserve
Charges
  Individual
Disability
Closed Block
Reserve
Charge
  As Reported    

Operating Income (Loss) by Segment Before Income Tax and Net Realized Investment Loss

     

Core Operations

     

Unum US

   $819.8       $-         $-         $819.8     

Unum UK

  192.0      -        -        192.0     

Colonial Life

  282.1      -        -        282.1     
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

Total Core Operations

  1,293.9      -        -        1,293.9     

Closed Block

  125.4      (863.4)     (183.5)     (921.5)    

Corporate

  (110.3)     -        -        (110.3)    
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

Total Operating Income (Loss) by Segment

   $    1,309.0       $(863.4)      $(183.5)     262.1     
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

   

Net Realized Investment Loss

     (4.9)    

Income Tax

     21.8     
    

 

 

  

Net Income

      $235.4     
     

 

 

  
  Twelve Months Ended
December 31
          
  2011  2007          

After-tax Operating Income

   $896.8       $786.2       

Deferred Acquisition Costs Impairment and Reserve Charges for Long-term Care Closed Block, Net of Tax

  (561.2)     -         

Reserve Charge for Individual Disability Closed Block, Net of Tax

  (119.3)     -         

Regulatory Reassessment Charges, Net of Tax

  -        (34.5)      

Special Tax Items and Debt Extinguishment Costs

  22.7      (36.1)      

Net Realized Investment Loss, Net of Tax

  (3.6)     (43.2)      
 

 

 

  

 

 

    

Income from Continuing Operations

  235.4      672.4       

Income from Discontinued Operations

  -        6.9       
 

 

 

  

 

 

    

Net Income

   $235.4       $679.3       
 

 

 

  

 

 

    
  Average
Allocated
Equity
  Adjusted
After-Tax
Operating
Income
(Loss)
  After-tax
Special Item
Adjustments
  After-Tax
Operating
Income
(Loss)
  Return on
Equity
 

Twelve Months Ended December 31, 2011

     

Core Operations

   $6,020.2       $876.1       $-         $876.1      14.6%      

Closed Block

  2,195.1      91.0      (680.5)     (589.5)    

Corporate

  (347.6)     (70.3)     22.7      (47.6)    
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

Total

   $7,867.7       $896.8       $(657.8)      $239.0      11.4%      
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

Twelve Months Ended December 31, 2007*

     

Core Operations

   $5,608.6       $782.0       $(43.1)      $738.9      13.9%      

Closed Block

  2,739.3      88.3      8.6      96.9     

Corporate

  (1,313.6)     (84.1)     (36.1)     (120.2)    
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

Total

   $7,034.3       $786.2       $(70.6)      $715.6      11.2%      
 

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  
  December 31    
  2011  2010  2007*  2006    

Total Stockholders’ Equity, As Reported

   $8,577.0       $8,944.4       $8,039.9       $7,718.8     

Net Unrealized Gain on Securities

  605.8      410.4      356.1      534.8     

Net Gain on Cash Flow Hedges

  408.7      361.0      182.5      194.2     
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

Total Stockholders’ Equity, As Adjusted

   $7,562.5       $8,173.0       $7,501.3       $6,989.8     
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

Average Equity, As Adjusted Year Ended

   $7,867.7        $7,034.3      
 * Average adjusted for cumulative effect of accounting principle changes of $422.5 million effective January 1, 2007.  
    Twelve Months Ended ** 
      12/31/2011      12/31/2010      12/31/2009      12/31/2008      12/31/2007   
 

Net Income

   $0.78       $2.71       $2.57       $1.62       $1.91    
 

Net Realized Investment Gain (Loss)

  (0.01)     0.05      -          (0.89)     (0.12)   
 

Income from Discontinued Operations

  -          -          -          -          0.02    
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
 

After-tax Operating Income from Continuing Operations Excluding Net Realized Investment Gain (Loss)

  0.79      2.66      2.57      2.51      2.01    
 

Special Tax Items and Debt Extinguishment Costs

  0.08      (0.03)     -          -          (0.10)   
 

Deferred Acquisition Costs Impairment and Reserve Charges for Long-term Care Closed Block, Net of Tax

  (1.85)     -          -          -          -        
 

Reserve Charge for Individual Disability Closed Block, Net of Tax

  (0.39)     -          -          -          -        
 

Regulatory Reassessment Charges, Net of Tax

  -          -          -          -          (0.10 )   
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
 

After-tax Operating Income from Continuing Operations Excluding Net Realized Investment Gain (Loss) and Special Items

   $2.95       $2.69       $2.57       $2.51       $2.21    
  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

  

 

 

 
 ** Amounts per diluted common share  

Unum GroupB-1


2012 Proxy StatementAppendix C

Appendix C

Directions to the Annual Meeting

This year’s Annual Meeting will be held in Portland, Maine, at our corporate campus located at 2211 Congress Street. The campus is located adjacent to Interstate 95 (Maine Turnpike) and the Portland International Jetport.

Directions from Interstate 95 (Maine Turnpike)

Take Exit 46 and turn right at the end of the off ramp.

Turn right onto Congress Street (Route 22).

Cross the I-95 overpass and turn left into the Unum campus west entrance.

Follow the posted signs to the meeting location.

Directions from Portland International Jetport

Leave the terminal and travel north on Westbrook Street.

Turn left onto Jetport Boulevard.

Turn right onto International Parkway.

Continue through the traffic light across Congress Street into the Unum campus east entrance.

Follow the posted signs to the meeting location.

Directions from Downtown Portland

Take I-295 South to Exit 5B (Congress Street).

Travel west on Congress Street (Route 22) for approximately 2.3 miles.

Turn right into the Unum campus east entrance (across from the jetport entrance).

Follow the posted signs to the meeting location.

Unum GroupC-1


Appendix C

2012 Proxy Statement

LOGO

C-2Unum Group


LOGO


LOGO   

LOGO

LOGO

 

Admission TicketElectronic Voting Instructions

LOGO

   

Electronic Voting Instructions

 

Available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week!

   

 

Instead of mailing your proxy, you may choose one of the voting methods

outlined below to vote your proxy.

   

 

VALIDATION DETAILS ARE LOCATED BELOW IN THE TITLE BAR.

   

 

Proxies submitted by the Internet or telephone must be received by 2:00

a.m. Eastern Time, on May 24, 2012.20, 2014.

   

LOGO     

  LOGO

Vote by Internet

     

• Go towww.envisionreports.com/unm

     

 

• Or scan the QR code with your smartphone

     

 

• Follow the steps outlined on the secure website

   

 

Vote by telephone

   

• Call toll free 1-800-652-VOTE (8683) within the USA, US

territories & Canada on a touch tone telephone

   

 

• Follow the instructions provided by the recorded message

Using ablack inkpen, mark your votes with anXas shown in

this example. Please do not write outside the designated areas.

  x 

 

LOGO

Annual Meeting Proxy Card

LOGO         

qIF YOU HAVE NOT VOTED VIA THE INTERNETOR TELEPHONE, FOLD ALONG THE PERFORATION, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE.q

 

 A Proposals — You must sign the card on the reverse side for your vote to be counted.

 

The Board of Directors recommends a voteFOR each of the nominees listed.

LOGO

 

 A 

  Proposals — You must sign the card on the reverse side for your vote to be counted.

1. 

 

+

The Board of Directors recommends a voteFOR each of the nominees listed.
1.   Election of Directors:  For  

Against

  Abstain    For  Against  Abstain    For  Against  Abstain
      01 - Timothy F. Keaney¨¨¨02 - Gloria C. Larson¨¨¨03 - William J. Ryan¨¨¨
      04 - Thomas R. Watjen¨¨¨  
01 - Pamela H. Godwin¨   ¨¨02 - Thomas Kinser¨¨¨03 - A.S. MacMillan, Jr.¨¨¨
04 - Edward J. Muhl¨¨¨                        

 

The Board of Directors recommends a voteFOR Proposals 2 3, and 4.3.

   For  Against Abstain     For Against Abstain
2. To approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the company’s named executive officers.  ¨  ¨ ¨  3. To approve the Unum Group Stock Incentive Plan of 2012.  ¨ ¨ ¨
   For  Against Abstain       
4. To ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the company’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2012.  ¨  ¨ ¨  .     
ForAgainstAbstainForAgainstAbstain
2.To approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of the company’s named executive officers.¨¨¨

3.  To ratify the appointment of Ernst & Young LLP as the company’s independent registered public accounting firm for 2014.

¨¨¨

 

 B   Non-Voting Items

Change of Address— Please print new address below.

IF VOTING BY MAIL, YOUMUST COMPLETE SECTIONS A - C ON BOTH SIDES OF THIS CARD.

 

LOGO

01FTBALOGO


Admission Ticket

UNUM GROUP

ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS

May 24, 201220, 2014

10:00 a.m. Eastern Time

2211 Congress Street1200 Colonial Life Boulevard

Portland, Maine 04122Columbia, South Carolina 29210

This admission ticket admits only the named shareholder.

If you plan on attending the Annual Meeting in person, please bring this Admission Ticket or proof of ownership of the Company’scompany’s common stockand valid picture identification (such as a driver’s license or passport).

If your shares are held beneficially in the name of a bank, broker or other holder of record and you plan to attend the Annual Meeting, a recent brokerage statement or letter from a bank or broker is an example of proof of ownership. If you arrive at the Annual Meeting without an admission ticket, we will admit you only if we are able to verify that you are a Companycompany shareholder.

For your safety, we reserve the right to inspect all personal items prior to admission to the Annual Meeting.

Your compliance is appreciated.

qIF YOU HAVE NOT VOTED VIA THE INTERNETOR TELEPHONE, FOLD ALONG THE PERFORATION, DETACH AND RETURN THE BOTTOM

PORTION IN THE ENCLOSED ENVELOPE.q

 

 

Proxy — Unum Group

+

Annual Meeting of Shareholders

May 24, 201220, 2014

10:00 a.m., Eastern Time

2211 Congress Street, Portland, Maine 041221200 Colonial Life Boulevard, Columbia, South Carolina 29210

PROXY SOLICITED ON BEHALF OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF UNUM GROUP

The undersigned hereby appoints Thomas R. Watjen and Liston Bishop III, or either of them, proxies, each with full power of substitution, acting jointly or by either of them if only one be present and acting, to vote and act with respect to all of the shares of common stock of the undersigned in Unum Group, at the Annual Meeting, upon all matters that may properly come before the meeting, including the matters described in the Proxy Statement furnished herewith, subject to the directions indicated on the reverse side of this card or through the telephone or Internet proxy procedures, and at the discretion of the proxies on any other matters that may properly come before the meeting.If specific voting instructions are not given with respect to the matters to be acted upon and the signed card is returned, the proxies will vote in accordance with the Board of Directors’ recommendations provided on the reverse side of this card, and at their discretion on any other matters that may properly come before the meeting.

This proxy card, when signed and returned, will also constitute voting instructions to the trustee for shares held in the Unum Group 401(k) Retirement Plan or to the broker-dealer for shares held in the Employee Stock Purchase Plan. If voting instructions representing shares in the foregoing employee benefit plans are not received, those shares will not be voted.

THIS PROXY, WHEN PROPERLY EXECUTED, WILL BE VOTED IN THE MANNER DIRECTED HEREIN BY THE UNDERSIGNED SHAREHOLDER. IF NO DIRECTION IS MADE, THIS PROXY WILL BE VOTED “FOR” PROPOSALS 1, 2, 3 AND 4.and 3. IF OTHER BUSINESS IS PROPERLY BROUGHT BEFORE THE MEETING, THE PROXIES WILL VOTE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THEIR BEST JUDGMENT.

 

 C  Authorized Signatures — This section must be completed for your vote to be counted. — Date and Sign
 Below

PLEASE SIGN THIS PROXY EXACTLY AS YOUR NAME OR NAMES APPEARS HEREON. IF STOCK IS HELD JOINTLY, SIGNATURES SHOULD APPEAR FOR BOTH NAMES. WHEN SIGNING AS AN ATTORNEY, EXECUTOR, ADMINISTRATOR, TRUSTEE, GUARDIAN OR CUSTODIAN, PLEASE INDICATE THE CAPACITY IN WHICH YOU ARE ACTING.

 

Date (mm/dd/yyyy) — Please print date below.

   Signature 1 — Please keep signature within the box.    Signature 2 — Please keep signature within the box.

/

/

         

 

n

  IF VOTING BY MAIL, YOUMUST COMPLETE SECTIONS A - C ON BOTH SIDES OF THIS CARD.  +